Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Frequency-Aware Guidance for Blind Image Restoration via Diffusion Models

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A frequency-aware guidance loss based on the 2D Haar wavelet transform, added to diffusion-based blind image restoration, enforces consistency in both spatial and high-frequency domains and improves motion-deblurring PSNR by 3.72 dB over…

desk verdict Eq. 14 is a frequency-weighted spatial residual, not a new dual-domain constraint, but the simple plug-in still gets real PSNR gains and deserves a careful revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12450 v1 pith:WUWZFSID submitted 2024-11-19 cs.CV eess.IV

Jun Xiao , Zihang Lyu , Hao Xie , Cong Zhang , Yakun Ju , Changjian Shui , Kin-Man Lam This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVeess.IV
keywords blindimagerestorationdiffusionmodelsfrequency-awareguidancediscretewavelettransformposteriorsamplingdeblurringturbulencezero-shot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a training-free guidance loss for diffusion-based blind image restoration. The loss adds a frequency-domain term, computed with a two-dimensional Haar discrete wavelet transform, to the usual spatial consistency term used in posterior sampling. Plugged into the BlindDPS framework, it enforces consistency between the estimated degraded observation and the observed image in both spatial and high-frequency wavelet subbands. The authors report a 3.72 dB PSNR improvement over BlindDPS for motion deblurring on FFHQ, along with consistent gains in imaging through turbulence and mixed blur-plus-noise restoration.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the two-dimensional discrete wavelet transform with the four orthogonal Haar filters $k_{LL}$, $k_{LH}$, $k_{HL}$, and $k_{HH}$ of Eq. (9), applied with stride 2 to the estimated degraded observation $\hat{y}$. The low-frequency subband carries the spatial consistency term, while the three high-frequency subbands carry the new frequency guidance. At each sampling step, the gradient of the combined loss is backpropagated through $\hat{x}_0$ and $\hat{k}_0$, redirecting the reverse diffusion so that reconstructed details match the observed image's high-frequency structure.

What would settle it

Compare the proposed loss against a purely spatial high-pass baseline, such as an $\ell^2$ penalty on the Laplacian or gradient of $\hat{y}$ versus $y$, on the same FFHQ deblurring benchmark. If the gains over BlindDPS disappear, the improvement is due to edge emphasis rather than wavelet-specific frequency consistency.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that existing diffusion guidance, which measures data consistency only in the spatial domain, leaves high-frequency content unconstrained and thus produces distorted, texture-poor results. The paper argues that adding a weighted penalty on the high-frequency subbands ($LH$, $HL$, $HH$) of the two-dimensional Haar wavelet decomposition of $\hat{y} = \hat{k}_0 * \hat{x}_0$ versus those of the observation $y$ steers the sampling trajectory toward cleaner, more detailed images. This claim is embodied in the loss $\mathcal{L}_{\text{freq}} = \|y - \hat{y}\|_2^2 + \sum_{i \in \{LH,HL,HH\}} \lambda_i \|\hat{y}_i - y_i\|_2^2$, which can be added plug-and-play to pre-trained diffusion models and requires no training.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that matching the high-frequency wavelet subbands of the predicted degraded image $\hat{y}$ to those of the observed image $y$ is a valid signal for recovering the clean image, even though this penalty is a heuristic add-on rather than a consequence of the posterior.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, any guided diffusion restoration method with a differentiable forward model can adopt this frequency loss without retraining.
  • The weight $\lambda$ gives a direct handle on the reconstruction-perception tradeoff: larger values emphasize high-frequency fidelity at the risk of distortion, while smaller values produce smoother results.
  • Because the loss operates on the estimated degraded observation, it remains applicable when the degradation kernel is unknown and estimated jointly, as in BlindDPS.
  • The reported gains in mixed blur-plus-noise restoration suggest the frequency penalty is robust to more than one degradation at a time.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The frequency penalty is only as reliable as the estimated kernel: if $\hat{k}_0$ is wrong, matching $\hat{y}$'s high-frequency subbands to $y$'s could push content in the wrong direction. A direct test would compare frequency guidance computed on $\hat{x}_0$ versus $\hat{y}$.
  • Treating the high-frequency penalty as a sharpness prior suggests it may transfer to other inverse problems where texture fidelity matters, such as super-resolution, without architectural change.
  • Ablating the wavelet-specific choice against a simple spatial high-pass filter (for example, an $\ell^2$ penalty on the Laplacian or gradient of $\hat{y}$ versus $y$) would clarify whether the benefit comes from the wavelet subbands or just from emphasizing edges.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a training-free, plug-and-play guidance loss for blind image restoration with diffusion models. The loss, defined in Eq. (14), combines the standard spatial data-consistency term of BlindDPS with additional terms that match high-frequency Haar wavelet subbands of the estimated degraded observation to those of the observed image. The authors evaluate the method on blind deblurring, imaging through turbulence, and multiple-degradation restoration, reporting consistent PSNR improvements over BlindDPS on FFHQ and, for deblurring and turbulence, a 3.72 dB gain on FFHQ motion deblurring. Ablation studies examine the effect of the weighting hyperparameter λ and of adding individual high-frequency subbands.

