Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 198 references

Artificial Intelligence for Geometry-Based Feature Extraction, Analysis and Synthesis in Artistic Images: A Survey

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey claims that injecting geometric information into AI models improves their performance on extracting, analyzing, and generating artistic images.

desk verdict A useful, well-organized survey whose central 'geometry boosts performance' claim runs ahead of the evidence it presents; worth refereeing with a request to temper the conclusion. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01450 v1 pith:WO6223KS submitted 2024-12-02 cs.AI cs.CV

Mridula Vijendran , Jingjing Deng , Shuang Chen , Edmond S. L. Ho , Hubert P. H. Shum This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.AIcs.CV
keywords artificialintelligencegeometricfeatureextractionartisticimageanalysissynthesisstyle-contentseparationdomainadaptationposeestimationsegmentationmasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey tries to establish that geometric information—bounding boxes, keypoints, segmentation masks, pose skeletons, and 3D shape proxies—consistently helps AI models work with artistic images. The authors argue that geometry gives models a stable form cue in a domain where style varies wildly, letting them separate style from content and bridge the gap between real photographs and paintings, sketches, cartoons, and sculptures. A sympathetic reader would care because the claim, if true, gives a concrete design rule: add geometric conditioning to models for art classification, retrieval, pose estimation, and generation. The survey also argues the same guidance improves data quality through better annotation and output refinement.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is geometric guidance in four forms: object-level labels (bounding boxes, keypoints, segmentation masks), human-centric labels (pose skeletons, facial landmarks, hand gestures), 3D representations (explicit meshes, implicit neural fields, parametric models like SMPL), and geometry-preserving data transformations such as style transfer and geometric warping. These cues let models keep structure stable while style varies, enforce spatial consistency in generated images, and provide pseudo-labels or constraints when annotations are missing. The review's argument is organized around this common thread: extraction produces geometric labels, analysis uses them for discriminative tasks, and synthesis consumes them as conditions or style-separating modules.

What would settle it

Run the same detector, pose estimator, or generator with and without geometric conditioning across several art datasets while holding architecture, data, and training budget fixed; if the no-geometry versions match the reported gains, the survey's central claim collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that incorporating geometric guidance boosts model performance in both discriminative and generative tasks on artistic images. Across extraction, analysis, and synthesis, the surveyed works show that geometry-based features act as constraints or intermediate representations that account for exaggerated shapes, cluttered compositions, and domain gaps. In the authors' words, 'incorporating geometric guidance boosts model performance in classification and synthesis tasks.' The review organizes evidence for three stages: extracting geometry from artworks, analyzing how geometry helps classification and retrieval, and synthesizing new artistic images or 3D models with geometry as conditioning.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's overall claim assumes that the performance gains reported in the cited papers come from the geometric information itself, and not from other differences such as stronger backbone networks, extra data, or dataset-specific tuning.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the survey is right, geometry-conditioned models should become the default choice for painting classification, retrieval, and human pose estimation in artistic images.
  • Generative models conditioned on masks, keypoints, or poses should produce fewer color-bleeding and boundary artifacts than unconditioned style transfer.
  • Annotations like bounding boxes and pose skeletons become valuable training signals even when imperfect, since they let models separate style from content.
  • The reported gains imply that investing in geometric annotation of art datasets will pay off in both discriminative and generative downstream tasks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: a fair test of the thesis would be a standardized benchmark that fixes the backbone and varies only geometric conditioning, which Section 5's own limitation note suggests the surveyed evidence does not yet provide.
  • My inference: the same geometric guidance could be used in interactive annotation tools, where model-predicted masks and poses are refined by expert correction to grow better art datasets.
  • My inference: geometry-conditioned models may transfer to conservation practice, where edge maps and masks already improve inpainting coherence on damaged paintings.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This survey reviews AI methods for artistic images that incorporate geometric information, organized into three stages: geometric feature extraction (bounding boxes, keypoints, segmentation, pose, 3D representations), discriminative analysis (detection, style/scene classification, human perception), and synthesis (style transfer, inpainting, relighting, conditional generation). The paper's central claim, stated in the abstract and conclusion, is that 'incorporating geometric guidance boosts model performance in classification and synthesis tasks.' The survey supports this with selected numerical examples from the literature (e.g., IoU 74.9% in Table 4, mAP 41.5% in Table 5), qualitative observations, and a discussion of future directions involving annotation, cross-attention, controlled guidance, and geometry-aware models.

Significance. If the central claim were established, this survey would be a valuable map of an emerging and fragmented area: it compiles a broad corpus, organizes methods by extraction/analysis/synthesis, provides useful tables of datasets, geometric representations, and evaluation metrics, and explicitly acknowledges several limitations. The taxonomy and the pointers to under-explored problems (e.g., standardized metrics for AI-generated graphics, fine-grained geometric control) are useful for researchers entering the field. However, the survey's headline claim is stronger than the evidence it assembles, and the paper itself concedes in Section 5 that evaluations were restricted to a limited set of models and datasets and lacked standardized metrics. This means the contribution is best read as a structured literature review with a plausible but not fully evidenced thesis, rather than a demonstrated empirical generalization.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, Section 5, Section 7] The central claim that 'incorporating geometric guidance boosts model performance' is not supported by the evidence presented. Tables 4 and 5 report absolute performance scores (e.g., IoU 74.9% in Table 4, mAP 41.5% in Table 5) without paired no-geometry baselines on the same dataset and backbone, or a common evaluation protocol. Section 5 explicitly states that the evaluation 'was restricted to a limited set of models' and that 'a narrow range of datasets limits the generalizability of our findings.' Several cited gains also confound the geometric contribution with other interventions: for example, the IoU 74.9% result from [79] in Table 4 is obtained by fine-tuning on style-transferred photographs, an intervention that changes the training distribution and does not add a geometric input. The abstract's causal 'boosts' should therefore be softened to a claim such as 'surveyed works report improvements when geometric information is used,' or the authors should add a systematic comparison table that isolates the geometric component.
  2. [Sections 2.5, 3.5, 4.4.4, Tables 4 and 5] The 'Effectiveness' subsections mix incomparable metrics and heterogeneous improvements, yet the paper treats them as evidence for a single conclusion. For instance, Table 5 lists mAP 41.5% for Faster R-CNN with CAM, accuracy 92.42% for orientation classification, and mAP 14.2% for scene retrieval; Section 2.5 reports mAP improvements of 7.05%, 3.5%, and 2.5% from different works with no common protocol; and Section 4.4.4 reports a 55% versus 11% agreement comparison in a user study. These numbers are not commensurable, and without per-paper baselines and ablation results that isolate the geometric component, they cannot establish the overarching claim that geometry is the cause of the gains. The authors should either provide a structured comparison table with baselines, backbones, datasets, and metrics, or explicitly present these as indicative examples rather than as support for a general causal conclusion.
  3. [Sections 2.1.2, 2.1.3, and 2.2.2] The survey defines 'geometric techniques' so broadly that it sometimes includes methods that do not extract or use explicit geometric information. Style transfer augmentation and data augmentation with affine transformations and cropping (Section 2.1.3) alter texture, color, and pixel positions, but they do not necessarily encode geometry as a feature, label, or constraint; the paper itself notes that style transfer 'does not correspondingly warp shapes' (Section 2.1.3). Similarly, geometric style transfer and TPS interpolation in Section 2.2.2 do inject geometric deformation, but the section does not distinguish this from texture-level augmentation. This conflation weakens the taxonomy and makes the central claim difficult to test, since any method that uses any form of augmentation could be classified as geometry-based. The authors should tighten the definition of 'geometric guidance' and indicate, for each method category, whether geometry is an explicit input, an intermediate representation, a loss constraint, or only an implicit effect of data augmentation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1, Section 1.2, Section 4] Several sentences are duplicated verbatim or nearly so. For example, 'They classify paintings based on style, identify and authenticate artwork, and provide exhibit and tour information...' appears twice in Section 1; the passage beginning 'A 3D proxy is an intermediate representation...' appears twice in Section 1.2; and 'The synthesis section covers the generation and manipulation of images or 3D models...' appears twice at the start of Section 4. These should be consolidated.
  2. [Section 2.5] The text writes 'a Chamber Distance of 0.04' and 'with a Chamber Distance of 0.047'; the correct term is 'Chamfer distance.'
  3. [Tables 2 and 6] Several table entries contain duplicate reference numbers, e.g., '[55, 55]' and '[80, 80]' in Table 2, and '128-138' followed by '128-136' in Table 6. These should be deduplicated and the reference numbering checked.
  4. [References] Some reference formatting is inconsistent, including misspelled author names (e.g., 'Cetinic, E., She, J.' appears as 'Cetinic' in the text and 'Cetinić' is standard) and incomplete fields in entries such as [38] and [182]. A careful copyedit of the bibliography is needed.
  5. [Section 5] The limitations paragraph is candid and useful, but it is placed after the evidence is presented. Consider moving a version of this caveat to the introduction so that the reader immediately understands the claim strength, and add a sentence in the conclusion that explicitly restates the limitations of the performance comparisons.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey's central claim is a literature-level meta-claim supported by many external citations, and its self-citations are ordinary supporting references, not definitional inputs.

