Pith. sign in

REVIEW 9 cited by

A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Open Research Challenges, and Future Directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.05563 v2 pith:MU3MVGWX submitted 2024-12-07 cs.CL cs.AI

Ola Shorinwa , Zhiting Mei , Justin Lidard , Allen Z. Ren , Anirudha Majumdar This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords llmsuncertaintymethodsquantificationresearchapplicationschallengesexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The remarkable performance of large language models (LLMs) in content generation, coding, and common-sense reasoning has spurred widespread integration into many facets of society. However, integration of LLMs raises valid questions on their reliability and trustworthiness, given their propensity to generate hallucinations: plausible, factually-incorrect responses, which are expressed with striking confidence. Previous work has shown that hallucinations and other non-factual responses generated by LLMs can be detected by examining the uncertainty of the LLM in its response to the pertinent prompt, driving significant research efforts devoted to quantifying the uncertainty of LLMs. This survey seeks to provide an extensive review of existing uncertainty quantification methods for LLMs, identifying their salient features, along with their strengths and weaknesses. We present existing methods within a relevant taxonomy, unifying ostensibly disparate methods to aid understanding of the state of the art. Furthermore, we highlight applications of uncertainty quantification methods for LLMs, spanning chatbot and textual applications to embodied artificial intelligence applications in robotics. We conclude with open research challenges in uncertainty quantification of LLMs, seeking to motivate future research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Conformalized Large Language Models under Configuration Shift

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Configuration shift (prompt, temperature, quantization) moves nonconformity score distributions and drives conformal coverage below target; bounds, diagnostics, and mitigations are provided.

  2. Check Yourself Before You Wreck Yourself: Selectively Quitting Improves LLM Agent Safety

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Explicitly instructing LLM agents to quit uncertain or risky tasks improves their safety scores by 0.39 on average in ToolEmu simulations, with a negligible average helpfulness decrease of 0.03.

  3. INSIGHT: INference-time Sequence Introspection for Generating Help Triggers in Vision-Language-Action Models

    cs.RO 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Token-level uncertainty sequences from a VLA policy, classified by a small transformer, predict when a robot should request human help better than static uncertainty scores.

  4. Uncertainty-aware Reward Design Process

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    URDP couples LLM-based reward component design with uncertainty-weighted Bayesian optimization, reporting better reward quality and efficiency than Eureka and Text2Reward on three benchmarks.

  5. SAFECAST: Robust Failure Detection for VLA Policies with Contrast-Set Training and Calibration

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SAFECAST augments hidden-state failure-probe training and conformal calibration with visual and language contrast sets, improving VLA failure detection under distribution shift in several tested settings.

  6. Uncertainty-o: One Model-agnostic Framework for Unveiling Uncertainty in Large Multimodal Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Uncertainty-o estimates uncertainty in large multimodal models by perturbing prompts and computing entropy over semantically clustered answers, improving hallucination detection across five modalities.

  7. Toward Better Generalisation in Uncertainty Estimators: Leveraging Data-Agnostic Features

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Adding data-agnostic probability and entropy features to hidden-state probes improves cross-task generalization in most but not all evaluated transfer pairs.

  8. ChemAU: Harness the Reasoning of LLMs in Chemical Research with Adaptive Uncertainty Estimation

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    ChemAU adds a position penalty to token-level uncertainty estimates so that flagged reasoning steps are corrected by a fine-tuned chemistry model, reporting improved accuracy on GPQA, MMLU-Pro, and SuperGPQA chemistry...

  9. Uncertainty-Aware Adaptation of Large Language Models for Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    LoRA ensembles and Bayesian LoRA improve accuracy and calibration of LLM-based protein-protein interaction prediction on disease-specific datasets, though gains are small and baselines are limited.

Pith tools