Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Hecke algebras and local Langlands correspondence for non-singular depth-zero representations

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves a bijective refined local Langlands correspondence and a matching category equivalence for all non-singular depth-zero representations of a p-adic reductive group.

desk verdict A serious, transparent 96-page LLC paper with a real new result; the main risk is the unexpanded case check in Proposition 3.5 and the sketch-level Lemma 8.1, both worth referee scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19846 v2 pith:B5RKXRTY submitted 2024-11-29 math.RT math.NT

Maarten Solleveld , Yujie Xu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.RTmath.NT MSC 22E5020C0820G25
keywords localLanglandscorrespondencedepth-zerorepresentationsnon-singularcuspidalsupportaffineHeckealgebrasenhancedL-parametersp-adicreductivegroupsDeligne–Lusztigpacketsrigidinnertwists
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a refined local Langlands correspondence for every depth-zero representation of a connected reductive group over a non-archimedean local field whose cuspidal support is non-singular. The correspondence is a bijection between such representations and enhanced L-parameters that are trivial on wild inertia, and it is upgraded to an equivalence of categories: finite-length non-singular depth-zero representations are equivalent to finite-length modules over a direct sum of twisted affine Hecke algebras built from Langlands parameters. This matters because it gives a uniform, structural handle on a large class of p-adic representations, with the Hecke-algebra comparison carrying all the arithmetic content. The bijection is compatible with central characters, temperedness, essential square-integrability, cuspidal support, parabolic induction, the Langlands classification, and twists by depth-zero characters.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a comparison of twisted affine Hecke algebras on the two sides of the correspondence, meaning crossed products of an affine Hecke algebra by a finite group with a 2-cocycle. On the p-adic side, the type-theoretic construction gives the Hecke algebra $H(G, P_f, \sigma)$ as such a crossed product; on the Galois side, the enhanced-parameter Bernstein component carries an algebra $H(s^\vee, q_F^{1/2})$ built from the geometry of the parameter variety. The proof establishes a canonical isomorphism of root systems $R_\sigma \cong R_{s^\vee}$, equality of q-parameters (Propositions 6.9 and 8.4), and, in the most difficult step, equality of the 2-cocycles after localization (Theorem 8.7). The 2-cocycle comparison rests on equivariant splittings of families of central extensions on the p-adic side (Proposition 2.10) and on the Galois side (Proposition 3.5), verified case-by-case over root system types.

What would settle it

Find one root system type not covered by Cases I–V in Section 2.1 (or the analogous cases in Section 3.2) for which the extension in Proposition 2.10 or Proposition 3.5 fails to split equivariantly; that would invalidate Theorem 8.7 and hence the categorical equivalence and the bijection. A more arithmetic falsifier would be to exhibit a non-singular depth-zero Bernstein block where the 2-cocycle of the p-adic Hecke algebra is not cohomologous to the parameter-side cocycle under the constructed isomorphism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1: there is a bijection between irreducible non-singular depth-zero G-representations and G-relevant enhanced depth-zero L-parameters trivial on wild inertia, with the map $\pi \mapsto \phi_\pi$ canonical, and with compatibility with the listed representation-theoretic invariants. Here enhanced L-parameters are L-parameters together with an irreducible representation of the relevant component group. Theorem 2 strengthens this to an equivalence of categories between finite-length non-singular depth-zero G-representations and finite-length modules over a direct sum of twisted affine Hecke algebras $H(s^\vee, q_F^{1/2})$ attached to Bernstein components of enhanced L-parameters. The paper also proves a new equivariance result at the supercuspidal level (Theorem 4.8) and a Kazhdan–Lusztig conjecture statement for the block category. In the authors' approach the bijection is obtained by specializing the category equivalence, so the category equivalence is the primary discovery and the bijection is its shadow.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument depends on the assertion that certain families of central extensions split equivariantly with respect to the relevant Weyl-group actions, a claim verified by a lengthy case check over root system types; a failure in any unexamined case would break the Hecke-algebra isomorphism and with it the correspondence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • All non-singular depth-zero irreducible representations acquire a canonical L-parameter, and each L-packet is finite and parametrized by the component-group enhancements.
  • Temperedness, essential square-integrability, cuspidal support, parabolic induction, and the Langlands classification are all respected by the correspondence.
  • The category equivalence means questions about such representations can be studied through modules over explicit Hecke algebras attached to parameters, giving an algebraic shadow of geometric Langlands-style equivalences in low depth.
  • The p-adic Kazhdan–Lusztig conjecture holds for the non-singular depth-zero block category, as a direct corollary of Theorem 2.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step is to push the same comparison through general types to arbitrary-depth non-singular representations; the paper notes that the relevant Hecke algebras from such types are known to be isomorphic to depth-zero ones, which makes that extension plausible.
  • The restriction to finite length in the categorical statement may be real, not just technical: the authors point to cuspidal-level 2-cocycles as obstructions to a Morita equivalence for infinite-length modules, so one should not expect the equivalence to extend literally.
  • If the 2-cocycle comparison is as robust as claimed, the same Hecke-algebra machinery could be applied to singular depth-zero supercuspidals, where L-packets mix supercuspidal and non-supercuspidal members, despite the paper not treating them.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper establishes a local Langlands correspondence for all non-singular depth-zero representations of a connected reductive p-adic group, viewed as a rigid inner twist, and a categorical refinement in terms of twisted affine Hecke algebras. The main results are Theorem 1 (a bijection between irreducible non-singular depth-zero representations and non-singular enhanced depth-zero L-parameters trivial on wild inertia, with compatibility properties) and Theorem 2 (a finite-length categorical equivalence between the group side and a direct sum of twisted affine Hecke algebras constructed from L-parameter geometry). The proof is a chain of reductions to Morris types, Kaletha's LLC for non-singular supercuspidals, the AMS3 Hecke algebra for enhanced L-parameters, and Solleveld's analysis of End_G(Pi_s). The new technical core is the comparison of the two Hecke algebras, especially the comparison of 2-cocycles in Theorem 8.7, which relies on equivariant splitting results for central extensions on both the p-adic and Galois sides.

