Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

TLDR: Token-Level Detective Reward Model for Large Vision Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.04734 v2 pith:IIBU7NEK submitted 2024-10-07 cs.LG cs.CLcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CLcs.CV
keywords modelstldrrewardtextbflanguagemodeltexttoken-level
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Although reward models have been successful in improving multimodal large language models, the reward models themselves remain brutal and contain minimal information. Notably, existing reward models only mimic human annotations by assigning only one binary feedback to any text, no matter how long the text is. In the realm of multimodal language models, where models are required to process both images and texts, a naive reward model may learn implicit biases toward texts and become less grounded in images. In this paper, we propose a $\textbf{T}$oken-$\textbf{L}$evel $\textbf{D}$etective $\textbf{R}$eward Model ($\textbf{TLDR}$) to provide fine-grained annotations to each text token. We first introduce a perturbation-based method to generate synthetic hard negatives and their token-level labels to train TLDR models. Then we show the rich usefulness of TLDR models both in assisting off-the-shelf models to self-correct their generations, and in serving as a hallucination evaluation tool. We show that TLDR automatically trains a token-level likelihood optimization, and can improve the base model's performance significantly. Finally, we show that TLDR models can significantly speed up human annotation by 3 times to acquire a broader range of high-quality vision language data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HalluScope: Fine-grained Hallucination Diagnosis for Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HalluScope couples span-level hallucination detection, 12-way type classification, and explanation generation in one model, and shows the resulting feedback reduces hallucinations in two MLLMs.

  2. Hallucination at a Glance: Controlled Visual Edits and Fine-Grained Multimodal Learning

    cs.CV 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new micro-edit dataset and fine-tuning recipe appear to help multimodal LLMs notice small visual changes, but the central 'feature consistency loss' claim is not present in the method.

  3. ASPO: Adaptive Sentence-Level Preference Optimization for Fine-Grained Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    ASPO's adaptive sentence-level loss, by the paper's own definitions, reduces exactly to the standard DPO loss, leaving no difference in the optimization objective.

Pith tools