Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Samudra: An AI Global Ocean Emulator for Climate

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the neural-network emulator Samudra reproduces the full-depth ocean temperature structure and variability of the OM4 model, remains stable for centuries, and runs about 150 times faster, though it under-responds to…

desk verdict A genuine full-depth ocean emulator with credible control-run stability, but the abstract oversells it: century-scale 'no drift' is shown only under repeated near-zero-forcing conditions, and the paper's own forced runs expose weak trends and instabilities. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03795 v4 pith:RFUN3ENL submitted 2024-12-05 physics.ao-ph cs.LG

Surya Dheeshjith , Adam Subel , Alistair Adcroft , Julius Busecke , Carlos Fernandez-Granda , Shubham Gupta , Laure Zanna This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ao-phcs.LG
keywords oceanemulatormachinelearningclimatemodelemulationfull-depthConvNeXtUNetOM4ENSOvariabilitylong-termstability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a single neural network can stand in for the ocean component of a global climate model across the full ocean depth and over centennial timescales. The network, named Samudra, is trained on output of the OM4 ocean model and predicts temperature, salinity, sea-surface height, and horizontal currents on nineteen depth levels from the surface to the seafloor. On an eight-year held-out test, the emulator reproduces the climatological depth structure and ENSO variability with little drift, and under a repeating ten-year atmospheric forcing cycle it remains stable for 400 years while running about 150 times faster than OM4. If these claims hold, ocean control runs and large ensembles become dramatically cheaper. The paper is candid that the emulator under-reproduces forced warming trends and that adding trend sensitivity tends to destabilize long rollouts.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the modified ConvNeXt UNet: a U-shaped convolutional network in which each block uses GeLU activations, dilated 3x3 convolutions, batch normalization, and inverted channel bottlenecks, with average-pooling downsampling and bilinear upsampling, periodic padding in longitude, and zero padding at the poles. The model is autoregressive in a two-input/two-output configuration: two previous 5-day ocean states plus the current atmospheric forcing produce the next two states, which are then fed back in. Each channel encodes one variable at one depth level, giving 158 input and 154 output channels for the full model; a separate thermodynamic-only version predicts temperature, salinity, and sea-surface height. The depth-varying land mask keeps land cells at zero. This learned map is what must simultaneously reproduce the model's climatology, its interannual variability, and its long-term equilibrium under repeated forcing.

What would settle it

Force Samudra for 100 years with a sustained 1 W/m2 per year increase in surface heat flux and compare the global ocean heat content trend against OM4 run under the same forcing; the central claim fails if the emulator's trend is systematically more than 20-50% too weak or if the rollout becomes unstable within a few decades.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The contribution is a global, autoregressive, machine-learning emulator of a full-depth ocean model. The authors train Samudra on 65 years of output from OM4, the ocean component of the CM4 climate model, conservatively remapped to 19 vertical levels and a 1 degree horizontal grid, with a 5-day time step. It predicts potential temperature, salinity, sea-surface height, and the two horizontal velocity components, and is driven by atmospheric wind stress, downward heat flux, and its anomaly. On a held-out 8-year period, the emulator reproduces the depth-latitude structure of temperature and salinity, the upper-ocean response to atmospheric forcing, and the phase and structure of ENSO events; the authors also report that training is robust to random seeds and initial conditions. Under a repeated 10-year atmospheric forcing cycle from 1990-2000, chosen for its near-zero global heat flux, both variants of the emulator stay stable for 100 years, and a 400-year run shows no drift, with century rollouts taking about 1.3 hours on one GPU versus roughly 8 days for OM4 on thousands of CPU cores. The paper's central claim is that this is the first ocean emulator to reproduce the full-depth ocean temperature structure and its variability over multiple centuries in a realistic, time-dependent forced configuration. The same experiments show the main limitation: when heat flux increases steadily, the emulator's warming trend is too weak, and some stronger-forced rollouts become unstable.

