REVIEW 7 cited by
ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Autonomous agents have demonstrated significant potential in automating complex multistep decision-making tasks. However, even state-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs), such as GPT-4o, still fall short of human-level performance, particularly in intricate web environments and long-horizon tasks. To address these limitations, we present ExACT, an approach to combine test-time search and self-learning to build o1-like models for agentic applications. We first introduce Reflective Monte Carlo Tree Search (R-MCTS), a novel test time algorithm designed to enhance AI agents' ability to explore decision space on the fly. R-MCTS extends traditional MCTS by 1) incorporating contrastive reflection, allowing agents to learn from past interactions and dynamically improve their search efficiency; and 2) using multi-agent debate for reliable state evaluation. Next, we introduce Exploratory Learning, a novel learning strategy to teach agents to search at inference time without relying on any external search algorithms. On the challenging VisualWebArena benchmark, our GPT-4o based R-MCTS agent achieves a 6% to 30% relative improvement across various tasks compared to the previous state-of-the-art. Additionally, we show that the knowledge and experience gained from test-time search can be effectively transferred back to GPT-4o via fine-tuning. After Exploratory Learning, GPT-4o 1) demonstrates the ability to explore the environment, evaluate a state, and backtrack to viable ones when it detects that the current state cannot lead to success, and 2) matches 87% of R-MCTS's performance while using significantly less compute. Notably, our work demonstrates the compute scaling properties in both training - data collection with R-MCTS - and testing time. These results suggest a promising research direction to enhance VLMs' capabilities for agentic applications via test-time search and self-learning.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
NeuroSymActive: Differentiable Neural-Symbolic Reasoning with Active Exploration for Knowledge Graph Question Answering
NeuroSymActive combines soft-unification symbolic modules, a neural path evaluator, and Monte-Carlo-style active exploration to reach strong answer accuracy on KGQA benchmarks while cutting graph lookups and model cal...
-
WebGuard: Building a Generalizable Guardrail for Web Agents
WebGuard introduces an action-level risk dataset for web agents and shows that a fine-tuned 7B model improves risk-prediction accuracy from about 38% to 80% and high-risk recall from 20% to 76%, still below deployment...
-
Thinking vs. Doing: Agents that Reason by Scaling Test-Time Interaction
Scaling the number of interaction steps, trained via a curriculum over rollout horizon, improves web-agent task success and outperforms scaling per-step reasoning under fixed token budgets.
-
LLM-First Search: Self-Guided Exploration of the Solution Space
LLM-First Search, where the model itself decides whether to continue or backtrack during reasoning, outperforms MCTS, BestFS, and ToT-BFS on harder Countdown and Sudoku tasks while using fewer tokens.
-
AdInject: Real-World Black-Box Attacks on Web Agents via Advertising Delivery
Fake 'Close AD' ads make VLM web agents click them over 60% of the time, and near 100% in some settings.
-
BacktrackAgent: Enhancing GUI Agent with Error Detection and Backtracking Mechanism
BacktrackAgent adds a trained error detector and a rewriter to GUI agents, improving task success on Mobile3M and Auto-UI benchmarks.
-
Read Quietly, Think Aloud: Decoupling Comprehension and Reasoning in LLMs
Masking loss on early training tokens and injecting embeddings from an auxiliary reader improves LLM accuracy on several reasoning benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.