Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

All Seeds Are Not Equal: Enhancing Compositional Text-to-Image Generation with Reliable Random Seeds

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.18810 v5 pith:DWXORTAR submitted 2024-11-27 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords compositionalreliablecompositiondiffusionimageimagespromptsseeds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Text-to-image diffusion models have demonstrated remarkable capability in generating realistic images from arbitrary text prompts. However, they often produce inconsistent results for compositional prompts such as "two dogs" or "a penguin on the right of a bowl". Understanding these inconsistencies is crucial for reliable image generation. In this paper, we highlight the significant role of initial noise in these inconsistencies, where certain noise patterns are more reliable for compositional prompts than others. Our analyses reveal that different initial random seeds tend to guide the model to place objects in distinct image areas, potentially adhering to specific patterns of camera angles and image composition associated with the seed. To improve the model's compositional ability, we propose a method for mining these reliable cases, resulting in a curated training set of generated images without requiring any manual annotation. By fine-tuning text-to-image models on these generated images, we significantly enhance their compositional capabilities. For numerical composition, we observe relative increases of 29.3% and 19.5% for Stable Diffusion and PixArt-{\alpha}, respectively. Spatial composition sees even larger gains, with 60.7% for Stable Diffusion and 21.1% for PixArt-{\alpha}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ISAC: Training-Free Instance-to-Semantic Attention Control for Multi-Instance Generation

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ISAC improves multi-instance image generation by carving out instance regions from self-attention first and then assigning semantics to those regions.

  2. GenTune: Toward Traceable Prompts to Improve Controllability of Image Refinement in Environment Design

    cs.HC 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GenTune improves AI image refinement by tracing image regions back to prompt labels and allowing element-level, semantic-guided edits.

  3. PosterCraft: Rethinking High-Quality Aesthetic Poster Generation in a Unified Framework

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    PosterCraft improves text-to-poster generation by cascading four stages of training (text rendering, region-weighted fine-tuning, preference optimization, and vision-language feedback), outperforming open-source basel...

Pith tools