Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Planning Anything with Rigor: General-Purpose Zero-Shot Planning with LLM-based Formalized Programming

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.12112 v3 pith:HU7K3RBS submitted 2024-10-15 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords planningproblemsllmfpllmstask-specificbestcomplexexamples
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

While large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated strong potential in solving planning problems, there is a trade-off between flexibility and complexity. LLMs, as zero-shot planners themselves, are still not capable of directly generating valid plans for complex planning problems such as multi-constraint or long-horizon tasks. On the other hand, many frameworks aiming to solve complex planning problems often rely on task-specific preparatory efforts, such as task-specific in-context examples and pre-defined critics/verifiers, which limits their cross-task generalization capability. In this paper, we tackle these challenges by observing that the core of many planning problems lies in optimization problems: searching for the optimal solution (best plan) with goals subject to constraints (preconditions and effects of decisions). With LLMs' commonsense, reasoning, and programming capabilities, this opens up the possibilities of a universal LLM-based approach to planning problems. Inspired by this observation, we propose LLMFP, a general-purpose framework that leverages LLMs to capture key information from planning problems and formally formulate and solve them as optimization problems from scratch, with no task-specific examples needed. We apply LLMFP to 9 planning problems, ranging from multi-constraint decision making to multi-step planning problems, and demonstrate that LLMFP achieves on average 83.7% and 86.8% optimal rate across 9 tasks for GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, significantly outperforming the best baseline (direct planning with OpenAI o1-preview) with 37.6% and 40.7% improvements. We also validate components of LLMFP with ablation experiments and analyzed the underlying success and failure reasons. Project page: https://sites.google.com/view/llmfp.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Improving the Data-efficiency of Reinforcement Learning by Warm-starting with LLM

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Warm-starting RL with a small LLM-generated buffer and then fine-tuning online (LORO) improves cumulative reward over pure RL in six Gym environments, though the theoretical guarantee is borrowed and the coverage assu...

  2. PLANET: A Collection of Benchmarks for Evaluating LLMs' Planning Capabilities

    cs.AI 2025-04 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey that catalogs and categorizes existing planning benchmarks for LLM agents and lists open gaps, without introducing new benchmarks, data, or experimental results.

Pith tools