Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 52 references

Unveiling the Hidden: Online Vectorized HD Map Construction with Clip-Level Token Interaction and Propagation

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read MapUnveiler constructs online vectorized HD maps from clip-level inputs, using compact clip tokens to unveil occluded road elements and inter-clip token propagation for long-term map consistency, achieving state-of-the-art mAP on nuScenes…

desk verdict A real step forward for online HD map construction, but the headline occlusion claim rests on a proximity proxy and an appendix table has an arithmetic slip. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11002 v1 pith:6QKJQVSB submitted 2024-11-17 cs.CV cs.AI

Nayeon Kim , Hongje Seong , Daehyun Ji , Sujin Jang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords vectorizedHDmapconstructionclip-levelinferencetokeninteractionpropagationocclusionrobustnessbird's-eyeviewonlinemappingUnveiler
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that static HD map elements—lane lines, dividers, boundaries—can be reliably recovered from short clips of camera frames even when dynamic objects occlude them, by replacing dense temporal feature propagation with compact clip tokens. MapUnveiler summarizes frame-level map queries into a small set of tokens, uses those tokens to update dense bird's-eye-view features within a clip, and then propagates only tokens across clips through a read-write memory. If correct, the approach would give online mapping systems the occlusion-recovery benefits of offline SLAM-style mapping without the heavy computation, and the paper reports exactly that: state-of-the-art mAP on nuScenes and Argoverse2, plus a +10.7% mAP improvement over prior methods in heavily occluded road scenes.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the clip token: a set of 50 compact embeddings produced by naive cross-attention over the frame-level map queries (T=3 frames × 50 elements × 20 points). These tokens carry the clip's spatio-temporal map cues into the BEV Updater, where they serve as keys and values for a cross-attention whose queries come from dense BEV features, updating those features to fill in occluded regions. The same tokens, together with map tokens, are written into a 96-token memory via the token summarizer from Token Turing Machines, which selects informative tokens during read and write; the memory then feeds the next clip's first layer. The mechanism's efficiency comes from decoupling spatial BEV features from temporal tokens, avoiding heavy spatio-temporal cross-attention while still communicating time information.

What would settle it

Construct a validation split from nuScenes where every target map element is occluded by a dynamic object in all three frames of every clip (using the dataset's 3D cuboid annotations). MapUnveiler's own limitation section concedes it fails in this case; measuring the exact mAP drop relative to a single-frame model would reveal how much of the +10.7% mAP comes from genuinely unveiling hidden geometry versus temporally averaging visible regions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

MapUnveiler's central claim is that clip-level token interaction—rather than frame-level or streaming dense features—is the right abstraction for temporal HD map construction. Within a clip, a naive cross-attention compresses T=3 frames of map queries into Nc=50 clip tokens; a BEV updater then lets dense BEV features cross-attend to these tokens to 'unveil' occluded map regions. Across clips, a Token Turing Machine-style summarizer reads and writes M=96 memory tokens, so long-term map information survives without propagating noisy dense features. The paper reports that this two-stage mechanism lifts mAP from 61.5% (MapTRv2) to 68.0% on nuScenes 60x30m, from 58.6% to 68.7% at 100x50m, and from 47.1% to 63.8% under heavy occlusion, while keeping inference at 12.7 FPS.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that 50 compact clip tokens, distilled from three frames of map queries, retain enough sub-meter geometric detail to update dense BEV features; if those tokens compress away the fine geometry needed at the 0.5 m Chamfer threshold, the reported AP gains could not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The clip-token mechanism transfers well across model backbones: MapUnveiler with a V2-99 backbone reaches 72.1% mAP on nuScenes 60x30m, up from 66.6% for MapTRv2 with the same backbone, so the gains are not tied to the ResNet50 features.
  • The approach generalizes to other map types: on centerline prediction it improves mAP by +9.0% (nuScenes) and +5.4% (Argoverse2) over MapTRv2, and it also sets a new state of the art for 3D vectorized map construction.
  • Performance keeps improving as the clip window grows (T=5 gives 70.1% vs. 69.8% at T=3), bounded only by GPU memory rather than by a modelling ceiling.
  • A frozen frame-level MapNet still outperforms the concurrent HiMap SOTA (66.7% vs. 66.4%), implying that most of the benefit comes from the token interaction itself, not from jointly fine-tuning the BEV encoder.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could test whether the +10.7% mAP in the heavy-occlusion split is reproducible on a publicly released version of that split; the paper constructs it automatically from cuboids, so a released split would let the community verify the number without recomputing occlusion statistics.
  • The paper never measures token reconstruction fidelity directly, so an independent probe—decoding the 50 clip tokens back into BEV space and comparing Chamfer distance against ground-truth maps in occluded regions—could determine whether the gains are true geometry recovery or temporal regularization.
  • The idea of using compact tokens as a substitute for dense temporal memory could also apply to other online perception tasks, such as lane-level trajectory prediction or occupancy grid forecasting, where occlusion-bounded temporal history is the bottleneck; the paper does not test this.
  • Since the memory is written and read with TTM's summarizer, an obvious extension is to replace the fixed 96-token memory with a variable-capacity or hierarchical one, trading memory footprint against longer-horizon map propagation; the paper only evaluates two-clip memory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. MapUnveiler proposes a clip-level, token-based temporal aggregation module for online vectorized HD map construction. It builds on MapTRv2, generating compact clip tokens from frame-level map queries via cross-attention, using them to update dense BEV features in an 'Intra-clip Unveiler', and propagating tokens across clips through a TTM-style memory in an 'Inter-clip Unveiler'. The paper reports state-of-the-art mAP on nuScenes and Argoverse2 at 60x30m and 100x50m ranges, and a +10.7% mAP improvement over StreamMapNet on a 'heavily occluded' split. Extensive ablations cover module contributions, temporal window/stride, token and memory sizes, backbones, and extensions to centerline and 3D maps.