Load-bearing premise

The centuries-long stability is demonstrated only under a repeating 10-year atmospheric forcing cycle from 1990-2000 chosen for its near-zero global heat flux, and the paper's own forced runs show that under steadily increasing heat flux the emulator's trend is too weak and some rollouts become unstable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Samudra can replace OM4 for control-type ocean simulations and for large ensemble studies, since a century-long run takes about 1.3 hours on a single GPU rather than 8 days on thousands of CPU cores.
  • Because the emulator reproduces the full-depth temperature structure and interannual variability including ENSO, it can be used to study contemporary ocean variability and extreme events at much lower cost.
  • The demonstrated stability over 400 years under repeated forcing means the emulator can accelerate spin-up integrations and support perturbed-parameter experiments for model calibration.
  • Coupling Samudra with an atmospheric emulator would make fast, full coupled-climate surrogates feasible, following the role the paper proposes for emulating the coupled model.
  • The demonstrated limitation restricts these uses to contemporary-ocean and control settings; forced climate-change projections are not yet supported by this emulator.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The near-zero-heat-flux forcing cycle used for the stability tests removes the sustained drift that defines climate change, so centennial stability under this cycle is a weaker result than it appears for forced applications.
  • The weak trend response may stem from the training data itself: the model still carries initialization adjustment and the atmospheric forcing already reflects the coupled ocean state, so the emulator learns a damped forcing-to-trend map; a promising testable fix is predicting tendencies rather than states and adding a conservation penalty.
  • A practical test would be to fine-tune Samudra on only the most recent decade of OM4 output and measure whether the trend bias shrinks, since the earlier adjustment period may be contaminating the learned response.
  • The thermodynamic-only emulator shows more aperiodic variability and less noise than the full model, suggesting that treating fast velocities separately from slow thermodynamics is a workable route toward stable forced runs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Samudra, a global ocean emulator built on a modified ConvNeXt UNet architecture, trained on 1975–2014 output from the OM4 ocean general circulation model. Samudra autoregressively predicts full-depth potential temperature, salinity, sea surface height, and horizontal velocities on a 1-degree grid with a 5-day timestep, using atmospheric forcing as boundary conditions. The authors evaluate the emulator on an 8-year held-out period (2014–2022), compare it against OM4 and, in the Supporting Information, against the GODAS reanalysis, and perform 100-year and 400-year control rollouts forced by a repeated 1990–2000 atmospheric cycle chosen for near-zero global heat flux. They report accurate climatologies and interannual variability, century-scale stability, a roughly 150x speedup relative to OM4, and robustness across training seeds and initial conditions. The paper also reports a central limitation: under increasing surface heat flux, the emulator underestimates warming trends and some configurations become unstable after roughly 50–80 years.

Significance. If the central claims hold, Samudra would be a valuable computational tool for large-ensemble studies, data assimilation, and model development for the contemporary ocean, and the released code and weights would make it reproducible. The manuscript includes several commendable practices: an 8-year held-out test, multiple training seeds, a GODAS comparison, and a clear disclosure of the trend-response deficiency in Section 4. The main significance, however, hinges on the scope of the stability claim. The demonstration of century-scale stability is confined to a repeated near-zero-heat-flux forcing cycle, which tests equilibration to a periodic control forcing rather than behavior under transient, climate-change-like forcing. The paper's own forced experiments show that the emulator cannot simultaneously capture trends and remain stable, so the abstract's and introduction's unqualified statements about stability 'for centuries' in 'climate-change simulations' overstate the evidence. With appropriate qualification, the paper would be a solid contribution to the growing literature on learned climate emulators.