Significance. If the main results are correct, this is a major advance: it gives the LLC for all non-singular depth-zero representations, going well beyond the supercuspidal case, and it provides a categorical refinement in the spirit of recent spectral-side equivalences. The paper is careful and transparent about the difficult steps, and it builds on substantial prior machinery rather than introducing ad hoc assumptions. The q-parameter comparison is made quite explicit via reduction to principal series of quasi-split groups (Propositions 6.9, 8.4), and the authors are honest about the non-canonical choices in the LLC and about the obstruction to extending the categorical equivalence beyond finite-length modules. The main weakness is that the most load-bearing technical step, the equivariant splitting on the Galois side (Proposition 3.5), is not written out but only asserted by analogy to the p-adic case-by-case verification; since Theorem 8.7 and hence Theorems 1 and 2 depend on it, this is a genuine gap in the present text.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Proposition 3.5] The proof of Proposition 3.5 ends with the statement that the remaining case-by-case check is 'entirely analogous to Cases I–V' from Proposition 2.10. This is a load-bearing assertion: the equivariant splitting of the extensions E^{0,phi'_T}_eta is used in Lemma 4.3, then in Lemma 4.4, and ultimately in Theorem 8.7(a) to identify the 2-cocycles on the two sides. The Galois-side extensions involve different groups (W(N_{G^vee}(L^vee),T^vee)^{WF}_{eta,phi_T}, component groups pi_0(S^+_phi), and pushouts along eta), so the analogy is not formal. If even one root-system case fails to admit a splitting equivariant for the stated stabilizer, the equality of 2-cocycles in Theorem 8.7 can fail and the LLC in Theorem 1 has no proof. I request that the omitted case check be supplied, or at minimum that the reduction to the p-adic cases be made precise enough that the reader can verify each case without rerunning the argument.
  2. [§8.1, Lemma 8.1] Lemma 8.1 asserts that the construction of H(s^vee,q_F^{1/2}) from [AMS3] adapts to rigid inner twists and to the component groups pi_0(S^+_phi) used in this paper, with 'all the results in [AMS3, §3]' remaining valid. This is a one-paragraph sketch rather than a proof, and it is used critically: the whole Galois-side Hecke algebra, including the 2-cocycle comparison in Theorem 8.7, depends on it. The substitutions listed in (8.3) are plausible, but the subsequent statements about equivariant local systems and the canonical parametrization of modules by enhanced L-parameters require checking that the rigid-inner-twist version does not introduce new choices or break the arguments in [AMS3]. I recommend expanding this lemma into a detailed verification, or explicitly citing a published source where the rigid-inner-twist adaptation is carried out.
  3. [§8.3, Theorem 8.7 and Proposition 8.8] The comparison of the 2-cocycles is presented as the most difficult step, but the argument is compressed: Theorem 8.7(a) reduces the equality to the existence of the equivariant isomorphisms in Proposition 8.6, whose proof refers to Appendices A and B and to 'similar isomorphisms without subscripts G'. The appendix material is not included in the reviewed text, so the reader cannot verify the key equality ♮_{s^vee} = ♮_tau. Given that Proposition 8.8, Theorem 9.4, Theorem 9.6, and Theorem 1 all rest on this, the paper should either include the full appendix arguments or give a precise pointer to where in the published literature the analogous comparison is proved.
  4. [§10, Theorem 1] Theorem 1 is stated as a bijection with a canonical map pi -> phi_pi, but the construction in §4 and §10 involves several choices: coherent splittings ϵ, isomorphisms ζ_0 in Lemma 4.4, and the choice of representatives in the LLC from Kaletha. The paper notes that the enhancement map is not canonical without a Whittaker datum and that the LLC is not uniquely specified. This is not an error, but it should be stated more prominently in Theorem 1 and its proof: the bijection depends on those choices, and only the L-parameter map pi -> phi_pi is claimed canonical. The current formulation could mislead a reader into thinking the full bijection is canonical.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§1] The statement 'The p-adic Kazhdan–Lusztig conjecture holds for Rep^0(G)_{ns}' appears without explanation. It would be helpful to give a reference or a short explanation of what is meant here, since the phrase is not standard and the following text does not return to it.
  2. [§2] The case-by-case verification in Cases I–V is long and relies on explicit coordinates and classification data. A table summarizing the relevant groups, stabilizers, and the splitting used in each case would improve readability and make it easier to check the claimed equivariance.
  3. [§3.1] The notation M^vee is used both for Z_{G^vee}(P_F) and later for the group in [AMS3], which can cause confusion. Consider using a different letter, e.g. M_0^vee, for the depth-zero centralizer.
