REVIEW 2 cited by
De-Identification of Medical Imaging Data: A Comprehensive Tool for Ensuring Patient Privacy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Medical data employed in research frequently comprises sensitive patient health information (PHI), which is subject to rigorous legal frameworks such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Consequently, these types of data must be pseudonymized prior to utilisation, which presents a significant challenge for many researchers. Given the vast array of medical data, it is necessary to employ a variety of de-identification techniques. To facilitate the anonymization process for medical imaging data, we have developed an open-source tool that can be used to de-identify DICOM magnetic resonance images, computer tomography images, whole slide images and magnetic resonance twix raw data. Furthermore, the implementation of a neural network enables the removal of text within the images. The proposed tool automates an elaborate anonymization pipeline for multiple types of inputs, reducing the need for additional tools used for de-identification of imaging data. We make our code publicly available at https://github.com/code-lukas/medical_image_deidentification.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Medical Image De-Identification Benchmark Challenge
A multi-institution benchmark challenge scored ten DICOM de-identification pipelines on real radiology images with synthetic PHI/PII, with top accuracy near 99.9%.
-
Exploring AI-based System Design for Pixel-level Protected Health Information Detection in Medical Images
A modular pipeline with YOLOv11 detecting text, EasyOCR reading it, and GPT-4o classifying PHI outperforms end-to-end GPT-4o and EasyOCR-only setups in accuracy, latency, and cost.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.