Significance. The idea of using a small set of learned clip tokens to transport temporal map information while avoiding dense spatio-temporal attention is sensible and, if validated, gives online VHC models a way to exploit longer temporal context without the noise accumulation of dense streaming. The paper is empirically thorough: it reports ablations for each module, read/write input variants, temporal window, stride, memory and clip token sizes, multiple backbones, and two datasets, and it includes additional experiments on centerline, 3D, and geo-disjoint splits. These strengths make the standard-benchmark SOTA claim plausible. However, the headline occlusion claim rests on a proximity-based split rather than a true occlusion split, and the appendix contains table arithmetic inconsistencies, so the central 'unveiling' claim is not yet supported at the level the abstract asserts.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Table 3] The 'heavily occluded' validation split is defined by the presence of a dynamic object within 2.5 m of the ego vehicle, not by whether map elements are occluded. Proximity is neither necessary nor sufficient for map occlusion: a nearby vehicle can leave the perception range unobstructed while a distant bus occludes a lane line. Thus the +10.7% gain in Table 3 may reflect scene difficulty, ego-relative motion, or frame truncation rather than the unveiling mechanism. Please redefine the split using geometric visibility checks (e.g., ray-casting from each camera through 3D bounding boxes to ground-truth map elements), and report mAP separately for elements occluded in some but not all frames of a clip and for elements occluded in all frames.
  2. [Sec. A.6, Table 16] The reported mAP values are inconsistent with the per-class AP averages. For MapUnveiler at 5% drop, per-class APs (58.0, 60.6, 60.0) average to about 59.5, not 66.9; at 20% drop, per-class APs (66.2, 66.9, 67.6) average to about 66.9, not 59.6. The MapTRv2 20% row also shows a mismatch (per-class average about 44.9 vs. reported 48.2). These discrepancies undermine the table as a consistency check; they should be corrected and all other tables verified for the same issue before submission.
  3. [Sec. 4.5, Tables 3 and 4] The claim that clip tokens 'unveil' occluded map elements is only indirectly supported. The module ablations show performance gains, and the failure mode when an element is occluded in all frames is acknowledged in Sec. 4.5, but no experiment measures per-element visibility as a condition. Please add a visibility-conditioned evaluation (e.g., AP among map elements that are visible, partially occluded, and fully occluded within the clip) to directly support the unveiling mechanism.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 3.1] The notation N_T in 'performing clip-level inference only NT /S times' is not defined before its use; please clarify.
  2. [Sec. 3.2] The sentence 'These BEV features are utilized for querying maps in the map decoder. With their BEV features, the map decoder outputs frame-level map queries' is redundant; streamline it.
  3. [Table 5] The 'GPU (MB)' column label should specify whether this is training or inference peak memory; the text says 'during inference' but the table header is ambiguous.
  4. [Appendix Figs. 6-9] The appendix figures are referenced but not discussed in the main text; consider adding a sentence summarizing what they show.
  5. [Sec. 5] The conclusion states 'we unveil the hidden map and noise in BEV features'; consider rephrasing to 'unveil hidden map elements and remove accumulated noise'.
  6. [General] The paper does not state whether code will be released; given the central claim's dependence on data processing (occlusion split), releasing code and the split construction script would greatly aid verification.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: MapUnveiler's reported gains are empirical benchmark results from learned modules, not derivations forced by the paper's own definitions or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper makes no analytical derivation whose output is equivalent to its input by construction. Its central claims—state-of-the-art mAP on nuScenes and Argoverse2, and +10.7% mAP on a heavy-occlusion split—are empirical results obtained by training and evaluating on public validation sets. The clip tokens, BEV updater, and inter-clip memory are learned differentiable components; the frame-level MapNet is adopted from MapTRv2 [23], and the memory mechanism is adopted from TTM [36]/TokenLearner [35], none of which are authored by the MapUnveiler authors or invoked as a uniqueness theorem that forbids alternatives. The losses in Eqs. 3-6 supervise predictions against ground truth, and comparisons in Tables 1-4 are against held-out validation data from external benchmarks, so no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The only concerns—the proximity-based occlusion split defined in Sec. 4.1, the appendix arithmetic inconsistency in Table 16, and the admitted failure mode in Sec. 4.5—affect whether the occlusion claim is well supported or how reliable the table arithmetic is, but none of them makes the derivation circular. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks, and no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central gains rest on modeling premises rather than mathematical derivation: static map content visible in at least one clip frame can be recovered through cross-attention; 50 clip tokens preserve the sub-meter geometry needed for vectorized outputs; and TTM-style memory summarizes long-term information without accumulating drift. The main hyperparameters (T, S, Nc, M) were selected on the nuScenes validation set via the paper's own ablations. No new physical entities are introduced; the clip token is an internal latent with no external falsifiable handle beyond downstream mAP.

