REVIEW 2 cited by
Further evidence of Quasiperiodic Eruptions in a tidal disruption event AT2019vcb by SRG/eROSITA
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We report the discovery of a short, large amplitude X-ray flare from AT2019vcb (aka Tormund), a tidal disruption event at $z=0.088$. The discovery is based on the data from the SRG/eROSITA X-ray telescope which happened to observe the source seven months after the onset of the optical TDE. eROSITA observation occurred 13 days after a soft flare was detected in the XMM-Newton data by Quintin et al. 2023. Both events bear similar characteristics in terms of timing and spectral properties. eROSITA spectrum is described as an accretion disk with a characteristic temperature of $\sim180$ eV and luminosity $\sim8\times10^{43}$ erg/s. The eROSITA flare lasted less than 12 hours and had an amplitude $\ge70$ with respect to the quiescent level, no flares were detected in later eROSITA observations (6-18 months later). The XMM-Newton and eROSITA flares provide strong evidence that the TDE AT2019vcb is a bona fide QPE source. Our work further strengthens the direct connection between TDEs and QPE following similar recent results in a TDE AT2019qiz by Nicholl et al. 2024.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Triple radio flares from tidal disruption events: jet-wind collisions and the discovery of a third radio flare from AT2020vwl
The TDE AT2020vwl showed a third radio flare at the time a jet-wind collision was predicted from its first two flares, the first predicted-and-confirmed third flare.
-
Can Quasi-periodic Eruptions Produce Detectable High Energy Neutrinos?
Quasi-periodic eruptions could accelerate protons to tens of TeV, but their 10-year neutrino fluences and IceCube event rates are too low for individual detection except for very nearby sources.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.