Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A comparison of Bayesian sampling algorithms for high-dimensional particle physics and cosmology applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.18464 v2 pith:E5BAD2YV submitted 2024-09-27 hep-ph stat.ML

classification hep-phstat.ML
keywords astrophysicsparticlecosmologyfunctionsphysicssamplingseriesalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

For several decades now, Bayesian inference techniques have been applied to theories of particle physics, cosmology and astrophysics to obtain the probability density functions of their free parameters. In this study, we review and compare a wide range of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and nested sampling techniques to determine their relative efficacy on functions that resemble those encountered most frequently in the particle astrophysics literature. Our first series of tests explores a series of high-dimensional analytic test functions that exemplify particular challenges, for example highly multimodal posteriors or posteriors with curving degeneracies. We then investigate two real physics examples, the first being a global fit of the $\Lambda$CDM model using cosmic microwave background data from the Planck experiment, and the second being a global fit of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model using a wide variety of collider and astrophysics data. We show that several examples widely thought to be most easily solved using nested sampling approaches can in fact be more efficiently solved using modern MCMC algorithms, but the details of the implementation matter. Furthermore, we also provide a series of useful insights for practitioners of particle astrophysics and cosmology.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Normalizing Flow-Assisted Nested Sampling on Type-II Seesaw Model

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A RealNVP normalizing flow trained inside nested sampling accelerates Bayesian scans of the Type-II seesaw parameter space and yields posterior constraints on scalar masses and couplings.

  2. hep-aid: A Python Library for Sample Efficient Parameter Scans in Beyond the Standard Model Phenomenology

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    hep-aid is a modular Python library that packages active search, neural network, and MCMC parameter scan methods with a Higgs physics software stack, and its demonstrations show sample efficiency gains on test and BSM...

  3. Modern Bayesian Sampling Methods for Cosmological Inference: A Comparative Study

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A comparative benchmark of six Markov Chain Monte Carlo and nested samplers finds that HMC and nested sampling perform best on complex cosmological parameter spaces, though no method dominates overall.

Pith tools