major comments (4)
  1. [Introduction and Section 3.2] The introduction states that Samudra 'can retain skill and remain stable for centuries for experiments equivalent to both control and climate-change simulations,' and the abstract claims the emulator 'is stable for centuries.' The evidence in Section 3.2 consists exclusively of 100-year and 400-year rollouts forced with a repeated 10-year cycle from 1990–2000, a period chosen specifically for its near-zero global heat flux (Section 2.5). This tests stability under a periodic zero-drift forcing, not under climate-change forcing. Section 4 and Supporting Information Figures S23, S24, and S27 show that forced runs with increasing heat flux produce too-weak trends, that the cumulative-forcing variant becomes unstable after about 80 years, and that a tendency-learning variant shows instabilities during short rollouts. The claims in the abstract and introduction should be revised to state that stability is demonstrated for control forcing only, and the phrase 'no drift relative to the truth' should be qualified accordingly.
  2. [Abstract and Section 3.1] The abstract says Samudra 'exhibits no drift relative to the truth.' In the 8-year test, the emulator underestimates the global-mean potential temperature trends by 20–50% at most depths (Section 3.1, Figures S1 and S3), and the GODAS comparison in the Supporting Information (Figures S21 and S22) shows that the emulator loses track of the observed warming trend and exhibits larger errors than OM4. In the 100-year control run, the 'truth' is the repeated 10-year OM4 segment, not an independent century-scale integration. The 'no drift' claim should be limited to the repeated near-zero-heat-flux control experiment; otherwise, it is contradicted by the paper's own results.
  3. [Section 4: speedup comparison] The reported 150x speedup compares 8 days of OM4 integration on 4,671 CPU cores with 1.3 hours for Samudra on a single 40GB A100 GPU. Because the two are run on different hardware types and the emulator uses a much larger timestep and coarser grid, the speedup is not a like-for-like comparison. The manuscript should either provide an estimate on comparable hardware or explicitly state that the speedup is hardware-dependent. In addition, Section 2.1 says OM4 used a 20-minute timestep, while Section 4 says '5 day time step (vs. 15 minutes in OM4)'; these statements are inconsistent and should be reconciled.
  4. [Introduction, 'first' claim] The paper claims Samudra is 'the first ocean emulator capable of reproducing the full-depth (from the surface down to the ocean floor) ocean temperature structure and its variability, while running for multiple centuries in a realistic configuration with time-dependent forcing.' The qualifier 'realistic configuration with time-dependent forcing' is potentially misleading because the multi-century runs use a repeated 10-year atmospheric forcing cycle, and the primary configuration struggles with transient forcing. The sentence should be rephrased to accurately reflect the experiment design, e.g., 'with prescribed atmospheric forcing from a reanalysis product, over control-style repeated forcing.'
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.4, Eq. (2)] The loss function is garbled in the text: 'Lt = P NX n=1 1 C Y X ...' is not a properly typeset equation. The symbol 'P' is not defined in the equation, and the normalization factors are unclear. Please rewrite the equation in standard mathematical notation and define P and N explicitly.
  2. [Section 3.2] The sentence 'The global mean temperatures are 3.225 ◦C/yr for Fthermo and 3.215 ◦C/yr for Fthermo+dynamic' uses incorrect units; the values are temperatures, not rates, so the units should be degrees Celsius (◦C), not ◦C/yr.
  3. [Supporting Information, Figure S24 caption] The caption for Figure S24 reads 'OHC trends (same caption as S23),' but Figure S23 is an 8-year test-set comparison while S24 shows 100-year forced runs; the cross-reference is misleading and should be corrected.
  4. [Section 2.1] The phrase 'conservatively remap onto 19 fixed-depth levels' and 'conservatively coarsen the data in time' would benefit from a one-sentence clarification of what 'conservatively' means in this context (e.g., conservation of volume-weighted integrals or fluxes), since the term is used for both spatial and temporal coarsening.