  4. [§4] The map in (4.11) is written as an induction map from (S^+_phi)_eta to S^+_phi, but in the surrounding text it is referred to as a canonical bijection by Clifford theory. Please clarify whether this is induction or its adjoint, and specify the normalization of the induction functor for possibly disconnected groups.
  5. [§7] The notation Can(U) for analytic functions on U is used without definition. It is understandable from context, but a one-line definition would help.
  6. [§8.2] The proof of Proposition 8.4 appeals to [Sol10, Lemma 5.2] for principal series of quasi-split groups. Since this is a key comparison of q-parameters, the dependence on [Sol10] should be made precise, especially regarding the normalization of q-parameters and the treatment of the q^* parameters.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the LLC and categorical equivalence are obtained by comparing two independently constructed Hecke algebras; the fragile proof-by-analogy in Proposition 3.5 and the adaptation in Lemma 8.1 are completeness risks, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is genuinely comparative. On the group side, Morris's type theory produces H(G,P_f,σ) with q-parameters and a 2-cocycle (Theorems 6.1 and 7.2). On the Galois side, [AMS3] produces H(s∨,q_F^{1/2}) from L-parameter geometry, with irreducible modules canonically parametrized by enhanced L-parameters ([AMS3, Theorem 3.18]). The paper then proves a q-parameter equality (Proposition 8.4), a root-system isomorphism (8.18), and the 2-cocycle equality ♮_{s∨}=♮_τ (Theorem 8.7) by matching the two explicit 2-cocycle constructions through Lemma 4.4. This yields the localized algebra isomorphism (1.8) in Proposition 8.8, the module-category equivalences (Theorem 9.4 and 9.6), and finally the LLC (Theorem 1) via the independent parametrization from [AMS3]. No equation is defined in terms of the result it is used to prove, and no parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed a prediction: the only numerical parameter is the fixed q_F^{1/2}=|k_F|^{1/2}. The two fragile passages are not circular. Proposition 3.5 (Section 3.2) ends with 'Thus we can conclude with a case-by-case check. This is entirely analogous to the cases I–V in the proof of Proposition 2.10.' If that analogy missed a case, the 2-cocycle comparison in Theorem 8.7 and hence Theorems 1–2 would lose their proof; this is a verification gap, not a circular reduction, because the proposition is a technical lemma proved independently of the main bijection. Lemma 8.1 (Section 8.1) asserts that the [AMS3] construction 'can be adapted' to rigid inner twists and that 'all the results in [AMS3, §3] remain valid'; this is an omitted-detail risk, and [AMS3] is prior independent work (co-authored by Solleveld) whose module parametrization is used as input, not as a restatement of the target. The numerous self-citations to [AMS1, AMS3, Sol5, Sol10, SoXu] are load-bearing in the ordinary sense, but each is an external result with independent content; per the review rules they do not constitute circularity. Finally, the paper openly acknowledges that the LLC is not fully canonical (Section 4 and the outlook), which further shows that no uniqueness claim is being imported from the authors' prior work to force the construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes a chain of comparisons between existing constructions. Its free-parameter budget is zero. The axioms are the standard corpus of the field (types, Deligne-Lusztig theory, LLC for tori, Kaletha's LLC, AMS3 Hecke algebras). The least established of these is Lemma 8.1, the adaptation of the AMS3 construction, which is asserted with a sketch rather than a full verification.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math LLC for tori (Langlands, Yu)
    Invoked throughout, e.g., Lemma 3.1 and Section 3.2, to convert torus characters to L-parameters and to preserve depth zero.
  • domain assumption Kaletha's LLC for non-singular supercuspidal representations [Kal3]
    The starting point of Section 4: the paper builds its cuspidal-level LLC (Theorem 4.8) on the existence and properties of the [Kal3] correspondence.
  • domain assumption Morris's type theory for depth-zero Bernstein blocks [Mor1, Mor2]
    Provides the types (P_f, sigma) and the Hecke algebra presentation used in Sections 6-7.
  • domain assumption Adaptability of the AMS3 Hecke algebra construction to rigid inner twists (Lemma 8.1)
    The Galois-side Hecke algebras H(s^vee, q^{1/2}_F) are assumed to exist in the S+_phi and rigid-inner-twist setting; the proof is a sketch (Section 8.1).
  • domain assumption Solleveld's structure theory for End_G(Pi_s) [Sol5]
    Used in Sections 7-9 for the progenerator formalism, analytic localization, and the twisted graded Hecke algebra description.
  • domain assumption The rigid inner twist framework of Kaletha [Kal1, Dil]
    Sets the relevance conditions for inner forms via the character zeta_G; used throughout Sections 3-4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hecke algebras and local Langlands correspondence for non-singular depth-zero representations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B5RKXRTY

