Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Mitigating Object Hallucination via Concentric Causal Attention

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.15926 v1 pith:F45DEJCQ submitted 2024-10-21 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords hallucinationlvlmsobjecttokensropevisualalignmentdecay
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) present remarkable zero-shot conversational and reasoning capabilities given multimodal queries. Nevertheless, they suffer from object hallucination, a phenomenon where LVLMs are prone to generate textual responses not factually aligned with image inputs. Our pilot study reveals that object hallucination is closely tied with Rotary Position Encoding (RoPE), a widely adopted positional dependency modeling design in existing LVLMs. Due to the long-term decay in RoPE, LVLMs tend to hallucinate more when relevant visual cues are distant from instruction tokens in the multimodal input sequence. Additionally, we observe a similar effect when reversing the sequential order of visual tokens during multimodal alignment. Our tests indicate that long-term decay in RoPE poses challenges to LVLMs while capturing visual-instruction interactions across long distances. We propose Concentric Causal Attention (CCA), a simple yet effective positional alignment strategy that mitigates the impact of RoPE long-term decay in LVLMs by naturally reducing relative distance between visual and instruction tokens. With CCA, visual tokens can better interact with instruction tokens, thereby enhancing model's perception capability and alleviating object hallucination. Without bells and whistles, our positional alignment method surpasses existing hallucination mitigation strategies by large margins on multiple object hallucination benchmarks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Retrieval Visual Contrastive Decoding to Mitigate Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RVCD uses YOLO detections and retrieved single-concept AI images to adjust LVLM logits at decode time, cutting CHAIR hallucination rates by roughly half versus prior contrastive decoding baselines.

  2. CAI: Caption-Sensitive Attention Intervention for Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CAI reduces object hallucination in LVLMs by injecting caption-query attention patterns into selected attention heads at inference time.

  3. Seeing Far and Clearly: Mitigating Hallucinations in MLLMs with Attention Causal Decoding

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FarSight adds upper-triangular negative biases to the causal mask to absorb outlier-token attention, reducing hallucinations in MLLMs without training.

  4. MCA-LLaVA: Manhattan Causal Attention for Reducing Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    MCA-LLaVA reindexes image tokens by sums of mirrored 2D coordinates so instruction tokens attend across the whole image, reducing hallucination on POPE, CHAIR, and MME.

Pith tools