Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 4 cited by

Triple Evolution Pathways to Black Hole Low-Mass X-ray Binaries: Insights from V404 Cygni

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that black hole low-mass X-ray binaries like V404 Cygni form most efficiently in hierarchical triple star systems, driven by eccentric Kozai-Lidov oscillations, and that the black holes in such systems receive almost no…

desk verdict A solid, well-argued update to the triple channel for BH-LMXBs, but the headline claim that triples dominate rests on two survival assumptions the paper itself flags as unmodeled. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15644 v2 pith:PDXYO5VI submitted 2024-11-23 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE

Cheyanne Shariat , Smadar Naoz , Kareem El-Badry , Kyle Akira Rocha , Vicky Kalogera , Alexander P. Stephan , Kevin B. Burdge , Isabel Angelo This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.HE
keywords blackholelow-massX-raybinarieshierarchicaltriplestarseccentricKozai-LidovmechanismcommonenvelopeevolutionnatalkicksbinarypopulationsynthesisV404Cygnitidalcircularization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that black hole low-mass X-ray binaries (BH-LMXBs) like V404 Cygni form most efficiently through hierarchical triple star evolution, not through isolated binary evolution. It argues that the recently discovered distant companion of V404 Cygni is the fingerprint of a formation channel in which a wide inner binary is pumped to extreme eccentricity by the Kozai-Lidov mechanism, allowing tides to shrink the orbit and start mass transfer without a common-envelope phase. The simulations also imply that the black hole in V404 Cygni received essentially no natal kick (at most about 5 km/s), and that roughly 80 percent of Galactic BH-LMXBs may have formed in triples. If right, the standard picture of BH-LMXB formation needs revision, and many observed BH-LMXBs may harbor undetected wide companions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the eccentric Kozai-Lidov (EKL) effect in a hierarchical triple: a distant tertiary star slowly exchanges angular momentum with a much wider inner binary, periodically driving the inner eccentricity to extreme values when the orbits are mutually inclined near 90 degrees. In this paper EKL is coupled to detailed stellar evolution models, equilibrium tidal dissipation, and natal kick prescriptions, and it does two jobs: it pushes wide inner binaries into Roche contact (either starting a common envelope at wide separation, or skipping the envelope entirely by acting after the black hole forms), and it produces the spin-orbit misalignment predicted for the resulting LMXBs.

What would settle it

A decisive check is to search for wide tertiaries around all roughly 25 dynamically confirmed Galactic BH-LMXBs using astrometry and radial velocities; finding that fewer than half of them have companions at $10^{3}$-$10^{4}$ au would rule out the claim that about 80 percent of BH-LMXBs formed in triples. Alternatively, one BH-LMXB with a bound tertiary and a systemic velocity requiring a natal kick above about 5 km/s would break the no-kick requirement for triple survival.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that V404 Cygni-like BH-LMXBs are made by the eccentric Kozai-Lidov channel: the inner binary starts with a separation of order 100 au and the tertiary orbits at 1000-10000 au, wide enough that the massive primary avoids overflowing its Roche lobe before collapsing to a black hole. After the black hole forms, secular torques from the tertiary drive the inner binary's eccentricity to 0.9-0.9999, so the pericenter drops to a few solar radii, where tidal dissipation circularizes and shrinks the orbit until the low-mass companion fills its Roche lobe and starts transferring mass. The authors find that such configurations reproduce V404 Cygni's observed orbital architecture, that they require black hole natal kicks no larger than about 5 km/s because larger kicks unbind the fragile wide tertiary, and that in their population synthesis triples produce BH-LMXBs 2-3 times more efficiently than isolated binaries, implying about 80 percent of the Galactic BH-LMXB population formed through triple evolution.

