Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

ChemSafetyBench: Benchmarking LLM Safety on Chemistry Domain

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.16736 v1 pith:BSV5QGC2 submitted 2024-11-23 cs.CL cs.AIphysics.chem-ph

classification cs.CLcs.AIphysics.chem-ph
keywords chemicalchemsafetybenchsafetychemistrymodelsresponsesaccuracydataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The advancement and extensive application of large language models (LLMs) have been remarkable, including their use in scientific research assistance. However, these models often generate scientifically incorrect or unsafe responses, and in some cases, they may encourage users to engage in dangerous behavior. To address this issue in the field of chemistry, we introduce ChemSafetyBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the accuracy and safety of LLM responses. ChemSafetyBench encompasses three key tasks: querying chemical properties, assessing the legality of chemical uses, and describing synthesis methods, each requiring increasingly deeper chemical knowledge. Our dataset has more than 30K samples across various chemical materials. We incorporate handcrafted templates and advanced jailbreaking scenarios to enhance task diversity. Our automated evaluation framework thoroughly assesses the safety, accuracy, and appropriateness of LLM responses. Extensive experiments with state-of-the-art LLMs reveal notable strengths and critical vulnerabilities, underscoring the need for robust safety measures. ChemSafetyBench aims to be a pivotal tool in developing safer AI technologies in chemistry. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/HaochenZhao/SafeAgent4Chem. Warning: this paper contains discussions on the synthesis of controlled chemicals using AI models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SciHazard: A Benchmark for Measuring Scientific Safety Risks with Decomposed Harm Scoring

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new scientific-safety benchmark and a decomposed, retrieval-grounded metric that aligns with expert harm judgments substantially better than existing LLM-as-judge baselines.

  2. onepot-Bench 0: towards lab-aware in silico chemistry benchmarks

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Frontier LLMs score well on basic chemistry questions but near chance on wet-lab reaction-outcome and catalyst-preference tasks in a new proprietary benchmark.

  3. The Dual-use Dilemma in LLMs: Do Empowering Ethical Capacities Make a Degraded Utility?

    cs.CL 2025-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A DPO-based alignment method with a balanced mixture of legal and illegal chemistry prompts improves combined safety and utility scores, but its benchmark shares training compounds and its hyperparameters are tuned on...

  4. Large Language Models Transform Organic Synthesis From Reaction Prediction to Automation

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    This survey claims to be the first systematic review of LLMs for organic synthesis, but its central 'evaluation' is never actually performed.

  5. Alignment and Safety in Large Language Models: Safety Mechanisms, Training Paradigms, and Emerging Challenges

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 1.0 of 10

    A broad survey of LLM alignment that catalogs objectives, benchmarks, SFT/RLHF/DPO methods, and safety challenges, without contributing new experimental or theoretical results.

Pith tools