Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 58 references

PCDreamer: Point Cloud Completion Through Multi-view Diffusion Priors

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that multi-view images dreamed up by a diffusion model supply the missing geometric cues that let a single-view partial point cloud be completed with fine detail, and that fusing those images with attention plus…

desk verdict Solid integration of diffusion priors for point cloud completion, but the key causal claim is under-tested by a missing control and the evaluation is on self-built datasets. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19036 v3 pith:TF7D7DEB submitted 2024-11-28 cs.CV cs.GR

Guangshun Wei , Yuan Feng , Long Ma , Chen Wang , Yuanfeng Zhou , Changjian Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.GR
keywords pointcloudcompletionmulti-viewdiffusionpriorssingle-viewpartialmulti-modalityfusiondepthimageguidanceconfidence-basedconsolidationChamferdistanceShapeNet-55
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a partially scanned point cloud can be completed far more reliably when a large multi-view diffusion model is first used to 'dream' images of the object from viewpoints that were never observed. The central claim is that those synthetic multi-view images encode both global structure, such as symmetric parts hidden by self-occlusion, and local fine details like thin supports, and that this extra signal produces better completion than using the partial cloud alone. To test this, the authors build PCDreamer, a three-stage pipeline that generates posed multi-view depth images from a single-view depth image, fuses image and point-cloud features with attention, and then filters out unreliable points using a learned confidence score. On self-constructed single-view variants of the PCN and ShapeNet-55/34 benchmarks, PCDreamer reports the lowest Chamfer distance and highest F1-Score among the compared methods, with the largest gains on severe single-view occlusions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the combination of a multi-view image generation pipeline and a two-stage shape refinery. The generation pipeline chains a depth-to-RGB translation model, a multi-view diffusion model, and a monocular depth estimator to turn one partial depth image into a set of posed multi-view depth images; this set is the imagined full-shape cue. The refinery consists of a multi-modality fuser, where a patch-based point-cloud encoder supplies queries and a pose-conditioned image encoder supplies keys/values in a cross-attention layer, followed by a shape consolidator that computes a per-point confidence score from self-attention over concatenated point-image features, filters the lowest 25 percent of points, and uses a per-point offset MLP to densify the remaining cloud. The confidence score is what lets the method tolerate the inevitable inconsistencies of diffusion-generated views.

What would settle it

Run PCDreamer on a set of partial point clouds built from slender, high-aspect-ratio objects such as earphones and thin tubular chair backs, and compare its Chamfer distance against the same model with the multi-view image branch removed; if the image-guided version is not systematically better on those cases, the claim that multi-view diffusion priors encode useful local cues fails exactly in the fine-detail regime the paper highlights.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's discovery is that multi-view diffusion priors, originally built for image-to-3D generation, can be repurposed as a free source of complete-shape cues for point cloud completion. Given a single-view partial point cloud, the method renders a depth image, converts it to RGB, asks a large multi-view diffusion model to generate several posed views of the full object, and estimates depth for each generated view. A patch-based Transformer encoder turns the partial point cloud into a query feature and the set of posed depth images into key/value features; cross-attention then produces a coarse complete point cloud. A confidence-guided consolidator scores each coarse point by its agreement with the multi-view image features and with other points, discards the low-confidence quarter, and upsamples the rest to a dense uniform completion. The authors report that this pipeline outperforms point-only and point-plus-image baselines on their datasets, especially for symmetric parts and fine structures that are invisible in the input view.