Load-bearing premise

The calculations assume that the chance a common envelope shrinks the inner binary without merging its stars is the same for triple inner binaries and isolated binaries, even though triples enter common envelopes at wider separations with more orbital energy available to eject the envelope.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • V404 Cygni most likely formed without a common-envelope phase: its 3500 au tertiary lies in the most probable range predicted by the no-CE triple channel.
  • Galactic BH-LMXB counts should be dominated by triple-formed systems (about 80 percent), so many of the roughly 25 dynamically confirmed BH-LMXBs may have wide tertiaries that are currently undetected.
  • Black holes in wide triples must receive negligible natal kicks (at most about 5 km/s); a BH-LMXB with a bound tertiary and a larger inferred kick would break the channel.
  • Triple-formed BH-LMXBs should show misaligned black hole spin-orbit angles at the start of mass transfer, which can appear as retrograde accretion disks or changing jet orientations.
  • EKL-driven eccentricity causes about twice as many inner binaries to enter a common envelope as in isolated binaries, and they enter it at wider separations, so the triple channel boosts BH-LMXB formation even when the envelope is retained.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If about 80 percent of BH-LMXBs formed in triples but wide tertiaries are easily unbound by galactic tides and flybys, the present-day fraction of BH-LMXBs with detected tertiaries is probably much lower than the formation fraction; a survey of astrometry or radial velocities around nearby BH-LMXBs could test this prediction.
  • The paper's bimodal kick inference (some black holes form with negligible kicks, others with tens of km/s) could be sharpened by measuring space velocities of detached black hole binaries with luminous companions, since those systems should also lack strong kicks if the no-kick population is large.
  • The eccentric mass-transfer events that begin at periastron in the radial channel may be observable as short-lived X-ray flares or micro-tidal disruption events, offering a way to catch BH-LMXB formation in action.
  • A direct test of the common-envelope assumption would be to compare the survival fraction of isolated-binary common envelopes with that of triples entering CE at wider separations; if triple CE survival is higher than the borrowed isolated-binary value, the predicted dominance of the triple channel only strengthens.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper uses ~50,000 hierarchical triple simulations, combining EKL secular dynamics with MESA/POSYDON single-star evolution and BH natal kicks, to explain the observed V404 Cygni triple and to argue that triple evolution is a major, likely dominant, formation channel for BH-LMXBs. The authors identify a non-CE 'eccentric' channel, in which a wide inner binary avoids Roche overflow until after BH formation, then undergoes EKL-driven eccentricity oscillations and tidal orbital decay to begin mass transfer; they also discuss a CE-mediated channel whose survival probabilities are imported from isolated-binary POSYDON models. From these populations they infer weak BH natal kicks (≲5 km/s) for V404-like systems, predict outer separations of 10^3–10^4 au and spin-orbit misalignment for triple-formed BH-LMXBs, and estimate that about 80% of Galactic BH-LMXBs may come from triples.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper supplies a concrete, dynamical explanation for the first robustly detected BH-LMXB with a wide tertiary and sharpens the case that at least some stellar BHs form with negligible kicks. The study is valuable because the orbital predictions—outer separations, outer eccentricities, mutual inclinations, and spin-orbit misalignments—emerge from the dynamics rather than being fit to V404 Cygni, and because the comparison with a POSYDON isolated-binary population gives a transparent baseline. The use of MESA-based single-star radii instead of SSE, the explicit handling of natal kicks on both orbits, and the self-identified limitations of the post-Roche and CE treatments are also strengths. The quantitative Galactic-rate and dominance claims, however, inherit uncertainties from two acknowledged assumptions: the fate of eccentric Roche-lobe crossings and the transfer of isolated-binary CE outcome fractions to triples.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2–2.3, Table 2, §6] The headline efficiency numbers in Table 2 (4.58% for triples vs 1.90% for binaries) and the derived 80% Galactic fraction in §3.4.2 assume that every simulation halted at rp < 2 RRoche and then integrated with tides alone (Eqs. 6–7) becomes a surviving, circularized LMXB. Section 6 explicitly concedes that the outcomes of eccentric mass transfer are not entirely understood and that some of these systems could instead manifest as micro-TDEs. Because the inner mass ratios are extreme and the donor begins Roche-lobe overflow on a highly eccentric orbit, this assumption is load-bearing: even a moderate merger/micro-TDE fraction would reduce the triple channel's LMXB yield below the isolated-binary yield. Please add an explicit sensitivity test that varies the survival fraction of eccentric Roche crossings, or state a conservative lower bound on the triple yield, and re-evaluate Conclusion 3 in that light.
  2. [§3.4.1, Table 2, §6] The CE outcome probabilities are taken from isolated-binary POSYDON models and applied to triple inner binaries, even though the paper notes that triples enter CE at wider separations with more available orbital energy: Section 3.4.1 states 'Assuming similar fractions between the models is not completely accurate' and Section 6 states that the predicted rates are 'highly dependent' on POSYDON CE outcomes, which predict about 92% CE mergers. This is a direct uncertainty in the CE-mediated component of the triple-vs-binary efficiency comparison. The non-CE channel is less affected, but the relative efficiency and the Galactic rate estimate are not robust to this assumption. Please quantify the sensitivity of Table 2 and the 80% estimate to the assumed CE survival fraction (for example, by varying the survival probability from 0% to roughly 20%) or restrict the population-level dominance claim to the non-CE channel.
  3. [Table 1] Table 1 contains internal inconsistencies with the stated definitions. For Models 3 and 4, N_BH (301 and 2964, respectively) exceeds N_total − N_Roche (105 and 1875, respectively), yet the table caption defines N_BH as the number of systems that formed a black hole in the inner binary without mass transfer with the BH progenitor. If the definition is correct, the N_BH entries or the N_Roche entries for these models need correction; if the definition is different for these models, the caption must say so. Because the 14% LMXB fraction quoted in §3.1 and the relative channel efficiencies in §3.4 derive from these counts, the discrepancy should be resolved before the quantitative conclusions can be checked.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.2, Eq. (4)] The Roche-limit definition is written as RRoche,ij = Rj / µRoche,ji, but the surrounding text and the later criterion rp < 2 RRoche do not specify which of the two inner-binary stars is meant by Rj; please clarify the notation and the index convention.
  2. [Figure 4] The caption and text explain that the observed 3500 au separation is converted into a semi-major axis range using factors of 1/2–3, but it is not stated whether the gray-shaded a2 region is log-uniform in that range or whether the factor should be interpreted as asymmetric upper and lower errors; a brief note in the caption would remove ambiguity.
  3. [§2.3 and Figure 2] The term 'LMXB formation' is used both for the first Roche-lobe crossing at high eccentricity and for the post-tidal circularized state; these are distinct events, and the text would be easier to follow if it consistently distinguished 'mass-transfer onset' from 'post-circularization LMXB state'.
  4. [Figure 6] The top panel label 'N LMXBs' is a histogram count of systems, but the caption does not state that the plotted quantity is a binned number; please relabel or explain in the caption.
  5. [Appendix C] The reference in Section 6 to 'Figure 4, 7, and 9' cites Figure 9, which is located in Appendix C; please add an explicit 'Appendix C' cross-reference to help the reader.
  6. [References] The reference list contains duplicated entries for Hurley et al. (2002) and for Tauris & van den Heuvel (2006); these should be merged and the citation style made uniform.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No material circularity: V404's orbital and kick conclusions are emergent from the stated dynamical model; self-citations are background and acknowledged uncertainties are not hidden.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation, that wide inner binaries with tertiaries at 1000-10000 au are driven by EKL to high eccentricity and then circularized by tides into BH-LMXBs, is not equivalent to its inputs. The initial masses are set by V404 observations (m3=1.2 Msun, m2 drawn from 1.2-2 Msun, and m1 chosen to yield a ~9 Msun BH), but the predicted distributions of a2, e2, mutual inclination, LMXB formation time, and the 14% conversion of detached BH binaries into LMXBs emerge from integrating the secular three-body equations, MESA/POSYDON stellar tracks, tides, and kick prescriptions rather than being inverses of those masses. The efficiency comparison with isolated binaries uses identical inner-binary initial conditions and imports POSYDON CE outcomes; Section 3.4.1 warns that 'Assuming similar fractions between the models is not completely accurate' and Section 6 concedes 'some of these binaries could instead manifest as micro-TDEs rather than BH-LMXBs.' These are explicit modeling uncertainties, not circular reductions. Self-citations to Naoz (2016), Naoz et al. (2016), and prior Shariat et al. papers supply the standard EKL/tidal formalism and earlier channel studies; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole support for the paper's rates. The Section 5 claim of roughly isotropic BH spin-orbit misalignment inherits part of its breadth from the stated uniform initial spin-orbit prior, but the qualitative misalignment also arises dynamically from EKL-driven orbital flips and is not load-bearing for the main formation-channel conclusions. Score 2 reflects routine self-citation with no load-bearing circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a standard secular three-body framework, a specific tidal dissipation model, a momentum-conserving kick prescription, and several population-synthesis choices. The most consequential inputs are the primary ZAMS mass tuned to reproduce the observed BH mass, the tidal viscous time, the initial distribution choices, and the borrowed common-envelope survival fractions. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • Primary ZAMS mass (m1) = 21.7 M_sun (PS20) or 27 M_sun (F12d)
    Chosen so that the BH remnant mass is about 9.2 M_sun, matching the observed V404 Cygni BH mass; stated in Section 2.2.
  • Secondary initial mass range (m2) = uniform 1.2-2.0 M_sun
    The lower bound follows the observed tertiary mass and the upper bound follows the constraint that a 2 M_sun star evolves off the main sequence in about 1 Gyr; this range is tuned to V404-like systems in Section 2.2.
  • Tidal viscous time (tv) = 5 yr
    Adopted following prior EKL/tidal studies and used in Equations 6 and 7; the tidal shrinking and circularization rates scale directly with tv, so the LMXB formation fraction depends on this assumption.
  • Apsidal motion constant (ks) = 0.25
    Assumed in the tidal equations; the paper notes this corresponds to a tidal quality factor Q approximately 1.8e6.
  • BH natal kick distribution = Maxwellian with NS sigma=265 km/s, scaled by 1.4 M_sun/M_BH
    This is an assumption, not a fit; it determines the surviving triple fraction and the paper's conclusion about weak kicks.
  • Initial period and eccentricity sampling = log-uniform periods 0.1-10^4 yr; uniform eccentricities; isotropic inclinations
    The grid is not drawn from an observed period distribution for massive triples, and the Galactic rate estimates in Section 3.4.2 inherit this choice.
  • Common-envelope survival probabilities = about 92% merger, about 5% survive
    Borrowed from isolated binary POSYDON runs and applied to triple inner binaries, despite the paper's admission in Section 3.4.1 that triples enter CE at wider separations with more orbital energy.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Hierarchical triple secular equations of motion to octupole order with 1PN precession describe the long-term evolution.
    Used throughout the simulations; equations from Naoz (2016) as cited in Section 2.1.1.
  • domain assumption The Mardling and Aarseth (2001) criterion and epsilon < 0.1 define which initial triples are stable and should be evolved.
    Section 2.2 applies these criteria and discards systems that violate them, which shapes the sampled population.
  • domain assumption The equilibrium tide model with tv=5 yr and ks=0.25 captures the tidal circularization and shrinking of the inner binary.
    Section 2.1.1 and Equations 6-7; the LMXB formation channel depends on efficient tidal dissipation at periastron.
  • ad hoc to paper The inner binary decouples from the tertiary after Roche crossing and can be evolved with tides alone.
    Section 2.3 states 'Once the star crosses its Roche Lobe, we expect the inner binary to decouple from the tertiary'; this ignores post-RL mass transfer and continued secular coupling.
  • ad hoc to paper Highly eccentric periastron Roche crossing leads to rapid circularization and LMXB formation rather than a merger or micro-TDE.
    Section 6 says 'we assume that highly eccentric systems that cross their Roche Limit at periastron will rapidly circularize and become BH-LMXBs'; the paper acknowledges micro-TDEs are a possible alternative.
  • ad hoc to paper Common-envelope outcome probabilities from isolated binaries apply to triple inner binaries.
    Section 3.4.1 explicitly says 'Assuming similar fractions between the models is not completely accurate' because triples enter CE at wider separations.
  • ad hoc to paper The sampled initial conditions are representative of the BH-LMXB progenitor population.
    Section 2.2 and Section 3.4.2 use log-uniform periods, uniform eccentricities, and fixed or narrow mass ranges; the Galactic number estimate also assumes f_m1>20, f_q, and f_binary/triple from external literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Triple Evolution Pathways to Black Hole Low-Mass X-ray Binaries: Insights from V404 Cygni." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PDXYO5VI