  5. [Section 3.1] The robustness claim 'The emulators’ skill is unchanged when using different seeds and start dates' is supported by standard deviations of 0.0033 and 0.00225 in RMSE, but the absolute RMSE values are not reported in the main text, making it hard for the reader to gauge whether these standard deviations are small relative to the skill. Please report the mean RMSE alongside the standard deviation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the emulator is trained on OM4 and evaluated on held-out OM4 data, a disclosed and standard protocol, with an external GODAS comparison in the Supporting Information; self-citations are implementation choices, not load-bearing premises.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a supervised-learning pipeline: OM4 states and forcing are inputs, a ConvNeXt-UNet is trained with an MSE loss, and skill is measured on a held-out 2014-2022 period plus multi-seed rollouts. No fitted parameter is later relabeled as a prediction, and no equation reduces to a hidden fitted value. The architecture is taken from the authors' prior work (Dheeshjith et al., 2024), but this is an implementation choice and is not used as a uniqueness argument or as evidence for the emulator's skill. The long-control experiments use a repeated 1990-2000 forcing cycle explicitly chosen for near-zero global heat flux; this is a limitation in the strength of the stability test, and the paper itself notes this choice and separately reports weak forced-trend response and unstable rollouts under stronger forcing (Section 4; Figures S16, S23, S24, S27). That is a scope-of-claim concern, not circularity, because the emulator is not defined in terms of the zero-drift forcing and could in principle have drifted or blown up under the repeated cycle. The Supporting Information includes an external comparison to GODAS reanalysis, providing independent grounding. The only self-citation that appears is the architecture citation and a consistency remark about velocity variability, neither of which carries the central derivation. The manuscript is self-contained against its stated ground truth and discloses its main weakness, so circularity is minimal.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The emulator contributes a fitted mapping from OM4 states to future OM4 states. The ledger counts the learned weights and preprocessing choices as free parameters, and lists the domain assumptions that the OM4 simulation, the exogenous forcing, the repeated-forcing control, and the coarsened grid are adequate for the claimed skill. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Learned network weights (135M parameters) = trained on OM4 1975-2014
    The entire mapping is fitted to the training simulation; reported skill is in-sample interpolation across time, not an independent physical derivation.
  • Time step Delta t = 5 days
    Chosen to coarsen the 20-minute model output; sets the temporal resolution of all rollouts.
  • Recurrent unroll steps N in loss = 4
    Controls how many autoregressive steps are backpropagated during training and affects long-run stability.
  • Spatial preprocessing filter and grid = 18x18-cell Gaussian filter; 1-degree grid; 19 depth levels
    Removes mesoscale variability; defines the effective resolution at which emulation skill is claimed.
  • Training period and exclusion = 1975-2014, last 50 samples validation
    Initialization and selection choices that affect trend and drift estimates; 1958-1975 is excluded due to model adjustment.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The OM4 65-year simulation is an adequate representation of the ocean for training and evaluation.
    All skill metrics are computed against OM4 output; comparison to GODAS reanalysis appears only in the Supporting Information and shows the emulator inherits OM4 biases.
  • domain assumption Atmospheric boundary conditions can be treated as exogenous inputs without interactive ocean-atmosphere coupling.
    The emulator is forced with prescribed stress and heat fluxes; the authors note the forcing may already reflect the changing ocean circulation (Discussion).
  • ad hoc to paper A repeated 10-year forcing period with near-zero global heat flux is a valid control experiment for testing long-term stability.
    The 100- and 400-year runs recycle 1990-2000 forcing; stability under other forcing is not established and forced runs can be unstable.
  • domain assumption Five-day averaging and 1-degree coarsening preserve the resolved dynamics relevant to the claims.
    The emulator is validated at these scales, not at the native 1/4-degree, 20-minute OM4 resolution.
  • domain assumption Residual ocean model adjustment after 1975 is small enough not to dominate trend evaluation.
    The paper prunes 1958-1975 because of drift but states some regions are still cooling post-1975 and this biased testing (Sections 2.4 and 4).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Samudra: An AI Global Ocean Emulator for Climate." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RFUN3ENL

