Singular mean-field backward stochastic Volterra integral equations in infinite dimensional spaces

Javad A. Asadzade; Nazim I. Mahmudov

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 31 references

Singular mean-field backward stochastic Volterra integral equations in infinite dimensional spaces

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that singular mean-field backward stochastic Volterra integral equations in infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces have unique adapted M-solutions, and it derives a stochastic maximum principle for the associated…

desk verdict Plausible combination of singular kernels, mean-field coupling, and infinite-dimensional spaces, but the main existence theorem rests on an unproved lemma and a mis-stated stability estimate that need real work before this is citable. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19433 v2 pith:RPIXSBSZ submitted 2024-11-29 math.PR math.OC

Javad A. Asadzade , Nazim I. Mahmudov This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PRmath.OC MSC 60H2060H1049K4593E20

keywords mean-fieldbackwardstochasticVolterraintegralequationssingularkernelsinfinite-dimensionalHilbertspacesadaptedM-solutionwell-posednessmaximumprincipleforwardoptimalcontrol

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that singular mean-field backward stochastic Volterra integral equations—equations whose generator depends on the average of the state and noise processes—have one and only one adapted solution in infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, together with a bound on the solution by the data and a stability estimate. The paper also shows the companion forward singular mean-field Volterra equations are uniquely solvable, and it applies both results to derive a stochastic maximum principle for an optimal control problem with convex control region. A reader should care because singular kernels cover fractional-order backward equations and memory-type evolutionary equations from viscoelasticity and heat conduction, while mean-field dependence models the collective behavior of many interacting agents. If these well-posedness claims hold, the associated control and finance models inherit existence and stability of their solutions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the adapted M-solution: a pair $(X(\cdot),\aleph(\cdot,\cdot))$ solving the equation in the standard stochastic-integral sense and satisfying the martingale-representation condition $X(t)=\mathbb{E}[X(s)]+\int_0^t \aleph(t,s)\,dB_s$, which pins down $\aleph(t,s)$ from the evolution of $X$. The proof machinery is a partition argument: the singular Lipschitz coefficients are assumed square-integrable over triangular domains with a small-tail property, so on sufficiently short intervals the solution map is a contraction. Lemma 3.1 supplies the needed existence, uniqueness, and stability estimates for a family of mean-field backward equations and Fredholm equations, and the proof then glues interval pieces together by martingale representation and Fredholm solves on off-diagonal triangular regions.

What would settle it

Take the scalar linear singular generator $\eta(t,s,z,\mathbb{E}[z])=\kappa\,\mathbb{E}[z]$ with kernel $(s-t)^{-\gamma}$, $\gamma\in(1/2,1)$, and compute the stability constant in Lemma 3.1's estimate directly; if the constant fails to stay finite or grows without bound as $\kappa$ or the singularity increases, Lemma 3.1 is false and Theorem 3.1's fixed-point proof has no foundation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, under Lipschitz assumptions with singular integrable kernels, the mean-field backward stochastic Volterra integral equation $$X(t)=\Psi(t)+\int_t^b P\big(t,s,X(s),\aleph(t,s),\aleph(s,t),\mathbb{E}[X(s)],\mathbb{E}[\aleph(t,s)],\mathbb{E}[\aleph(s,t)]\big)\,ds-\int_t^b \aleph(t,s)\,dB_s$$ has a unique adapted M-solution in $H^2[0,b]$, with the expected $L^2$-norm of $X$ and $\aleph$ controlled by the expected norm of the free term $\Psi$. The paper also proves unique solvability of the forward singular mean-field stochastic Volterra integral equation and derives a variational maximum-principle inequality that any optimal control must satisfy. The results are a direct extension of the singular and mean-field BSVIE theories to the combination of both features in infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.