Load-bearing premise

The pipeline only completes as well as the imagined multi-view images are trustworthy: if the diffusion model generates inconsistent or geometrically wrong views (as it can for slender structures), the fusion and consolidation stages have no way to recover the true shape.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, single-view completion of severely occluded objects improves materially because the diffusion prior supplies symmetric counterparts and thin structures that geometric-only methods guess randomly.
  • The method is model-agnostic: swapping the multi-view generator (image-based versus video-based) changes results modestly, so better multi-view diffusion models should translate directly into better completion.
  • Confidence filtering acts as a safety valve: generated views that are locally inconsistent are down-weighted before densification, which is why the pipeline can tolerate imperfect dreams.
  • Because training uses only Chamfer distance on synthesized single-view partial clouds, the same recipe can be retrained on other completion benchmarks with paired partial and complete clouds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An upper-bound experiment the paper does not run: feeding ground-truth rendered multi-view depth images through the same fusion and consolidation modules would quantify exactly how much error is inherited from diffusion inconsistency versus from the fusion network itself.
  • A testable extension: make the filtering threshold per-point and view-aware instead of a fixed 75/25 split, which could rescue slender structures like the earphone failure the paper shows in Fig. 9.
  • The same fusion-plus-consolidation skeleton could be applied to LiDAR object completion in autonomous driving, using the viewpoint-selection strategy on real scans that the supplementary material begins to sketch.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. PCDreamer proposes a three-stage pipeline for single-view point cloud completion: it first generates multi-view RGB and depth images of the imagined shape using frozen large diffusion models (ControlNet for depth-to-RGB, Wonder3D or Stable Video Diffusion for multi-view generation, and DepthAnything for depth estimation), then fuses these multi-view depth images with the partial point cloud in a patch-based attention fuser to produce a coarse point cloud, and finally applies a confidence-based point filtering and upsampling stage to obtain a dense, uniform completion. Only the fusion and consolidation modules are trained, optimized end-to-end with a hyperbolic Chamfer distance loss. The authors construct single-view variants of the PCN and ShapeNet-55 datasets, retrain ten prior methods from scratch on these custom benchmarks, and report improved average CD and DCD along with competitive F1 scores. Ablations cover the choice of visual modality, the fusion design, the confidence filtering, the number of views, and the filtering percentage, while the supplementary provides qualitative results on real scans and comparisons with SDS-Complete and single-image 3D generation methods.

Significance. If the central attribution holds, the contribution is a practical recipe for injecting geometric cues from frozen multi-view diffusion priors into a small, trainable completion network, together with a confidence-guided consolidation mechanism that tolerates the known inconsistencies of those priors. The paper has notable strengths: it retrains all baselines from scratch on the same data, evaluates two independent diffusion backbones (Wonder3D and SVD), ablates the main design choices, and includes an honest failure-case analysis. The consolidation idea could be of independent value for any method that consumes imperfect multi-view priors. However, the significance is currently bounded by three issues: the headline claim that the diffusion prior content itself provides the useful cues is not directly tested, one headline table contains a metric on which a baseline clearly wins, and all quantitative claims are made on self-constructed benchmarks rather than the standard test protocols. The stress-test concern about the missing control lands: it targets the interpretation of the numbers rather than the numbers themselves, and it can be answered with additional experiments.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, §4.3, Tabs. 4–5] The central claim that multi-view diffusion priors ‘encode both global and local shape cues’ that benefit completion is not directly tested by the current ablations. In every image-conditioned row of Tables 4 and 5, the multi-view depth images come from the same frozen chain (ControlNet + Wonder3D/SVD + DepthAnything); there is no condition in which these images are replaced by ground-truth renders at the same six camera poses, and no condition with non-informative images matched for encoder capacity. Since the partial-only row (CD 6.91, Table 4) removes the entire image encoder, the improvement to CD 6.49 with both modalities is also consistent with explanations that do not involve the diffusion prior’s content, such as added parameters or the mere availability of six additional views of the visible surface. This ambiguity is compounded by the depth-only ablation (CD 17.69), which shows that the raw generated depth images are nearly unusable on their own, and by the supplementary’s own list of defects in these images (inconsistencies, missing details, scale discrepancies, noise). I recommend adding two controls in Sec. 4.3: (i) the same fusion pipeline trained with ground-truth depth renders from the mesh at the six poses, and (ii) a non-informative image control (e.g., scrambled or blank depth images) to bound the contribution of the added encoder capacity. Without one of these controls, the paper’s headline attribution remains an interpretation rather than an established result.
  2. [§4.2, Tab. 2] Table 2 is in tension with the statement that the method ‘consistently outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches across all categories’ on ShapeNet-55. SVDFormer’s F-Score@1% is 0.447, which is clearly above Ours(SVD-MV) at 0.408 and Ours(Wonder3D) at 0.418, and the same pattern appears on the unseen categories of ShapeNet-34 in Table 3 (SVDFormer 0.348 vs. Ours(SVD-MV) 0.339). Since F1@1% is one of the three headline metrics the paper adopts, the text should acknowledge this trade-off and either explain it (for example, whether the confidence filtering removes points that contribute to the 1%-radius recall) or qualify the claim of uniform superiority. As written, the assertion of consistent superiority is contradicted by the paper’s own reported numbers.
  3. [§4.1–§4.2] All quantitative claims are made on a self-constructed single-view variant of PCN and ShapeNet-55, with a fixed viewpoint along the positive z-axis and back-projected partial point clouds. This is a legitimate design choice for studying the harder single-view setting, and retraining the baselines on the same data is fair internal comparison. However, because the test protocol differs from the standard PCN and ShapeNet-55 benchmarks, the reported numbers are not directly comparable with any published scores, and the claim of state-of-the-art performance rests solely on internally retrained baselines on the authors’ own split. I ask the authors to report results on the original benchmark protocols where feasible, to clearly frame the contribution as a new benchmark plus method otherwise, and to release the constructed datasets so that the comparison can be audited by the community.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typos and inconsistent notations that should be corrected: ‘Mutli-modality Fuser’ (Sec. 3.2), ‘baesd’ (Fig. 6 caption), ‘Poffet’ (Eq. 6), ‘Ff usion’ (Eq. 4), ‘0.0.617’ (Table 2, CRA-PCN DCD column), ‘the the image feature’ (Sec. 3.2), and the ungrammatical opening ‘PCDreamer, a novel algorithm’ in the introduction. Also, ‘we have proved in the ablation study’ (Sec. 3.2) should read ‘we show in the ablation study’.
  2. [§3.3, Eq. (5)] The definition of the confidence score is unclear: it is not specified over which dimension the average in Avg(dot(Q_i, K_i)) is taken, nor why a per-point self-attention dot product measures cross-view agreement. Please spell out the exact computation and the role of the sigmoid in producing the filtering percentage used in Sec. 4.4.
  3. [§3.1] The paper states that generated depth image values are normalized to the range [0, 1], but it does not say whether the normalization is per-view or joint across views. Since the supplementary acknowledges scale discrepancies between generated views, per-view normalization could distort relative depth cues; this choice should be specified and, if per-view, justified with an experiment or a comment.
  4. [Supplementary, Fig. A1] The generalization experiments on ScanObjectNN, KITTI, and randomly cropped point clouds are qualitative only. Given the introduction’s motivation of autonomous driving and robotics, a quantitative table on at least one real-scan set would substantially strengthen the claim of practical applicability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: PCDreamer is an empirical, held-out-evaluated pipeline whose components are trained against ground-truth point clouds; the diffusion priors are frozen external tools, not fitted to the target metric.