@misc{pith2026241203795,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Samudra: An AI Global Ocean Emulator for Climate},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RFUN3ENL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03795}
}
read the original abstract

AI emulators for forecasting have emerged as powerful tools that can outperform conventional numerical predictions. The next frontier is to build emulators for long climate simulations with skill across a range of spatiotemporal scales, a particularly important goal for the ocean. Our work builds a skillful global emulator of the ocean component of a state-of-the-art climate model. We emulate key ocean variables, sea surface height, horizontal velocities, temperature, and salinity, across their full depth. We use a modified ConvNeXt UNet architecture trained on multi-depth levels of ocean data. We show that the ocean emulator - Samudra - which exhibits no drift relative to the truth, can reproduce the depth structure of ocean variables and their interannual variability. Samudra is stable for centuries and 150 times faster than the original ocean model. Samudra struggles to capture the correct magnitude of the forcing trends and simultaneously remain stable, requiring further work.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03795 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a) Schematic of the model training process, illustrating the mapping from input (ocean states and atmospheric forcing) to output (ocean states rolled out over several time steps). Initially, the ground-truth ocean states, Φt and Φt−∆t, along with the atmospheric forcing, τ t, are provided as inputs to predict Φ˜t+∆t and Φ˜t+2∆t. Predictions, along with ground-truth atmospheric forcing, are then used as inputs for fu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. a) Spatially averaged timeseries of potential temperature θO at depths 2.5m (left) and 775m (right) over the test set comparing the ground truth OM4 (black), and predictions from Fthermo (red) and Fthermo+dynamic (green). The mean prediction and its variance (indi￾cated by shading) are plotted over 5 initial seeds of training for each model. b) Nino 3.4 index timeseries over the test set for the ground truth (OM4, b… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a) Globally averaged potential temperature (θO) timeseries over a 100-year con￾trol run, comparing the 10-year ground truth OM4 (black) and predictions from Fthermo (red) and Fthermo+dynamic (green). b) Time-averaged potential temperature (θO) depth profile over a 100-year control run, comparing the 10-year ground truth OM4 (left) and predictions from Fthermo (middle) and Fthermo+dynamic (right). c) Nino 3.4 index t… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Simultaneous emulation and downscaling with physically-consistent deep learning-based regional ocean emulators

    physics.ao-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-stage deep learning framework autoregressively emulates Gulf of Mexico ocean surface fields at 8 km and downscales them to 4 km with stable 10-year climatology.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , Busecke, J J M

    xGCM APACrefauthors Abernathey, R P. , Busecke, J J M. , Smith, T A. , Deauna, J D. , Banihirwe, A. , Nicholas, T. Thielen, J. APACrefauthors \ 2022 11 . xgcm. xgcm. Zenodo . APACrefURL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7348619 APACrefURL APACrefDOI doi:10.5281/zenodo.7348619 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.7348619 2022

  2. [2]

    , Anderson, W

    adcroft_2019 APACrefauthors Adcroft, A. , Anderson, W. , Balaji, V. , Blanton, C. , Bushuk, M. , Dufour, C O. Zhang, R. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . The GFDL Global Ocean and Sea Ice Model OM4 .0: Model Description and Simulation Features The GFDL Global Ocean and Sea Ice Model OM4 .0: Model Description and Simulation Features . Journal of Advances in Modeling...

    doi:10.1029/2019ms001726 2019

  3. [3]

    , Szunyogh, I

    arcomano2023hybrid APACrefauthors Arcomano, T. , Szunyogh, I. , Wikner, A. , Hunt, B R. \ Ott, E. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . A hybrid atmospheric model incorporating machine learning can capture dynamical processes not captured by its physics-based component A hybrid atmospheric model incorporating machine learning can capture dynamical processes not capture...

