Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Accurate and Regret-aware Numerical Problem Solver for Tabular Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.12846 v4 pith:3TFRBB32 submitted 2024-10-10 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords llmstablapaccuratenumericaltabularansweransweringapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Question answering on free-form tables (a.k.a. TableQA) is a challenging task because of the flexible structure and complex schema of tables. Recent studies use Large Language Models (LLMs) for this task, exploiting their capability in understanding the questions and tabular data, which are typically given in natural language and contain many textual fields, respectively. While this approach has shown promising results, it overlooks the challenges brought by numerical values which are common in tabular data, and LLMs are known to struggle with such values. We aim to address this issue, and we propose a model named TabLaP that uses LLMs as a planner rather than an answer generator. This approach exploits LLMs' capability in multi-step reasoning while leaving the actual numerical calculations to a Python interpreter for accurate calculation. Recognizing the inaccurate nature of LLMs, we further make a first attempt to quantify the trustworthiness of the answers produced by TabLaP, such that users can use TabLaP in a regret-aware manner. Experimental results on two benchmark datasets show that TabLaP is substantially more accurate than the state-of-the-art models, improving the answer accuracy by 5.7% and 5.8% on the two datasets, respectively.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MRT at SemEval-2025 Task 8: Maximizing Recovery from Tables with Multiple Steps

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A code-generation pipeline with step-by-step instructions and error recovery scores 70.50% on the SemEval-2025 table question-answering task.

Pith tools