REVIEW 9 cited by
O1 Replication Journey -- Part 2: Surpassing O1-preview through Simple Distillation, Big Progress or Bitter Lesson?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper presents a critical examination of current approaches to replicating OpenAI's O1 model capabilities, with particular focus on the widespread but often undisclosed use of knowledge distillation techniques. While our previous work explored the fundamental technical path to O1 replication, this study reveals how simple distillation from O1's API, combined with supervised fine-tuning, can achieve superior performance on complex mathematical reasoning tasks. Through extensive experiments, we show that a base model fine-tuned on simply tens of thousands of samples O1-distilled long-thought chains outperforms O1-preview on the American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) with minimal technical complexity. Moreover, our investigation extends beyond mathematical reasoning to explore the generalization capabilities of O1-distilled models across diverse tasks: hallucination, safety and open-domain QA. Notably, despite training only on mathematical problem-solving data, our models demonstrated strong generalization to open-ended QA tasks and became significantly less susceptible to sycophancy after fine-tuning. We deliberately make this finding public to promote transparency in AI research and to challenge the current trend of obscured technical claims in the field. Our work includes: (1) A detailed technical exposition of the distillation process and its effectiveness, (2) A comprehensive benchmark framework for evaluating and categorizing O1 replication attempts based on their technical transparency and reproducibility, (3) A critical discussion of the limitations and potential risks of over-relying on distillation approaches, our analysis culminates in a crucial bitter lesson: while the pursuit of more capable AI systems is important, the development of researchers grounded in first-principles thinking is paramount.
Forward citations
Cited by 9 Pith papers
-
AlphaOne: Reasoning Models Thinking Slow and Fast at Test Time
A stochastic scheduling framework that modulates slow-to-fast reasoning in large reasoning models at test time, improving accuracy while reducing token usage.
-
Discriminative Policy Optimization for Token-Level Reward Models
Q-RM learns token-level rewards from preference data via a discriminative policy and improves RL alignment on math, reading, and instruction-following benchmarks.
-
Which Data Attributes Stimulate Math and Code Reasoning? An Investigation via Influence Functions
Influence-function attribution shows high-difficulty math and low-difficulty code training data best improve math and code reasoning, and difficulty-based reweighting improves benchmark performance.
-
DiagnosisArena: Benchmarking Diagnostic Reasoning for Large Language Models
DiagnosisArena, a 1,113-case benchmark from top journals, shows state-of-the-art LLMs achieve at most 51% top-1 diagnostic accuracy, far below clinical-level competence.
-
The Hallucination Tax of Reinforcement Finetuning
Standard RFT sharply reduces LLM refusal on unanswerable questions, and adding 10% synthetic unanswerable math during RFT restores refusal with small accuracy losses.
-
One Missing Piece for Open-Source Reasoning Models: A Dataset to Mitigate Cold-Starting Short CoT LLMs in RL
A pipeline converts short-CoT LLM outputs into o1-style long chain-of-thought rationales using 1K seed reasoning flows, and SFT on the resulting dataset improves downstream RLVR cold-start.
-
A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthiness in Reasoning with Large Language Models
A structured literature survey concluding that reasoning capabilities do not automatically make LLMs more trustworthy and can introduce new vulnerabilities in safety, robustness, and privacy.
-
A Survey on Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models
A taxonomy of model extraction attacks and defenses for large language models, with proposed evaluation metrics and future research directions.
-
Pangu Embedded: An Efficient Dual-system LLM Reasoner with Metacognition
Pangu Embedded, a 7B reasoner trained with iterative distillation, RL, and an adaptive fast/slow thinking scheme, reports superior benchmark scores to similarly sized Qwen3-8B and GLM-4-9B.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.