Significance. If the empirical gains hold, the paper offers a useful, simple, and training-free modification to BlindDPS that improves reconstruction fidelity in several blind restoration tasks. The main strengths are the clear experimental setup, the inclusion of ablations on λ and on frequency components, and the reporting of three metrics (PSNR, LPIPS, FID) across three tasks. However, the central novelty claim—that the loss simultaneously enforces consistency in the spatial and frequency domains—is undermined by the mathematics of the Haar DWT, which makes Eq. (14) a reweighted version of the spatial residual rather than a genuinely new constraint. The paper also contains a clear regression on ImageNet turbulence (FID and LPIPS worse than BlindDPS) that is understated in the text, and the 'various diffusion models' claim is not supported because only BlindDPS is used as the base method. These issues are fixable but require additional experiments and revised claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3, Eq. (14)] The mathematical claim that Eq. (14) enforces consistency 'in both the spatial and frequency domains' is not supported, because the Haar DWT used in Eqs. (9)–(13) is an orthogonal transform up to a constant scale. For the residual d = y − ŷ, the squared energies of the four subbands satisfy ||d_LL||² + ||d_LH||² + ||d_HL||² + ||d_HH||² = 4||d||². Substituting into Eq. (14) with a common weight λ gives L_freq = (1 + 4λ)||d||² − λ||d_LL||², i.e., a reweighting of the spatial residual that upweights high frequencies and downweights the LL component. No genuinely new data-consistency constraint is added beyond the DPS loss. The paper never compares against a spatial-domain high-pass regularizer of matched scale (e.g., ||∇(y − ŷ)||² or the residual minus its LL subband). Without that baseline, the reported gains in Tables 1 and 5 cannot be attributed to the proposed frequency-domain mechanism; they may simply reflect a beneficial reweighting of the existing data-consistency term. This is load-bearing for the paper's central novelty claim and should be addressed by adding the baseline or by revising the claim to 'high-frequency-weighted data consistency'.
  2. [§4.2, Table 2] The ImageNet turbulence results do not support the general claim of improved perceptual quality. Compared with BlindDPS, the method improves PSNR (21.75 vs. 19.59) but worsens LPIPS (0.389 vs. 0.341) and FID (80.78 vs. 51.25). The text states that the method 'achieves comparable LPIPS results' on ImageNet, which understates a clear regression on two of three metrics. The paper should report and discuss this trade-off, and either temper the claim that the method provides 'the best visual quality' or explain why the ImageNet regression is acceptable (e.g., the domain gap from the FFHQ-pretrained diffusion model mentioned in the same section).
  3. [§4] The claim that the guidance loss is 'plug-and-play' and 'can be integrated into various diffusion models' is not demonstrated: all experiments use the BlindDPS framework with its pretrained image and kernel diffusion models. To support the generality claim, the authors should either add an experiment with at least one different base method (e.g., DPS or IIGDM with a known forward operator) or revise the claim to 'can be integrated into BlindDPS.'
minor comments (5)
  1. [Tables 2 and 3] BlindDPS is cited as [7] in Tables 2 and 3, but the correct reference is [5]; reference [7] is the MCG paper. Please fix the citation inconsistencies throughout.
  2. [§3.3, Eq. (14)] The notation y_i and ŷ_i is not defined; specify that these are the wavelet subbands of y and ŷ, respectively, and clarify whether a single λ is used for all three high-frequency subbands or a separate λ_i as written.
  3. [§4.4, Table 4] The ablation on λ is performed on only 100 images and without error bars; given the stochastic nature of diffusion sampling, report variance or multiple seeds.
  4. [§2.1] 'Two reserve diffusion processes' is a typo for 'two reverse diffusion processes.'
  5. [§1 and §5] The phrase 'simultaneously enforces content consistency in both the spatial and frequency domains' overstates the mechanism in light of the orthogonality argument; consider rewording to describe the loss as a frequency-weighted spatial consistency term.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the guidance loss is an additive term, and the wavelet-subband concern is a novelty/baseline issue rather than a circular derivation.