Load-bearing premise

The main theorem stands on Lemma 3.1, which the paper states without proof and attributes to known estimates; if those estimates do not control the mean-field expectation terms in this infinite-dimensional singular setting, the contraction argument in Theorem 3.1 fails at its first step.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The fractional-order mean-field backward equation with singular kernel of order $\gamma\in(1/2,1)$ is a special case of the singular MF-BSVIE, so its mild solutions inherit existence and uniqueness.
Forward semilinear stochastic evolutionary integral equations with resolvent kernels, including the viscoelasticity and heat-with-memory examples, satisfy the forward theorem when the stated Lipschitz and integrability conditions hold.
The maximum-principle inequality gives a checkable necessary condition for optimality in the convex-control problem, expressed through the adjoint MF-BSVIE.
The stability estimates imply small changes in the free term or generator lead to small changes in the solution, which supports approximation and parameter-sensitivity studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If Lemma 3.1's estimates hold as stated, the same partition contraction argument should extend to singular MF-BSVIEs with jumps, since the proof uses only the martingale-representation form of the M-solution, not continuity of paths.
The stability estimates in the main theorems suggest a natural numerical scheme: approximate the solution piecewise on the partition intervals, with the contraction constants implicitly controlling the error, though the paper computes no convergence rates.
The maximum-principle inequality can be read as the first-order condition for a mean-field game equilibrium with memory; making that game interpretation precise would require extra equilibrium assumptions beyond the paper.
The paper leaves regularity open; a plausible next step is to propagate Hölder regularity through the M-solution representation using the singular-kernel estimates on each partition piece.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is the first paper I've seen that puts all three ingredients together—singular kernels, mean-field coupling, and infinite-dimensional Hilbert state space—in BSVIEs, and it also treats forward MF-FSVIEs and a maximum principle. If the well-posedness theorem is right, it is a genuine extension of Wang–Zheng and Shi–Wang–Yong. The examples (Caputo fractional BSDE, resolvent setting) give useful motivation.

Credit where it is due: the functional framework is set up carefully, the partition-of-time proof is the right Yong-style strategy, and the authors do not hide their debts—they cite Yong [29] and Prüss explicitly. Theorem 3.1 states the natural result. The introduction and structure of the paper are clear enough that a knowledgeable reader can see what is being attempted.

Now the soft spots. The load-bearing Lemma 3.1 is simply asserted. "We omit the detailed derivation here for brevity" will not carry a theorem. The lemma claims existence, uniqueness, and stability for a family of mean-field BSDEs in the singular infinite-dimensional setting. Yong's Proposition 2.1 and Lemma 3.3 are not verbatim for a generator with mean-field terms and L^2-type singular kernels, and the paper does not show that the constant in (3.5) is uniform in t. Corollary 3.2's estimate (3.8) is also written in a form that cannot support the contraction in Theorem 3.1: the left-hand side has a supremum over t and an integral over s, while the right-hand side is a pointwise t expression with |Ψ(t)-\bar Ψ(t)|^2 and a generator difference squared, with no outer integral. Step 1 of the proof invokes a different, integrated bound. As submitted, the fixed-point argument is not justified. The definition of adapted M-solution on page 8 is also garbled—the conditional expectation or martingale representation is missing—and this matters because the whole method depends on that structure.

Minor issues: the introduction says the Lipschitz coefficients are positive constants while Assumption (A1) has coefficient functions Lx1(t,s), etc.; Section 5 cites a nonexistent Theorem 3.10 when it probably means Theorem 4.1. These are fixable in revision.

None of this feels unfixable in principle. The strategy is standard and the gap could close if Lemma 3.1 is supplied with a correct proof and the estimates are stated in the right norm. But that is real work, not copyediting.

This paper is for researchers working on stochastic Volterra equations and mean-field control. They would want to know about the combination, but they should not cite it as proved until the lemma is fixed. My recommendation: send it to peer review, and tell the referee to focus on Lemma 3.1 and the contraction in Theorem 3.1. If the authors supply the missing proof and correct (3.8), this becomes a solid contribution.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper studies singular mean-field backward stochastic Volterra integral equations (MF-BSVIEs) in infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. The main result, Theorem 3.1, claims existence, uniqueness, and stability of adapted M-solutions for equation (3.1) under a Lipschitz assumption (A1) with singular kernels. The proof proceeds by a fixed-point argument built on a family of mean-field BSDEs parameterized by t (Lemma 3.1 and Corollaries 3.1-3.2). Section 4 establishes well-posedness for a forward singular MF-FSVIE (Theorem 4.1), and Section 5 derives a stochastic maximum principle (Theorem 5.1) as an application. The paper also presents two motivating examples involving Caputo fractional equations and stochastic evolutionary integral equations.