free parameters (4)
  • Temporal window size T = 3
    Ablated in Tab 9 on the nuScenes validation set; T=3 chosen as best under 32GB GPU memory, while T=5 gives 70.1 mAP but requires over 40GB.
  • Temporal stride S = 2
    Ablated in Tab 9; S=1 and S=3 are reported as suboptimal, and S=2 is selected for the final model.
  • Clip token size Nc = 50
    Ablated in Tab 11; Nc=50 gives the best mAP while Nc=25, 100, and 200 all perform worse.
  • Memory token size M = 96
    Ablated in Tab 10; M=96 or above gives similar performance, while smaller sizes degrade mAP.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Static map elements occluded in some frames are visible in other frames within the clip, and cross-attention between dense BEV features and clip tokens can expose them.
    Core premise of the BEV Updater in Sec 3.3.1; if an element is occluded in all T frames, the paper itself concedes failure in Sec 4.5.
  • domain assumption The TokenLearner-style token summarizer from TTM selects and retains informative tokens across clips without cumulative positional drift or noise accumulation.
    Used in Eq. 1 and Eq. 2 for memory read and write; the paper does not measure memory fidelity directly and relies on TTM [36] and TokenLearner [35].
  • domain assumption BEV features from MapTRv2's LSS pooling and deformable attention provide a consistent ego-centric coordinate system across frames so that clip-level token interactions align map elements.
    The clip-level pipeline concatenates BEV features from multiple frames without explicit ego-motion compensation; the assumption is that the PV-to-BEV transform handles this or that small inter-frame motion is tolerable.
  • domain assumption The adopted MapTRv2 frame-level MapNet produces sufficiently informative frame-level map queries and BEV features for the unveiler to refine.
    The whole MapUnveiler pipeline is built on MapTRv2 outputs; the paper pre-trains this base model and then trains the temporal modules on top.
invented entities (1)
  • Compact clip tokens
    purpose: Summarize temporal map information within a clip and update dense BEV features via cross-attention in the BEV Updater.
    Introduced in Sec 3.3.1; their effectiveness is only observed through downstream mAP, with no standalone measurement, interpretability analysis, or external falsifiable handle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unveiling the Hidden: Online Vectorized HD Map Construction with Clip-Level Token Interaction and Propagation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6QKJQVSB

