Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 111 references

Creating a Cooperative AI Policymaking Platform through Open Source Collaboration

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes an open-source platform that combines a policy-conditioned economic forecasting model, value elicitation, and a public interface to support data-driven policymaking.

desk verdict A clear, honest research proposal with zero results; the core causal-forecasting assumption is unresolved and unvalidated. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06936 v1 pith:ZX2CJ5Y3 submitted 2024-12-09 cs.CY cs.AIcs.LG

Aiden Lewington , Alekhya Vittalam , Anshumaan Singh , Anuja Uppuluri , Arjun Ashok , Ashrith Mandayam Athmaram , Austin Milt , Benjamin Smith
show 43 more authors
Charlie Weinberger Chatanya Sarin Christoph Bergmeir Cliff Chang Daivik Patel Daniel Li David Bell Defu Cao Donghwa Shin Edward Kang Edwin Zhang Enhui Li Felix Chen Gabe Smithline Haipeng Chen Henry Gasztowtt Hoon Shin Jiayun Zhang Joshua Gray Khai Hern Low Kishan Patel Lauren Hannah Cooke Marco Burstein Maya Kalapatapu Mitali Mittal Raymond Chen Rosie Zhao Sameen Majid Samya Potlapalli Shang Wang Shrenik Patel Shuheng Li Siva Komaragiri Song Lu Sorawit Siangjaeo Sunghoo Jung Tianyu Zhang Valery Mao Vikram Krishnakumar Vincent Zhu Wesley Kam Xingzhe Li Yumeng Liu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.LG
keywords AIgovernanceeconomicforecastingtimeseriesfoundationmodelsvalueelicitationpolicygenerationopen-sourcecollaborationlargelanguagecivictechnology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a nonprofit, open-source collaboration can build a cooperative AI policymaking platform from three planned components: an Economics Transformer (a multimodal language model that forecasts economic time series from policy text and event data), an AI Legislator (value elicitation plus LLM-based policy generation), and a Policy Interface for transparent public interaction. The motivation is that current regulatory incentives lag behind AI development, so better data-driven tools could help policymakers anticipate economic effects of proposed policies and incorporate diverse public values. If the proposal succeeds, policymakers and citizens would have a transparent way to ask what a policy would do to GDP or inflation, and to see policy drafts aligned with elicited values. The paper is explicit that these are planned contributions with a 2024–2025 roadmap, not completed systems.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the paired (policy, time-series) dataset and the model family built on it. The paper proposes to align each policy text $x_t$ with an economic time-series segment $y_t$ at a common time index $t$, using an event indicator $E(t)$ to emphasize periods around policy enactments. The Economics Transformer then maps both modalities into a shared latent representation $z = f_{\mathrm{lang}}(x) = f_{\mathrm{ts}}(y)$, so language-conditioned forecasting reduces to predicting $y$ from $z$. The AI Legislator's mechanism is hierarchical Bayesian updating of a user's value parameters $\theta_{\mathrm{user}}$ from questionnaire responses, grounded in Moral Foundations Theory; the elicited distribution then constrains the LLM policy generator. These mechanisms together are what would carry the platform's claimed ability to forecast policy impacts and align proposals with public values.

What would settle it

A backtest: train the Economics Transformer on historical (policy, time-series) pairs, then hold out a set of later policy interventions and ask whether its forecasts of GDP and inflation beat an unconditional forecast or a DSGE baseline on those held-out events. If conditioning on policy text does not improve accuracy on held-out interventions, the central causal-signal assumption is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that integrating numerical economic time series with natural-language policy documents in a single foundation model will yield forecasts of policy impacts that are richer and more useful than classical approaches such as DSGE, and that coupling this forecaster with a hierarchical Bayesian value-elicitation mechanism and an LLM policy generator can produce policy recommendations that reflect broad public preferences. The paper proposes the Economics Transformer as a fine-tuned time-series LLM, with temporal and event-based alignment of text and data, joint encoders into a shared latent space, and probabilistic output for uncertainty quantification. It also proposes the AI Legislator, which uses Moral Foundations Theory and active query selection to elicit values, and a policy generator that decomposes intents, retrieves context, and validates drafts against simulated personas. The paper frames these as components to be built and released open-source, with the combined platform supporting transparent, inclusive, data-driven policymaking.