@misc{pith2026241119846,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hecke algebras and local Langlands correspondence for non-singular depth-zero representations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B5RKXRTY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19846}
}
read the original abstract

Let G be a connected reductive group over a non-archimedean local field. We say that an irreducible depth-zero (complex) G-representation is non-singular if its cuspidal support is non-singular. We establish a Local Langlands Correspondence for all such representations. We obtain it as a specialization from a categorical version: an equivalence between the category of finite-length non-singular depth-zero G-representations and the category of finite-length right modules of a direct sum of twisted affine Hecke algebras constructed from Langlands parameters. We also show that our LLC and our equivalence of categories have several nice properties, for example compatibility with parabolic induction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On parameters of Hecke algebras for $p$-adic groups

    math.RT 2025-05 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Depth-zero Hecke algebra parameters equal unipotent Hecke algebra parameters, proving a version of Lusztig's conjecture under tameness.

  2. On depth-zero characters of p-adic groups

    math.NT 2025-02 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    For every reductive group over a p-adic field, a character has depth zero if and only if it is trivial on the pro-unipotent radical of every parahoric subgroup, and this agrees with the torus-based definition.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Adler, J

    J.D. Adler, J. Fintzen, M. Mishra, K. Ohara, ``Structure of Hecke algebras arising from types", arXiv:2408.07801, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Adler, J

    J.D. Adler, J. Fintzen, M. Mishra, K. Ohara, ``Reduction to depth zero for tame p -adic groups via Hecke algebra isomorphisms", arXiv:2408.07805, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Arthur, ``On the transfer of distributions: weighted orbital integrals", Duke Math

    J. Arthur, ``On the transfer of distributions: weighted orbital integrals", Duke Math. J. 99.2 , (1999), 209--283

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    Arthur, ``A note on L-packets", Pure Appl

    J. Arthur, ``A note on L-packets", Pure Appl. Math. Quaterly 2.1 (2006), 199--217

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Aubert, P.F

    A.-M. Aubert, P.F. Baum, R.J. Plymen, M. Solleveld, ``Conjectures about p -adic groups and their noncommutative geometry", Contemp. Math. 691 (2017), 15--51