full rationale

The derivation chain is empirical rather than formal. Given a partial point cloud, the method renders a depth image, converts it to RGB with ControlNet, generates multi-view images with frozen Wonder3D/SVD, estimates depth with frozen DepthAnything, and trains the fusion/consolidation networks end-to-end with Chamfer/HyperCD losses against ground-truth meshes (Eqs. 7-9). The ground truth is sampled independently from meshes, and the test metrics are computed on held-out samples, so no predicted quantity is defined in terms of the target. The ablations (Tabs. 4-6) vary input modalities and modules, and the hyperparameters (view count, filtering percentage) are tuned on validation-style experiments, not folded into the definition of the metric. There are no self-citations in the reference list and no invoked 'uniqueness theorem' or ansatz citation that carries the argument. The skeptic's concern - that no control replaces the diffusion-generated views with ground-truth renders or non-informative views, so the causal claim about diffusion priors is under-tested - is a valid missing-control and interpretation critique, but it is not circularity: the paper does not reduce its central claim to its inputs by construction. Its own limitation section (Sec. 4.4 and supplementary) concedes inconsistent generation and failure cases, which weakens generalizability but does not make the derivation circular. Thus the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The method's gains rely on external pretrained diffusion priors and on a few hand-selected hyperparameters; the main free parameters are the view count and filtering percentage, both selected via ablations on the same benchmark used for final evaluation.

free parameters (4)
  • Confidence filtering percentage = 25% (keep top 75%)
    Selected via ablation over 12%, 25%, 50% on the PCN dataset (Table 8); affects final CD and F1.
  • Number of multi-view images V = 6
    Selected via ablation over 2, 4, 6, 8 views (Table 7); 6 gives the best CD/F1.
  • Patch radius r = 0.2
    Hand-set for point cloud patch construction (Sec. 4, Implementation); not ablated.
  • Number of seed points K = 128
    Hand-set for the patch-based point cloud encoder; not ablated.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Multi-view diffusion models (Wonder3D, SVD) provide sufficiently view-consistent images that encode reliable shape cues for the missing regions.
    The whole method rests on the quality of generated multi-view depth images; the paper's own failure case (Fig. 9) shows this assumption can fail for slender structures.
  • domain assumption Single-view partial point clouds generated by back-projecting a fixed-viewpoint depth map from ShapeNet meshes are representative of the single-view completion setting.
    The custom PCN and ShapeNet-55 datasets are constructed this way (Sec. 4.1); if this synthetic protocol misrepresents real scans, benchmark results may not transfer.
  • domain assumption Retraining prior methods from scratch with their default configurations on the custom dataset is a fair comparison.
    Used in Sec. 4.2; without tuning baselines to the new data distribution, the comparison may favor the proposed method.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of PCDreamer: Point Cloud Completion Through Multi-view Diffusion Priors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TF7D7DEB