full rationale

This manuscript is a literature survey rather than a derivation, so the circularity patterns that apply to fitted parameters, self-defined predictions, or imported uniqueness theorems do not arise. The abstract's claim that 'incorporating geometric guidance boosts model performance in classification and synthesis tasks' is a synthetic meta-claim about the surveyed literature, not a result derived from equations in the paper. The quantitative tables (Table 4 and Table 5) report performance measures from external papers, such as IoU 74.9% from [79] and mAP 41.5% from [11]; these are reported as observations, not used as inputs that by construction imply the survey's conclusion. The paper's self-citations [93], [111], [117], and [153] appear in supporting roles: [117] is cited for a Chamfer distance value in 3D reconstruction, [111] for a sculpting reconstruction method, [93] for a painting-classification observation, and [153] for a diffusion-model survey. None of these citations is invoked as a uniqueness theorem, a forced modeling ansatz, or a definition of geometric guidance in terms of the performance gain claimed. Section 5 itself concedes that evaluation was 'restricted to a limited set of models that were mostly ablation studies comparing model components and capacities' and that a 'narrow range of datasets limits the generalizability of our findings.' This candid limitation weakens the evidential strength of the performance-attribution claim, but it is an empirical-support concern, not a circularity. No equation, fitted parameter, or definitional identity is presented that would make the conclusion equivalent to its own inputs. The survey is self-contained as a literature review, and the presence of self-citations does not make the central claim circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no numerical fits or new entities. Its conclusions rest on the reliability and representativeness of the cited literature, which is an unverifiable background assumption here.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Reported metrics in cited papers are accurate and interpreted correctly.
    The survey aggregates numbers from many sources (Tables 4 and 5) without independent verification; if any are misreported, conclusions weaken.
  • domain assumption The selected set of papers is representative of the field.
    No systematic search or inclusion criteria is described; the survey may reflect the authors' selection biases.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Artificial Intelligence for Geometry-Based Feature Extraction, Analysis and Synthesis in Artistic Images: A Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WO6223KS

@misc{pith2026241201450,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Artificial Intelligence for Geometry-Based Feature Extraction, Analysis and Synthesis in Artistic Images: A Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WO6223KS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01450}
}
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence significantly enhances the visual art industry by analyzing, identifying and generating digitized artistic images. This review highlights the substantial benefits of integrating geometric data into AI models, addressing challenges such as high inter-class variations, domain gaps, and the separation of style from content by incorporating geometric information. Models not only improve AI-generated graphics synthesis quality, but also effectively distinguish between style and content, utilizing inherent model biases and shared data traits. We explore methods like geometric data extraction from artistic images, the impact on human perception, and its use in discriminative tasks. The review also discusses the potential for improving data quality through innovative annotation techniques and the use of geometric data to enhance model adaptability and output refinement. Overall, incorporating geometric guidance boosts model performance in classification and synthesis tasks, providing crucial insights for future AI applications in the visual arts domain.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

198 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [79]

    Electronic Imaging 34(13), 169–11691 (2022) https://doi.org/10.2352/EI.2022.34.13.CV AA-169

    Heitzinger, T., Stork, D.G.: Improving semantic segmentation of fine art images using photographs rendered in a style learned from artworks. Electronic Imaging 34(13), 169–11691 (2022) https://doi.org/10.2352/EI.2022.34.13.CV AA-169

    work page doi:10.2352/ei.2022.34.13.cv 2022

  2. [1]

    Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 8(1), 42 (2023)

    Bellaiche, L., Shahi, R., Turpin, M.H., Ragnhildstveit, A., Sprockett, S., Barr, N., Christensen, A., Seli, P.: Humans versus ai: whether and why we prefer human-created compared to ai-created artwork. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 8(1), 42 (2023)

    2023

  3. [2]

    Hatje Cantz Verlag (2021)

    Hirsch, A.J., Stocker, G., Jandl, M.: The practice of art and ai. Hatje Cantz Verlag (2021)

    2021

  4. [3]

    In: ITM Web of Conferences, vol

    Rani, S., Jining, D., Shah, D., Xaba, S., Singh, P.R.: Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence and computing technologies in art museums. In: ITM Web of Conferences, vol. 53 (2023). EDP Sciences

    2023

  5. [4]

    Sklodowski, M., Pawlowski, P., G´ orecka, K.: Geometrical models of old curvilin- ear paintings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 8671, 578–585 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11331-9 69

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11331-9 2014

  6. [5]

    Computer Graphics Forum 35, 4–31 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12668

    Pintus, R., Pal, K., Yang, Y., Weyrich, T., Gobbetti, E., Rushmeier, H.: A survey of geometric analysis in cultural heritage. Computer Graphics Forum 35, 4–31 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12668

    work page doi:10.1111/cgf.12668 2016

  7. [6]

    Journal of Cultural Heritage 44, 239–259 (2020)

    Borg, B., Dunn, M., Ang, A., Villis, C.: The application of state-of-the-art tech- nologies to support artwork conservation: Literature review. Journal of Cultural Heritage 44, 239–259 (2020)

    2020

  8. [7]

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9730.2011.00664.x

    Remondino, F., Rizzi, A., Barazzetti, L., Scaioni, M., Fassi, F., Brumana, R., Pelagotti, A.: Review of Geometric and Radiometric Analyses of Paintings. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9730.2011.00664.x

    work page arXiv 2011

Show all 198 references
  1. [8]

    In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol

    Pintus, R., Pal, K., Yang, Y., Weyrich, T., Gobbetti, E., Rushmeier, H.: A survey of geometric analysis in cultural heritage. In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 35, pp. 4–31 (2016). Wiley Online Library

    2016

  2. [9]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., Farhadi, A.: You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 779–788 (2016)

    2016

  3. [10]

    ACM Trans

    Mathieu, A., Inria, T.M.U., Russell, B.C., Aubry, M., Sivic, J.: Painting-to- 3d model alignment via discriminative visual elements. ACM Trans. Graph 33 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1145/2591009