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Aubert, A

    A.-M. Aubert, A. Moussaoui, M. Solleveld, ``Generalizations of the Springer correspondence and cuspidal Langlands parameters", Manus. Math. 157 (2018), 121--192

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Graded Hecke algebras for disconnected reductive groups

    A.-M. Aubert, A. Moussaoui, M. Solleveld, ``Graded Hecke algebras for disconnected reductive groups", pp. 23--84 in: Geometric aspects of the trace formula, W. M\"uller, S. W. Shin, N. Templier (eds.), Simons Symposia, Springer, 2018, and arxiv:1607.02713v2

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Aubert, A

    A.-M. Aubert, A. Moussaoui, M. Solleveld, ``Affine Hecke algebras for Langlands parameters", arXiv:1701.03593v6, 2024

    arXiv 2024

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Aubert, A

    A.-M. Aubert, A. Moussaoui, M. Solleveld, ``Affine Hecke algebras for classical p -adic groups", arXiv:2211.08196, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Aubert, Y

    A.-M. Aubert, Y. Xu, ``Hecke algebras for p -adic reductive groups and Local Langlands Correspondence for Bernstein blocks", Adv. Math. 436 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2023.109384

    2024

  3. [11]

    Aubert, Y

    A.-M. Aubert, Y. Xu, ``The explicit local Langlands correspondence for G_2 ", arXiv:2208.12391, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Ben-Zvi, H

    D. Ben-Zvi, H. Chen, D. Helm, D. Nadler, ``Coherent Springer theory and the categorical Deligne-Langlands correspondence", Invent. Math. 235 (2024), 255--344

    2024

  5. [13]

    Borel, ``Automorphic L-functions", Proc

    A. Borel, ``Automorphic L-functions", Proc. Symp. Pure Math 33.2 (1979), 27--61

    1979

  6. [14]

    Bourbaki, Groupes et alg\`ebres de Lie

    N. Bourbaki, Groupes et alg\`ebres de Lie. Chapitres IV, V et VI, \'El\'ements de math\'ematique XXXIV , Hermann, 1968

    1968

  7. [15]

    Bourgeois, P

    A. Bourgeois, P. Mezo, ``Functoriality for supercuspidal L-packets", arXiv:2109.09552v4, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Bruhat, J

    F. Bruhat, J. Tits, ``Groupes r\'eductifs sur un corps local: II. Sch\'emas en groupes. Existence d'une donn\'ee radicielle valu\'ee'', Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes \'Etudes Sci. 60 (1984), 5--184

    1984

  9. [17]

    Bushnell, P.C

    C.J. Bushnell, P.C. Kutzko, ``Smooth representations of reductive p -adic groups: structure theory via types", Proc. London Math. Soc. 77.3 (1998), 582--634

    1998

  10. [18]

    DeBacker, ``Parameterizing conjugacy classes of maximal unramified Tori via Bruhat--Tits theory", Michigan J

    S. DeBacker, ``Parameterizing conjugacy classes of maximal unramified Tori via Bruhat--Tits theory", Michigan J. Math 54 (2006), 157--178

    2006

  11. [19]

    DeBacker, M

    S. DeBacker, M. Reeder ``Depth-zero supercuspidal L-packets and their stability", Annals of Math. 169.3 (2009), 795--901

    2009

  12. [20]

    Deligne, G

    P. Deligne, G. Lusztig, ``Representations of reductive groups over a finite field", Annals Math. 103 (1976), 103--161

    1976

  13. [21]

    Digne, G

    F. Digne, G. Lehrer, J. Michel, ``The characters of the group of rational points of a reductive group with non-connected centre", J. reine angew. Math. 425 (1992), 155--192

    1992

  14. [22]

    Digne, J

    F. Digne, J. Michel, Representations of finite groups of Lie type, London Mathematical Society Student Texts 21 , Cambridge University Press, 1991

    1991

  15. [23]

    Dillery, ``Rigid inner forms over local function fields", Adv

    P. Dillery, ``Rigid inner forms over local function fields", Adv. Math. 430 (2023), 109204

    2023

  16. [24]

    Dillery, D

    P. Dillery, D. Schwein, ``Rigid inner forms and the Bernstein decomposition for L-parameters", arXiv:2308.11752, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Fargues, P