@misc{pith2026241111002,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unveiling the Hidden: Online Vectorized HD Map Construction with Clip-Level Token Interaction and Propagation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6QKJQVSB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11002}
}
read the original abstract

Predicting and constructing road geometric information (e.g., lane lines, road markers) is a crucial task for safe autonomous driving, while such static map elements can be repeatedly occluded by various dynamic objects on the road. Recent studies have shown significantly improved vectorized high-definition (HD) map construction performance, but there has been insufficient investigation of temporal information across adjacent input frames (i.e., clips), which may lead to inconsistent and suboptimal prediction results. To tackle this, we introduce a novel paradigm of clip-level vectorized HD map construction, MapUnveiler, which explicitly unveils the occluded map elements within a clip input by relating dense image representations with efficient clip tokens. Additionally, MapUnveiler associates inter-clip information through clip token propagation, effectively utilizing long-term temporal map information. MapUnveiler runs efficiently with the proposed clip-level pipeline by avoiding redundant computation with temporal stride while building a global map relationship. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that MapUnveiler achieves state-of-the-art performance on both the nuScenes and Argoverse2 benchmark datasets. We also showcase that MapUnveiler significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in a challenging setting, achieving +10.7% mAP improvement in heavily occluded driving road scenes. The project page can be found at https://mapunveiler.github.io.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.11002 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Existing approaches relying on single-frame inference cannot capture the entire map [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Our framework takes clip-level multi-view images and outputs clip-level vectorized HD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A detailed implementation of Intra-clip Unveiler. We use [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative comparisons on two range variants of nuScenes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A limitation under heavy occlusions. Ma [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative comparisons on nuScenes val with 60×30m perception range setting. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Qualitative comparisons on nuScenes val with 60×30m perception range setting. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative comparisons on nuScenes val with 100×50m perception range setting. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Qualitative comparisons on nuScenes val with 100×50m perception range setting. 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A situation-adaptive lane-keeping support system: Overview of the safelane approach

    Angelos Amditis, Matthaios Bimpas, George Thomaidis, Manolis Tsogas, Mariana Netto, Saïd Mammar, Achim Beutner, Nikolaus Möhler, Tom Wirthgen, Stephan Zipser, et al. A situation-adaptive lane-keeping support system: Overview of the safelane approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 11(3):617–629, 2010. 1

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Memory transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.11527, 2020

    Mikhail S Burtsev, Yuri Kuratov, Anton Peganov, and Grigory V Sapunov. Memory transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.11527, 2020. 3

    arXiv 2006

  3. [3]

    nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving

    Holger Caesar, Varun Bankiti, Alex H Lang, Sourabh V ora, Venice Erin Liong, Qiang Xu, Anush Krishnan, Yu Pan, Giancarlo Baldan, and Oscar Beijbom. nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. In CVPR, pages 11621–11631, 2020. 2, 6, 7

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    End-to-end object detection with transformers

    Nicolas Carion, Francisco Massa, Gabriel Synnaeve, Nicolas Usunier, Alexander Kirillov, and Sergey Zagoruyko. End-to-end object detection with transformers. In ECCV, pages 213–229. Springer, 2020. 3

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Efficient and robust 2d-to-bev representation learning via geometry-guided kernel transformer

    Shaoyu Chen, Tianheng Cheng, Xinggang Wang, Wenming Meng, Qian Zhang, and Wenyu Liu. Efficient and robust 2d-to-bev representation learning via geometry-guided kernel transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.04584, 2022. 1, 3

    arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    End-to-end learning for lane keeping of self-driving cars

    Zhilu Chen and Xinming Huang. End-to-end learning for lane keeping of self-driving cars. In IV, pages 1856–1860. IEEE, 2017. 1

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Putting the object back into video object segmentation

    Ho Kei Cheng, Seoung Wug Oh, Brian Price, Joon-Young Lee, and Alexander Schwing. Putting the object back into video object segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12982, 2023. 3

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling

    Junyoung Chung, Caglar Gulcehre, KyungHyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. In NeurIPS Workshops, 2014. 3

    work page 2014

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Pivotnet: Vectorized pivot learning for end-to-end hd map construction

    Wenjie Ding, Limeng Qiao, Xi Qiu, and Chi Zhang. Pivotnet: Vectorized pivot learning for end-to-end hd map construction. In ICCV, pages 3672–3682, 2023. 7