@misc{pith2026241115644,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Triple Evolution Pathways to Black Hole Low-Mass X-ray Binaries: Insights from V404 Cygni},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PDXYO5VI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15644}
}
abstract

A recent discovery shows that V404 Cygni, a prototypical black hole low-mass X-ray binary (BH-LMXB) is a hierarchical triple: the BH and donor star are orbited by a $1.2$ M$_{\odot}$ tertiary at a distance of at least $3500$ au. Motivated by this system, we evolve a grid of $\sim50,000$ triple star systems, spanning a broad range of initial orbits. Our calculations employ {\tt MESA} stellar evolution models, using {\tt POSYDON}, and self-consistently track the effects of eccentric Kozai-Lidov (EKL) oscillations, mass loss, tides, and BH natal kicks. In our simulations, the progenitors of V404 Cygni-like systems have initial outer separations of $1000 - 10000$ au and inner separations of $\sim100$ au, such that they avoid Roche lobe overflow most of the time. Later on, EKL oscillations drive the inner binary to high eccentricities until tides shrink the orbit and mass transfer begins. Notably, such systems only form in simulations with very weak black hole natal kicks ($\lesssim 5\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$) because stronger kicks unbind the tertiaries. Our simulations also predict a population of BH-LMXB triples that form via the classical common-envelope channel, when the BH progenitor does overflow its Roche lobe. The formation rate for this channel is also higher in triples than in isolated binaries because early EKL oscillations cause inner binaries with a wider range of initial separations to enter and survive a common envelope. Our calculations demonstrate that at least some stellar BHs form with extremely weak kicks, and that triple evolution is a significant formation channel for BH-LMXBs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15644 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of V404 Cygni in a hierarchical triple. The triple system contains a close ‘inner binary’ with a semi￾major axis and eccentricity of a1 and e1, respectively. The distant tertiary orbits the inner binary, creating the ‘outer binary’, which has a respective semi-major axis and eccen￾tricity of a2 and e2. In the inner binary, a m1 = 9 M⊙ black hole accretes from a m2 = 0.7 M⊙ evolved companion in a circular o… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effect of tides on the periastron of interacting binaries. The top row shows the outer semi-major axis, a2, as a function of the periastron distance at the last step of the simulations. Square points denote triples with inner BH-LMXBs, and all circular points are detached BH binaries. The bottom row is the same as the top but shows the parameters after tidal evolution. The left and right columns present the same dat… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Time evolution of a triple system where the inner binary became an LMXB. Top: The evolution of the inner (a1) and outer orbit (a2) semi-major axes (orange and red), the pericenter distance (rperi, gray), and the Roche radius of the secondary in the inner binary (RRoche,2, cyan). Middle: The evolution of the mutual inclination (imutual = i1 + i2) between the inner and outer orbits (green) and the spin-orbit angle of … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Outer-orbit’s semi-major axis (a2) and inner-orbit’s eccentricity (e1) as a function of inner-orbit’s semi-major axis (a1) at the last simulation timestep. The left column shows the results for simulations that do not include BH natal kicks, while the right column incl…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Percentage of BH-LMXBs formed in the differ￾ent populations. The top row shows the percentage of BH￾LMXBs out of all systems that avoided a CE, whereas the bottom row includes all systems in the model’s population, including those that underwent a CE phase. Specific va…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Characteristics of LMXBs at the onset of mass transfer. At the top, we show the distribution of tLMXB. In the middle panel, we plot the pericenter distance, rp = a1(1 − e1), at the time of LMXB formation (tLMXB) as a function of tLMXB. In the bottom, we plot tLMXB vs. …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Predictions for the eccentricity of the outer orbit (e2) and the spin-orbit angle of the inner black hole (ΨBH). We color the points by the mutual inclination of the triple, which is mostly likely be near 45◦ or 135◦ (e.g., [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: POSYDON vs SSE single stellar evolution as implemented in the complete triples dynamics code. This figure is the same system as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Corner plot comparing the initial (subscript ‘i‘)to the final orbital parameters (subscript ‘f‘). We plot the distributions for the initial/final inner semi-major axis (a1), outer semi-major axis (a2), inner eccentricity (e1), outer eccentricity (e2), and mutual inclin…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Histograms of initial (top) and final (bottom) probability density distributions of triples with a black hole in the inner binary. We include the triples that have detached inner binaries (gray), BH-LMXB inner binaries (blue), and BH-LMXB inner binaries with similar o…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spectroscopic Detection of a 2.9-hour Orbit in a Long Period Radio Transient