    L. Fargues, P. Scholze, ``Geometrization of the local Langlands correspondence", arXiv:2102.13459, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Fintzen, T

    J. Fintzen, T. Kaletha, L. Spice ``A twisted Yu construction, Harish-Chandra characters, and endoscopy", Duke Math. J. 172.12 (2023), 2241--2301

    2023

  19. [27]

    M. Geck, G. Malle, The character theory of finite groups of Lie type. A guided tour, Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics 187 , Cambridge University Press, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    Gross, M

    B.H. Gross, M. Reeder, ``Arithmetic invariants of discrete Langlands parameters", Duke Math. J. 154.3 (2010), 431--508

    2010

  21. [29]

    Haines, ``The stable Bernstein center and test functions for Shimura varieties", pp

    T.J. Haines, ``The stable Bernstein center and test functions for Shimura varieties", pp. 118--186 in: Automorphic forms and Galois representations, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 415 , Cambridge University Press, 2014

    2014

  22. [30]

    Hellmann, ``On the derived category of the Iwahori-Hecke algebra", Compos

    E. Hellmann, ``On the derived category of the Iwahori-Hecke algebra", Compos. Math. 159.5 (2023), 1042--1110

    2023

  23. [31]

    Henniart, M.-F

    G. Henniart, M.-F. Vign\'eras, ``A Satake isomorphism for representations modulo p of reductive groups over local fields", J. reine angew. Math. 701 (2015), 33--75

    2015

  24. [32]

    Howlett, G

    R.B. Howlett, G. Lehrer, ``Induced cuspidal representations and generalised Hecke rings", Invent. Math. 58 (1980), 37--64

    1980

  25. [33]

    Kaletha, ``Rigid inner forms of real and p -adic groups", Ann

    T. Kaletha, ``Rigid inner forms of real and p -adic groups", Ann. Math. 184.2 (2016), 559--632

    2016

  26. [34]

    Kaletha, ``Regular supercuspidal representations", J

    T. Kaletha, ``Regular supercuspidal representations", J. Amer. Math. Soc. 32 (2019), 1071--1170

    2019

  27. [35]

    Kaletha, ``Supercuspidal L-packets", arXiv:1912.03274v2, 2021

    T. Kaletha, ``Supercuspidal L-packets", arXiv:1912.03274v2, 2021

    1912 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Kaletha, ``On L-embeddings and double covers of tori over local fields", arXiv:1907.05173v2, 2021

    T. Kaletha, ``On L-embeddings and double covers of tori over local fields", arXiv:1907.05173v2, 2021

    1907 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Kaletha, ``On the local Langlands conjectures for disconnected groups", arXiv:2210.02519, 2022

    T. Kaletha, ``On the local Langlands conjectures for disconnected groups", arXiv:2210.02519, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Kaletha, ``Representations of reductive groups over local fields", pp

    T. Kaletha, ``Representations of reductive groups over local fields", pp. 2498--2975 in: Proc. Int. Cong. Math. 2022, Vol. 4, EMS Press, Berlin, 2023

    2022

  31. [39]

    Kaletha, A

    T. Kaletha, A. Minguez, S.-W. Shin, P.-J. White, ``Endoscopic Classification of Representations: Inner Forms of Unitary Groups", arXiv:1409.3731v3, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Kaletha, G

    T. Kaletha, G. Prasad, Bruhat–Tits Theory: A New Approach, New Mathematical Monographs 44 , Cambridge University Press, 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Kim, J-K

    J-L. Kim, J-K. Yu, ``Construction of tame types", pp. 337--537 in: Representation Theory, Number Theory, and Invariant Theory, Progress in Mathematics 323 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    Konno, ``A note on the Langlands classification and irreducibility of induced representations of p-adic groups", Kyushu J

    T. Konno, ``A note on the Langlands classification and irreducibility of induced representations of p-adic groups", Kyushu J. Math. 57 (2003), 383--409

    2003

  35. [43]

    Langlands, ``On the classification of irreducible representations of real algebraic groups", pp

    R.P. Langlands, ``On the classification of irreducible representations of real algebraic groups", pp. 101--170 in: Representation theory and harmonic analysis on semisimple Lie groups, Math. Surveys Monogr. 31 , American Mathematical Society, 1989

    1989

  36. [44]

    Langlands, ``Representations of abelian algebraic groups", Olga Taussky-Todd: in memoriam, Pacific J