Load-bearing premise

The whole platform depends on the assumption that historical pairings of policy language and economic time series contain a learnable causal signal, so that a model trained on the past can forecast the economic effect of a new policy it has never seen.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the Economics Transformer works, a policymaker could enter a draft policy in plain language and receive probabilistic forecasts of GDP, inflation, and other indicators, with uncertainty quantified.
  • If the AI Legislator works, policy drafts would be generated under explicit value constraints, and conflicts between stakeholder moral profiles could be flagged before enactment.
  • The DBITS live leaderboard on FRED-MD data would let researchers continuously compare forecasting models, including traditional methods, under rolling-window evaluation.
  • Open-source release of code, datasets, and benchmarks would establish public baselines that other groups can extend, reducing dependence on profit-driven AI development.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the historical pairing of policy language and economic outcomes may be too sparse and confounded for the model to isolate policy effects; a backtest on held-out interventions would be the decisive test.
  • Editorial inference: if the causal link is learnable, the same architecture could extend beyond macroeconomics to local governance, environmental regulation, and prediction-market data, as the paper hints but does not develop.
  • Editorial inference: the value-elicitation approach assumes the simulated-agent population used for validation faithfully represents real-world value heterogeneity; the paper leaves open how to validate that transfer.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes the development of a cooperative, open-source AI policymaking platform with three components: an Economics Transformer (a multimodal time-series language model that forecasts economic indicators from policy text and numeric data), an AI Legislator (a value-elicitation and policy-generation system), and a Policy Interface (a web platform for interacting with legislative data and model outputs). The paper describes a project roadmap, including an implemented but not yet analyzed leaderboard prototype (DBITS), and a separate proposal for an empirical study of GPT/LLM effects on employment. The authors are candid that the components are planned rather than completed: Section 2 frames the contributions as goals, Section 3.1 flags the text-time-series pairing as unresolved, and Section 3.4 states that formal statistical analysis of the leaderboard remains to be done. The central claim, if realized, is that the platform would support more accurate, inclusive, and transparent policymaking through open collaboration.