full rationale

The paper's frequency-aware guidance (Eq. 14) is an additive, training-free loss term appended to the BlindDPS sampling gradient (Eq. 8); it is not a fitted parameter later reported as a prediction, and the reported PSNR/FID/LPIPS improvements are external measurements. The strongest reduction concern is that the four Haar filters in Eq. 9 form an orthogonal 2x2 DWT, so the high-frequency subband residuals in Eq. 14 are linear transforms of the same residual y - \hat y used in the spatial term; hence the 'frequency-domain consistency' is mathematically a high-frequency reweighting of the existing spatial consistency and does not inject independent information. That undercuts the strength of the 'simultaneous spatial-frequency' novelty claim and motivates the missing spatial high-pass baseline, but it is a mathematical/interpretation issue, not circularity: no equation is defined in terms of its own conclusion, and no self-citation is load-bearing. The self-citations (e.g., refs. 40, 42) appear only as background motivation for the perceptual importance of high frequencies. Score is 2 only because of these minor background self-citations; the central empirical claim is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a few free parameters and domain assumptions. The only fitted quantity is the frequency guidance weight lambda (0.1). The paper relies on the DPS approximation and the BlindDPS kernel and tile-map estimators, and on the heuristic that matching high-frequency wavelet bands of the degraded observation improves restoration. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • lambda (high-frequency guidance weight) = 0.1 in main experiments; swept over 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0
    Controls the strength of the high-frequency wavelet consistency terms in Eq. 14. It is chosen empirically after an ablation on 100 images, and Table 4 shows the main PSNR result varies from 25.08 to 26.41 depending on its value.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Haar DWT filters in Eq. 9 are orthogonal up to scale, so the wavelet-domain loss is a linear re-weighting of spatial errors.
    Invoked in Section 3.3 through the definition of the four wavelet filters and the computation of subbands; this is standard linear algebra for the Haar transform.
  • domain assumption The pre-trained BlindDPS diffusion model and its kernel and tile-map estimators provide a valid generative prior and reliable degradation estimates.
    The method is evaluated on top of checkpoints and settings from Chung et al. [5]; if those estimates are poor, the frequency guidance is computed against a wrong yhat.
  • domain assumption Matching high-frequency wavelet subbands of the estimated degraded observation to those of the observed degraded image drives the latent toward the clean image.
    Section 3.3, Eq. 14; this is the paper's core modeling assumption and is not proven, only validated empirically on selected benchmarks.
  • domain assumption The DPS approximation that grad_x log p(y|x) is proportional to grad_x ||y - khat * xhat0||^2 remains valid when the frequency loss is added.
    Inherited from BlindDPS and DPS in Section 3.2, Eq. 8; the added frequency loss assumes the same point-estimate approximation still guides sampling correctly.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Frequency-Aware Guidance for Blind Image Restoration via Diffusion Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WUWZFSID

@misc{pith2026241112450,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Frequency-Aware Guidance for Blind Image Restoration via Diffusion Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WUWZFSID}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12450}
}
read the original abstract

