REVIEW 3 cited by
Selective Attention Improves Transformer
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Unneeded elements in the attention's context degrade performance. We introduce Selective Attention, a simple parameter-free change to the standard attention mechanism which reduces attention to unneeded elements. Selective attention consistently improves language modeling and downstream task performance in a variety of model sizes and context lengths. For example, transformers trained with the language modeling objective on C4 with selective attention perform language modeling equivalently to standard transformers with ~2X more heads and parameters in their attention modules. Selective attention also allows decreasing the size of the attention's context buffer, leading to meaningful reductions in the memory and compute requirements during inference. For example, transformers trained on C4 with context sizes of 512, 1,024, and 2,048 need 16X, 25X, and 47X less memory for their attention module, respectively, when equipped with selective attention, as those without selective attention, with the same validation perplexity.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Kernelized Linear Attention: Breaking the Capacity Wall with Symmetric Cones
KATA uses rank-one PSD feature maps to pack exponentially many nearly orthogonal keys at fixed interference, reaching near-softmax MQAR at 16× length with about a quarter of softmax's KV-cache entries.
-
MUDDFormer: Breaking Residual Bottlenecks in Transformers via Multiway Dynamic Dense Connections
Dynamic multiway dense connections across Transformer layers let a 2.8B model match a 6.9B model's pretraining quality and few-shot performance.
-
Memory for Large Language Models
The paper organizes LLM memory architectures along three axes—implicit vs explicit representation, offline vs online update, and short vs long-term persistence—plus finer-grained update rules.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.