    astro-ph.SR 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The 2.9-hour radio period of GLEAM-X J0704-37 is the orbital period of a compact white dwarf plus M dwarf binary at about 400 pc.

  2. The IACOB project XIX. Revisiting massive-star evolution with empirical TAMS constraints: updated models, overshoot calibration, and the population of blue supergiants

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Massive-star models require mass-dependent core overshoot (α_ov ≈ 0.18–0.45) to match the empirical TAMS, but still fail to explain the velocity dependence of the TAMS and the observed blue supergiant population.

  3. Mixed origins: strong natal kicks for some black holes and none for others

    astro-ph.GA 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Gaia-based kinematic comparison shows black holes have mixed natal kicks: several are much faster than 90% of their local stars, while others match the local population, supporting both strong-kick and weak-kick for...

  4. Unveiling the nature of G6096: a likely hierarchical triple system

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    G6096 is likely a hierarchical triple of main-sequence stars rather than a binary hosting a white dwarf or neutron star.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

171 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J., & Kalogera, V

    Andrews, J. J., & Kalogera, V. 2022, ApJ, 930, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac66d6

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac66d6 2022

  2. [2]

    2022, AJ, 163, 227, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac6094

    Angelo, I., Naoz, S., Petigura, E., et al. 2022, AJ, 163, 227, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac6094

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac6094 2022

  3. [3]

    L., et al

    Antonini, F., Chatterjee, S., Rodriguez, C. L., et al. 2016, ApJ, 816, 65, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/816/2/65

    doi:10.3847/0004-637x/816/2/65 2016

  4. [4]

    Gorski, M. D. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 5455, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab345

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab345 2021

  5. [5]

    F., & Cordes, J

    Arzoumanian, Z., Chernoff, D. F., & Cordes, J. M. 2002, ApJ, 568, 289, doi: 10.1086/338805

    doi:10.1086/338805 2002

  6. [6]

    Atri, P., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Bahramian, A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 3116, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2335

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2335 2019

  7. [7]

    2023, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, 120, doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0 94-1

    Bahramian, A., & Degenaar, N. 2023, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, 120, doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0 94-1

    doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0 2023

  8. [8]

    S., & Correia, A

    Bataille, M., Libert, A. S., & Correia, A. C. M. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 4749, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1758

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1758 2018

Show all 171 references
  1. [10]

    J., & Holman, M

    Bhaskar, H., Li, G., Hadden, S., Payne, M. J., & Holman, M. J. 2021, AJ, 161, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abcbfc

    2021 doi

  2. [11]

    B., El-Badry, K., Kara, E., et al

    Burdge, K. B., El-Badry, K., Kara, E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.03719, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.03719

    2024 doi arXiv

  3. [12]

    D., Craig, P

    Chakrabarti, S., Simon, J. D., Craig, P. A., et al. 2023, AJ, 166, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/accf21

    2023 doi

  4. [13]

    N., & Ding, G

    Chen, X., Zhang, S. N., & Ding, G. Q. 2006, ApJ, 650, 299, doi: 10.1086/506338

    2006 doi

  5. [14]

    Chou, Y., & Grindlay, J. E. 2001, ApJ, 563, 934, doi: 10.1086/324038

    2001 doi

  6. [15]

    H., & Parkinson, J

    Clark, D. H., & Parkinson, J. H. 1975, Nature, 258, 408, doi: 10.1038/258408a0

    1975 doi

  7. [16]

    Corbet, R. H. D., Asai, K., Dotani, T., & Nagase, F. 1994, ApJL, 436, L15, doi: 10.1086/187622

    1994 doi

  8. [17]

    M., & Chernoff, D

    Cordes, J. M., & Chernoff, D. F. 1998, ApJ, 505, 315, doi: 10.1086/306138

    1998 doi

  9. [18]

    M., Casares, J., Mu˜ noz-Darias, T., et al

    Corral-Santana, J. M., Casares, J., Mu˜ noz-Darias, T., et al. 2016, A&A, 587, A61, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527130

    2016 doi

  10. [19]

    C., Bahramian, A., Naoz, S., et al

    Dage, K. C., Bahramian, A., Naoz, S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 1347, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae578 Triple Evolution Pathways to Black Hole Low-Mass X-ray Binaries 25 Dashwood Brown, C., Gandhi, P., & Zhao, Y. 2024, MNRAS, 527, L82, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad151

    2024 doi

  11. [20]

    2016, ApJ, 825, 71, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/71 Duchˆ ene, G., Bouvier, J., Moraux, E., et al

    Dosopoulou, F., & Kalogera, V. 2016, ApJ, 825, 71, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/71 Duchˆ ene, G., Bouvier, J., Moraux, E., et al. 2013, A&A, 555, A137, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321691

    2016 doi

  12. [21]

    1991, A&A, 248, 485

    Duquennoy, A., & Mayor, M. 1991, A&A, 248, 485

    1991

  13. [22]

    Eggleton, P. P. 1983, ApJ, 268, 368, doi: 10.1086/160960

    1983 doi

  14. [23]

    P., Kiseleva, L

    Eggleton, P. P., Kiseleva, L. G., & Hut, P. 1998, ApJ, 499, 853, doi: 10.1086/305670

    1998 doi

  15. [24]

    P., & Kiseleva-Eggleton, L

    Eggleton, P. P., & Kiseleva-Eggleton, L. 2001, ApJ, 562, 1012, doi: 10.1086/323843

    2001 doi

  16. [25]

    P., & Verbunt, F

    Eggleton, P. P., & Verbunt, F. 1986, MNRAS, 220, 13P, doi: 10.1093/mnras/220.1.13P

    1986 doi

  17. [26]

    2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480, 4884, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2186