@misc{pith2026241119036,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: PCDreamer: Point Cloud Completion Through Multi-view Diffusion Priors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TF7D7DEB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19036}
}
read the original abstract

This paper presents PCDreamer, a novel method for point cloud completion. Traditional methods typically extract features from partial point clouds to predict missing regions, but the large solution space often leads to unsatisfactory results. More recent approaches have started to use images as extra guidance, effectively improving performance, but obtaining paired data of images and partial point clouds is challenging in practice. To overcome these limitations, we harness the relatively view-consistent multi-view diffusion priors within large models, to generate novel views of the desired shape. The resulting image set encodes both global and local shape cues, which are especially beneficial for shape completion. To fully exploit the priors, we have designed a shape fusion module for producing an initial complete shape from multi-modality input (i.e.,, images and point clouds), and a follow-up shape consolidation module to obtain the final complete shape by discarding unreliable points introduced by the inconsistency from diffusion priors. Extensive experimental results demonstrate our superior performance, especially in recovering fine details.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19036 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Given a partial point cloud input (a) with (b) as a novel view for visualization purposes, the goal of point cloud completion is to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of PCDreamer. Given an input partial point cloud, we have designed three core modules to complete it. The multi-view image generation module (Sec. 3.1) dreams out multi-view images of the input by leveraging a few large models. The priors within these models serve as the fuel for the completion. The following fusion module (Sec. 3.2) effectively fuses the original input and the inspiring MV images with the … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The partial point cloud and multi-view image encoders. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visual comparisons on the PCN dataset. That second column is representative depth images selected from the multiple views [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visual comparisons on the ShapeNet-55 dataset. The red-boxed regions highlight the effectiveness of different methods in completing local structures. egories, with a particularly notable improvement of 0.16 in the CD metric for the Mailbox category. Although the first …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Visual comparisons with 3D model generation baesd on single-view RGB image. (b) shows an RGB image gener￾ated by ControlNet from a single-view depth image. (c) One-2- 3-45++ [24], (d) Crafsman [21]. Comparison with 3D model generation. We further compare our approach w…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visual results of multi-modality fusion. (b) uses only multi-view images, and (c) uses only the partial point cloud. Does multi-modality fusion play an important role? To evaluate the effectiveness of our multi-modality fusion strat￾egy, we split the network architectu…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Visualization of confidence filtering. use an MLP to map it to a coarse point cloud, which is then refined by the decoder module to produce the final re￾sult. The second branch operates solely on the partial point cloud by removing the multi-view image module from our …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Failure Case. Due to the slender structure of the ear￾phone, the multi-view depth images are inconsistent (b), we thus fail to complete the shape. Other methods (d-f) fail as well. 5. Conclusion In this paper, we have presented a novel approach for point cloud completi…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cross- modal learning for image-guided point cloud shape comple- tion

    Emanuele Aiello, Diego Valsesia, and Enrico Magli. Cross- modal learning for image-guided point cloud shape comple- tion. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 35:37349–37362, 2022. 2

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets

    Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Sumith Kulal, Daniel Mendelevitch, Maciej Kilian, Dominik Lorenz, Yam Levi, Zion English, Vikram V oleti, Adam Letts, et al. Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023. 2, 3

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with la- tent diffusion models

    Andreas Blattmann, Robin Rombach, Huan Ling, Tim Dock- horn, Seung Wook Kim, Sanja Fidler, and Karsten Kreis. Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with la- tent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 22563–22575, 2023. 2

    2023

  4. [4]

    Past, present, and future of simultaneous localiza- tion and mapping: Toward the robust-perception age

    Cesar Cadena, Luca Carlone, Henry Carrillo, Yasir Latif, Davide Scaramuzza, Jos ´e Neira, Ian Reid, and John J Leonard. Past, present, and future of simultaneous localiza- tion and mapping: Toward the robust-perception age. IEEE Transactions on robotics, 32(6):1309–1332, 2016. 1

