Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Reasoning Paths Optimization: Learning to Reason and Explore From Diverse Paths

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.10858 v1 pith:ME5UNA5E submitted 2024-10-07 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords reasoningpathsmodelsoptimizationdiverseexploreframeworklanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Advanced models such as OpenAI o1 exhibit impressive problem-solving capabilities through step-by-step reasoning. However, they may still falter on more complex problems, making errors that disrupt their reasoning paths. We attribute this to the expansive solution space, where each step has the risk of diverging into mistakes. To enhance language model reasoning, we introduce a specialized training framework called Reasoning Paths Optimization (RPO), which enables learning to reason and explore from diverse paths. Our approach encourages favorable branches at each reasoning step while penalizing unfavorable ones, enhancing the model's overall problem-solving performance. Reasoning Paths Optimization does not rely on large-scale human-annotated rationales or outputs from closed-source models, making it scalable and data-efficient. We focus on multi-step reasoning tasks, such as math word problems and science-based exam questions. The experiments demonstrate that our framework significantly enhances the reasoning performance of large language models, with up to 3.1% and 4.3% improvement on GSM8K and MMLU (STEM) respectively. Our data and code can be found at https://reasoning-paths.github.io.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Danger of Overthinking: Examining the Reasoning-Action Dilemma in Agentic Tasks

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AI coding agents that overthink, spending effort on internal reasoning instead of acting, perform worse, and selecting lower-overthinking attempts improves success by ~30% with 43% less compute.

Pith tools