Significance. If the proposed platform worked as claimed, it would be a valuable public-interest contribution: it would provide transparent, open-source forecasting tools for policy analysis, a mechanism for eliciting and aggregating public values, and a benchmark infrastructure (DBITS) for evaluating economic time-series models. The DBITS MVP is a concrete, reproducible first step, and the paper's commitment to open-source release is commendable. However, the significance cannot currently be assessed empirically: no component except the leaderboard has been implemented, and the leaderboard results are not reported. The core forecasting claim depends on learning causal policy-to-economy effects from paired text and time series, an assumption the paper itself identifies as unresolved. The paper is thus a research proposal rather than a completed study, and its scientific contribution at present is the architectural plan and the identification of open problems, not a validated system.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (1); §2] The central value of the Economics Transformer depends on learning a causal relationship between natural-language policy events and economic time-series outcomes, but the proposed alignment mechanisms (temporal alignment and the event indicator E(t)) only co-locate text and numbers in time; they do not address selection or endogeneity, since policies are often enacted in response to economic conditions. The paper's own Section 3.1 states that it is "less clear how to effectively integrate data across these two modalities and establishing meaningful pairings that reinforce a strong causal connection." Without an identification strategy (e.g., difference-in-differences, synthetic control, or an instrumental-variable design) or at least a retrospective case study demonstrating that a text-conditioned forecast outperforms a purely autoregressive baseline, the claim of "enhanced forecasting accuracy" in the Abstract and Section 2 is unsupported. This is load-bearing because the AI Legislator and Policy Interface rely on the forecast's reliability.
  2. [§3.4] The DBITS leaderboard is the only component described as fully implemented, yet no numerical results are reported. The text says, "Based on a quick glance of our preliminary data, we have demonstrated variation across contexts ... and seemingly significant trends," but immediately adds that "we will have to do more formal statistical analysis to prove this significance." Without a table or figure of the leaderboard rankings, error metrics, or rolling-window evaluations for the eight listed models, the reader cannot verify that the MVP functions as claimed or that it provides a useful basis for comparing forecasting methods.
  3. [§4.2; §2] The claim that the AI Legislator will generate policies with "broad, bipartisan appeal" (Section 2) is not operationalized. Section 4.2 defines a total score Stotal(P) = αSp(P) + βSl(P) but does not specify how Sp and Sl are computed, how the coefficients α and β are chosen, or how the "bipartisan appeal" construct is measured or validated. Without an explicit, falsifiable definition, this central promise of the AI Legislator remains untestable.
  4. [§4.1] The value-elicitation framework leans entirely on the generative-agent simulation of Park et al. (2024) for its validation, and the paper cites the 85% survey-replication accuracy of that external work as if it transfers to the proposed questionnaire and hierarchical Bayesian model. No plan is given to validate the elicitation on real user responses, to measure convergence of the posterior (e.g., via calibration or test-retest reliability), or to compare the inferred value profiles against independent behavioral measures. A concrete validation protocol is needed to support the claim that the framework produces "structured, empirically validated representations of values."
minor comments (6)
  1. [§3.2] Typo: "we propse the Continuous-Valued Transformer" should read "we propose."
  2. [§6] The sentence "Building upon the currentGPTs are GPTspaper" is garbled; it should read "Building upon the 'GPTs are GPTs' paper."
  3. [References] The FRED dataset is cited to "National Renewable Energy Laboratory" (2011), but FRED is maintained by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; this misattribution should be corrected.
  4. [§5.1] The sentence "We will use models like feedback loops will refine the design" is grammatically incomplete and should be rewritten.
  5. [§3.3] The scaling-law equation involving L(N,Di,Dj) is not numbered, and the notation L(N,Di) appearing on the right-hand side is not defined as a single-modality loss; clarify the definitions.
  6. [Figure 1] The figure caption says the Economics Transformer receives data from "the Federal Reserve," but the text refers to FRED, which is specifically the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; the caption should be precise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the manuscript is an open-source project proposal with no fitted predictions, no self-citation-derived conclusions, and no definitional equivalences among its proposed components.

full rationale

The paper makes no empirical claims that reduce to its own inputs. Each proposed component is built on externally published methods and datasets (e.g., Time-LLM, Park et al.'s generative agents, FRED-MD, OpenTS, Aghajanyan et al.'s scaling laws), rather than on the authors' own prior results. The central 'Economics Transformer' is explicitly a planned model rather than a fitted predictor; Section 3.1 states that pairing text and time series for causal learning is 'less clear,' which is an unresolved feasibility caveat, not a circular validation. The scaling-law formula in Section 3.3 is imported from Aghajanyan et al. (2023) and Edwards et al. (2024), external sources, and is used to motivate future experiments rather than to derive a conclusion from itself. Several cited works share authors with this preprint (e.g., Cao et al. in Section 3.2), but these citations serve as baselines and related work; no conclusion is forced by a self-citation, and no 'uniqueness theorem' is invoked to forbid alternatives. The DBITS leaderboard (Section 3.4) is an independent infrastructure deliverable with standard baseline models. Consequently, there is no step in the paper that equates a prediction with a fitted parameter, defines a claimed result in terms of its own target, or smuggles a conclusion in via self-citation. This is a proposal document, and its admitted open questions are honesty about feasibility, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 4 invented entities

