Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Navigation-Guided Sparse Scene Representation for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.18341 v2 pith:OJN2QGJG submitted 2024-09-26 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords drivingsceneautonomousfuturedeploymente2eadend-to-endfaster
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

End-to-End Autonomous Driving (E2EAD) methods typically rely on supervised perception tasks to extract explicit scene information (e.g., objects, maps). This reliance necessitates expensive annotations and constrains deployment and data scalability in real-time applications. In this paper, we introduce SSR, a novel framework that utilizes only 16 navigation-guided tokens as Sparse Scene Representation, efficiently extracting crucial scene information for E2EAD. Our method eliminates the need for human-designed supervised sub-tasks, allowing computational resources to concentrate on essential elements directly related to navigation intent. We further introduce a temporal enhancement module, aligning predicted future scenes with actual future scenes through self-supervision. SSR achieves a 27.2\% relative reduction in L2 error and a 51.6\% decrease in collision rate to UniAD in nuScenes, with a 10.9$\times$ faster inference speed and 13$\times$ faster training time. Moreover, SSR outperforms VAD-Base with a 48.6-point improvement on driving score in CARLA's Town05 Long benchmark. This framework represents a significant leap in real-time autonomous driving systems and paves the way for future scalable deployment. Code is available at https://github.com/PeidongLi/SSR.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BeyondSight: Object Permanence for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A sparse-query end-to-end driving model that maintains persistent actor hypotheses across full occlusions, plus a nuScenes extension that supervises and evaluates unobservable actors, cuts planning L2 error and raises...

  2. Mosaic: An Extensible Framework for Composing Rule-Based and Learned Motion Planners

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Mosaic integrates rule-based and learned planners via arbitration graphs to set new state-of-the-art scores on nuPlan and interPlan benchmarks while cutting at-fault collisions by 30%.

  3. LAP: Fast LAtent Diffusion Planner for Autonomous Driving

    cs.RO 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LAP plans trajectories in a VAE-learned latent space with one- or two-step latent diffusion, beating prior learning-based planners on nuPlan hard scenarios with up to ~10x lower inference latency.

  4. 3D and 4D World Modeling: A Survey

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey that defines 3D/4D world modeling, organizes methods into VideoGen, OccGen, and LiDARGen categories, and compiles datasets, metrics, and benchmark numbers.

  5. ReAL-AD: Towards Human-Like Reasoning in End-to-End Autonomous Driving

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ReAL-AD combines VLM-generated strategy and tactical commands with a two-stage trajectory decoder, cutting open-loop L2 error and collision rate by about a third on nuScenes and Bench2Drive.

  6. A Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey organizes vision-language-action models for autonomous driving into four stages, compares over 20 systems, and catalogs datasets, benchmarks, and open challenges.

Pith tools