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    , Xie, L

    bi2023accurate APACrefauthors Bi, K. , Xie, L. , Zhang, H. , Chen, X. , Gu, X. \ Tian, Q. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Accurate medium-range global weather forecasting with 3D neural networks Accurate medium-range global weather forecasting with 3d neural networks . Nature 619 7970 533--538

    2023

  5. [5]

    , L \"u tjens, B

    bire2023ocean APACrefauthors Bire, S. , L \"u tjens, B. , Azizzadenesheli, K. , Anandkumar, A. \ Hill, C N. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Ocean emulation with fourier neural operators: Double gyre Ocean emulation with fourier neural operators: Double gyre . Authorea Preprints

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    , Henn, B

    cachay2024probabilistic APACrefauthors Cachay, S R. , Henn, B. , Watt-Meyer, O. , Bretherton, C S. \ Yu, R. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Probabilistic Emulation of a Global Climate Model with Spherical DYffusion Probabilistic emulation of a global climate model with spherical dyffusion . arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14798

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    , Zanna, L

    chemke2020identifying APACrefauthors Chemke, R. , Zanna, L. \ Polvani, L M. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Identifying a human signal in the North Atlantic warming hole Identifying a human signal in the north atlantic warming hole . Nature communications 11 1 1540

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    ACE2-SOM: Coupling an ML atmospheric emulator to a slab ocean and learning the sensitivity of climate to changed CO$_2$

    clark2024ace2 APACrefauthors Clark, S K. , Watt-Meyer, O. , Kwa, A. , McGibbon, J. , Henn, B. , Perkins, W A. Harris, L M. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . ACE2-SOM: Coupling to a slab ocean and learning the sensitivity of climate to changes in CO \_2 Ace2-som: Coupling to a slab ocean and learning the sensitivity of climate to changes in co \_2 . arXiv preprint a...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    , Gregory, J M

    couldrey2020causes APACrefauthors Couldrey, M P. , Gregory, J M. , Dias, F B. , Dobrohotoff, P. , Domingues, C M. , Garuba, O. others APACrefauthors \ 2020 . What causes the spread of model projections of ocean dynamic sea-level change in response to greenhouse gas forcing? Wh...

    2020

  2. [10]

    APACrefauthors \ 2025

    dheeshjith-doi-software APACrefauthors Dheeshjith, S. APACrefauthors \ 2025 . suryadheeshjith/Samudra: v1.0.0 - First Stable Release [Software]. suryadheeshjith/samudra: v1.0.0 - first stable release [software]. Zenodo . APACrefURL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15037463 APACr...

    2025 doi

  3. [11]

    , Subel, A

    dheeshjith2024transfer APACrefauthors Dheeshjith, S. , Subel, A. , Gupta, S. , Adcroft, A. , Fernandez-Granda, C. , Busecke, J. \ Zanna, L. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Transfer Learning for Emulating Ocean Climate Variability across CO\_2 forcing Transfer learning for emulating oc...

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    , Chattopadhyay, A

    gray2024long APACrefauthors Gray, M A. , Chattopadhyay, A. , Wu, T. , Lowe, A. \ He, R. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Long-term Prediction of the Gulf Stream Meander Using OceanNet: a Principled Neural Operator-based Digital Twin Long-term prediction of the gulf stream meander using...

    2024

  5. [13]

    , Danabasoglu, G

    griffies_omip_2016 APACrefauthors Griffies, S M. , Danabasoglu, G. , Durack, P J. , Adcroft, A J. , Balaji, V. , Böning, C W. Yeager, S G. APACrefauthors \ 2016 09 . OMIP contribution to CMIP6 : experimental and diagnostic protocol for the physical component of the Ocean Model...

    2016

  6. [14]

    , Lyu, P

    guo2024orca APACrefauthors Guo, Z. , Lyu, P. , Ling, F. , Luo, J J. , Boers, N. , Ouyang, W. \ Bai, L. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . ORCA: A Global Ocean Emulator for Multi-year to Decadal Predictions Orca: A global ocean emulator for multi-year to decadal predictions . arXiv prepri...