    2014 doi

  4. [11]

    Journal of Imaging 8 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8080215 40

    Milani, F., Vago, N.O.P., Fraternali, P.: Proposals generation for weakly super- vised object detection in artwork images. Journal of Imaging 8 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8080215 40

    2022 doi

  5. [12]

    learning 8, 14 (2013)

    Crowley, E.J., Zisserman, A.: Of gods and goats: Weakly supervised learning of figurative art. learning 8, 14 (2013)

    2013

  6. [13]

    Gest˜ ao & Tecnologia de Projetos18(2), 109–121 (2023)

    ¨Ozg¨ un, F.N.K., Ala¸ cam, S.: A computational approach for analysis of art compositions. Gest˜ ao & Tecnologia de Projetos18(2), 109–121 (2023)

    2023

  7. [14]

    Stork, D.G.: Mathematical foundations for quantifying shape, shading, and cast shadows in realist master drawings and paintings, vol. 6315, p. 63150 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.681141

    2006 doi

  8. [15]

    Science China Information Sciences 61, 1–14 (2018)

    Li, Q., Zou, Q., Ma, D., Wang, Q., Wang, S.: Dating ancient paintings of mogao grottoes using deeply learnt visual codes. Science China Information Sciences 61, 1–14 (2018)

    2018

  9. [16]

    Hertzmann, A.: Can computers create art? In: Arts, vol. 7, p. 18 (2018). MDPI

    2018

  10. [17]

    Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 17, 22–31 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bica.2016.07.006

    Augello, A., Infantino, I., Manfr´ e, A., Pilato, G., Vella, F.: Analyzing and dis- cussing primary creative traits of a robotic artist. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 17, 22–31 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bica.2016.07.006

    2016 doi

  11. [18]

    Ernst, H.: Artificial: A study on the use of artificial intelligence in art (2023)

    2023

  12. [19]

    In: 4th International Conference on Language, Art and Cultural Exchange (ICLACE 2023), pp

    Fan, X., Liang, Y.: The research on the characteristics of ai application in art field and its value. In: 4th International Conference on Language, Art and Cultural Exchange (ICLACE 2023), pp. 146–160 (2023). Atlantis Press

    2023

  13. [20]

    Artificial intelligence review, 1–68 (2022)

    Anantrasirichai, N., Bull, D.: Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: a review. Artificial intelligence review, 1–68 (2022)

    2022

  14. [21]

    In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp

    Srinivasan, R., Uchino, K.: Biases in generative art: A causal look from the lens of art history. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 41–51 (2021)

    2021

  15. [22]

    Design and Culture 10(2), 219–223 (2018)

    James, B.: Thinking machines: Art and design in the computer age, 1959–1989, the museum of modern art, new york, usa, november 13, 2017–april 8, 2018. Design and Culture 10(2), 219–223 (2018)

    2018

  16. [23]

    In: Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2) (2021)

    Ypsilantis, N.-A., Garcia, N., Han, G., Ibrahimi, S., Van Noord, N., Tolias, G.: The met dataset: Instance-level recognition for artworks. In: Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2) (2021)

    2021

  17. [24]

    Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713545

    Duan, Y., Zhang, J., Gu, X.: A novel paradigm to design personalized derived images of art paintings using an intelligent emotional analysis model. Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713545

    2021

  18. [25]

    AI & SOCIETY 35, 409–416 (2020) 41

    Nawar, H.: Collective bread diaries: cultural identities in an artificial intelligence framework. AI & SOCIETY 35, 409–416 (2020) 41

    2020

  19. [26]

    In: Measuring, Modeling, and Reproducing Material Appearance 2015, vol

    Cox, B.D., Berns, R.S.: Imaging artwork in a studio environment for com- puter graphics rendering. In: Measuring, Modeling, and Reproducing Material Appearance 2015, vol. 9398, p. 939803 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/12. 2083388

    2015 doi

  20. [27]

    In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol

    Cohen, N., Newman, Y., Shamir, A.: Semantic segmentation in art paintings. In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 41, pp. 261–275 (2022). Wiley Online Library

    2022

  21. [28]

    ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 16, 1–17 (2022)

    Madhu, P., Villar-Corrales, A., Kosti, R., Bendschus, T., Reinhardt, C., Bell, P., Maier, A., Christlein, V.: Enhancing human pose estimation in ancient vase paintings via perceptually-grounded style transfer learning. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 16, 1–17 (2022)

    2022

  22. [29]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.04891 (2021)

    Lorente, O., Riera, I., Chaudhuri, S., Catalan, O., Casales, V.: Museum painting retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.04891 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  23. [30]

    In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020 Workshops: Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 16, pp

    Ufer, N., Lang, S., Ommer, B.: Object retrieval and localization in large art col- lections using deep multi-style feature fusion and iterative voting. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020 Workshops: Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 16, pp. 159–176 (2020). Springer

    2020

  24. [32]

    1338–1345 (2019)

    Jenicek, T., Chum, O.: Linking art through human poses, pp. 1338–1345 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2019.00216

    2019

  25. [33]

    Khungurn, P., Chou, D.: Pose estimation of anime/manga characters: A case for synthetic data (2016) https://doi.org/10.1145/3011549.3011552

    2016

  26. [34]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.08501 (2020)

    Wan, Q., Lu, O.: Napa: Neural art human pose amplifier. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.08501 (2020)

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    The Visual Computer 27, 251–261 (2011)

    Islam, M.T., Nahiduzzaman, K.M., Why, Y.P., Ashraf, G.: Informed character pose and proportion design. The Visual Computer 27, 251–261 (2011)

    2011

  28. [36]

    Marsocci, V., Lastilla, L., Pozo, S.D., Kainz, W.: Geo-information pose-id-on- a novel framework for artwork pose clustering (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijgi10040257

    2021

  29. [37]

    Journal of Imaging 9(6), 120 (2023)

    Bernasconi, V., Cetini´ c, E., Impett, L.: A computational approach to hand pose recognition in early modern paintings. Journal of Imaging 9(6), 120 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    In: 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces

    Bernasconi, V.: Gab - gestures for artworks browsing. In: 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. IUI ’22 Companion, pp. 50–53. Asso- ciation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2022). https://doi.org/ 42 10.1145/3490100.3516470 . https://doi.org/...

    2022

  31. [39]

    logical interpretations for generative algorithms

    Soddu, C.: Generative art geometry. logical interpretations for generative algorithms

  32. [40]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.14617 (2022)

    Farid, H.: Perspective (in) consistency of paint by text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.14617 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11408 (2023)

    Luccioni, A.S., Akiki, C., Mitchell, M., Jernite, Y.: Stable bias: Analyzing societal representations in diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11408 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12853 (2024)

    Akleman, E., Kurt, M., Akleman, D., Bruins, G., Deng, S., Subrama- nian, M.: Hyper-realist rendering: A theoretical framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12853 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    In: Proceedings of EV A London 2021, pp

    Foka, A.F.: Computer vision applications for art history: Reflections and paradigms for future research. In: Proceedings of EV A London 2021, pp. 73–80 (2021). BCS Learning & Development

    2021

  36. [44]

    Neural Computing and Applications 33(19), 12263–12282 (2021)

    Castellano, G., Vessio, G.: Deep learning approaches to pattern extraction and recognition in paintings and drawings: An overview. Neural Computing and Applications 33(19), 12263–12282 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM) 18(2), 1–22 (2022)