Blind image restoration remains a significant challenge in low-level vision tasks. Recently, denoising diffusion models have shown remarkable performance in image synthesis. Guided diffusion models, leveraging the potent generative priors of pre-trained models along with a differential guidance loss, have achieved promising results in blind image restoration. However, these models typically consider data consistency solely in the spatial domain, often resulting in distorted image content. In this paper, we propose a novel frequency-aware guidance loss that can be integrated into various diffusion models in a plug-and-play manner. Our proposed guidance loss, based on 2D discrete wavelet transform, simultaneously enforces content consistency in both the spatial and frequency domains. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in three blind restoration tasks: blind image deblurring, imaging through turbulence, and blind restoration for multiple degradations. Notably, our method achieves a significant improvement in PSNR score, with a remarkable enhancement of 3.72\,dB in image deblurring. Moreover, our method exhibits superior capability in generating images with rich details and reduced distortion, leading to the best visual quality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12450 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Visualization of the blurry images, motion kernels, images generated by Blind￾DPS [5] and ours, and the corresponding ground-truth images. Recent advancements in denoising diffusion models have shown their remark￾able ability in image synthesis. Inspired by the inherent generative prior pro￾vided by diffusion models, various diffusion-based IR methods have emerged. Notably, zero-shot diffusion-based IR models have g… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Visual results of the images generated by MPRNet [45], DeblurGANv2 [20], BlindDPS [5], and our method. setting by [5] and utilized another diffusion model to predict the tile map. This diffusion model has been trained on 50,000 randomly generated tile maps, and other model configurations are kept unchanged to ensure a fair comparison. To generate the low-quality images during testing, the point spread function (PSF)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Visual results of the images generated by MPRNet [45], DeblurGANv2 [20], BlindDPS [5], and our method. 4.3 Experiments on Multiple Degradations Real-world images often suffer from various types of degradation, so we further evaluate our proposed method on images with multiple degradations, which is a more challenging setting compared to the previous experiments. Specifically, we evaluated our method on 10,000 images… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visual results of the images generated by MPRNet [45], DeblurGANv2 [20], BlindDPS [5], and our method. The average PSNR, LPIPS, and FID scores of different restoration models on the FFHQ dataset with multiple degradations are illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/fu…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visual results of our method with various values of the hyper-parameter λ, where λ is set to 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 Experiments on Frequency Components. Our method based on the 2D DWT decomposes images into one low-frequency component, denoted by LL, and three hi…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Visual results of the models with different combinations of frequency compo￾nents, where H1 = {LH}, H2 = {LH, HL}, and H3 = {LH, HL, HH}. 5 Conclusion In this paper, we propose a frequency-aware guidance loss for blind image restora￾tion, which integrates with various …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Guidance in the Frequency Domain Enables High-Fidelity Sampling at Low CFG Scales

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    By boosting high-frequency guidance while keeping low-frequency guidance modest, frequency-decoupled guidance improves image quality and diversity metrics across several diffusion models.

  2. MultLFG: Training-free Multi-LoRA composition using Frequency-domain Guidance

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MultLFG merges multiple LoRA adapters by adaptively weighting them in wavelet frequency subbands per denoising timestep, improving multi-concept composition on the ComposLoRA benchmark compared to prior training-free methods.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 42(12), 3071–3087 (2019)

    Chen, C., Xiong, Z., Tian, X., Zha, Z.J., Wu, F.: Real-world image denoising with deep boosting. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 42(12), 3071–3087 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI)

    Cheng, X., Zhang, N., Yu, J., Wang, Y., Li, G., Zhang, J.: Null-space diffusion sam- pling for zero-shot point cloud completion. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). vol. 2 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Cho, S.J., Ji, S.W., Hong, J.P., Jung, S.W., Ko, S.J.: Rethinking coarse-to-fine ap- proach in single image deblurring. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 4641–4650 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02938 (2021)

    Choi, J., Kim, S., Jeong, Y., Gwon, Y., Yoon, S.: Ilvr: Conditioning method for denoising diffusion probabilistic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02938 (2021)

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Chung, H., Kim, J., Kim, S., Ye, J.C.: Parallel diffusion models of operator and image for blind inverse problems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 6059–6069 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    ICLR (2022)

    Chung, H., Kim, J., Mccann, M.T., Klasky, M.L., Ye, J.C.: Diffusion posterior sampling for general noisy inverse problems. ICLR (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35, 25683–25696 (2022)