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    , Guo, H

    held_2019 APACrefauthors Held, I M. , Guo, H. , Adcroft, A. , Dunne, J P. , Horowitz, L W. , Krasting, J. Zadeh, N. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Structure and Performance of GFDL 's CM4 .0 Climate Model Structure and Performance of GFDL 's CM4 .0 Climate Model . Journal of Advances...

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    , Clementi, E

    holmberg2024regional APACrefauthors Holmberg, D. , Clementi, E. \ Roos, T. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Regional Ocean Forecasting with Hierarchical Graph Neural Networks Regional ocean forecasting with hierarchical graph neural networks . arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.11807

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    , Cresswell-Clay, N

    karlbauer2023advancing APACrefauthors Karlbauer, M. , Cresswell-Clay, N. , Durran, D R. , Moreno, R A. , Kurth, T. \ Butz, M V. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Advancing Parsimonious Deep Learning Weather Prediction using the HEALPix Mes Advancing parsimonious deep learning weather pr...

    2023

  10. [18]

    APACrefauthors \ 2024

    khatiwala2024efficient APACrefauthors Khatiwala, S. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Efficient spin-up of Earth System Models using sequence acceleration Efficient spin-up of earth system models using sequence acceleration . Science Advances 10 18 eadn2839

    2024

  11. [19]

    , Yuval, J

    kochkov2024neural APACrefauthors Kochkov, D. , Yuval, J. , Langmore, I. , Norgaard, P. , Smith, J. , Mooers, G. others APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Neural general circulation models for weather and climate Neural general circulation models for weather and climate . Nature 1--7

    2024

  12. [20]

    , Boyer, T

    woa2013 APACrefauthors Levitus, S. , Boyer, T. , Garcia, H. , Locarnini, R. , Zweng, M. , Mishonov, A. Seidov, D. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . World Ocean Atlas 2013 ( NCEI Accession 0114815). World ocean atlas 2013 ( NCEI accession 0114815). APACrefDOI doi:10.7289/v5f769gt APACrefDOI

    2015 doi

  13. [21]

    , Mao, H

    liu2022convnet APACrefauthors Liu, Z. , Mao, H. , Wu, C Y. , Feichtenhofer, C. , Darrell, T. \ Xie, S. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . A convnet for the 2020s A convnet for the 2020s . Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition Proceedings of the...

    2022

  14. [22]

    , Abernathey, R

    Loose2022 APACrefauthors Loose, N. , Abernathey, R. , Grooms, I. , Busecke, J. , Guillaumin, A. , Yankovsky, E. Martin, P. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . GCM-Filters: A Python Package for Diffusion-based Spatial Filtering of Gridded Data Gcm-filters: A python package for diffusion-ba...

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    , Milinski, S

    maher2021large APACrefauthors Maher, N. , Milinski, S. \ Ludwig, R. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Large ensemble climate model simulations: introduction, overview, and future prospects for utilising multiple types of large ensemble Large ensemble climate model simulations: introduct...

    2021

  16. [24]

    , Collins, W

    mahesh2024huge APACrefauthors Mahesh, A. , Collins, W. , Bonev, B. , Brenowitz, N. , Cohen, Y. , Elms, J. others APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Huge ensembles part i: Design of ensemble weather forecasts using spherical fourier neural operators Huge ensembles part i: Design of ensemb...

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    , Cohen, Y

    manshausen2024generative APACrefauthors Manshausen, P. , Cohen, Y. , Pathak, J. , Pritchard, M. , Garg, P. , Mardani, M. Brenowitz, N. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Generative data assimilation of sparse weather station observations at kilometer scales Generative data assimilation o...

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Department of Commerce

    cisl_rda_dsd277006 APACrefauthors National Centers for Environmental Prediction, National Weather Service, NOAA , U.S . Department of Commerce . APACrefauthors \ 2006 . NCEP Global Ocean Data Assimilation System ( GODAS ). NCEP global ocean data assimilation system ( GODAS ). ...

