Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

How Do Training Methods Influence the Utilization of Vision Models?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.14470 v1 pith:ZP7BTB3W submitted 2024-10-18 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG
keywords traininglayersarchitecturedecisionfindingsfunctioninfluencemethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Not all learnable parameters (e.g., weights) contribute equally to a neural network's decision function. In fact, entire layers' parameters can sometimes be reset to random values with little to no impact on the model's decisions. We revisit earlier studies that examined how architecture and task complexity influence this phenomenon and ask: is this phenomenon also affected by how we train the model? We conducted experimental evaluations on a diverse set of ImageNet-1k classification models to explore this, keeping the architecture and training data constant but varying the training pipeline. Our findings reveal that the training method strongly influences which layers become critical to the decision function for a given task. For example, improved training regimes and self-supervised training increase the importance of early layers while significantly under-utilizing deeper layers. In contrast, methods such as adversarial training display an opposite trend. Our preliminary results extend previous findings, offering a more nuanced understanding of the inner mechanics of neural networks. Code: https://github.com/paulgavrikov/layer_criticality

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DispBench: Benchmarking Disparity Estimation to Synthetic Corruptions

    cs.CV 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    DispBench measures four stereo disparity models under 15 common corruptions and 5 adversarial attacks, finding transformer-based models more fragile on weather corruptions and no reliable transfer from synthetic to re...

  2. Are Synthetic Corruptions A Reliable Proxy For Real-World Corruptions?

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Synthetic corruptions are a strong proxy for real-world corruptions when ranking semantic segmentation models on average, but individual corruption types like fog and night show weak correlation.

Pith tools