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Shapenet: An information-rich 3d model repository

    Angel X Chang, Thomas Funkhouser, Leonidas Guibas, Pat Hanrahan, Qixing Huang, Zimo Li, Silvio Savarese, Manolis Savva, Shuran Song, Hao Su, et al. Shapenet: An information-rich 3d model repository. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.03012, 2015. 5

    arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Anchorformer: Point cloud completion from discriminative nodes

    Zhikai Chen, Fuchen Long, Zhaofan Qiu, Ting Yao, Wen- gang Zhou, Jiebo Luo, and Tao Mei. Anchorformer: Point cloud completion from discriminative nodes. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 13581–13590, 2023. 1, 2, 5, 6, 8

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Shape completion using 3d-encoder-predictor cnns and shape synthesis

    Angela Dai, Charles Ruizhongtai Qi, and Matthias Nießner. Shape completion using 3d-encoder-predictor cnns and shape synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5868–5877,

    work page

  8. [8]

    Vision meets robotics: The kitti dataset

    Andreas Geiger, Philip Lenz, Christoph Stiller, and Raquel Urtasun. Vision meets robotics: The kitti dataset. The Inter- national Journal of Robotics Research , 32(11):1231–1237,

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to- image diffusion models without specific tuning, 2024

    Yuwei Guo, Ceyuan Yang, Anyi Rao, Zhengyang Liang, Yaohui Wang, Yu Qiao, Maneesh Agrawala, Dahua Lin, and Bo Dai. Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to- image diffusion models without specific tuning, 2024. 2

    2024

  2. [10]

    3d semantic segmentation based on spatial-aware convolution and shape completion for augmented reality ap- plications

    Yun-Chih Guo, Tzu-Hsuan Weng, Robin Fischer, and Li- Chen Fu. 3d semantic segmentation based on spatial-aware convolution and shape completion for augmented reality ap- plications. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 224: 103550, 2022. 1

    2022

  3. [11]

    High-resolution shape com- pletion using deep neural networks for global structure and local geometry inference

    Xiaoguang Han, Zhen Li, Haibin Huang, Evangelos Kalogerakis, and Yizhou Yu. High-resolution shape com- pletion using deep neural networks for global structure and local geometry inference. In Proceedings of the IEEE inter- national conference on computer vision, pages 85–93, 2017. 2

    2017

  4. [12]

    Latent video diffusion models for high-fidelity long video generation, 2023

    Yingqing He, Tianyu Yang, Yong Zhang, Ying Shan, and Qifeng Chen. Latent video diffusion models for high-fidelity long video generation, 2023. 2

    2023

  5. [13]

    Mvd-fusion: Single-view 3d via depth-consistent multi-view generation

    Hanzhe Hu, Zhizhuo Zhou, Varun Jampani, and Shubham Tulsiani. Mvd-fusion: Single-view 3d via depth-consistent multi-view generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 9698–9707, 2024. 2

    2024

  6. [14]

    Render4completion: Synthesizing multi-view depth maps for 3d shape completion

    Tao Hu, Zhizhong Han, Abhinav Shrivastava, and Matthias Zwicker. Render4completion: Synthesizing multi-view depth maps for 3d shape completion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, pages 0–0, 2019. 2

    2019

  7. [15]

    Pf-net: Point fractal network for 3d point cloud completion

    Zitian Huang, Yikuan Yu, Jiawen Xu, Feng Ni, and Xinyi Le. Pf-net: Point fractal network for 3d point cloud completion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition, pages 7662–7670, 2020. 1

    2020

  8. [16]

    Epidiff: Enhancing multi-view synthesis via localized epipolar-constrained diffusion

    Zehuan Huang, Hao Wen, Junting Dong, Yaohui Wang, Yangguang Li, Xinyuan Chen, Yan-Pei Cao, Ding Liang, Yu Qiao, Bo Dai, et al. Epidiff: Enhancing multi-view synthesis via localized epipolar-constrained diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and...

    2024

  9. [17]

    Point-cloud completion with pretrained text-to-image diffusion models

    Yoni Kasten, Ohad Rahamim, and Gal Chechik. Point-cloud completion with pretrained text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.10533, 2023. 2, 1

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Autoware on board: Enabling autonomous vehicles with embedded systems

    Shinpei Kato, Shota Tokunaga, Yuya Maruyama, Seiya Maeda, Manato Hirabayashi, Yuki Kitsukawa, Abraham Monrroy, Tomohito Ando, Yusuke Fujii, and Takuya Azumi. Autoware on board: Enabling autonomous vehicles with embedded systems. In 2018 ACM/IEEE 9th International Conference on...