    2023

  2. [10]

    Simultaneous localization and mapping: part i

    Hugh Durrant-Whyte and Tim Bailey. Simultaneous localization and mapping: part i. IEEE robotics & automation magazine, 13(2):99–110, 2006. 3

    2006

  3. [11]

    Producing and leveraging online map uncertainty in trajectory prediction

    Xunjiang Gu, Guanyu Song, Igor Gilitschenski, Marco Pavone, and Boris Ivanovic. Producing and leveraging online map uncertainty in trajectory prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16439, 2024. 1

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In CVPR, pages 770–778, 2016. 4, 7, 14

    2016

  5. [13]

    Vita: Video instance segmentation via object token association

    Miran Heo, Sukjun Hwang, Seoung Wug Oh, Joon-Young Lee, and Seon Joo Kim. Vita: Video instance segmentation via object token association. In NeurIPS, volume 35, pages 23109–23120, 2022. 3

    2022

  6. [14]

    Long short-term memory

    Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8):1735–1780,

  7. [15]

    Planning-oriented autonomous driving

    Yihan Hu, Jiazhi Yang, Li Chen, Keyu Li, Chonghao Sima, Xizhou Zhu, Siqi Chai, Senyao Du, Tianwei Lin, Wenhai Wang, et al. Planning-oriented autonomous driving. In CVPR, pages 17853–17862, 2023. 1

    2023

  8. [16]

    Bevpoolv2: A cutting-edge implementation of bevdet toward deployment

    Junjie Huang and Guan Huang. Bevpoolv2: A cutting-edge implementation of bevdet toward deployment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.17111, 2022. 4

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Video instance segmentation using inter-frame communication transformers

    Sukjun Hwang, Miran Heo, Seoung Wug Oh, and Seon Joo Kim. Video instance segmentation using inter-frame communication transformers. In NeurIPS, volume 34, pages 13352–13363, 2021. 3

    2021

  10. [18]

    Learning to remember more with less memorization

    Hung Le, Truyen Tran, and Svetha Venkatesh. Learning to remember more with less memorization. In ICLR, 2019. 3

    2019

  11. [19]

    Centermask: Real-time anchor-free instance segmentation

    Youngwan Lee and Jongyoul Park. Centermask: Real-time anchor-free instance segmentation. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 13906–13915, 2020. 14

    2020

  12. [20]

    Hdmapnet: An online hd map construction and evaluation framework

    Qi Li, Yue Wang, Yilun Wang, and Hang Zhao. Hdmapnet: An online hd map construction and evaluation framework. In ICRA, pages 4628–4634. IEEE, 2022. 1, 3, 7

    2022

  13. [21]

    Bev- former: Learning bird’s-eye-view representation from multi-camera images via spatiotemporal transformers

    Zhiqi Li, Wenhai Wang, Hongyang Li, Enze Xie, Chonghao Sima, Tong Lu, Yu Qiao, and Jifeng Dai. Bev- former: Learning bird’s-eye-view representation from multi-camera images via spatiotemporal transformers. In ECCV, pages 1–18. Springer, 2022. 1, 3

    2022

  14. [22]

    Maptr: Structured modeling and learning for online vectorized hd map construction

    Bencheng Liao, Shaoyu Chen, Xinggang Wang, Tianheng Cheng, Qian Zhang, Wenyu Liu, and Chang Huang. Maptr: Structured modeling and learning for online vectorized hd map construction. In ICLR,

  15. [23]

    Maptrv2: An end-to-end framework for online vectorized hd map construction

    Bencheng Liao, Shaoyu Chen, Yunchi Zhang, Bo Jiang, Qian Zhang, Wenyu Liu, Chang Huang, and Xing- gang Wang. Maptrv2: An end-to-end framework for online vectorized hd map construction. International Journal of Computer Vision, pages 1–23, 2024. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14

    2024

  16. [24]

    Path planning for autonomous vehicles using model predictive control

    Chang Liu, Seungho Lee, Scott Varnhagen, and H Eric Tseng. Path planning for autonomous vehicles using model predictive control. In IV, pages 174–179. IEEE, 2017. 1

    2017

  17. [25]