    R.P. Langlands, ``Representations of abelian algebraic groups", Olga Taussky-Todd: in memoriam, Pacific J. Math. (1997), Special Issue, 231--250

    1997

  37. [45]

    Langlands, D

    R.P. Langlands, D. Shelstad, ``On the definition of transfer factors", Math. Ann. 278 (1987), 219--271

    1987

  38. [46]

    Lusztig, ``Intersection cohomology complexes on a reductive group", Invent

    G. Lusztig, ``Intersection cohomology complexes on a reductive group", Invent. Math. 75.2 (1984), 205--272

    1984

  39. [47]

    Lusztig, ``On the representations of reductive groups with disconnected centre", Ast\'erisque 168 (1988), 157--166

    G. Lusztig, ``On the representations of reductive groups with disconnected centre", Ast\'erisque 168 (1988), 157--166

    1988

  40. [48]

    Lusztig, ``Affine Hecke algebras and their graded version", J

    G. Lusztig, ``Affine Hecke algebras and their graded version", J. Amer. Math. Soc 2.3 (1989), 599--635

    1989

  41. [49]

    Lusztig, ``Cuspidal local systems and graded Hecke algebras

    G. Lusztig, ``Cuspidal local systems and graded Hecke algebras. III", Represent. Theory 6 (2002), 202--242

    2002

  42. [50]

    Lusztig, Z

    G. Lusztig, Z. Yun, ``Endoscopy for Hecke categories, character sheaves and representations", Forum Math. Pi 8 (2020), doi.org/10.1017/fmp.2020.9 and revision arXiv:1904.01176v3

    2020 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Morris, ``Tamely ramified intertwining algebras", Invent

    L. Morris, ``Tamely ramified intertwining algebras", Invent. Math. 114.1 (1993), 1--54

    1993

  44. [52]

    Morris, ``Level zero G-types", Compositio Math

    L. Morris, ``Level zero G-types", Compositio Math. 118.2 (1999), 135--157

    1999

  45. [53]

    A. Moy, G. Prasad, ``Unrefined minimal K-types for p -adic groups", Inv. Math. 116 (1994), 393--408

    1994

  46. [54]

    A. Moy, G. Prasad, ``Jacquet functors and unrefined minimal K-types", Comment. Math. Helvetici 71 (1996), 98--121

    1996

  47. [55]

    Ohara, ``Hecke algebras for tame supercuspidal types", Amer

    K. Ohara, ``Hecke algebras for tame supercuspidal types", Amer. J. Math. 146.1 (2024), 277--293

    2024

  48. [56]

    Ohara, ``A comparison of endomorphism algebras", J

    K. Ohara, ``A comparison of endomorphism algebras", J. Algebra 659 (2024), 183--343

    2024

  49. [57]

    Opdam, ``On the spectral decomposition of affine Hecke algebras", J

    E.M. Opdam, ``On the spectral decomposition of affine Hecke algebras", J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 3.4 (2004), 531--648

    2004

  50. [58]

    Renard, Repr\'esentations des groupes r\'eductifs p-adiques, Cours sp\'ecialis\'es 17 , Soci\'et\'e Math\'ematique de France, 2010

    D. Renard, Repr\'esentations des groupes r\'eductifs p-adiques, Cours sp\'ecialis\'es 17 , Soci\'et\'e Math\'ematique de France, 2010

    2010

  51. [59]

    Roche, ``The Bernstein decomposition and the Bernstein centre", pp

    A. Roche, ``The Bernstein decomposition and the Bernstein centre", pp. 3--52 in: Ottawa lectures on admissible representations of reductive p -adic groups, Fields Inst. Monogr. 26 , Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2009

    2009

  52. [60]

    Silberger, E.-W

    A.J. Silberger, E.-W. Zink, ``Langlands Classification for L-Parameters", J. Algebra 511 (2018), 299--357

    2018

  53. [61]

    Solleveld, ``On the classification of irreducible representations of affine Hecke algebras with unequal parameters", Represent

    M. Solleveld, ``On the classification of irreducible representations of affine Hecke algebras with unequal parameters", Represent. Th. 16 (2012), 1--87

    2012

  54. [62]

    , pp. 207--262 in: Representations of Reductive p-adic Groups, A.-M. Aubert, M. Mishra, A. Roche, S. Spallone (eds.), Progress in Mathematics 328 , Birkh\