    El-Badry, K., & Rix, H.-W. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480, 4884, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2186

    2018 doi

  18. [27]

    El-Badry, K., Rix, H.-W., & Weisz, D. R. 2018, ApJL, 860, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaca9c

    2018 doi

  19. [28]

    2023a, MNRAS, 518, 1057, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3140

    El-Badry, K., Rix, H.-W., Quataert, E., et al. 2023a, MNRAS, 518, 1057, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3140

    doi

  20. [29]

    2023b, MNRAS, 521, 4323, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad799

    El-Badry, K., Rix, H.-W., Cendes, Y., et al. 2023b, MNRAS, 521, 4323, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad799

    doi

  21. [30]

    D., Reggiani, H., et al

    El-Badry, K., Simon, J. D., Reggiani, H., et al. 2024a, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 7, 27, doi: 10.33232/001c.116675

    doi

  22. [31]

    W., et al

    El-Badry, K., Rix, H.-W., Latham, D. W., et al. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.00089, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.00089

    doi arXiv

  23. [32]

    C., Pringle, J

    Fabian, A. C., Pringle, J. E., & Rees, M. J. 1975, MNRAS, 172, 15, doi: 10.1093/mnras/172.1.15P

    1975 doi

  24. [33]

    2007, ApJ, 669, 1298, doi: 10.1086/521702

    Fabrycky, D., & Tremaine, S. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1298, doi: 10.1086/521702

    2007 doi

  25. [34]

    C., & Anninos, P

    Fragile, P. C., & Anninos, P. 2005, ApJ, 623, 347, doi: 10.1086/428433

    2005 doi

  26. [35]

    C., Blaes, O

    Fragile, P. C., Blaes, O. M., Anninos, P., & Salmonson, J. D. 2007, ApJ, 668, 417, doi: 10.1086/521092

    2007 doi

  27. [36]

    2017, MNRAS, 467, 451, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx106

    Fragione, G., Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R., & Kroupa, P. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 451, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx106

    2017 doi

  28. [37]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 47, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1651

    Perna, R. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 47, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1651

    2019 doi

  29. [38]

    2017, NewA, 55, 32, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2017.03.002

    Fragione, G., & Loeb, A. 2017, NewA, 55, 32, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2017.03.002

    2017 doi

  30. [39]

    Fragione, G., Loeb, A., & Rasio, F. A. 2020, ApJL, 902, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abbc0a

    2020 doi

  31. [40]

    2013a, ApJL, 776, L31, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/776/2/L31

    Basu-Zych, A. 2013a, ApJL, 776, L31, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/776/2/L31

    doi

  32. [41]

    2009, ApJ, 697, 1057, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1057

    Fragos, T., Willems, B., Kalogera, V., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1057, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1057

    2009 doi

  33. [42]

    2013b, ApJ, 764, 41, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/41

    Fragos, T., Lehmer, B., Tremmel, M., et al. 2013b, ApJ, 764, 41, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/41

    doi

  34. [43]

    J., Bavera, S

    Fragos, T., Andrews, J. J., Bavera, S. S., et al. 2023, ApJS, 264, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac90c1

    2023 doi

  35. [44]

    L., Belczynski, K., Wiktorowicz, G., et al

    Fryer, C. L., Belczynski, K., Wiktorowicz, G., et al. 2012, ApJ, 749, 91, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/91

    2012 doi

  36. [45]

    L., Woosley, S

    Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., & Hartmann, D. H. 1999, ApJ, 526, 152, doi: 10.1086/307992

    1999 doi

  37. [46]

    Giesler, M., Clausen, D., & Ott, C. D. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 1853, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty659

    2018 doi

  38. [47]

    J., Gilfanov, M., & Sunyaev, R

    Grimm, H. J., Gilfanov, M., & Sunyaev, R. 2002, A&A, 391, 923, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020826

    2002 doi

  39. [48]

    E., Bailyn, C

    Grindlay, J. E., Bailyn, C. D., Cohn, H., et al. 1988, ApJL, 334, L25, doi: 10.1086/185305

    1988 doi

  40. [49]

    Grishin, E., & Perets, H. B. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 4993, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac706

    2022 doi

  41. [50]

    B., Zenati, Y., & Michaely, E

    Grishin, E., Perets, H. B., Zenati, Y., & Michaely, E. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 276, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3096

    2017 doi

  42. [51]

    2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 865, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadae2

    Hamers, A., Bar-Or, B., Petrovich, C., & Antonini, F. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 865, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadae2

    2018 doi

  43. [52]

    S., & Thompson, T

    Hamers, A. S., & Thompson, T. A. 2019, ApJ, 882, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab321f

    2019 doi

  44. [53]

    Hansen, B. M. S., & Phinney, E. S. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 569, doi: 10.1093/mnras/291.3.569

    1997 doi

  45. [54]

    Hills, J. G. 1976, MNRAS, 175, 1P, doi: 10.1093/mnras/175.1.1P

    1976 doi

  46. [55]

    2022, ApJ, 934, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7787

    Hoang, B.-M., Naoz, S., & Sloneker, M. 2022, ApJ, 934, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7787

    2022 doi

  47. [57]

    R., Pols, O

    Hurley, J. R., Pols, O. R., & Tout, C. A. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 543, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.x

    2000

  48. [60]

    2011, ApJ, 730, 76, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/76

    Ivanova, N. 2011, ApJ, 730, 76, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/76

    2011 doi

  49. [61]

    2015, MNRAS, 447, 2181, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2582

    Ivanova, N., Justham, S., & Podsiadlowski, P. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 2181, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2582

    2015 doi

  50. [62]

    2020, Common Envelope Evolution, doi: 10.1088/2514-3433/abb6f0

    Ivanova, N., Justham, S., & Ricker, P. 2020, Common Envelope Evolution, doi: 10.1088/2514-3433/abb6f0

    2020 doi

  51. [64]

    2013, A&A Rv, 21, 59, doi: 10.1007/s00159-013-0059-2

    Ivanova, N., Justham, S., Chen, X., et al. 2013, A&A Rv, 21, 59, doi: 10.1007/s00159-013-0059-2

    2013 doi

  52. [65]

    S., Bauer, E

    Jermyn, A. S., Bauer, E. B., Schwab, J., et al. 2023, ApJS, 265, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acae8d

    2023 doi

  53. [66]

    G., & Nelemans, G

    Jonker, P. G., & Nelemans, G. 2004, MNRAS, 354, 355, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08193.x

    2004

  54. [67]

    Y., & Hoang, B.-M

    Jurado, C., Naoz, S., Lam, C. Y., & Hoang, B.-M. 2024, ApJ, 971, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad55ee

