REVIEW 2 cited by
A Fast, Analytic Empirical Model of the Gaia Data Release 3 Astrometric Orbit Catalog Selection Function
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In June 2022, the Gaia mission released a catalog of astrometric orbital solutions for 168,065 binary systems, by far the largest such catalog to date. The catalog's selection function is difficult to characterize because of choices made in its construction. Understanding the catalog's selection function is required to model and interpret its contents. We use a combination of analytic and empirical prescriptions to construct a function that computes the probability that a binary with a given set of properties would have been published in the Gaia Data Release 3 astrometric orbit catalog. This is a complementary approach to the more accurate but significantly more computationally expensive approach of El-Badry et al. (2024). We also construct a binary population synthesis model to validate our characterization of the selection function, finding good agreement with the actual Gaia NSS catalog, with the exception of the orbital eccentricity distribution. The NSS catalog suggests high-eccentricity orbits are relatively uncommon at intermediate periods $100 \lesssim P_{orb} \lesssim 1000$ days. As an example application of the selection function, we estimate the Gaia DR3 detection probabilities of the star + BH binaries Gaia BH1 and BH2, and find them to be 0.38 and 0.27, respectively. Compared to the values obtained by detailed modeling in El-Badry et al. (2024), the probabilities are identical for BH1, and within a factor of 2 for BH2. We also estimate the population of Sun-like star + BH binaries in the Galaxy to be $\sim 3000$ for $100 < P_{orb} < 400$ day, $< 800$ for $400 < P_{orb} < 1000$ day, and $< 12,000$ for $1000 < P_{orb} < 1500$ day.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
You're Gonna Need a Bigger Core: Calibrating Massive Star Models against Galactic OB-type Stars
Galactic OB-star HR-diagram data imply a constant core overshoot α_ov ≈ 0.33 for 12–40 M_sun, yielding larger helium cores than standard prescriptions.
-
Radial Velocity Orbital Solutions for Candidate Black Hole and Neutron Star Binary Systems in the Gaia Data Release 3 Catalog
New radial-velocity orbits refute nearly every high-mass dark-companion candidate in Gaia DR3; only Gaia BH1 and BH2 remain as black holes, with one new 1.16 Msun compact-object candidate in the acceleration sample.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.