    2018

  11. [19]

    Text2video-zero: Text- to-image diffusion models are zero-shot video generators

    Levon Khachatryan, Andranik Movsisyan, Vahram Tade- vosyan, Roberto Henschel, Zhangyang Wang, Shant Navasardyan, and Humphrey Shi. Text2video-zero: Text- to-image diffusion models are zero-shot video generators. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Comput...

    2023

  12. [20]

    Era3d: High-resolution multiview diffusion using efficient row-wise attention

    Peng Li, Yuan Liu, Xiaoxiao Long, Feihu Zhang, Cheng Lin, Mengfei Li, Xingqun Qi, Shanghang Zhang, Wenhan Luo, Ping Tan, et al. Era3d: High-resolution multiview diffusion using efficient row-wise attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.11616, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Craftsman: High-fidelity mesh generation with 3d native generation and interactive geometry refiner

    Weiyu Li, Jiarui Liu, Rui Chen, Yixun Liang, Xuelin Chen, Ping Tan, and Xiaoxiao Long. Craftsman: High-fidelity mesh generation with 3d native generation and interactive geometry refiner. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14979, 2024. 7, 2

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Hyperbolic cham- fer distance for point cloud completion

    Fangzhou Lin, Yun Yue, Songlin Hou, Xuechu Yu, Yajun Xu, Kazunori D Yamada, and Ziming Zhang. Hyperbolic cham- fer distance for point cloud completion. In 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 14549–14560, 2023. 5, 6

    2023

  15. [23]

    Morphing and sampling network for dense point cloud completion

    Minghua Liu, Lu Sheng, Sheng Yang, Jing Shao, and Shi- Min Hu. Morphing and sampling network for dense point cloud completion. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pages 11596–11603, 2020. 2 9

    2020

  16. [24]

    One-2-3-45++: Fast single im- age to 3d objects with consistent multi-view generation and 3d diffusion

    Minghua Liu, Ruoxi Shi, Linghao Chen, Zhuoyang Zhang, Chao Xu, Xinyue Wei, Hansheng Chen, Chong Zeng, Ji- ayuan Gu, and Hao Su. One-2-3-45++: Fast single im- age to 3d objects with consistent multi-view generation and 3d diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on ...

    2024

  17. [25]

    Syncdreamer: Gen- erating multiview-consistent images from a single-view im- age

    Yuan Liu, Cheng Lin, Zijiao Zeng, Xiaoxiao Long, Lingjie Liu, Taku Komura, and Wenping Wang. Syncdreamer: Gen- erating multiview-consistent images from a single-view im- age. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.03453, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Wonder3d: Sin- gle image to 3d using cross-domain diffusion

    Xiaoxiao Long, Yuan-Chen Guo, Cheng Lin, Yuan Liu, Zhiyang Dou, Lingjie Liu, Yuexin Ma, Song-Hai Zhang, Marc Habermann, Christian Theobalt, et al. Wonder3d: Sin- gle image to 3d using cross-domain diffusion. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pa...

    2024

  19. [27]

    Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation

    Charles R Qi, Hao Su, Kaichun Mo, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 652–660,

  20. [28]

    Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space

    Charles Ruizhongtai Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017. 2

    2017

  21. [29]

    Richdreamer: A generalizable normal-depth diffusion model for detail richness in text-to- 3d

    Lingteng Qiu, Guanying Chen, Xiaodong Gu, Qi Zuo, Mu- tian Xu, Yushuang Wu, Weihao Yuan, Zilong Dong, Liefeng Bo, and Xiaoguang Han. Richdreamer: A generalizable normal-depth diffusion model for detail richness in text-to- 3d. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- ...

