Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MixEval-X: Any-to-Any Evaluations from Real-World Data Mixtures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.13754 v2 pith:COFR6SFE submitted 2024-10-17 cs.AI cs.LGcs.MM

classification cs.AIcs.LGcs.MM
keywords evaluationsreal-worldbenchmarkeffectivelymixeval-xany-to-anydistributionsdiverse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Perceiving and generating diverse modalities are crucial for AI models to effectively learn from and engage with real-world signals, necessitating reliable evaluations for their development. We identify two major issues in current evaluations: (1) inconsistent standards, shaped by different communities with varying protocols and maturity levels; and (2) significant query, grading, and generalization biases. To address these, we introduce MixEval-X, the first any-to-any, real-world benchmark designed to optimize and standardize evaluations across diverse input and output modalities. We propose multi-modal benchmark mixture and adaptation-rectification pipelines to reconstruct real-world task distributions, ensuring evaluations generalize effectively to real-world use cases. Extensive meta-evaluations show our approach effectively aligns benchmark samples with real-world task distributions. Meanwhile, MixEval-X's model rankings correlate strongly with that of crowd-sourced real-world evaluations (up to 0.98) while being much more efficient. We provide comprehensive leaderboards to rerank existing models and organizations and offer insights to enhance understanding of multi-modal evaluations and inform future research.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Estimating Machine Translation Difficulty

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A source-only quality model, Sentinel-src-24, predicts which texts machine translation systems will translate poorly better than heuristics, LLM judges, and expensive crowd pipelines.

Pith tools