Significance. If the main theorems are correct, the paper would extend recent results on singular BSVIEs (Wang and Zheng [23]) and mean-field BSVIEs to a combined infinite-dimensional singular mean-field setting, with potential applications to optimal control of Volterra systems and mathematical finance. The main conceptual contribution is the fixed-point scheme based on a t-parameterized family of mean-field BSDEs. However, the paper as written does not provide a complete proof of the central lemma and contains a misstated stability estimate; the mathematical value can be assessed only after these gaps are repaired. The paper's strengths are its clear research question and the motivation from Caputo fractional and evolutionary integral equations; it does not include machine-checked proofs or reproducible code.

major comments (4)

[Section 3, Lemma 3.1] The proof of Lemma 3.1 is omitted; the authors state that it follows by analogy with Proposition 2.1 and Lemma 3.3 of [29]. Since Lemma 3.1 underpins Corollaries 3.1–3.2 and the fixed-point argument in Theorem 3.1, this is not a minor brevity issue. The cited results are for standard (non-mean-field) BSVIEs, and the paper does not verify that they extend to the mean-field term E[μ(t,s)] and to the singular L̄2 kernels in infinite dimensions. Without a proof or a precise reduction, the well-posedness theorem is not established.
[Section 3, Corollary 3.2, Eq. (3.8)] The stability estimate (3.8) is not correctly stated. The left-hand side is E[sup_t |X(t)−X̄(t)|^2_H + ∫_δ^b |ℵ(t,s)−ℵ̄(t,s)|^2_{L²_0} ds], while the right-hand side contains the free parameter t inside the expectation, with |Ψ(t)−Ψ̄(t)|^2_H and ∫_t^b |η−η̄|^2_H ds, and no outer dt. Thus (3.8) cannot hold for a fixed t. Moreover, in the proof of Theorem 3.1, Step 1 applies a different estimate, with E∫_δ^b (∫_t^b |P−P̄| ds)^2 dt, which is not a consequence of (3.8) as written. This gap materially affects the contraction argument.
[Section 3, page 8, definition of adapted M-solution] The definition of adapted M-solution is garbled: the text reads 'X(t) = EX(s) + ∫_0^t ℵ(t,s)dB_s, a.e. t ∈ [0,b]', which mixes an unconditional expectation with a stochastic integral and does not match the standard M-solution condition (see Yong [29]). A correct definition, e.g., X(t) = E[X(t)|F_s] + ∫_0^s ℵ(t,r)dB_r for 0≤s≤t≤b, must be supplied, since all main theorems are stated in terms of this notion.
[Section 3, proof of Theorem 3.1, Step 1] In the chain of inequalities establishing contractivity of Θ, the terms involving E∫∫ |z−z̄|^2 are replaced, without justification, by terms involving E∫|x−x̄|^2. If the replacement relies on the Itô isometry for elements of M²[0,b] (namely E∫∫ |z−z̄|^2 ≤ E∫|x−x̄|^2), this must be stated and proved. As written, the argument does not establish that Θ is a contraction in M²[δ,b], because the z-component of the M²-norm is not controlled.

minor comments (6)

[Section 3, Assumption (A1)] The generator is denoted F in the first sentence and P in the Lipschitz condition (3.2); the domain also contains a doubled '× ×'. Use a single consistent symbol.
[Section 3, Lemma 3.1 and Corollary 3.2] The space L²_{F_T}(δ,b;H) is used without defining T; it should be L²_{F_b}(δ,b;H).
[Section 3, Lemma 3.1 proof] The sentence 'Given the structural similarity...' is repeated verbatim twice; delete the duplicate.
[Section 5, Theorem 5.1] In equation (5.3), the adjoint arguments should be κ_y(s,t)^*, ν_y(s,t)^*, κ_Ey(s,t)^*, ν_Ey(s,t)^* to match the duality calculation in the proof; the printed κ_y(t,s) etc. is inconsistent.
[Section 4, Theorem 4.1] The stability estimate has a malformed expression: the final 'dt' appears outside the square brackets, and the power 1/2 is not consistently applied. The intended inequality should involve a single outer E∫_0^b |Y−Y'|^2 dt on the left and an integral of the data differences on the right.
[Section 2, definition of L̄2(Δ*)] In the definition, the set 'ess sup_{t∈(0,b)}' and 'ess sup_{t∈b_i,b_{i+1}}' should be 'ess sup_{t∈(0,b)} (...)' and 'ess sup_{t∈(b_i,b_{i+1})} (...)' with parentheses; the current notation is ambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the main results rest on external classical results, not on the paper's own conclusions or fitted quantities.