  22. [30]

    Carfusion: Combining point tracking and part detection for dynamic 3d reconstruction of vehicles

    N Dinesh Reddy, Minh V o, and Srinivasa G Narasimhan. Carfusion: Combining point tracking and part detection for dynamic 3d reconstruction of vehicles. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recog- nition, pages 1906–1915, 2018. 1

    1906

  23. [31]

    Cra-pcn: Point cloud completion with intra-and inter-level cross-resolution transformers

    Yi Rong, Haoran Zhou, Lixin Yuan, Cheng Mei, Jiahao Wang, and Tong Lu. Cra-pcn: Point cloud completion with intra-and inter-level cross-resolution transformers. In Pro- ceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages 4676–4685, 2024. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7

    2024

  24. [32]

    Mvdream: Multi-view diffusion for 3d gen- eration

    Yichun Shi, Peng Wang, Jianglong Ye, Mai Long, Kejie Li, and Xiao Yang. Mvdream: Multi-view diffusion for 3d gen- eration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16512, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Learning 3d shape comple- tion from laser scan data with weak supervision

    David Stutz and Andreas Geiger. Learning 3d shape comple- tion from laser scan data with weak supervision. InProceed- ings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1955–1964, 2018. 2

    1955

  26. [34]

    Lake-net: Topology-aware point cloud comple- tion by localizing aligned keypoints

    Junshu Tang, Zhijun Gong, Ran Yi, Yuan Xie, and Lizhuang Ma. Lake-net: Topology-aware point cloud comple- tion by localizing aligned keypoints. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1726–1735, 2022. 1

    2022

  27. [35]

    Lgm: Large multi-view gaussian model for high-resolution 3d content creation

    Jiaxiang Tang, Zhaoxi Chen, Xiaokang Chen, Tengfei Wang, Gang Zeng, and Ziwei Liu. Lgm: Large multi-view gaussian model for high-resolution 3d content creation. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1–18. Springer, 2025. 1, 2

    2025

  28. [36]

    Mvdiffusion: Enabling holistic multi- view image generation with correspondence-aware diffu- sion

    Shitao Tang, Fuyang Zhang, Jiacheng Chen, Peng Wang, and Yasutaka Furukawa. Mvdiffusion: Enabling holistic multi- view image generation with correspondence-aware diffu- sion. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 51202–51233. Curran Associates, Inc., 2023. 2

    2023

  29. [37]

    Revisiting point cloud classification: A new benchmark dataset and classifi- cation model on real-world data

    Mikaela Angelina Uy, Quang-Hieu Pham, Binh-Son Hua, Duc Thanh Nguyen, and Sai-Kit Yeung. Revisiting point cloud classification: A new benchmark dataset and classifi- cation model on real-world data. InInternational Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019. 1

    2019

  30. [38]

    Shape completion enabled robotic grasping

    Jacob Varley, Chad DeChant, Adam Richardson, Joaqu ´ın Ruales, and Peter Allen. Shape completion enabled robotic grasping. In 2017 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS) , pages 2442–2447. IEEE, 2017. 1, 2

    2017

  31. [39]

    Cas- caded refinement network for point cloud completion

    Xiaogang Wang, Marcelo H Ang Jr, and Gim Hee Lee. Cas- caded refinement network for point cloud completion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition, pages 790–799, 2020. 2

    2020

  32. [40]

    Dynamic graph cnn for learning on point clouds

    Yue Wang, Yongbin Sun, Ziwei Liu, Sanjay E Sarma, Michael M Bronstein, and Justin M Solomon. Dynamic graph cnn for learning on point clouds. ACM Transactions on Graphics (tog), 38(5):1–12, 2019. 3

    2019

  33. [41]

    Crm: Single image to 3d textured mesh with convolutional reconstruction model

    Zhengyi Wang, Yikai Wang, Yifei Chen, Chendong Xi- ang, Shuo Chen, Dajiang Yu, Chongxuan Li, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu. Crm: Single image to 3d textured mesh with convolutional reconstruction model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05034, 2024. 2, 1

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Pmp-net++: Point cloud completion by transformer-enhanced multi-step point mov- ing paths

    Xin Wen, Peng Xiang, Zhizhong Han, Yan-Pei Cao, Pengfei Wan, Wen Zheng, and Yu-Shen Liu. Pmp-net++: Point cloud completion by transformer-enhanced multi-step point mov- ing paths. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Ma- chine Intelligence, 45(1):852–867, 2022. 1, 2, 5

    2022

  35. [43]

    Lever- aging single-view images for unsupervised 3d point cloud completion

    Lintai Wu, Qijian Zhang, Junhui Hou, and Yong Xu. Lever- aging single-view images for unsupervised 3d point cloud completion. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2023. 1, 2

    2023

  36. [44]

