Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

PassionNet: An Innovative Framework for Duplicate and Conflicting Requirements Identification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.01657 v1 pith:KG54HG6U submitted 2024-12-02 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords predictivepipelinesconflictingduplicaterequirementssimilarityframeworkllms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Early detection and resolution of duplicate and conflicting requirements can significantly enhance project efficiency and overall software quality. Researchers have developed various computational predictors by leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) potential to detect duplicate and conflicting requirements. However, these predictors lack in performance and requires more effective approaches to empower software development processes. Following the need of a unique predictor that can accurately identify duplicate and conflicting requirements, this research offers a comprehensive framework that facilitate development of 3 different types of predictive pipelines: language models based, multi-model similarity knowledge-driven and large language models (LLMs) context + multi-model similarity knowledge-driven. Within first type predictive pipelines landscape, framework facilitates conflicting/duplicate requirements identification by leveraging 8 distinct types of LLMs. In second type, framework supports development of predictive pipelines that leverage multi-scale and multi-model similarity knowledge, ranging from traditional similarity computation methods to advanced similarity vectors generated by LLMs. In the third type, the framework synthesizes predictive pipelines by integrating contextual insights from LLMs with multi-model similarity knowledge. Across 6 public benchmark datasets, extensive testing of 760 distinct predictive pipelines demonstrates that hybrid predictive pipelines consistently outperforms other two types predictive pipelines in accurately identifying duplicate and conflicting requirements. This predictive pipeline outperformed existing state-of-the-art predictors performance with an overall performance margin of 13% in terms of F1-score

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Evolution of Natural Language Processing: How Prompt Optimization and Language Models are Shaping the Future

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review that categorizes 45 prompt optimization strategies into 11 classes and surveys their use across NLP tasks, models, and datasets, but with inconsistent counts and overlapping categories.

Pith tools