    Cetinic, E., She, J.: Understanding and creating art with ai: Review and outlook. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM) 18(2), 1–22 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    The Photogrammetric Record 26(136), 439–461 (2011)

    Remondino, F., Rizzi, A., Barazzetti, L., Scaioni, M., Fassi, F., Brumana, R., Pelagotti, A.: Review of geometric and radiometric analyses of paintings. The Photogrammetric Record 26(136), 439–461 (2011)

    2011

  39. [47]

    Multimedia Tools and Applications 80, 6599–6616 (2021)

    Castellano, G., Lella, E., Vessio, G.: Visual link retrieval and knowledge dis- covery in painting datasets. Multimedia Tools and Applications 80, 6599–6616 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    In: 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recogni- tion (ICPR), pp

    Castellano, G., Vessio, G.: Deep convolutional embedding for digitized paint- ing clustering. In: 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recogni- tion (ICPR), pp. 2708–2715 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR48806.2021. 9412438

    2021

  41. [49]

    In: 2022 Eleventh International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA), pp

    Madhu, P., Meyer, A., Zinnen, M., Muhrenberg, L., Suckow, D., Bendschus, T., Reinhardt, C., Bell, P., Verstegen, U., Kosti, R.,et al.: One-shot object detection in heterogeneous artwork datasets. In: 2022 Eleventh International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and ...

    2022

  42. [50]

    IET Image Processing (2023)

    Ahmad, T., Schich, M.: Toward cross-domain object detection in artwork images using improved yolov5 and xgboosting. IET Image Processing (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), pp

    Fuertes, D., del-Blanco, C.R., Jaureguizar, F., Giarcia, N.: Logomix: A data augmentation technique for object detection applied to logo recognition. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), pp. 1–2 (2022). IEEE

    2022

  44. [53]

    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1– 24 (2023)

    Zhao, Q., Chang, Z., Wang, Z.: Research on the factors affecting accuracy of abstract painting orientation detection. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1– 24 (2023)

    2023

  45. [54]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.00855 (2015)

    Saleh, B., Elgammal, A.: Large-scale classification of fine-art paintings: Learning the right metric on the right feature. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.00855 (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  46. [55]

    In: 2020 International Conference on Infor- mation and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), pp

    Jeon, H.-J., Jung, S., Choi, Y.-S., Kim, J.W., Kim, J.S.: Object detection in artworks using data augmentation. In: 2020 International Conference on Infor- mation and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), pp. 1312–1314 (2020). IEEE

    2020

  47. [56]

    In: 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp

    Kadish, D., Risi, S., Lovlie, A.S.: Improving object detection in art images using only style transfer. In: 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1–8 (2021). IEEE

    2021

  48. [57]

    IEEE Access 9, 81969–81985 (2021)

    Sandoval, C., Pirogova, E., Lech, M.: Adversarial learning approach to unsuper- vised labeling of fine art paintings. IEEE Access 9, 81969–81985 (2021)

    2021

  49. [58]

    In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval, pp

    Anwer, R.M., Khan, F.S., Van De Weijer, J., Laaksonen, J.: Combining holistic and part-based deep representations for computational painting categorization. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval, pp. 339–342 (2016)

    2016

  50. [59]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Castrejon, L., Aytar, Y., Vondrick, C., Pirsiavash, H., Torralba, A.: Learning aligned cross-modal representations from weakly aligned data. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2940– 2949 (2016)

    2016

  51. [60]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10111 (2023)

    Huang, Y., Iizuka, S., Simo-Serra, E., Fukui, K.: Controllable multi-domain semantic artwork synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10111 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Pattern Recog- nition Letters 126, 3–10 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PATREC.2018.02

    Wechsler, H., Toor, A.S.: Modern art challenges face detection. Pattern Recog- nition Letters 126, 3–10 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PATREC.2018.02. 014 44

    2019 doi

  53. [62]

    Yaniv, J.: The face of art: Landmark detection and geometric style in portraits (2019) https://doi.org/10.1145/3306346.3322984

    2019

  54. [63]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.05124 (2023)

    Schneider, S., Vollmer, R.: Poses of people in art: A data set for human pose estimation in digital art history. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.05124 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Sensors 21(6), 2091 (2021)

    Ciortan, I.-M., George, S., Hardeberg, J.Y.: Colour-balanced edge-guided digital inpainting: Applications on artworks. Sensors 21(6), 2091 (2021)

    2021

  56. [65]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp

    Xue, A.: End-to-end chinese landscape painting creation using generative adver- sarial networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp. 3863–3871 (2021)

    2021

  57. [66]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Bai, Z., Nakashima, Y., Garcia, N.: Explain me the painting: Multi-topic knowledgeable art description generation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 5422–5432 (2021)

    2021

  58. [67]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Shen, X., Efros, A.A., Aubry, M.: Discovering visual patterns in art collections with spatially-consistent feature learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 9278–9287 (2019)

    2019

  59. [68]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.00110 (2015)

    Cai, H., Wu, Q., Corradi, T., Hall, P.: The cross-depiction problem: Computer vision algorithms for recognising objects in artwork and in photographs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.00110 (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  60. [69]

    IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 1285–1288 (2011)

    Schlecht, J., Carque, B., Ommer, B.: Detecting gestures in medieval image. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 1285–1288 (2011)

    2011

  61. [70]

    In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops (2018)

    Gonthier, N., Gousseau, Y., Ladjal, S., Bonfait, O.: Weakly supervised object detection in artworks. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops (2018)

    2018

  62. [71]

    Neurocomputing 490, 163–180 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.01.068

    Lu, Y., Guo, C., Dai, X., Wang, F.Y.: Data-efficient image captioning of fine art paintings via virtual-real semantic alignment training. Neurocomputing 490, 163–180 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.01.068

    2022 doi

  63. [72]

    In: 2020 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), pp

    Marinescu, M.-C., Reshetnikov, A., Lopez, J.M.: Improving object detection in paintings based on time contexts. In: 2020 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), pp. 926–932 (2020). IEEE

    2020

  64. [73]

    IEEE Access 8 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988856

    Sizyakin, R., Cornelis, B., Meeus, L., Dubois, H., Martens, M., Voronin, V., Pizurica, A.: Crack detection in paintings using convolutional neural networks. IEEE Access 8 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988856

    2020

  65. [74]

    In: 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05), vol

    Dalal, N., Triggs, B.: Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05), vol. 1, pp. 886–8931 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/ CVPR.2005.177 45

    2005

  66. [75]

    In: Com- puter Vision–ECCV 2016 Workshops: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 8-10 and 15-16, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14, pp

    Westlake, N., Cai, H., Hall, P.: Detecting people in artwork with cnns. In: Com- puter Vision–ECCV 2016 Workshops: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 8-10 and 15-16, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14, pp. 825–841 (2016). Springer

    2016

  67. [76]

    Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2014 (2014)

    Crowley, E.J., Zisserman, A.: The state of the art: Object retrieval in paint- ings using discriminative regions. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2014 (2014)

    2014

  68. [77]

    Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 33 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy006

    Lang, S., Ommer, B.: Attesting similarity: Supporting the organization and study of art image collections with computer vision. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 33 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy006

    2018 doi

  69. [78]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11924 (2023)

    Delgado, A., Alba-Carcel’en, L., Murillo-Fuentes, J.J.: Crossing points detec- tion in plain weave for old paintings with deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11924 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  70. [80]

    Pattern Recognition 135 (2023) https://doi

    Zhang, J., Liu, C., Xian, K., Cao, Z.: Large motion anime head animation using a cascade pose transform network. Pattern Recognition 135 (2023) https://doi. org/10.1016/J.PATCOG.2022.109181

    2023

  71. [81]

    In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM ’22), Oct, 2022, Lisboa, Portugal, vol

    Springstein, M., Schneider, S., Althaus, C., Ewerth, R., Ew, R.: Semi-supervised human pose estimation in art-historical images. In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM ’22), Oct, 2022, Lisboa, Portugal, vol. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145...