    2024 doi

  55. [68]

    2006, MNRAS, 366, 1415, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09907.x

    Justham, S., Rappaport, S., & Podsiadlowski, P. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 1415, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09907.x

    2006

  56. [69]

    A., & Raymond, S

    Kaib, N. A., & Raymond, S. N. 2014, ApJ, 782, 60, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/60

    2014 doi

  57. [70]

    1996, ApJ, 471, 352, doi: 10.1086/177974 —

    Kalogera, V. 1996, ApJ, 471, 352, doi: 10.1086/177974 —. 1999a, ApJ, 521, 723, doi: 10.1086/307562 —. 1999b, ApJ, 521, 723, doi: 10.1086/307562 —. 2000, ApJ, 541, 319, doi: 10.1086/309400

    1996 doi

  58. [71]

    Kalogera, V., & Webbink, R. F. 1996, ApJ, 458, 301, doi: 10.1086/176813 —. 1998, ApJ, 493, 351, doi: 10.1086/305085

    1996 doi

  59. [72]

    M., Bailes, M., Manchester, R

    Kaspi, V. M., Bailes, M., Manchester, R. N., Stappers, B. W., & Bell, J. F. 1996, Nature, 381, 584, doi: 10.1038/381584a0

    1996 doi

  60. [73]

    S., & Robinson, E

    Khargharia, J., Froning, C. S., & Robinson, E. L. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1105, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1105

    2010 doi

  61. [74]

    2023, ApJL, 952, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace526

    Kimball, C., Imperato, S., Kalogera, V., et al. 2023, ApJL, 952, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace526

    2023 doi

  62. [75]

    2016, MNRAS, 462, 464, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1598

    King, A., & Nixon, C. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 464, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1598

    2016 doi

  63. [76]

    G., Eggleton, P

    Kiseleva, L. G., Eggleton, P. P., & Mikkola, S. 1998, MNRAS, 300, 292, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01903.x

    1998

  64. [77]

    A., Kiminki, D

    Kobulnicky, H. A., Kiminki, D. C., Lundquist, M. J., et al. 2014, ApJS, 213, 34, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/213/2/34

    2014 doi

  65. [78]

    1962, AJ, 67, 591, doi: 10.1086/108790

    Kozai, Y. 1962, AJ, 67, 591, doi: 10.1086/108790

    1962 doi

  66. [79]

    L., & Rasio, F

    Kremer, K., Chatterjee, S., Rodriguez, C. L., & Rasio, F. A. 2018, ApJ, 852, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa99df

    2018 doi

  67. [80]

    L., Lachat, M., & Rasio, F

    Kremer, K., Lu, W., Rodriguez, C. L., Lachat, M., & Rasio, F. A. 2019, ApJ, 881, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2e0c

    2019 doi

  68. [82]

    2022, PhRvD, 105, 024017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.024017

    Kuntz, A. 2022, PhRvD, 105, 024017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.024017

    2022 doi

  69. [83]

    Lai, D., Bildsten, L., & Kaspi, V. M. 1995, ApJ, 452, 819, doi: 10.1086/176350

    1995 doi

  70. [84]

    D., Berkeley, M., Zezas, A., et al

    Lehmer, B. D., Berkeley, M., Zezas, A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 789, 52, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/52

    2014 doi

  71. [85]

    1918, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 19, 156

    Lense, J., & Thirring, H. 1918, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 19, 156

    1918

  72. [86]

    M., Massey, P., Olsen, K

    Levesque, E. M., Massey, P., Olsen, K. A. G., et al. 2005, ApJ, 628, 973, doi: 10.1086/430901

    2005 doi

  73. [87]

    Lidov, M. L. 1962, Planet. Space Sci., 9, 719, doi: 10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0

    1962 doi

  74. [88]

    Lim, H., & Rodriguez, C. L. 2020, PhRvD, 102, 064033, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.064033

    2020 doi

  75. [89]

    2017, ApJL, 846, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8727

    Liu, B., & Lai, D. 2017, ApJL, 846, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8727

    2017 doi

  76. [90]

    J., & Lai, D

    Liu, B., Mu˜ noz, D. J., & Lai, D. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 747, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2396

    2015 doi

  77. [91]

    R., Bailes, M., & Harrison, P

    Lorimer, D. R., Bailes, M., & Harrison, P. A. 1997, MNRAS, 289, 592, doi: 10.1093/mnras/289.3.592

    1997 doi

  78. [92]

    X., & Naoz, S

    Lu, C. X., & Naoz, S. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 1506, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz036

    2019 doi

  79. [93]

    G., & Lorimer, D

    Lyne, A. G., & Lorimer, D. R. 1994, Nature, 369, 127, doi: 10.1038/369127a0

    1994 doi

  80. [94]

    Maccarone, T. J. 2002, MNRAS, 336, 1371, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05876.x

    2002

  81. [95]

    2016, MNRAS, 456, 578, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2733

    Mandel, I. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 578, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2733

    2016 doi

  82. [96]

    A., & Aarseth, S

    Mardling, R. A., & Aarseth, S. J. 2001, MNRAS, 321, 398, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.03974.x

    2001

  83. [97]

    G., Tout, C

    Martin, R. G., Tout, C. A., & Pringle, J. E. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 188, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13148.x Mata Sanchez, D., Torres, M. A. P., Casares, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.13310, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.13310

    2008

  84. [98]

    Michaely, E., & Perets, H. B. 2014, ApJ, 794, 122, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/122 —. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 4188, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw368 —. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 4924, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2720

    2014 doi

  85. [99]

    Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Jonker, P. G., Nelemans, G., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 1440, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14404.x

    2009

  86. [100]

    Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Tetarenko, A. J., Sivakoff, G. R., et al. 2019, Nature, 569, 374, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1152-0

    2019 doi

  87. [101]

    Mirabel, I. F. 2017, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 324, New Frontiers in Black Hole Astrophysics, ed. A. Gomboc, 303–306, doi: 10.1017/S1743921316012904

    2017 doi

  88. [102]

    2001, Nature, 413, 139, doi: 10.1038/35093060

    Guglielmetti, F. 2001, Nature, 413, 139, doi: 10.1038/35093060

    2001 doi

  89. [103]

    F., & Rodrigues, I

    Mirabel, I. F., & Rodrigues, I. 2003, Science, 300, 1119, doi: 10.1126/science.1083451

    2003 doi

  90. [104]

    2017, ApJS, 230, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6

    Moe, M., & Di Stefano, R. 2017, ApJS, 230, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6

    2017 doi

  91. [105]

    R., Miller, J

    Morningstar, W. R., Miller, J. M., Reis, R. C., & Ebisawa, K. 2014, ApJL, 784, L18, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/784/2/L18

