Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SudoLM: Learning Access Control of Parametric Knowledge with Authorization Alignment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.14676 v3 pith:HIMCWUDS submitted 2024-10-18 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords knowledgeusersaccessalignmentparametricsudolmauthorizationcontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing preference alignment is a one-size-fits-all alignment mechanism, where the part of the large language model (LLM) parametric knowledge with non-preferred features is uniformly blocked to all the users. However, this part of knowledge can be useful to advanced users whose expertise qualifies them to handle these information. The one-size-fits-all alignment mechanism undermines LLM's utility for these qualified users. To address this problem, we propose SudoLM, a framework that lets LLMs learn access control over specific parametric knowledge for users with different credentials via authorization alignment. SudoLM allows authorized users to unlock their access to all the parametric knowledge with an assigned SUDO key while blocking access to non-qualified users. Experiments on two application scenarios demonstrate that SudoLM effectively controls the user's access to the parametric knowledge and maintains its general utility.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ACCESS DENIED INC: The First Benchmark Environment for Sensitivity Awareness

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark generates a fake company and tests whether seven LLMs follow simple access-rights rules, finding high leakage rates on unauthorized requests in every model.

Pith tools