Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

VideoWebArena: Evaluating Long Context Multimodal Agents with Video Understanding Web Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.19100 v3 pith:FQH4YXYC submitted 2024-10-24 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords tasksretentionlong-contextvideoagentfactualagentscomplete
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Videos are often used to learn or extract the necessary information to complete tasks in ways different than what text and static imagery alone can provide. However, many existing agent benchmarks neglect long-context video understanding, instead focusing on text or static image inputs. To bridge this gap, we introduce VideoWebArena (VideoWA), a benchmark for evaluating the capabilities of long-context multimodal agents for video understanding. VideoWA consists of 2,021 web agent tasks based on manually crafted video tutorials, which total almost four hours of content. For our benchmark, we define a taxonomy of long-context video-based agent tasks with two main areas of focus: skill retention and factual retention. While skill retention tasks evaluate whether an agent can use a given human demonstration to complete a task efficiently, the factual retention task evaluates whether an agent can retrieve instruction-relevant information from a video to complete a task. We find that the best model achieves 13.3% success on factual retention tasks and 45.8% on factual retention QA pairs, far below human performance at 73.9% and 79.3%, respectively. On skill retention tasks, long-context models perform worse with tutorials than without, exhibiting a 5% performance decrease in WebArena tasks and a 10.3% decrease in VisualWebArena tasks. Our work highlights the need to improve the agentic abilities of long-context multimodal models and provides a testbed for future development with long-context video agents.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FieldWorkArena: Agentic AI Benchmark for Real Field Work Tasks

    cs.AI 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new benchmark dataset and evaluation framework for testing multimodal AI agents on real field work tasks derived from on-site data and worker interviews.

  2. Instruction Agent: Enhancing Agent with Expert Demonstration

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    With one human demonstration, the Instruction Agent extracts instructions and uses verifier/backtracker modules to execute them, reaching 60% success on 20 previously unsolved OSWorld tasks.

  3. Build the web for agents, not agents for the web

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a paradigm shift: design a standardized Agentic Web Interface for AI agents, rather than adapting agents to human-facing websites.

  4. DeepShop: A Benchmark for Deep Research Shopping Agents

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DeepShop, a benchmark of 150 complex online shopping queries with fine-grained evaluation, shows that leading web agents and deep research systems achieve at most a 32% task success rate.

  5. WorkForceAgent-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLM-based Web Agents via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    R1-style reinforcement learning on single-step web actions lifts open-source agents above gpt-4o on WorkArena while avoiding the reward hacking seen with dense rewards.

  6. Evolutionary Perspectives on the Evaluation of LLM-Based AI Agents: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that classifies AI agent evaluation benchmarks along environment and capability axes, and proposes five traits that distinguish agents from chatbots.

Pith tools