    2014 doi

  92. [106]

    E., Kajava, J

    Motta, S. E., Kajava, J. J. E., S´ anchez-Fern´ andez, C., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 1797, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1699 Triple Evolution Pathways to Black Hole Low-Mass X-ray Binaries 27

    2017 doi

  93. [107]

    2020, MNRAS, 498, 665, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2492

    Mushkin, J., & Katz, B. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 665, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2492

    2020 doi

  94. [108]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.16847, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.16847

    Nagarajan, P., & El-Badry, K. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.16847, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.16847

    2024 doi arXiv

  95. [109]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 441, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315

    Naoz, S. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 441, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315

    2016 doi

  96. [110]

    Naoz, S., & Fabrycky, D. C. 2014, ApJ, 793, 137, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/137

    2014 doi

  97. [111]

    2011, Nature, 473, 187, doi: 10.1038/nature10076 —

    Teyssandier, J. 2011, Nature, 473, 187, doi: 10.1038/nature10076 —. 2013a, MNRAS, 431, 2155, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt302

    2011 doi

  98. [112]

    P., & Rasio, F

    Naoz, S., Fragos, T., Geller, A., Stephan, A. P., & Rasio, F. A. 2016, ApJL, 822, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/822/2/L24

    2016 doi

  99. [113]

    2013b, ApJ, 773, 187, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/187

    Naoz, S., Kocsis, B., Loeb, A., & Yunes, N. 2013b, ApJ, 773, 187, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/187

    doi

  100. [114]

    Offner, S. S. R., Moe, M., Kratter, K. M., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 275, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.10066 Paczy´ nski, B. 1967, AcA, 17, 287

    2023 doi arXiv

  101. [115]

    A., & Sukhbold, T

    Patton, R. A., & Sukhbold, T. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 2803, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3029

    2020 doi

  102. [116]

    2011, ApJS, 192, 3, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    2011 doi

  103. [117]

    2013, ApJS, 208, 4, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 4, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    2013 doi

  104. [118]

    2015, ApJS, 220, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., et al. 2015, ApJS, 220, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    2015 doi

  105. [119]

    B., et al

    Paxton, B., Schwab, J., Bauer, E. B., et al. 2018, ApJS, 234, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8

    2018 doi

  106. [120]

    2019, ApJS, 243, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241

    Paxton, B., Smolec, R., Schwab, J., et al. 2019, ApJS, 243, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241

    2019 doi

  107. [121]

    B., & Kratter, K

    Perets, H. B., & Kratter, K. M. 2012, ApJ, 760, 99, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/760/2/99

    2012 doi

  108. [122]

    B., Li, Z., Lombardi, James C., J., & Milcarek, Stephen R., J

    Perets, H. B., Li, Z., Lombardi, James C., J., & Milcarek, Stephen R., J. 2016, ApJ, 823, 113, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/113

    2016 doi

  109. [123]

    C., & Rees, M

    Podsiadlowski, P., Cannon, R. C., & Rees, M. J. 1995, MNRAS, 274, 485, doi: 10.1093/mnras/274.2.485

    1995 doi

  110. [124]

    2010, MNRAS, 406, 840, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16751.x

    Podsiadlowski, P., Ivanova, N., Justham, S., & Rappaport, S. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 840, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16751.x

    2010

  111. [125]

    2000, ApJ, 529, 946, doi: 10.1086/308323

    Podsiadlowski, P., & Rappaport, S. 2000, ApJ, 529, 946, doi: 10.1086/308323

    2000 doi

  112. [126]

    2003, MNRAS, 341, 385, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06464.x Portegies Zwart, S

    Podsiadlowski, P., Rappaport, S., & Han, Z. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 385, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06464.x Portegies Zwart, S. F., Verbunt, F., & Ergma, E. 1997, A&A, 321, 207, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9701037

    2003

  113. [127]

    V., et al

    Poutanen, J., Veledina, A., Berdyugin, A. V., et al. 2022, Science, 375, 874, doi: 10.1126/science.abl4679

    2022 doi

  114. [128]

    1967, Boletin de los Observatorios Tonantzintla y Tacubaya, 4, 86

    Poveda, A., Ruiz, J., & Allen, C. 1967, Boletin de los Observatorios Tonantzintla y Tacubaya, 4, 86

    1967

  115. [129]

    2015, ApJ, 798, 117, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/798/2/117

    Prodan, S., & Murray, N. 2015, ApJ, 798, 117, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/798/2/117

    2015 doi

  116. [130]

    Rappaport, S., Verbunt, F., & Joss, P. C. 1983, ApJ, 275, 713, doi: 10.1086/161569

    1983 doi

  117. [131]

    J., McClintock, J

    Reid, M. J., McClintock, J. E., Steiner, J. F., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 2, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/2

    2014 doi

  118. [133]

    P., & Nelemans, G

    Repetto, S., Igoshev, A. P., & Nelemans, G. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 298, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx027

    2017 doi

  119. [134]

    2015, MNRAS, 453, 3341, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1753

    Repetto, S., & Nelemans, G. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 3341, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1753

    2015 doi

  120. [135]

    A., Kalogera, V., Doctor, Z., et al

    Rocha, K. A., Kalogera, V., Doctor, Z., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 133, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5955

    2024 doi

  121. [136]

    L., Morscher, M., Pattabiraman, B., et al

    Rodriguez, C. L., Morscher, M., Pattabiraman, B., et al. 2015, PhRvL, 115, 051101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.051101

    2015 doi

  122. [137]

    2023, MNRAS, 525, 706, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2366

    Romagnolo, A., Belczynski, K., Klencki, J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 706, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2366

    2023 doi

  123. [138]

    Romani, R. W. 1998, A&A, 333, 583

    1998

  124. [139]

    C., Naoz, S., & Geller, A

    Rose, S. C., Naoz, S., & Geller, A. M. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 2480, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1846

    2019 doi

  125. [140]

    M., Naoz, S., Morris, M

    Salas, J. M., Naoz, S., Morris, M. R., & Stephan, A. P. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 3029, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1515

    2019 doi

  126. [141]

    E., de Koter, A., et al

    Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., et al. 2012, Science, 337, 444, doi: 10.1126/science.1223344

    2012 doi

  127. [142]

    B., Lacour, S., et al

    Sana, H., Le Bouquin, J. B., Lacour, S., et al. 2014, ApJS, 215, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/215/1/15

    2014 doi

  128. [143]

    F., Willems, B., Kalogera, V., & Rasio, F

    Sepinsky, J. F., Willems, B., Kalogera, V., & Rasio, F. A. 2007, ApJ, 667, 1170, doi: 10.1086/520911

    2007 doi

  129. [144]