full rationale

The paper derives well-posedness of singular mean-field BSVIEs/FSVIEs and a maximum principle. No parameter is fitted and no quantity is 'predicted' from data; the claims are existence/uniqueness/stability theorems. The principal load-bearing step is Lemma 3.1, whose proof is explicitly delegated to Proposition 2.1 and Lemma 3.3 of Yong [29]: 'Given the structural similarity of this lemma’s proof to the arguments employed in Proposition 2.1 and Lemma 3.3 of [29], we omit the detailed derivation here for brevity.' Yong is not the present authors, so this dependence is external rather than self-referential. The paper's self-citations ([2], [16], [17]) appear only in the introduction among a list of related literature and in Example 1.2 as background; they are not used to justify any theorem. The contraction argument in Theorem 3.1 uses Corollary 3.2, which is derived from Lemma 3.1, and the maximum principle in Theorem 5.1 follows a standard variational/duality argument using the adjoint MF-BSVIE; none of these steps reduce to the paper's own definitions or prior claims by construction. There may be rigor concerns (Lemma 3.1 is asserted without proof, and estimate (3.8) is difficult to use as stated), but those are correctness/completeness issues, not circularity. Therefore no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or fitted constants. The generic constant C in the estimates is not a free parameter. The main load-bearing assumption is the unproved Lemma 3.1 taken from Yong [29], plus standard analytical tools.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Lemma 3.1: For Ψ ∈ L^2_{F_T}(δ,b;H) and generator h satisfying (A2), equation (3.4) has a unique adapted solution with stability estimate (3.5).
Stated without proof; the paper delegates the proof to Proposition 2.1 and Lemma 3.3 of Yong [29]. This result is load-bearing for Corollaries 3.1, 3.2, and Theorem 3.1.
standard math Martingale representation theorem in Hilbert spaces: every square-integrable F_t-martingale can be written as a stochastic integral against the cylindrical Brownian motion.
Used to define the M-solution property and to construct ℵ(t,s) in Step 2 and Step 3 of Theorem 3.1.
standard math Itô isometry, stochastic Fubini theorem, and Hölder/Cauchy-Schwarz inequalities for Hilbert-space-valued stochastic integrals.
Used throughout the estimates in Sections 3, 4, and 5, including the duality computation in the maximum principle proof.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Singular mean-field backward stochastic Volterra integral equations in infinite dimensional spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RPIXSBSZ

@misc{pith2026241119433,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Singular mean-field backward stochastic Volterra integral equations in infinite dimensional spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RPIXSBSZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19433}
}

abstract

This paper investigates the well-posedness of singular mean-field backward stochastic Volterra integral equations (MF-BSVIEs) in infinite-dimensional spaces. We consider the equation: \[X(t) = \Psi(t) + \int_t^b P\big(t, s, X(s), \aleph(t, s), \aleph(s, t), \mathbb{E}[X(s)], \mathbb{E}[\aleph(t, s)], \mathbb{E}[\aleph(s, t)]\big) ds - \int_t^b \aleph(t, s) dB_s, \] where the focus lies on establishing the existence and uniqueness of adapted M-solutions under appropriate conditions. A key contribution of this work is the development of essential lemmas that provide a rigorous foundation for analyzing the well-posedness of these equations. In addition, we extend our analysis to singular mean-field forward stochastic Volterra integral equations (MF-FSVIEs) in infinite-dimensional spaces, demonstrating their solvability and unique adapted solutions. Finally, we strengthen our theoretical results by applying them to derive stochastic maximum principles, showcasing the practical relevance of the proposed framework. These findings contribute to the growing body of research on mean-field stochastic equations and their applications in control theory and mathematical finance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