    Mgmap: Mask-guided learning for online vectorized hd map construction

    Xiaolu Liu, Song Wang, Wentong Li, Ruizi Yang, Junbo Chen, and Jianke Zhu. Mgmap: Mask-guided learning for online vectorized hd map construction. In CVPR, pages 14812–14821, 2024. 7

    2024

  18. [26]

    Vectormapnet: End-to-end vectorized hd map learning

    Yicheng Liu, Tianyuan Yuan, Yue Wang, Yilun Wang, and Hang Zhao. Vectormapnet: End-to-end vectorized hd map learning. In ICML, pages 22352–22369. PMLR, 2023. 2, 3, 7, 13 11

    2023

  19. [27]

    Leveraging enhanced queries of point sets for vectorized map construction

    Zihao Liu, Xiaoyu Zhang, Guangwei Liu, Ji Zhao, and Ningyi Xu. Leveraging enhanced queries of point sets for vectorized map construction. In ECCV, 2024. 7

    2024

  20. [28]

    Decoupled weight decay regularization

    Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In ICLR, 2019. 7

    2019

  21. [29]

    Map-based navigation in mobile robots:: Ii

    Jean-Arcady Meyer and David Filliat. Map-based navigation in mobile robots:: Ii. a review of map-learning and path-planning strategies. Cognitive Systems Research, 4(4):283–317, 2003. 1

    2003

  22. [30]

    Divide- and-conquer for lane-aware diverse trajectory prediction

    Sriram Narayanan, Ramin Moslemi, Francesco Pittaluga, Buyu Liu, and Manmohan Chandraker. Divide- and-conquer for lane-aware diverse trajectory prediction. In CVPR, pages 15799–15808, 2021. 1

    2021

  23. [31]

    Video object segmentation using space-time memory networks

    Seoung Wug Oh, Joon-Young Lee, Ning Xu, and Seon Joo Kim. Video object segmentation using space-time memory networks. In ICCV, pages 9226–9235, 2019. 3

    2019

  24. [32]

    Lift, splat, shoot: Encoding images from arbitrary camera rigs by implicitly unprojecting to 3d

    Jonah Philion and Sanja Fidler. Lift, splat, shoot: Encoding images from arbitrary camera rigs by implicitly unprojecting to 3d. In ECCV, pages 194–210. Springer, 2020. 1, 3, 4

    2020

  25. [33]

    End-to-end vectorized hd-map construction with piecewise bezier curve

    Limeng Qiao, Wenjie Ding, Xi Qiu, and Chi Zhang. End-to-end vectorized hd-map construction with piecewise bezier curve. In CVPR, pages 13218–13228, 2023. 7

    2023

  26. [34]

    Compressive transformers for long-range sequence modelling

    Jack W Rae, Anna Potapenko, Siddhant M Jayakumar, and Timothy P Lillicrap. Compressive transformers for long-range sequence modelling. In ICLR, 2019. 3

    2019

  27. [35]

    Tokenlearner: Adaptive space-time tokenization for videos

    Michael Ryoo, AJ Piergiovanni, Anurag Arnab, Mostafa Dehghani, and Anelia Angelova. Tokenlearner: Adaptive space-time tokenization for videos. In NeurIPS, volume 34, pages 12786–12797, 2021. 5

    2021

  28. [36]

    Token turing machines

    Michael S Ryoo, Keerthana Gopalakrishnan, Kumara Kahatapitiya, Ted Xiao, Kanishka Rao, Austin Stone, Yao Lu, Julian Ibarz, and Anurag Arnab. Token turing machines. InCVPR, pages 19070–19081, 2023. 3, 5

    2023

  29. [37]

    Lego-loam: Lightweight and ground-optimized lidar odometry and mapping on variable terrain

    Tixiao Shan and Brendan Englot. Lego-loam: Lightweight and ground-optimized lidar odometry and mapping on variable terrain. In IROS, pages 4758–4765. IEEE, 2018. 1, 3

    2018

  30. [38]

    Lio-sam: Tightly- coupled lidar inertial odometry via smoothing and mapping

    Tixiao Shan, Brendan Englot, Drew Meyers, Wei Wang, Carlo Ratti, and Daniela Rus. Lio-sam: Tightly- coupled lidar inertial odometry via smoothing and mapping. In IROS, pages 5135–5142. IEEE, 2020. 1, 3

    2020

  31. [39]

    Attention is all you need

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In NeurIPS, volume 30, 2017. 3, 5