    A., Bunn, J

    Shahbaz, T., Ringwald, F. A., Bunn, J. C., et al. 1994, MNRAS, 271, L10, doi: 10.1093/mnras/271.1.L10

    1994 doi

  130. [145]

    Shakura, N. I. 1973, Soviet Ast., 16, 756

    1973

  131. [146]

    J., & Thompson, T

    Shappee, B. J., & Thompson, T. A. 2013, ApJ, 766, 64, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/64

    2013 doi

  132. [147]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.06257, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.06257

    Shariat, C., Naoz, S., El-Badry, K., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.06257, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.06257

    2024 doi arXiv

  133. [148]

    Shariat, C., Naoz, S., Hansen, B. M. S., et al. 2023, ApJL, 955, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf76b

    2023 doi

  134. [149]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 1085, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01730-y 28 Shariat et al

    Shenar, T., Sana, H., Mahy, L., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 1085, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01730-y 28 Shariat et al

    2022 doi

  135. [150]

    F., Reis, R

    Steiner, J. F., Reis, R. C., Fabian, A. C., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 2552, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22128.x

    2012

  136. [151]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.13307, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.13307

    Shariat, C. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.13307, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.13307

    2024 doi arXiv

  137. [152]

    P., Naoz, S., & Gaudi, B

    Stephan, A. P., Naoz, S., & Gaudi, B. S. 2018, AJ, 156, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad6e5 —. 2021, ApJ, 922, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac22a9

    2018 doi

  138. [153]

    P., Naoz, S., Ghez, A

    Stephan, A. P., Naoz, S., Ghez, A. M., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 3494, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1220

    2016 doi

  139. [154]

    P., Naoz, S., Ghez, A

    Stephan, A. P., Naoz, S., Ghez, A. M., et al. 2019, in AAS/Division of Dynamical Astronomy Meeting, Vol. 51, AAS/Division of Dynamical Astronomy Meeting, 202.02

    2019

  140. [155]

    2021, PhRvD, 103, 063040, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063040

    Su, Y., Lai, D., & Liu, B. 2021, PhRvD, 103, 063040, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063040

    2021 doi

  141. [156]

    Janka, H. T. 2016, ApJ, 821, 38, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/38

    2016 doi

  142. [157]

    E., & Ricker, P

    Taam, R. E., & Ricker, P. M. 2010, NewAR, 54, 65, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2010.09.027

    2010 doi

  143. [158]

    M., & van den Heuvel, E

    Tauris, T. M., & van den Heuvel, E. P. J. 2006a, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed. W. H. G. Lewin & M. van der Klis, Vol. 39, 623–665, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0303456 —. 2006b, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed. W. H. G. Lewin & M. van der Klis, Vol. 39, 623–665, d...

    doi arXiv

  144. [159]

    1991, Nature, 351, 39, doi: 10.1038/351039a0

    Tavani, M. 1991, Nature, 351, 39, doi: 10.1038/351039a0

    1991 doi

  145. [160]

    Gladstone, J. C. 2016, ApJS, 222, 15, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/222/2/15

    2016 doi

  146. [161]

    E., Arzoumanian, Z., Camilo, F., & Lyne, A

    Thorsett, S. E., Arzoumanian, Z., Camilo, F., & Lyne, A. G. 1999, ApJ, 523, 763, doi: 10.1086/307771

    1999 doi

  147. [162]

    Toonen, S., Boekholt, T. C. N., & Portegies Zwart, S. 2022, A&A, 661, A61, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141991

    2022 doi

  148. [163]

    2016, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 3, 6, doi: 10.1186/s40668-016-0019-0

    Toonen, S., Hamers, A., & Portegies Zwart, S. 2016, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 3, 6, doi: 10.1186/s40668-016-0019-0

    2016 doi

  149. [164]

    B., & Hamers, A

    Toonen, S., Perets, H. B., & Hamers, A. S. 2018, A&A, 610, A22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731874

    2018 doi

  150. [165]

    2020, A&A, 640, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936835 van Paradijs, J., & White, N

    Bandopadhyay, D. 2020, A&A, 640, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936835 van Paradijs, J., & White, N. 1995, ApJL, 447, L33, doi: 10.1086/309558 van Son, L. A. C., Roy, S. K., Mandel, I., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.02484, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.02484

    2020 doi arXiv

  151. [166]

    1981, A&A, 100, L7 Vigna-G´ omez, A., Willcox, R., Tamborra, I., et al

    Verbunt, F., & Zwaan, C. 1981, A&A, 100, L7 Vigna-G´ omez, A., Willcox, R., Tamborra, I., et al. 2024, PhRvL, 132, 191403, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.191403

    1981 doi

  152. [167]

    2007, A&A, 468, 49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066614

    Voss, R., & Gilfanov, M. 2007, A&A, 468, 49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066614

    2007 doi

  153. [168]

    2024, Nature Astronomy, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02359-9

    Wang, S., Zhao, X., Feng, F., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02359-9

    2024 doi

  154. [169]

    C., Naoz, S., & Hansen, B

    Weldon, G. C., Naoz, S., & Hansen, B. M. S. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.20377, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.20377

    2024 doi arXiv

  155. [170]

    E., & van Paradijs, J

    White, N. E., & van Paradijs, J. 1996, ApJL, 473, L25, doi: 10.1086/310380

    1996 doi

  156. [171]

    2005, ApJ, 625, 324, doi: 10.1086/429557

    Willems, B., Henninger, M., Levin, T., et al. 2005, ApJ, 625, 324, doi: 10.1086/429557

    2005 doi

  157. [172]

    2014, ApJ, 790, 119, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/119

    Wong, T.-W., Valsecchi, F., Ansari, A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 790, 119, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/119

    2014 doi

  158. [173]

    2012, ApJ, 747, 111, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/111

    Wong, T.-W., Valsecchi, F., Fragos, T., & Kalogera, V. 2012, ApJ, 747, 111, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/111

    2012 doi

  159. [174]

    E., & Weaver, T

    Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. 1995, ApJS, 101, 181, doi: 10.1086/192237

    1995 doi

  160. [175]

    Zahn, J. P. 1977, A&A, 57, 383

    1977

  161. [176]

    Zhang, E., Naoz, S., & Will, C. M. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.08271, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2301.08271

    2023 doi arXiv

  162. [177]

    2012, A&A, 546, A36, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219015

    Zhang, Z., Gilfanov, M., & Bogd´ an,´A. 2012, A&A, 546, A36, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219015

    2012 doi

  163. [178]

    A., & Gualandris, A

    Zubovas, K., Wynn, G. A., & Gualandris, A. 2013, ApJ, 771, 118, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/771/2/118

    2013 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.