[29]

Yong, J. (2008). Well-posedness and regularity of backward s tochastic Volterra integral equations. Prob- ability Theory and Related Fields, 142(1), 21-77

work page 2008
[23]

Wang, T., & Zheng, M. (2024). Singular backward stochastic Vo lterra integral equations in inﬁnite dimensional spaces. Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 407, 1-56

work page 2024
[1]

Ahmadova, A., & Mahmudov, N. I. (2023). Stochastic maximum pr inciple for discrete time mean-ﬁeld optimal control problems. Optimal Control Applications and Metho ds, 44(6), 3361-3378

work page 2023
[2]

Ahmadova, A., & Mahmudov, N. I. (2024). Picard approximation o f a singular backward stochastic nonlinear Volterra integral equation. Qualitative Theory of Dynamic al Systems, 23(4), 192

work page 2024
[3]

Agram, N., Hu, Y., & Øksendal, B. (2022). Mean-ﬁeld backward st ochastic diﬀerential equations and applications. Systems & Control Letters, 162, 105196

work page 2022
[4]

V., Grecksch, W., & Yong, J

Anh, V. V., Grecksch, W., & Yong, J. (2010). Regularity of backw ard stochastic Volterra integral equations in Hilbert spaces. Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 29 (1), 146-168. 25

work page 2010
[5]

Andersson, D., & Djehiche, B. (2011). A maximum principle for SDE s of mean-ﬁeld type. Applied Mathematics & Optimization, 63, 341-356

work page 2011
[6]

Bismut, J. M. (1973). Conjugate convex functions in optimal st ochastic control. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 44(2), 384-404

work page 1973

Show all 31 references

[7]

Buckdahn, R., Djehiche, B., Li, J., & Peng, S. (2009). Mean-ﬁeld b ackward stochastic diﬀerential equations: a limit approach

2009
[8]

Buckdahn, R., Li, J., & Peng, S. (2009). Mean-ﬁeld backward sto chastic diﬀerential equations and related partial diﬀerential equations. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 119(10), 3133-3154

2009
[9]

Gilding, B. H. (1993). A singular nonlinear Volterra integral equat ion. The Journal of Integral Equations and Applications, 465-502

1993
[10]

Hamaguchi, Y. (2023). Variation of constants formulae for fo rward and backward stochastic Volterra integral equations. Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 343, 332- 389

2023
[11]

Hamaguchi, Y. (2021). Inﬁnite horizon backward stochastic V olterra integral equations and discounted control problems. ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Var iations, 27, 101

2021
[12]

A., Neuman, E., & Voss, M

Jaber, E. A., Neuman, E., & Voss, M. (2023). Equilibrium in functio nal stochastic games with mean-ﬁeld interaction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05433

2023 arXiv
[13]

Li, Z., & Luo, J. (2012). Mean-ﬁeld reﬂected backward stocha stic diﬀerential equations. Statistics & Probability Letters, 82(11), 1961-1968

2012
[14]

Lin, P., & Yong, J. (2020). Controlled singular Volterra integral equations and Pontryagin maximum principle. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 58(1), 136-1 64

2020
[15]

Ma, J., & Yong, J. (1999). Forward-backward stochastic diﬀe rential equations and their applications (No. 1702). Springer Science & Business Media

1999
[16]

J., Asadzade, J

Gasimov, J. J., Asadzade, J. A., & Mahmudov, N. I. (2024). Pon tryagin maximum principle for fractional delay diﬀerential equations and controlled weakly singular Volterra d elay integral equations. Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems, 23(5), 213

2024
[17]

I., & Ahmadova, A

Mahmudov, N. I., & Ahmadova, A. (2022). Some results on back ward stochastic diﬀerential equations of fractional order. Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems, 21 (4), 129

2022
[18]