    2022

  72. [82]

    Sindel, A., Maier, A., Christlein, V.: Artfacepoints: High-resolution facial landmark detection in paintings and prints (2022)

    2022

  73. [83]

    In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2012: 12th European Conference on Computer Vision, Florence, Italy, October 7-13, 2012, Proceedings, Part IV 12, pp

    Carneiro, G., Da Silva, N.P., Del Bue, A., Costeira, J.P.: Artistic image classifi- cation: An analysis on the printart database. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2012: 12th European Conference on Computer Vision, Florence, Italy, October 7-13, 2012, Proceedings, Part IV 12, pp. 143–1...

    2012

  74. [84]

    Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00067

    Ju, X., Zeng, A., Wang, J., Xu, Q., Zhang, L.: Human-art: A versatile human- centric dataset bridging natural and artificial scenes. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00067

    2023

  75. [85]

    Pattern Recognition 51, 148–175 (2016)

    Nguyen, D.T., Li, W., Ogunbona, P.O.: Human detection from images and videos: A survey. Pattern Recognition 51, 148–175 (2016)

    2016

  76. [86]

    Computational Visual Media 1, 91–103 46 (2015)

    Hall, P., Cai, H., Wu, Q., Corradi, T.: Cross-depiction problem: Recognition and synthesis of photographs and artwork. Computational Visual Media 1, 91–103 46 (2015)

    2015

  77. [87]

    Multimedia Tools and Applications (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13801-3

    Arkin, E., Yadikar, N., Xu, X., Aysa, A., Ubul, K., Tools, M.: A survey: object detection methods from cnn to transformer. Multimedia Tools and Applications (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13801-3

    2023 doi

  78. [88]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Wang, X., Girdhar, R., Yu, S.X., Misra, I.: Cut and learn for unsupervised object detection and instance segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3124–3134 (2023)

    2023

  79. [89]

    ACM Computing Surveys (2023)

    Liu, Y., Yang, D., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Liu, J., Boukerche, A., Sun, P., Song, L.: Generalized video anomaly event detection: Systematic taxonomy and comparison of deep models. ACM Computing Surveys (2023)

    2023

  80. [90]

    IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (2023)

    Liu, Y., Liu, J., Yang, K., Ju, B., Liu, S., Wang, Y., Yang, D., Sun, P., Song, L.: Amp-net: Appearance-motion prototype network assisted automatic video anomaly detection system. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (2023)

    2023

  81. [91]

    In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp

    Liu, Y., Xia, Z., Zhao, M., Wei, D., Wang, Y., Liu, S., Ju, B., Fang, G., Liu, J., Song, L.: Learning causality-inspired representation consistency for video anomaly detection. In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 203–212 (2023)

    2023

  82. [92]

    Pattern Recognition 140, 109568 (2023)

    Liu, J., Liu, Y., Zhu, W., Zhu, X., Song, L.: Distributional and spatial-temporal robust representation learning for transportation activity recognition. Pattern Recognition 140, 109568 (2023)

    2023

  83. [93]

    In: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications

    Vijendran, M., Li, F.W.B., Shum, H.P.H.: Tackling data bias in painting classi- fication with style transfer. In: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications. VISAPP ’23, pp. 250–261 (2023). https://doi.org/10.5220/0011776600003417

    2023 doi

  84. [94]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.06014 (2021)

    Feng, Y., Jiang, J., Tang, M., Jin, R., Gao, Y.: Rethinking supervised pre- training for better downstream transferring. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.06014 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  85. [95]

    In: 2018 Metrology for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (MetroArchaeo), pp

    Smirnov, S., Eguizabal, A.: Deep learning for object detection in fine-art paint- ings. In: 2018 Metrology for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (MetroArchaeo), pp. 45–49 (2018). IEEE

    2018

  86. [96]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Li, D., Yang, Y., Song, Y.-Z., Hospedales, T.M.: Deeper, broader and artier domain generalization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 5542–5550 (2017)

    2017

  87. [97]

    Acta Bio Medica: Atenei Parmensis 90(4), 526 (2019) 47

    Lazzeri, D., Nicoli, F., Zhang, Y.X.: Secret hand gestures in paintings. Acta Bio Medica: Atenei Parmensis 90(4), 526 (2019) 47

    2019

  88. [98]

    ACM Computing Surveys 56(1), 1–37 (2023)

    Zheng, C., Wu, W., Chen, C., Yang, T., Zhu, S., Shen, J., Kehtarnavaz, N., Shah, M.: Deep learning-based human pose estimation: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys 56(1), 1–37 (2023)

    2023

  89. [99]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 43(10), 3349–3364 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/ TPAMI.2020.2983686

    Wang, J., Sun, K., Cheng, T., Jiang, B., Deng, C., Zhao, Y., Liu, D., Mu, Y., Tan, M., Wang, X., Liu, W., Xiao, B.: Deep high-resolution representa- tion learning for visual recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 43(10), 3349–3364 (2021) ht...

    2021

  90. [100]

    In: Human-Computer Interaction

    He, N., Lu, K.: An image segmentation method for chinese paintings by com- bining deformable models with graph cuts. In: Human-Computer Interaction. Design and Development Approaches: 14th International Conference, HCI Inter- national 2011, Orlando, FL, USA, July 9-14, 2011, P...

    2011

  91. [101]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Kamann, C., Rother, C.: Increasing the robustness of semantic segmenta- tion models with painting-by-numbers. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 369–387 (2020). Springer

    2020

  92. [102]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.07059 (2022)

    Chen, Y., Yuan, Q., Li, Z., Xie, Y.L.W.W.C., Wen, X., Yu, Q.: Upst-nerf: Uni- versal photorealistic style transfer of neural radiance fields for 3d scene. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.07059 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  93. [103]

    In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 Papers, pp

    Carroll, R., Agarwala, A., Agrawala, M.: Image warps for artistic perspective manipulation. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 Papers, pp. 1–9 (2010)

    2010

  94. [104]

    In: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp

    Sahay, P., Rajagopalan, A.: Geometric inpainting of 3d structures. In: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp. 1–7 (2015)

    2015

  95. [105]

    In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games, pp

    Kim, Y., Winnemoller, H., Lee, S.: Wysiwyg stereo painting. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games, pp. 169–176 (2013)

    2013

  96. [106]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Huang, Y.-H., He, Y., Yuan, Y.-J., Lai, Y.-K., Gao, L.: Stylizednerf: consistent 3d scene stylization as stylized nerf via 2d-3d mutual learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 18342–18352 (2022)

    2022

  97. [107]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Tseng, K.-W., Lee, Y.-C., Chen, C.-S.: Artistic style novel view synthesis based on a single image. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2258–2262 (2022)

    2022

  98. [108]

    In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXXI, pp

    Zhang, K., Kolkin, N., Bi, S., Luan, F., Xu, Z., Shechtman, E., Snavely, N.: Arf: Artistic radiance fields. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXXI, pp. 48 717–733 (2022). Springer

    2022

  99. [109]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Srinivasan, P.P., Deng, B., Zhang, X., Tancik, M., Mildenhall, B., Barron, J.T.: Nerv: Neural reflectance and visibility fields for relighting and view synthesis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7495–7504 (2021)

    2021

  100. [110]

    : Efficient geometry-aware 3d generative adversarial networks

    Chan, E.R., Lin, C.Z., Chan, M.A., Nagano, K., Pan, B., De Mello, S., Gallo, O., Guibas, L.J., Tremblay, J., Khamis, S., et al. : Efficient geometry-aware 3d generative adversarial networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,...