    Chung, H., Sim, B., Ryu, D., Ye, J.C.: Improving diffusion models for inverse problems using manifold constraints. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35, 25683–25696 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    In: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Chung, H., Sim, B., Ye, J.C.: Come-closer-diffuse-faster: Accelerating conditional diffusion models for inverse problems through stochastic contraction. In: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 12413–12422 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2023)

    Cui, Y., Ren, W., Cao, X., Knoll, A.: Image restoration via frequency selection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    In: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Deng, X., Yang, R., Xu, M., Dragotti, P.L.: Wavelet domain style transfer for an ef- fective perception-distortion tradeoff in single image super-resolution. In: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 3076–3085 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Advances in neural information processing systems34, 8780–8794 (2021)

    Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A.: Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. Advances in neural information processing systems34, 8780–8794 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14353 (2023)

    Fabian, Z., Tinaz, B., Soltanolkotabi, M.: Diracdiffusion: Denoising and incremen- tal reconstruction with assured data-consistency. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14353 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Fei, B., Lyu, Z., Pan, L., Zhang, J., Yang, W., Luo, T., Zhang, B., Dai, B.: Genera- tive diffusion prior for unified image restoration and enhancement. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 9935–9946 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    In: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Feng, B.T., Smith, J., Rubinstein, M., Chang, H., Bouman, K.L., Freeman, W.T.: Score-based diffusion models as principled priors for inverse imaging. In: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 10520– 10531 (2023) 16 Jun Xiao et al

    2023

  7. [15]

    Advances in neural information processing systems33, 6840–6851 (2020)

    Ho, J., Jain, A., Abbeel, P.: Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems33, 6840–6851 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Nature Machine Intelligence3(10), 876–884 (2021)

    Jin, D., Chen, Y., Lu, Y., Chen, J., Wang, P., Liu, Z., Guo, S., Bai, X.: Neutralizing the impact of atmospheric turbulence on complex scene imaging via deep learning. Nature Machine Intelligence3(10), 876–884 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems35, 23593–23606 (2022)

    Kawar, B., Elad, M., Ermon, S., Song, J.: Denoising diffusion restoration models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems35, 23593–23606 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.11888 (2022)

    Kawar, B., Song, J., Ermon, S., Elad, M.: Jpeg artifact correction using denoising diffusion restoration models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.11888 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems34, 21757–21769 (2021)

    Kawar, B., Vaksman, G., Elad, M.: Snips: Solving noisy inverse problems stochasti- cally. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems34, 21757–21769 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Kupyn, O., Martyniuk, T., Wu, J., Wang, Z.: Deblurgan-v2: Deblurring (orders- of-magnitude) faster and better. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 8878–8887 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems32 (2019)

    Laine,S.,Karras,T.,Lehtinen,J.,Aila,T.:High-qualityself-superviseddeepimage denoising. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems32 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Li, J., Dai, T., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Wang, Z., Xia, S.T.: Fsr: A general frequency- oriented framework to accelerate image super-resolution networks. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. pp. 1343–1350 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops

    Liu, P., Zhang, H., Zhang, K., Lin, L., Zuo, W.: Multi-level wavelet-cnn for image restoration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. pp. 773–782 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Lugmayr, A., Danelljan, M., Romero, A., Yu, F., Timofte, R., Van Gool, L.: Re- paint: Inpainting using denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 11461– 11471 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Magid, S.A., Zhang, Y., Wei, D., Jang, W.D., Lin, Z., Fu, Y., Pfister, H.: Dy- namic high-pass filtering and multi-spectral attention for image super-resolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 4288–4297 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 39(2), 342–355 (2016)

    Pan, J., Hu, Z., Su, Z., Yang, M.H.:l_0-regularized intensity and gradient prior for deblurring text images and beyond. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 39(2), 342–355 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence40(10), 2315–2328 (2017)

    Pan, J., Sun, D., Pfister, H., Yang, M.H.: Deblurring images via dark channel prior. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence40(10), 2315–2328 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2023)

