Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Comprehensive Study on Quantization Techniques for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.02530 v1 pith:4RDWGD7E submitted 2024-10-30 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

A Comprehensive Study on Quantization Techniques for Large Language Models

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL
keywords quantizationllmsmodelslargecomprehensivecomputationallanguagemethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been extensively researched and used in both academia and industry since the rise in popularity of the Transformer model, which demonstrates excellent performance in AI. However, the computational demands of LLMs are immense, and the energy resources required to run them are often limited. For instance, popular models like GPT-3, with 175 billion parameters and a storage requirement of 350 GB, present significant challenges for deployment on resource-constrained IoT devices and embedded systems. These systems often lack the computational capacity to handle such large models. Quantization, a technique that reduces the precision of model values to a smaller set of discrete values, offers a promising solution by reducing the size of LLMs and accelerating inference. In this research, we provide a comprehensive analysis of quantization techniques within the machine learning field, with a particular focus on their application to LLMs. We begin by exploring the mathematical theory of quantization, followed by a review of common quantization methods and how they are implemented. Furthermore, we examine several prominent quantization methods applied to LLMs, detailing their algorithms and performance outcomes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Federated Learning: An approach with Hybrid Homomorphic Encryption

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    Pairing the PASTA stream cipher with BFV homomorphic encryption in federated learning cuts client upload by about 2000x and keeps MNIST accuracy within 1.3% of plaintext, but makes server aggregation roughly 15,000x m...

  2. The Illusion of Equivalency: Statistical Characterization of Quantization Effects in LLMs

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Quantized LLMs diverge from their base models at the decision level even when accuracy is preserved, with query and key attention projections showing the greatest structural distortion under low-bit compression.

  3. CLARIFY: A Specialist-Generalist Framework for Accurate and Lightweight Dermatological Visual Question Answering

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0

    A specialist classifier feeding a pruned VLM with knowledge-graph grounding reports 82.1% diagnostic accuracy on a 39-image dermatology test set, about 18 percentage points above a fine-tuned VLM baseline.

  4. A Vision Toward Energy-Efficient Domain-Specific Artificial Intelligence Models and Agents

    cs.AI 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A position paper proposing compact, domain-specific AI agents as the path to ≥1000× energy efficiency, without demonstrating the claim.