REVIEW 5 cited by
All Languages Matter: Evaluating LMMs on Culturally Diverse 100 Languages
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Existing Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) generally focus on only a few regions and languages. As LMMs continue to improve, it is increasingly important to ensure they understand cultural contexts, respect local sensitivities, and support low-resource languages, all while effectively integrating corresponding visual cues. In pursuit of culturally diverse global multimodal models, our proposed All Languages Matter Benchmark (ALM-bench) represents the largest and most comprehensive effort to date for evaluating LMMs across 100 languages. ALM-bench challenges existing models by testing their ability to understand and reason about culturally diverse images paired with text in various languages, including many low-resource languages traditionally underrepresented in LMM research. The benchmark offers a robust and nuanced evaluation framework featuring various question formats, including true/false, multiple choice, and open-ended questions, which are further divided into short and long-answer categories. ALM-bench design ensures a comprehensive assessment of a model's ability to handle varied levels of difficulty in visual and linguistic reasoning. To capture the rich tapestry of global cultures, ALM-bench carefully curates content from 13 distinct cultural aspects, ranging from traditions and rituals to famous personalities and celebrations. Through this, ALM-bench not only provides a rigorous testing ground for state-of-the-art open and closed-source LMMs but also highlights the importance of cultural and linguistic inclusivity, encouraging the development of models that can serve diverse global populations effectively. Our benchmark is publicly available.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Will It Still Be True Tomorrow? Multilingual Evergreen Question Classification to Improve Trustworthy QA
EverGreenQA and EG-E5 provide a multilingual, human-labeled evergreen question classifier that improves self-knowledge estimation and QA dataset curation.
-
STROKEVISION-BENCH: A Multimodal Video And 2D Pose Benchmark For Tracking Stroke Recovery
A new 1,000-video benchmark of stroke patients performing box-and-block sub-actions, with raw frames and 2D skeletons, establishes baseline action classification accuracy for seven models.
-
Multi-TW: Benchmarking Multimodal Models on Traditional Chinese Question Answering in Taiwan
Multi-TW is the first Traditional Chinese benchmark to evaluate multimodal models on both image-text and audio-text questions while also measuring inference latency.
-
Mitigating Response Delays in Free-Form Conversations with LLM-powered Intelligent Virtual Agents
Natural conversational fillers improve perceived response time for VR agents when LLM responses are delayed above four seconds, while artificial wait indicators do not.
-
LinguaMark: Do Multimodal Models Speak Fairly? A Benchmark-Based Evaluation
A multilingual visual question-answering benchmark across 11 languages and 5 social attributes, evaluated on 7 large multimodal models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.