Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

AutoPT: How Far Are We from the End2End Automated Web Penetration Testing?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.01236 v1 pith:EXRDNLMP submitted 2024-11-02 cs.CR cs.AI

classification cs.CRcs.AI
keywords penetrationtestingautoptframeworkagentsautomatedstateagent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Penetration testing is essential to ensure Web security, which can detect and fix vulnerabilities in advance, and prevent data leakage and serious consequences. The powerful inference capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have made significant progress in various fields, and the development potential of LLM-based agents can revolutionize the cybersecurity penetration testing industry. In this work, we establish a comprehensive end-to-end penetration testing benchmark using a real-world penetration testing environment to explore the capabilities of LLM-based agents in this domain. Our results reveal that the agents are familiar with the framework of penetration testing tasks, but they still face limitations in generating accurate commands and executing complete processes. Accordingly, we summarize the current challenges, including the difficulty of maintaining the entire message history and the tendency for the agent to become stuck. Based on the above insights, we propose a Penetration testing State Machine (PSM) that utilizes the Finite State Machine (FSM) methodology to address these limitations. Then, we introduce AutoPT, an automated penetration testing agent based on the principle of PSM driven by LLMs, which utilizes the inherent inference ability of LLM and the constraint framework of state machines. Our evaluation results show that AutoPT outperforms the baseline framework ReAct on the GPT-4o mini model and improves the task completion rate from 22% to 41% on the benchmark target. Compared with the baseline framework and manual work, AutoPT also reduces time and economic costs further. Hence, our AutoPT has facilitated the development of automated penetration testing and significantly impacted both academia and industry.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Ethics of Autonomous AI Agents for Offensive Security

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Autonomous AI hacking tools combine three kinds of indeterminacy—action, impact, and users—making moral responsibility diffuse and giving attackers a short-term advantage under current cost asymmetries.

  2. Eradicating the Unseen: Detecting, Exploiting, and Remediating a Path Traversal Vulnerability across GitHub

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single vulnerable Node.js path traversal pattern was found in 1,756 GitHub projects, most rated critical, and the authors' automated pipeline produced patches, disclosures, and evidence that LLMs have learned the pattern.

  3. Can LLMs Hack Enterprise Networks? Autonomous Assumed Breach Penetration-Testing Active Directory Networks

    cs.CR 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An autonomous LLM-driven agent can compromise accounts in a realistic Active Directory testbed, with reasoning models outperforming non-reasoning ones at competitive cost.

  4. A Survey of LLM-Driven Penetration Testing: Taxonomy, Co-Evolution, and Open Challenges

    cs.SE 2026-07 accept novelty 5.5 of 10

    LLM pentest agents co-evolved through four bottleneck-driven phases into RLVR systems, while CTF platforms became dual evaluation/training infrastructure and three linked reliability gaps remain.

  5. Cybersecurity AI: The Dangerous Gap Between Automation and Autonomy

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A roboticist adapts driving-automation levels to cybersecurity, arguing that today's 'autonomous' penetration testers run at Level 3-4 and still require human oversight.

Pith tools