    Balanced chamfer distance as a comprehen- sive metric for point cloud completion

    Tong Wu, Liang Pan, Junzhe Zhang, Tai Wang, Ziwei Liu, and Dahua Lin. Balanced chamfer distance as a comprehen- sive metric for point cloud completion. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:29088–29100, 2021. 5

    2021

  37. [45]

    Snowflakenet: Point cloud completion by snowflake point deconvolution with skip-transformer

    Peng Xiang, Xin Wen, Yu-Shen Liu, Yan-Pei Cao, Pengfei Wan, Wen Zheng, and Zhizhong Han. Snowflakenet: Point cloud completion by snowflake point deconvolution with skip-transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF inter- national conference on computer vision , pages 5499–5509,

  38. [46]

    Grnet: Gridding resid- ual network for dense point cloud completion

    Haozhe Xie, Hongxun Yao, Shangchen Zhou, Jiageng Mao, Shengping Zhang, and Wenxiu Sun. Grnet: Gridding resid- ual network for dense point cloud completion. In European conference on computer vision , pages 365–381. Springer,

  39. [47]

    Fbnet: Feedback network for point cloud completion

    Xuejun Yan, Hongyu Yan, Jingjing Wang, Hang Du, Zhi- hong Wu, Di Xie, Shiliang Pu, and Li Lu. Fbnet: Feedback network for point cloud completion. In European Confer- 10 ence on Computer Vision , pages 676–693. Springer, 2022. 1

    2022

  40. [48]

    Depth anything: Unleashing the power of large-scale unlabeled data

    Lihe Yang, Bingyi Kang, Zilong Huang, Xiaogang Xu, Jiashi Feng, and Hengshuang Zhao. Depth anything: Unleashing the power of large-scale unlabeled data. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10371–10381, 2024. 3

    2024

  41. [49]

    Geoformer: Learning point cloud completion with tri-plane integrated transformer

    Jinpeng Yu, Binbin Huang, Yuxuan Zhang, Huaxia Li, Xu Tang, and Shenghua Gao. Geoformer: Learning point cloud completion with tri-plane integrated transformer. In ACM Multimedia 2024. 4

    2024

  42. [50]

    Pointr: Diverse point cloud comple- tion with geometry-aware transformers

    Xumin Yu, Yongming Rao, Ziyi Wang, Zuyan Liu, Jiwen Lu, and Jie Zhou. Pointr: Diverse point cloud comple- tion with geometry-aware transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 12498–12507, 2021. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8

    2021

  43. [51]

    Pcn: Point completion network

    Wentao Yuan, Tejas Khot, David Held, Christoph Mertz, and Martial Hebert. Pcn: Point completion network. In 2018 in- ternational conference on 3D vision (3DV), pages 728–737. IEEE, 2018. 1, 2, 5, 6

    2018

  44. [52]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3836–3847, 2023. 3

    2023

  45. [53]

    View- guided point cloud completion

    Xuancheng Zhang, Yutong Feng, Siqi Li, Changqing Zou, Hai Wan, Xibin Zhao, Yandong Guo, and Yue Gao. View- guided point cloud completion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 15890–15899, 2021. 1, 2

    2021

  46. [54]

    Controlvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation

    Yabo Zhang, Yuxiang Wei, Dongsheng Jiang, Xiaopeng Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, and Qi Tian. Controlvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13077, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Point transformer

    Hengshuang Zhao, Li Jiang, Jiaya Jia, Philip HS Torr, and Vladlen Koltun. Point transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 16259–16268, 2021. 2

    2021

  48. [56]

    Magicvideo: Efficient video generation with latent diffusion models

    Daquan Zhou, Weimin Wang, Hanshu Yan, Weiwei Lv, Yizhe Zhu, and Jiashi Feng. Magicvideo: Efficient video generation with latent diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11018, 2022. 2

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Seedformer: Patch seeds based point cloud completion with upsample transformer

    Haoran Zhou, Yun Cao, Wenqing Chu, Junwei Zhu, Tong Lu, Ying Tai, and Chengjie Wang. Seedformer: Patch seeds based point cloud completion with upsample transformer. In European conference on computer vision , pages 416–432. Springer, 2022. 1, 2, 5, 6

    2022

  50. [58]

    Svdformer: Complementing point cloud via self-view augmentation and self-structure dual- generator

    Zhe Zhu, Honghua Chen, Xing He, Weiming Wang, Jing Qin, and Mingqiang Wei. Svdformer: Complementing point cloud via self-view augmentation and self-structure dual- generator. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 14508–14518, 2023. 1...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.