    2006 doi

  19. [27]

    , Arcomano, T

    patel2024exploring APACrefauthors Patel, D. , Arcomano, T. , Hunt, B. , Szunyogh, I. \ Ott, E. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Exploring the Potential of Hybrid Machine-Learning/Physics-Based Modeling for Atmospheric/Oceanic Prediction Beyond the Medium Range Exploring the potential o...

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    , Sanchez-Gonzalez, A

    price2023gencast APACrefauthors Price, I. , Sanchez-Gonzalez, A. , Alet, F. , Andersson, T R. , El-Kadi, A. , Masters, D. others APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Gencast: Diffusion-based ensemble forecasting for medium-range weather Gencast: Diffusion-based ensemble forecasting for med...

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    , Fischer, P

    ronneberger2015u APACrefauthors Ronneberger, O. , Fischer, P. \ Brox, T. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation . Medical image computing and computer-assisted inte...

    2015

  22. [30]

    , Reichl, B G

    sane2023parameterizing APACrefauthors Sane, A. , Reichl, B G. , Adcroft, A. \ Zanna, L. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Parameterizing vertical mixing coefficients in the ocean surface boundary layer using neural networks Parameterizing vertical mixing coefficients in the ocean surfac...

    2023

  23. [31]

    \ Zanna, L

    subel2024building APACrefauthors Subel, A. \ Zanna, L. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Building ocean climate emulators Building ocean climate emulators . arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04342

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    , Zanna, L

    todd2020ocean APACrefauthors Todd, A. , Zanna, L. , Couldrey, M. , Gregory, J. , Wu, Q. , Church, J A. others APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Ocean-only FAFMIP: Understanding regional patterns of ocean heat content and dynamic sea level change Ocean-only fafmip: Understanding regional...

    2020

  25. [33]

    , Urakawa, L S

    tsujino_2020 APACrefauthors Tsujino, H. , Urakawa, L S. , Griffies, S M. , Danabasoglu, G. , Adcroft, A J. , Amaral, A E. Yu, Z. APACrefauthors \ 2020 08 . Evaluation of global ocean–sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparis...

    2020

  26. [34]

    , Pritchard, M S

    wang2024coupled APACrefauthors Wang, C. , Pritchard, M S. , Brenowitz, N. , Cohen, Y. , Bonev, B. , Kurth, T. Pathak, J. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Dynamics in a Machine Learning Earth System Model Coupled ocean-atmosphere dynamics in a machine learning e...

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    , Dresdner, G

    watt2023ace APACrefauthors Watt-Meyer, O. , Dresdner, G. , McGibbon, J. , Clark, S K. , Henn, B. , Duncan, J. others APACrefauthors \ 2023 . ACE: A fast, skillful learned global atmospheric model for climate prediction Ace: A fast, skillful learned global atmospheric model for...

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    , Xiang, Y

    xiong2023ai APACrefauthors Xiong, W. , Xiang, Y. , Wu, H. , Zhou, S. , Sun, Y. , Ma, M. \ Huang, X. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . AI-GOMS: Large AI-Driven Global Ocean Modeling System Ai-goms: Large ai-driven global ocean modeling system . arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03152

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    , Khatiwala, S

    zanna2019global APACrefauthors Zanna, L. , Khatiwala, S. , Gregory, J M. , Ison, J. \ Heimbach, P. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Global reconstruction of historical ocean heat storage and transport Global reconstruction of historical ocean heat storage and transport . Proceedings of...

    2019

  30. [38]

    , raphael dussin , Huard, D

    xesmf APACrefauthors Zhuang, J. , raphael dussin , Huard, D. , Bourgault, P. , Banihirwe, A. , Raynaud, S. Li, X. APACrefauthors \ 2023 09 . pangeo-data/xESMF: v0.8.2. pangeo-data/xesmf: v0.8.2. Zenodo . APACrefURL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8356796 APACrefURL APACrefDOI d...

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.