    Qiao, Y., Shao, M., Wang, L., Zuo, W.: Learning depth-density priors for fourier- based unpaired image restoration. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Ren, D., Zhang, K., Wang, Q., Hu, Q., Zuo, W.: Neural blind deconvolution using deep priors. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 3341–3350 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    In: International conference on machine learning

    Sohl-Dickstein, J., Weiss, E., Maheswaranathan, N., Ganguli, S.: Deep unsuper- vised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 2256–2265. PMLR (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2022)

    Song, J., Vahdat, A., Mardani, M., Kautz, J.: Pseudoinverse-guided diffusion mod- els for inverse problems. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Sun, H., Bouman, K.L.: Deep probabilistic imaging: Uncertainty quantification and multi-modal solution characterization for computational imaging. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. pp. 2628–2637 (2021) FAG-Diff: Frequency-Aware Guidance Diffusion 17

    2021

  25. [33]

    The Astrophysical Journal932(2), 99 (2022)

    Sun, H., Bouman, K.L., Tiede, P., Wang, J.J., Blunt, S., Mawet, D.:α-deep prob- abilistic inference (α-dpi): efficient uncertainty quantification from exoplanet as- trometry to black hole feature extraction. The Astrophysical Journal932(2), 99 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision

    Tsai, F.J., Peng, Y.T., Lin, Y.Y., Tsai, C.C., Lin, C.W.: Stripformer: Strip trans- former for fast image deblurring. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 146–162. Springer (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.00490 (2022)

    Wang, Y., Yu, J., Zhang, J.: Zero-shot image restoration using denoising diffusion null-space model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.00490 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence43(10), 3365–3387 (2020)

    Wang, Z., Chen, J., Hoi, S.C.: Deep learning for image super-resolution: A survey. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence43(10), 3365–3387 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning (ICML-11)

    Welling, M., Teh, Y.W.: Bayesian learning via stochastic gradient langevin dy- namics. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning (ICML-11). pp. 681–688. Citeseer (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    IEEE Transactions on Multimedia25, 1111–1124 (2022)

    Wu, S., Dong, C., Qiao, Y.: Blind image restoration based on cycle-consistent network. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia25, 1111–1124 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    IEEE Trans- actions on Multimedia (2023)

    Xiao, J., Jiang, X., Zheng, N., Yang, H., Yang, Y., Yang, Y., Li, D., Lam, K.M.: Online video super-resolution with convolutional kernel bypass grafts. IEEE Trans- actions on Multimedia (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Neu- rocomputing 464, 408–420 (2021)

    Xiao, J., Liu, T., Zhao, R., Lam, K.M.: Balanced distortion and perception in single-image super-resolution based on optimal transport in wavelet domain. Neu- rocomputing 464, 408–420 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)

    Xiao, J., Zhao, R., Lai, S.C., Jia, W., Lam, K.M.: Deep progressive convolutional neural network for blind super-resolution with multiple degradations. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). pp. 2856–2860. IEEE (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    Signal Processing: Image Communication96, 116299 (2021)

    Xiao, J., Zhao, R., Lam, K.M.: Bayesian sparse hierarchical model for image de- noising. Signal Processing: Image Communication96, 116299 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Xie, W., Song, D., Xu, C., Xu, C., Zhang, H., Wang, Y.: Learning frequency-aware dynamic network for efficient super-resolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 4308–4317 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Yoo,J.,Lee,S.h.,Kwak,N.:Imagerestorationbyestimatingfrequencydistribution of local patches. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 6684–6692 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Zamir, S.W., Arora, A., Khan, S., Hayat, M., Khan, F.S., Yang, M.H., Shao, L.: Multi-stage progressive image restoration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 14821–14831 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Zhang, G., Ji, J., Zhang, Y., Yu, M., Jaakkola, T., Chang, S.: Towards coherent image inpainting using denoising diffusion implicit models (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Zhang, K., Luo, W., Zhong, Y., Ma, L., Stenger, B., Liu, W., Li, H.: Deblurring by realistic blurring. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 2737–2746 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Zhang, R., Isola, P., Efros, A.A., Shechtman, E., Wang, O.: The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 586–595 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.