Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

MEMO-Bench: A Multiple Benchmark for Text-to-Image and Multimodal Large Language Models on Human Emotion Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.11235 v1 pith:CXZDEV24 submitted 2024-11-18 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords modelsanalysisemotionemotionshumanmemo-benchmllmscapabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has demonstrated significant capabilities in various fields, and in areas such as human-computer interaction (HCI), embodied intelligence, and the design and animation of virtual digital humans, both practitioners and users are increasingly concerned with AI's ability to understand and express emotion. Consequently, the question of whether AI can accurately interpret human emotions remains a critical challenge. To date, two primary classes of AI models have been involved in human emotion analysis: generative models and Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). To assess the emotional capabilities of these two classes of models, this study introduces MEMO-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark consisting of 7,145 portraits, each depicting one of six different emotions, generated by 12 Text-to-Image (T2I) models. Unlike previous works, MEMO-Bench provides a framework for evaluating both T2I models and MLLMs in the context of sentiment analysis. Additionally, a progressive evaluation approach is employed, moving from coarse-grained to fine-grained metrics, to offer a more detailed and comprehensive assessment of the sentiment analysis capabilities of MLLMs. The experimental results demonstrate that existing T2I models are more effective at generating positive emotions than negative ones. Meanwhile, although MLLMs show a certain degree of effectiveness in distinguishing and recognizing human emotions, they fall short of human-level accuracy, particularly in fine-grained emotion analysis. The MEMO-Bench will be made publicly available to support further research in this area.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EmoSpace: Immersive Affective Image Generation Guided by Fine-Grained Emotion Prototypes

    cs.CV 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    EmoSpace generates emotion-controlled images and VR panoramas via a dynamic bank of 1,024 CLIP-space emotion prototypes, reporting higher fine-grained emotional alignment than baseline diffusion models.

  2. Who is a Better Talker: Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment for AI-Generated Talking Heads

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new large dataset and the FSCD model improve automated quality scoring of AI-generated talking-head videos, beating 15 baselines in correlation with human ratings.

  3. NTIRE 2025 XGC Quality Assessment Challenge: Methods and Results

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    All 19 valid entries in the NTIRE 2025 XGC quality assessment challenge outperformed their track baselines at predicting human quality scores for user-generated video, AI-generated video, and talking heads.

Pith tools