REVIEW 5 cited by
FlowBench: A Large Scale Benchmark for Flow Simulation over Complex Geometries
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Simulating fluid flow around arbitrary shapes is key to solving various engineering problems. However, simulating flow physics across complex geometries remains numerically challenging and computationally resource-intensive, particularly when using conventional PDE solvers. Machine learning methods offer attractive opportunities to create fast and adaptable PDE solvers. However, benchmark datasets to measure the performance of such methods are scarce, especially for flow physics across complex geometries. We introduce FlowBench, a dataset for neural simulators with over 10K samples, which is currently larger than any publicly available flow physics dataset. FlowBench contains flow simulation data across complex geometries (\textit{parametric vs. non-parametric}), spanning a range of flow conditions (\textit{Reynolds number and Grashoff number}), capturing a diverse array of flow phenomena (\textit{steady vs. transient; forced vs. free convection}), and for both 2D and 3D. FlowBench contains over 10K data samples, with each sample the outcome of a fully resolved, direct numerical simulation using a well-validated simulator framework designed for modeling transport phenomena in complex geometries. For each sample, we include velocity, pressure, and temperature field data at 3 different resolutions and several summary statistics features of engineering relevance (such as coefficients of lift and drag, and Nusselt numbers). %Additionally, we include masks and signed distance fields for each shape. We envision that FlowBench will enable evaluating the interplay between complex geometry, coupled flow phenomena, and data sufficiency on the performance of current, and future, neural PDE solvers. We enumerate several evaluation metrics to help rank order the performance of neural PDE solvers. We benchmark the performance of several baseline methods including FNO, CNO, WNO, and DeepONet.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Geometric Operator Learning with Optimal Transport
An optimal transport based geometry embedding, computed independently for each shape, improves accuracy and reduces compute for neural operator predictions of surface pressure and drag on car and airfoil benchmarks.
-
MPFBench: A Large Scale Dataset for SciML of Multi-Phase-Flows: Droplet and Bubble Dynamics
MPF-Bench provides a large validated two-phase flow dataset and shows CNO outperforms other neural operators on 2D bubble dynamics.
-
A Shifted Boundary Method for Thermal Flows
Octree-based shifted boundary method with a linear semi-implicit solver accurately simulates coupled incompressible flow and heat transfer, including Neumann (heat-flux) boundary conditions, across laminar to turbulen...
-
Geometry Matters: Benchmarking Scientific ML Approaches for Flow Prediction around Complex Geometries
On the FlowBench lid-driven cavity benchmark, vision-transformer foundation models outperform neural operators in data-limited regimes, but all models generalize poorly to out-of-range Reynolds numbers and geometry ge...
-
Improving Large Vision-Language Models' Understanding for Flow Field Data
FieldLVLM compresses flow-field images and fine-tunes a vision-language model on text generated by specialist physics models, reporting high accuracy on flow analysis benchmarks that copy those same specialists.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.