    2022

  101. [111]

    In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pp

    Chang, Z., Koulieris, G.A., Shum, H.P.: 3d reconstruction of sculptures from single images via unsupervised domain adaptation on implicit models. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pp. 1–10 (2022)

    2022

  102. [112]

    Neural Computing and Applications, 1–15 (2023)

    Pang, S., Peng, R., Dong, Y., Yuan, Q., Wang, S., Sun, J.: Jointmetro: a 3d reconstruction model for human figures in works of art based on transformer. Neural Computing and Applications, 1–15 (2023)

    2023

  103. [113]

    In: GCH 2019-EUROGRAPHICS Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage, pp

    Casati, P., Ronfard, R., Hahmann, S.: Approximate reconstruction of 3d scenes from bas-reliefs. In: GCH 2019-EUROGRAPHICS Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage, pp. 109–118 (2019). The Eurographics Association

    2019

  104. [114]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques 6(2), 1–12 (2023)

    Zeidler, D., McGinity, M.: Bodylab: in virtuo sculpting, painting and perform- ing of full-body avatars. Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques 6(2), 1–12 (2023)

    2023

  105. [115]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.12922 (2021)

    Jetchev, N.: Clipmatrix: Text-controlled creation of 3d textured meshes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.12922 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  106. [116]

    In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol

    Fu, T., Chaine, R., Digne, J.: Fakir: An algorithm for revealing the anatomy and pose of statues from raw point sets. In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 39, pp. 375–385 (2020). Wiley Online Library

    2020

  107. [117]

    Chang, Z., Koulieris, G.A., Shum, H.P.H.: 3d reconstruction of sculptures from single images via unsupervised domain adaptation on implicit models (2022)

    2022

  108. [118]

    In: Computer Vision–ACCV 2018: 14th Asian Conference on Com- puter Vision, Perth, Australia, December 2–6, 2018, Revised Selected Papers, Part III 14, pp

    Thomas, C., Kovashka, A.: Artistic object recognition by unsupervised style adaptation. In: Computer Vision–ACCV 2018: 14th Asian Conference on Com- puter Vision, Perth, Australia, December 2–6, 2018, Revised Selected Papers, Part III 14, pp. 460–476 (2019). Springer

    2019

  109. [119]

    In: 2016 International Conference on Platform Technology and Service (PlatCon), pp

    Seo, S., Lee, H., Kim, Y., Son, W.: Video motion analysis for landscape image abstraction. In: 2016 International Conference on Platform Technology and Service (PlatCon), pp. 1–4 (2016). IEEE 49

    2016

  110. [120]

    Computer Vision and Image Understanding 222, 103487 (2022)

    Pasqualino, G., Furnari, A., Farinella, G.M.: A multi camera unsupervised domain adaptation pipeline for object detection in cultural sites through adver- sarial learning and self-training. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 222, 103487 (2022)

    2022

  111. [121]

    In: Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems: 15th International Conference, ACIVS 2013, Poznan, Poland, October 28-31, 2013

    Condorovici, R.G., Florea, C., Vertan, C.: Painting scene recognition using homogenous shapes. In: Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems: 15th International Conference, ACIVS 2013, Poznan, Poland, October 28-31, 2013. Proceedings 15, pp. 262–273 (2013). Springer

    2013

  112. [122]

    Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 71, 183– 193 (2009) https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.1.183

    Todorovic, D.: The effect of the observer vantage point on perceived distortions in linear perspective images. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 71, 183– 193 (2009) https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.1.183

    2009 doi

  113. [123]

    The Journal of architecture 13(6), 701–736 (2008)

    Rapp, J.B.: A geometrical analysis of multiple viewpoint perspective in the work of giovanni battista piranesi: an application of geometric restitution of perspective. The Journal of architecture 13(6), 701–736 (2008)

    2008

  114. [124]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15284 (2023)

    Fumanal-Idocin, J., Andreu-Perez, J., Cordon, O., Hagras, H., Bustince, H.: Artxai: Explainable artificial intelligence curates deep representation learning for artistic images using fuzzy techniques. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15284 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  115. [125]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Liu, X.-C., Yang, Y.-L., Hall, P.: Geometric and textural augmentation for domain gap reduction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 14340–14350 (2022)

    2022

  116. [126]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Yang, J., Guo, F., Chen, S., Li, J., Yang, J.: Industrial style transfer with large-scale geometric warping and content preservation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7834–7843 (2022)

    2022

  117. [127]

    In: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Liu, X.-C., Yang, Y.-L., Hall, P.: Learning to warp for style transfer. In: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3702–3711 (2021)

    2021

  118. [128]

    Materials 14(16), 4551 (2021)

    Vulimiri, P.S., Deng, H., Dugast, F., Zhang, X., To, A.C.: Integrating geometric data into topology optimization via neural style transfer. Materials 14(16), 4551 (2021)

    2021

  119. [129]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08410 (2019)

    Nakano, R.: Neural painters: A learned differentiable constraint for generating brushstroke paintings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08410 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  120. [130]

    arXiv e-prints, 2207 (2022)

    Geng, J., Ma, L., Li, X., Yan, Y.: Ptgcf: Printing texture guided color fusion for impressionism oil painting style rendering. arXiv e-prints, 2207 (2022)

    2022

  121. [131]

    In: Advances in Image and Video Technology: Third Pacific Rim Symposium, PSIVT 2009, 50 Tokyo, Japan, January 13-16, 2009

    Papari, G., Petkov, N.: Glass patterns and artistic imaging. In: Advances in Image and Video Technology: Third Pacific Rim Symposium, PSIVT 2009, 50 Tokyo, Japan, January 13-16, 2009. Proceedings 3, pp. 1034–1045 (2009). Springer

    2009

  122. [132]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

    Yin, W., Liu, Z., Loy, C.C.: Instance-level facial attributes transfer with geometry-aware flow. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, pp. 9111–9118 (2019)

    2019

  123. [133]

    In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXVI 16, pp

    Kim, S.S., Kolkin, N., Salavon, J., Shakhnarovich, G.: Deformable style transfer. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXVI 16, pp. 246–261 (2020). Springer

    2020

  124. [134]

    In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol

    Kopanas, G., Philip, J., Leimkuhler, T., Drettakis, G.: Point-based neural ren- dering with per-view optimization. In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 40, pp. 29–43 (2021). Wiley Online Library

    2021

  125. [135]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.05471 (2020)

    Liu, X.-C., Li, X.-Y., Cheng, M.-M., Hall, P.: Geometric style transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.05471 (2020)

    2020 arXiv

  126. [136]

    Applied Sciences 12(12), 6055 (2022)

    Alexandru, I., Nicula, C., Prodan, C., Rotaru, R.-P., Voncilua, M.-L., Tar- bua, N., Boiangiu, C.-A.: Image style transfer via multi-style geometry warping. Applied Sciences 12(12), 6055 (2022)

    2022

  127. [137]

    arXiv, 119 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2626116

    Du, X., He, Y., Yang, X., Chang, C.-M., Xie, H.: Sketch-based 3d shape modeling from sparse point clouds. arXiv, 119 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2626116

