Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

DLBacktrace: A Model Agnostic Explainability for any Deep Learning Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.12643 v2 pith:UYPYA65U submitted 2024-11-19 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords dlbacktracemodelmodelsdeepinterpretabilitylearningacrossarchitectures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid growth of AI has led to more complex deep learning models, often operating as opaque "black boxes" with limited transparency in their decision-making. This lack of interpretability poses challenges, especially in high-stakes applications where understanding model output is crucial. This work highlights the importance of interpretability in fostering trust, accountability, and responsible deployment. To address these challenges, we introduce DLBacktrace, a novel, model-agnostic technique designed to provide clear insights into deep learning model decisions across a wide range of domains and architectures, including MLPs, CNNs, and Transformer-based LLM models. We present a comprehensive overview of DLBacktrace and benchmark its performance against established interpretability methods such as SHAP, LIME, and GradCAM. Our results demonstrate that DLBacktrace effectively enhances understanding of model behavior across diverse tasks. DLBacktrace is compatible with models developed in both PyTorch and TensorFlow, supporting architectures such as BERT, ResNet, U-Net, and custom DNNs for tabular data. The library is open-sourced and available at https://github.com/AryaXAI/DLBacktrace .

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Faithfulness to Refusal: A Causal Audit of Neuron Selectors

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A causal audit via neuron-row zeroing shows attribution methods (LRP, IG) faithfully identify dispensable neurons and can install refusal behavior, while rank-stability proxies systematically miss selector failures.

  2. xai_evals : A Framework for Evaluating Post-Hoc Local Explanation Methods

    cs.LG 2025-02 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A technical report introducing xai_evals, a Python package that wraps existing explainability and metric libraries without adding new methods or validated results.

Pith tools