REVIEW 4 cited by
MIRAGE-Bench: Automatic Multilingual Benchmark Arena for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Traditional retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) benchmarks evaluate systems using heuristic-based metrics, but these require human preferences as the ground truth for reference. In contrast, arena-based benchmarks, where systems compete against each other, require an expensive large language model (LLM) as a judge for a reliable evaluation. We present a simple efficient technique to combine the best of both worlds. The idea is to train a surrogate judge using heuristic metrics as input, to output the LLM as a judge prediction. In our work, we develop MIRAGE-Bench, a synthetic arena-based RAG benchmark for 18 diverse languages on Wikipedia focused on multilingual answer generation evaluation. It extensively couples both heuristic features and LLM as a judge for evaluation. We benchmark 19 multilingual LLMs, and observe a high correlation (Kendall Tau ($\tau$) = 0.909) using our surrogate judge and between GPT-4o as a teacher using the Bradley-Terry framework. Our results show proprietary and large open-source LLMs currently dominate on MIRAGE-Bench. Our code and datasets are made publicly available here: https://github.com/vectara/mirage-bench.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
XRAG: Cross-lingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation
XRAG is a new cross-lingual RAG benchmark showing that large language models frequently ignore the question language and fail at combining evidence from documents in different languages.
-
The Great Nugget Recall: Automating Fact Extraction and RAG Evaluation with Large Language Models
A fully automatic LLM-based nugget evaluation for RAG systems matches human assessments at the run level on TREC 2024, with stronger agreement when only nugget assignment is automated.
-
Chatbot Arena Meets Nuggets: Towards Explanations and Diagnostics in the Evaluation of LLM Responses
Nugget-based fact-recall scores on Search Arena battles correlate with human preferences, with about 54% agreement, and offer finer-grained diagnostic signals than raw win/loss votes.
-
Can LLMs Be Trusted for Evaluating RAG Systems? A Survey of Methods and Datasets
A systematic review of 63 RAG evaluation papers concludes that LLM-based automation is feasible across dataset generation, retrieval scoring, and answer evaluation, but only six studies directly compare LLM judges wit...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.