Pardoux, E., & Peng, S. (1990). Adapted solution of a backwar d stochastic diﬀerential equation. Systems & Control Letters, 14(1), 55-61

1990
[19]

Peng, S., in: J. Yan, S. Peng, S. Fang, L. Wu (Eds.), BSDE and St ochastic Optimizations; Topics in Stochastic Analysis, Science Press, Beijing, 1997 (Chapter 2) (in C hinese)

1997
[20]

Pr¨ uss, J. (2012). Evolutionary integral equations and applic ations. Springer Science & Business Media

2012
[21]

Shi, Y., Wang, T., & Yong, J. (2011). Mean-ﬁeld backward stoch astic Volterra integral equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1104.4725

2011 arXiv
[22]

F., Wen, J

Shi, Y. F., Wen, J. Q., & Xiong, J. (2021). Mean-ﬁeld backward st ochastic diﬀerential equations driven by fractional Brownian motion. Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Ser ies, 37(7), 1156-1170

2021
[24]

Wang, T., & Yong, J. (2019). Backward stochastic Volterra int egral equations—representation of adapted solutions. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 1 29(12), 4926-4964. 26

2019
[25]

(2022, May)

Wang, H., Yong, J., & Zhang, J. (2022, May). Path dependent F eynman–Kac formula for forward backward stochastic Volterra integral equations. In Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e (B) Probabilit´ es et statistiques (Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 603-638). Institut Henri Poin car´ e

2022
[26]

Wang, T., & Yong, J. (2023). Spike variations for stochastic Vo lterra integral equations. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 61(6), 3608-3634

2023
[27]

Wu, H., & Hu, J. (2023). Mean ﬁeld backward doubly stochastic V olterra integral equations and their applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems-Series S, 1 6(5)

2023
[28]

Yang, B., Wu, J., & Guo, T. (2024). Well-posedness and regularit y of mean-ﬁeld backward doubly stochastic Volterra integral equations and applications to dynamic risk measures. Journal of Mathemat- ical Analysis and Applications, 535(1), 128089

2024
[30]

Yong, J. (2006). Backward stochastic Volterra integral equ ations and some related problems. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 116(5), 779-795

2006
[31]

A., & Wang, S

Zhu, Q., Su, L., Liu, F., Shi, Y., Shen, Y. A., & Wang, S. (2020). Mea n-ﬁeld type forward-backward dou- bly stochastic diﬀerential equations and related stochastic diﬀere ntial games. Frontiers of Mathematics in China, 15, 1307-1326. 27

2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [29]

Yong, J. (2008). Well-posedness and regularity of backward s tochastic Volterra integral equations. Prob- ability Theory and Related Fields, 142(1), 21-77

work page 2008

[2] [23]

Wang, T., & Zheng, M. (2024). Singular backward stochastic Vo lterra integral equations in inﬁnite dimensional spaces. Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 407, 1-56

work page 2024

[3] [1]

Ahmadova, A., & Mahmudov, N. I. (2023). Stochastic maximum pr inciple for discrete time mean-ﬁeld optimal control problems. Optimal Control Applications and Metho ds, 44(6), 3361-3378

work page 2023

[4] [2]

Ahmadova, A., & Mahmudov, N. I. (2024). Picard approximation o f a singular backward stochastic nonlinear Volterra integral equation. Qualitative Theory of Dynamic al Systems, 23(4), 192

work page 2024

[5] [3]

Agram, N., Hu, Y., & Øksendal, B. (2022). Mean-ﬁeld backward st ochastic diﬀerential equations and applications. Systems & Control Letters, 162, 105196

work page 2022

[6] [4]

V., Grecksch, W., & Yong, J

Anh, V. V., Grecksch, W., & Yong, J. (2010). Regularity of backw ard stochastic Volterra integral equations in Hilbert spaces. Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 29 (1), 146-168. 25

work page 2010

[7] [5]

Andersson, D., & Djehiche, B. (2011). A maximum principle for SDE s of mean-ﬁeld type. Applied Mathematics & Optimization, 63, 341-356

work page 2011

[8] [6]

Bismut, J. M. (1973). Conjugate convex functions in optimal st ochastic control. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 44(2), 384-404

work page 1973