    2017

  32. [40]

    Ltp: Lane-based trajectory prediction for autonomous driving

    Jingke Wang, Tengju Ye, Ziqing Gu, and Junbo Chen. Ltp: Lane-based trajectory prediction for autonomous driving. In CVPR, pages 17134–17142, 2022. 1

    2022

  33. [41]

    Stream query denoising for vectorized hd map construction

    Shuo Wang, Fan Jia, Yingfei Liu, Yucheng Zhao, Zehui Chen, Tiancai Wang, Chi Zhang, Xiangyu Zhang, and Feng Zhao. Stream query denoising for vectorized hd map construction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09112, 2024. 2, 3, 7

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Exploring object-centric temporal modeling for efficient multi-view 3d object detection

    Shihao Wang, Yingfei Liu, Tiancai Wang, Ying Li, and Xiangyu Zhang. Exploring object-centric temporal modeling for efficient multi-view 3d object detection. In ICCV, pages 3621–3631, 2023. 3

    2023

  35. [43]

    End-to-end video instance segmentation with transformers

    Yuqing Wang, Zhaoliang Xu, Xinlong Wang, Chunhua Shen, Baoshan Cheng, Hao Shen, and Huaxia Xia. End-to-end video instance segmentation with transformers. In CVPR, pages 8741–8750, 2021. 3, 6

    2021

  36. [44]

    Argoverse 2: Next generation datasets for self-driving perception and forecasting

    Benjamin Wilson, William Qi, Tanmay Agarwal, John Lambert, Jagjeet Singh, Siddhesh Khandelwal, Bowen Pan, Ratnesh Kumar, Andrew Hartnett, Jhony Kaesemodel Pontes, Deva Ramanan, Peter Carr, and James Hays. Argoverse 2: Next generation datasets for self-driving perception and fo...

    2021

  37. [45]

    Video instance segmentation

    Linjie Yang, Yuchen Fan, and Ning Xu. Video instance segmentation. In ICCV, pages 5188–5197, 2019. 3

    2019

  38. [46]

    Streammapnet: Streaming mapping network for vectorized online hd map construction

    Tianyuan Yuan, Yicheng Liu, Yue Wang, Yilun Wang, and Hang Zhao. Streammapnet: Streaming mapping network for vectorized online hd map construction. In WACV, pages 7356–7365, 2024. 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14

    2024

  39. [47]

    Online map vectorization for autonomous driving: A rasterization perspective

    Gongjie Zhang, Jiahao Lin, Shuang Wu, Zhipeng Luo, Yang Xue, Shijian Lu, Zuoguan Wang, et al. Online map vectorization for autonomous driving: A rasterization perspective. In NeurIPS, volume 36, 2023. 7

    2023

  40. [48]

    Loam: Lidar odometry and mapping in real-time

    Ji Zhang and Sanjiv Singh. Loam: Lidar odometry and mapping in real-time. In Robotics: Science and systems, volume 2, pages 1–9. Berkeley, CA, 2014. 1, 3

    2014

  41. [49]

    Online vectorized hd map construction using geometry

    Zhixin Zhang, Yiyuan Zhang, Xiaohan Ding, Fusheng Jin, and Xiangyu Yue. Online vectorized hd map construction using geometry. In ECCV, 2024. 7

    2024

  42. [50]

    Cross-view transformers for real-time map-view semantic segmenta- tion

    Brady Zhou and Philipp Krähenbühl. Cross-view transformers for real-time map-view semantic segmenta- tion. In CVPR, pages 13760–13769, 2022. 1, 3

    2022

  43. [51]

    Himap: Hybrid representation learning for end-to-end vectorized hd map construction

    Yi Zhou, Hui Zhang, Jiaqian Yu, Yifan Yang, Sangil Jung, Seung-In Park, and ByungIn Yoo. Himap: Hybrid representation learning for end-to-end vectorized hd map construction. In CVPR, pages 15396–15406,

  44. [52]

    Deformable detr: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection

    Xizhou Zhu, Weijie Su, Lewei Lu, Bin Li, Xiaogang Wang, and Jifeng Dai. Deformable detr: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection. In ICLR, 2021. 3, 5 12 A Appendix A.1 Clip-level Inference Scheme Our MapUnveiler runs in a clip-level. Specifically, thek-th clip ...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.