    2022 doi

  128. [138]

    In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW), pp

    Upadhyay, A., Dubey, A., Kuriakose, S.M., Mahato, D.: 3dstnet: Neural 3d shape style transfer. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW), pp. 1–6 (2022). IEEE

    2022

  129. [139]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.09170 (2021)

    Bird, J.J.: Continuation of famous art with ai: A conditional adversarial network inpainting approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.09170 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  130. [140]

    LatinX in AI at International Conference on Machine Learning 2022 (2022) https://doi.org/10

    Cipolina-Kun, L., Papadakis, S.M., Caenazzo, S.: Discriminative candidate selection for image inpainting applications to the fine arts. LatinX in AI at International Conference on Machine Learning 2022 (2022) https://doi.org/10. 52591/lxai202207176

    2022

  131. [141]

    Zhang, L., Agrawala, M.: Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion Models (2023)

    2023

  132. [142]

    In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol

    Chen, X., Jin, X., Zhao, Q., Wu, H.: Artistic illumination transfer for portraits. In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 31, pp. 1425–1434 (2012). Wiley Online Library

    2012

  133. [143]

    IEEE Access 9, 7033–7042 (2021) 51

    Chen, W.-Y., Ople, J.J.M., Si, M.J., Tan, D.S., Hua, K.-L.: Perspective preserving style transfer for interior portraits. IEEE Access 9, 7033–7042 (2021) 51

    2021

  134. [144]

    The Visual Computer 33(1), 33–46 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00371-015-1150-7

    Henz, B., Oliveira, M.M.: Artistic relighting of paintings and draw- ings. The Visual Computer 33(1), 33–46 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00371-015-1150-7

    2017

  135. [145]

    Henz, B.: Image relighting using shading proxies. (2014)

    2014

  136. [146]

    ArXiv abs/2208.04370 (2022)

    Mishra, S., Granskog, J.: Clip-based neural neighbor style transfer for 3d assets. ArXiv abs/2208.04370 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  137. [147]

    Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Photorealistic Image and Environment Synthesis for Multimedia Experiments (2022)

    Jin, B., Tian, B., Zhao, H., Zhou, G.: Language-guided semantic style transfer of 3d indoor scenes. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Photorealistic Image and Environment Synthesis for Multimedia Experiments (2022)

    2022

  138. [148]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Zhao, A., Balakrishnan, G., Lewis, K.M., Durand, F., Guttag, J.V., Dalca, A.V.: Painting many pasts: Synthesizing time lapse videos of paintings. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8435–8445 (2020)

    2020

  139. [149]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)34(4), 1–10 (2015)

    Tan, J., Dvoroˇ zˇ n´ ak, M., S` ykora, D., Gingold, Y.: Decomposing time-lapse paintings into layers. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)34(4), 1–10 (2015)

    2015

  140. [150]

    In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol

    Koyama, Y., Goto, M.: Decomposing images into layers with advanced color blending. In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 37, pp. 397–407 (2018). Wiley Online Library

    2018

  141. [151]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 30, 8644–8657 (2021)

    Hou, H., Huo, J., Wu, J., Lai, Y.-K., Gao, Y.: Mw-gan: multi-warping gan for car- icature generation with multi-style geometric exaggeration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 30, 8644–8657 (2021)

    2021

  142. [152]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12015 (2023)

    Abrahamsen, N., Yao, J.: Inventing painting styles through natural inspiration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12015 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  143. [153]

    arXiv preprint arXiv: 2306.04542 (2023)

    Chang, Z., Koulieris, G.A., Shum, H.P.H.: On the design fundamentals of diffusion models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2306.04542 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  144. [154]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09274 (2023)

    Chen, D.-Y.: Conditional human sketch synthesis with explicit abstraction control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09274 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  145. [155]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06908 (2023)

    Peng, Y., Zhao, C., Xie, H., Fukusato, T., Miyata, K.: Difffacesketch: High- fidelity face image synthesis with sketch-guided latent diffusion model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06908 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  146. [156]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Zeng, Y., Lin, Z., Zhang, J., Liu, Q., Collomosse, J., Kuen, J., Patel, V.M.: Scenecomposer: Any-level semantic image synthesis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 22468–22478 (2023)

    2023

  147. [157]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Kolkin, N., Salavon, J., Shakhnarovich, G.: Style transfer by relaxed optimal 52 transport and self-similarity. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 10051–10060 (2019)

    2019

  148. [158]

    In: 2017 Ninth International Conference on Advances in Pattern Recognition (ICAPR), pp

    Datta, R., Ghorai, M., Mandal, S.: Image inpainting using geometric transfor- mations for digital circuit images. In: 2017 Ninth International Conference on Advances in Pattern Recognition (ICAPR), pp. 1–6 (2017). IEEE

    2017

  149. [159]

    In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp

    Ci, Y., Ma, X., Wang, Z., Li, H., Luo, Z.: User-guided deep anime line art colorization with conditional adversarial networks. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 1536–1544 (2018)

    2018

  150. [160]

    In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp

    He, B., Gao, F., Ma, D., Shi, B., Duan, L.-Y.: Chipgan: A generative adversarial network for chinese ink wash painting style transfer. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 1172–1180 (2018)

    2018

  151. [161]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp

    Chen, M., Laina, I., Vedaldi, A.: Training-free layout control with cross-attention guidance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp. 5343–5353 (2024)

    2024

  152. [162]

    Heritage Science 7 (2019) https://doi.org/10

    Abate, D.: Documentation of paintings restoration through photogrammetry and change detection algorithms. Heritage Science 7 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 1186/s40494-019-0257-y

    2019

  153. [163]

    364 (2018)

    Castagnetti, C., Rossi, P., Capra, A.: 3d reconstruction of rock paintings: A cost-effective approach based on modern photogrammetry for rapidly mapping archaeological findings, vol. 364 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/ 364/1/012020

    2018 doi

  154. [164]

    Journal of Cultural Heritage 15, 308–312 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.06

    Carrozzino, M., Evangelista, C., Brondi, R., Tecchia, F., Bergamasco, M.: Vir- tual reconstruction of paintings as a tool for research and learning. Journal of Cultural Heritage 15, 308–312 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.06. 003

    2014 doi

  155. [165]

    Heritage Science 10 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00750-1

    Bent, G.R., Pfaff, D., Brooks, M., Radpour, R., Delaney, J.: A practical workflow for the 3d reconstruction of complex historic sites and their decorative interiors: Florence as it was and the church of orsanmichele. Heritage Science 10 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-02...

    2022 doi

  156. [166]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, vol

    Jackson, A.S., Bulat, A., Argyriou, V., Tzimiropoulos, G.: Large pose 3d face reconstruction from a single image via direct volumetric cnn regression. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 2017-October, pp. 1031–1039 (2017). https://doi....

    2017 doi

  157. [167]

    Optics InfoBase Conference Papers (2020) https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.390326 53

    Zhou, X., In, D., Chen, X., Liu, X., Yang, Y.: Spectral 3d reconstruction of impressionist oil painting based on macroscopic oct imaging. Optics InfoBase Conference Papers (2020) https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.390326 53

    2020 doi

  158. [168]

    Sensors 22 (2022) https://doi.org/10

    Moradi, M., Ghorbani, R., Sfarra, S., Tax, D.M.J., Zarouchas, D.: A spatiotem- poral deep neural network useful for defect identification and reconstruction of artworks using infrared thermography. Sensors 22 (2022) https://doi.org/10. 3390/s22239361

    2022

  159. [169]

    Soft Matter 13, 5802–5808 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1039/c7sm00985b

    L´ eang, M., Giorgiutti-Dauphin´ e, F., Lee, L.T., Pauchard, L.: Crack opening: From colloidal systems to paintings. Soft Matter 13, 5802–5808 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1039/c7sm00985b

    2017 doi

  160. [170]

    Polymers 12, 1–12 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12112536

    Yuan, J., Chen, C., Yao, D., Chen, G.: 3d printing of oil paintings based on material jetting and its reduction of staircase effect. Polymers 12, 1–12 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12112536

    2020 doi

  161. [171]

    In: Medical Image Computing and Computer- Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18, pp

    Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer- Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18, pp...