    M. Solleveld, ``On completions of Hecke algebras", pp. 207--262 in: Representations of Reductive p-adic Groups, A.-M. Aubert, M. Mishra, A. Roche, S. Spallone (eds.), Progress in Mathematics 328 , Birkh\"auser, 2019

    2019

  55. [63]

    Solleveld, ``Langlands parameters, functoriality and Hecke algebras", Pacific J

    M. Solleveld, ``Langlands parameters, functoriality and Hecke algebras", Pacific J. Math. 304.1 (2020), 209--302

    2020

  56. [64]

    Solleveld, ``Affine Hecke algebras and their representations", Indag

    M. Solleveld, ``Affine Hecke algebras and their representations", Indag. Math. 32.5 (2021), 1005--1082

    2021

  57. [65]

    Solleveld, ``Endomorphism algebras and Hecke algebras for reductive p -adic groups", J

    M. Solleveld, ``Endomorphism algebras and Hecke algebras for reductive p -adic groups", J. Algebra 606 (2022), 371--470 and appendix in arXiv:2005.07899v3 (2023)

    2022 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Solleveld, ``A local Langlands correspondence for unipotent representations", Amer

    M. Solleveld, ``A local Langlands correspondence for unipotent representations", Amer. J. Math. 145.3 (2023), 673--719

    2023

  59. [67]

    Solleveld, ``On unipotent representations of ramified p -adic groups", Represent

    M. Solleveld, ``On unipotent representations of ramified p -adic groups", Represent. Theory 27 (2023), 669--716

    2023

  60. [68]

    Solleveld, ``Parameters of Hecke algebras for Bernstein components of p -adic groups", Indag

    M. Solleveld, ``Parameters of Hecke algebras for Bernstein components of p -adic groups", Indag. Math. 36.1 (2025), 124--170

    2025

  61. [69]

    Solleveld, ``Graded Hecke algebras, constructible sheaves and the p -adic Kazhdan--Lusztig conjecture", J

    M. Solleveld, ``Graded Hecke algebras, constructible sheaves and the p -adic Kazhdan--Lusztig conjecture", J. Algebra 667 (2025), 865--910

    2025

  62. [70]

    Solleveld, ``On principal series representations of quasi-split reductive p -adic groups", arXiv:2304.06418, 2023 (to appear in Pacific J

    M. Solleveld, ``On principal series representations of quasi-split reductive p -adic groups", arXiv:2304.06418, 2023 (to appear in Pacific J. Math.)

    2023 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Solleveld, Y

    M. Solleveld, Y. Xu, ``On depth-zero characters of p -adic groups", arXiv:2502.01505, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Springer, Linear algebraic groups 2nd ed., Progress in Mathematics 9 , Birkh\"auser, Boston MA, 1998

    T.A. Springer, Linear algebraic groups 2nd ed., Progress in Mathematics 9 , Birkh\"auser, Boston MA, 1998

    1998

  65. [73]

    Steinberg Endomorphisms of linear algebraic groups, Mem

    R. Steinberg Endomorphisms of linear algebraic groups, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 80 , American Mathematical Society, Providence RI, 1968

    1968

  66. [74]

    Suzuki, Y

    K. Suzuki, Y. Xu, ``The explicit Local Langlands Correspondence for GSp_4 , Sp_4 and stability (with an application to Modularity Lifting)'', arXiv:2304.02622, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Tits, ``Normalisateurs de tores I

    J. Tits, ``Normalisateurs de tores I. Groupes de Coxeter \'etendus", J. Algebra 4 (1966), 96--116

    1966

  68. [76]

    Vogan, ``The local Langlands conjecture", pp

    D. Vogan, ``The local Langlands conjecture", pp. 305--379 in: Representation theory of groups and algebras, Contemp. Math. 145 , American Mathematical Society, Providence RI, 1993

    1993

  69. [77]

    Yu, ``On the local Langlands correspondence for tori", pp

    J.-K. Yu, ``On the local Langlands correspondence for tori", pp. 177--183 in: Ottawa lectures on admissible representations of reductice p-adic groups, Fields Institute Monographs, American Mathematical Society, 2009

    2009

  70. [78]

    Zhu, ``Coherent sheaves on the stack of Langlands parameters", arXiv:2008.02998, 2020

    X. Zhu, ``Coherent sheaves on the stack of Langlands parameters", arXiv:2008.02998, 2020

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.