    2015

  162. [172]

    International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 38(Part 5) (2010)

    Barazzetti, L., Remondino, F., Scaioni, M., Lo Brutto, M., Rizzi, A., Bru- mana, R., et al.: Geometric and radiometric analysis of paintings. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 38(Part 5) (2010)

    2010

  163. [173]

    In: International Workshop on Recording, Modeling and Visualization of Cultural Heritage, p

    Blais, F., Taylor, J., Cournoyer, L., Picard, M., Borgeat, L., Dicaire, L., Rioux, M., Beraldin, J., Godin, G., Lahanier, C., et al.: Ultra-high resolution imaging at 50µm using a portable xyz-rgb color laser scanner. In: International Workshop on Recording, Modeling and Visua...

    2005

  164. [174]

    2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 5800–5809 (2020)

    Lee, J., Kim, E., Lee, Y., Kim, D., Chang, J., Choo, J.: Reference-based sketch image colorization using augmented-self reference and dense semantic correspondence. 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 5800–5809 (2020)

    2020

  165. [175]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

    Schaldenbrand, P., Oh, J.: Content masked loss: Human-like brush stroke plan- ning in a reinforcement learning painting agent. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, pp. 505–512 (2021)

    2021

  166. [176]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., DiVerdi, S., Wang, Z., Echevarria, J., Fu, Y.: Texture hallucination for large-factor painting super-resolution. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 209–225 (2020). Springer

    2020

  167. [177]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04719 (2023) 54

    Yuan, S., Dai, A., Yan, Z., Liu, R., Chen, M., Chen, B., Qiu, Z., He, X.: Learning to generate poetic chinese landscape painting with calligraphy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04719 (2023) 54

    2023 arXiv

  168. [178]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.08808 (2023)

    Shahid, M., Koch, M., Schneider, N.: Paint it black: Generating paintings from text descriptions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.08808 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  169. [179]

    In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp

    Tong, Z., Wang, X., Yuan, S., Chen, X., Wang, J., Fang, X.: Im2oil: Stroke-based oil painting rendering with linearly controllable fineness via adaptive sampling. In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 1035–1046 (2022)

    2022

  170. [180]

    Computational Visual Media10(2), 355–373 (2024)

    Huang, Y., Iizuka, S., Simo-Serra, E., Fukui, K.: Controllable multi-domain semantic artwork synthesis. Computational Visual Media10(2), 355–373 (2024)

    2024

  171. [181]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Singh, J., Zheng, L., Smith, C., Echevarria, J.: Paint2pix: interactive paint- ing based progressive image synthesis and editing. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 678–695 (2022). Springer

    2022

  172. [182]

    http://www.ics.forth.gr/recover/

    Lourakis, M., Alongi, P., Delouis, D., Lippi, F., Spadoni, F., SpA, P.A.S.: RECOVER: PHOTOREALISTIC 3D RECONSTRUCTION OF PERSPEC- TIVE PAINTINGS AND PICTURES. http://www.ics.forth.gr/recover/

  173. [183]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.19406 (2023)

    Li, X., Lin, C.-C., Chen, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, J., Raj, B.: Paintseg: Training-free segmentation via painting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.19406 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  174. [184]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Singh, J., Zheng, L.: Combining semantic guidance and deep reinforcement learn- ing for generating human level paintings. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 16387–16396 (2021)

    2021

  175. [185]

    Applied Sciences 13(2), 867 (2023)

    Han, X., Wu, Y., Wan, R.: A method for style transfer from artistic images based on depth extraction generative adversarial network. Applied Sciences 13(2), 867 (2023)

    2023

  176. [186]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Yang, B., Zhang, Y., Xu, Y., Li, Y., Zhou, H., Bao, H., Zhang, G., Cui, Z.: Learning object-compositional neural radiance field for editable scene rendering. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 13779–13788 (2021)

    2021

  177. [187]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Park, K., Sinha, U., Barron, J.T., Bouaziz, S., Goldman, D.B., Seitz, S.M., Martin-Brualla, R.: Nerfies: Deformable neural radiance fields. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 5865–5874 (2021)

    2021

  178. [188]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), pp

    Zhao, Y., Barnes, C., Zhou, Y., Shechtman, E., Amirghodsi, S., Fowlkes, C.: Geofill: Reference-based image inpainting with better geometric understand- ing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), pp. 1776–1786 (2023)

    2023

  179. [189]

    In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp

    Sofiiuk, K., Petrov, I.A., Konushin, A.: Reviving iterative training with mask 55 guidance for interactive segmentation. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 3141–3145 (2022). IEEE

    2022

  180. [190]

    Pattern Recognition 131, 108882 (2022)

    Bragantini, J., Falc˜ ao, A.X., Najman, L.: Rethinking interactive image segmen- tation: Feature space annotation. Pattern Recognition 131, 108882 (2022)

    2022

  181. [191]

    IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (2023)

    Groenen, I., Rudinac, S., Worring, M.: Panorams: automatic annotation for detecting objects in urban context. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (2023)

    2023

  182. [192]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Kirillov, A., Mintun, E., Ravi, N., Mao, H., Rolland, C., Gustafson, L., Xiao, T., Whitehead, S., Berg, A.C., Lo, W.-Y., et al.: Segment anything. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 4015–4026 (2023)

    2023

  183. [193]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.05887 (2022)

    Wang, X., Guo, P., Zhang, Y.: Domain adaptation via bidirectional cross- attention transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.05887 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  184. [194]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 23(7), 9529–9542 (2022)

    Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Shen, Z., Shen, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y.: Confidence- and-refinement adaptation model for cross-domain semantic segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 23(7), 9529–9542 (2022)

    2022

  185. [195]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01626 (2022)

    Hertz, A., Mokady, R., Tenenbaum, J., Aberman, K., Pritch, Y., Cohen-Or, D.: Prompt-to-prompt image editing with cross attention control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01626 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  186. [196]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16322 (2023)

    Zhao, S., Chen, D., Chen, Y.-C., Bao, J., Hao, S., Yuan, L., Wong, K.-Y.K.: Uni- controlnet: All-in-one control to text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16322 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  187. [197]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05559 (2022)

    Wu, C.H., Torre, F.: Unifying diffusion models’ latent space, with applications to cyclediffusion and guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05559 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  188. [198]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Tertikas, K., Paschalidou, D., Pan, B., Park, J.J., Uy, M.A., Emiris, I., Avrithis, Y., Guibas, L.: Generating part-aware editable 3d shapes without 3d supervision. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4466–4478 (2023)

    2023

  189. [199]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13514 (2023)

    Ayg¨ un, M., Mac Aodha, O.: Saor: Single-view articulated object reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13514 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  190. [200]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04461 (2023) 56

    Zheng, X.-Y., Pan, H., Wang, P.-S., Tong, X., Liu, Y., Shum, H.-Y.: Locally attentional sdf diffusion for controllable 3d shape generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04461 (2023) 56

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.