The paper's central proposal depends on several unverified domain assumptions, most notably the learnability of causal policy-to-economy relationships from paired historical data and the transferability of generative agent simulations to moral value inference. No free parameters are fitted in this proposal, because no model is trained. The invented entities are proposed software systems, not empirically established constructs.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Existing LLMs can be fine-tuned to forecast multivariate time series while retaining language understanding.
    Section 3 states this as the central idea of the Economics Transformer, citing Time-LLM and similar models; it is not validated for economic policy text.
  • domain assumption Temporally aligned policy texts and economic time series can support causal inference about policy impacts.
    Section 3.1 acknowledges this is open: it is less clear how to effectively integrate data across these two modalities and establish a strong causal connection.
  • domain assumption Generative agent simulations from Park et al. (2024) replicate human survey responses with 85% accuracy and this fidelity transfers to value elicitation for policy.
    Section 4.1 uses this as the foundation for testing the elicitation framework, but no transfer validation is given.
  • domain assumption Moral Foundations Theory provides a valid six-dimensional basis for representing political and moral values.
    Section 4.1 treats the six moral foundations as a structured basis for queries without addressing criticisms of the theory's validity.
  • domain assumption Scaling laws from mixed-modal language models and time-series models apply to the proposed multimodal economics transformer.
    Section 3.3 imports equations from Aghajanyan et al. and Edwards et al. and plans to fit constants, but no evidence that these laws hold for economic policy forecasting.
  • standard math Bayes' theorem is correct and applicable to the proposed hierarchical Bayesian update rule.
    Section 4.1 presents P(theta_user | r_q) = P(r_q | theta_user) P(theta_user) / P(r_q), a standard application of Bayes' rule.
invented entities (4)
  • Economics Transformer
    purpose: Forecast economic indicators from policy text and time series
    Proposed in Sections 2 and 3, but not implemented or evaluated; no trained model or benchmark results are reported.
  • AI Legislator
    purpose: Elicit user values and generate policy proposals aligned with them
    Proposed in Sections 2 and 4, but only a framework description; no prototype, user study, or validation is presented.
  • Continuous-Valued Transformer (CVT)
    purpose: Continuous-domain time-series foundation model with Diffusion Loss
    Proposed in Section 3.2 as a novel architecture, but no implementation or experiments exist.
  • DBITS
    purpose: Live benchmarking leaderboard for economic time-series models
    Section 3.4 claims a functional MVP, but no public code, data, or results are provided, so it cannot be independently verified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Creating a Cooperative AI Policymaking Platform through Open Source Collaboration." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZX2CJ5Y3

@misc{pith2026241206936,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Creating a Cooperative AI Policymaking Platform through Open Source Collaboration},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZX2CJ5Y3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06936}
}
read the original abstract

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) present significant risks and opportunities, requiring improved governance to mitigate societal harms and promote equitable benefits. Current incentive structures and regulatory delays may hinder responsible AI development and deployment, particularly in light of the transformative potential of large language models (LLMs). To address these challenges, we propose developing the following three contributions: (1) a large multimodal text and economic-timeseries foundation model that integrates economic and natural language policy data for enhanced forecasting and decision-making, (2) algorithmic mechanisms for eliciting diverse and representative perspectives, enabling the creation of data-driven public policy recommendations, and (3) an AI-driven web platform for supporting transparent, inclusive, and data-driven policymaking.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.06936 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A broad overview of the system’s workflow. The AI Legislator first collects user values and policy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Policy Generator Model Frontend Mock-Up. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Acemoglu and P

    D. Acemoglu and P. Restrepo. Tasks, automation, and the rise in us wage inequality. Econometrica, 90 0 (5): 0 1973--2016, 2022

    1973

  2. [2]

    R. Adao, M. Kolesar, and E. Morales. Shift-share designs: Theory and inference. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134 0 (4): 0 1949--2010, 2019

    1949

  3. [3]

    Aghajanyan, L

    A. Aghajanyan, L. Yu, A. Conneau, W.-N. Hsu, K. Hambardzumyan, S. Zhang, S. Roller, N. Goyal, O. Levy, and L. Zettlemoyer. Scaling laws for generative mixed-modal language models. In A. Krause, E. Brunskill, K. Cho, B. Engelhardt, S. Sabato, and J. Scarlett, editors, Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 202 of Proce...

    2023

  4. [4]

    T. Aksu, G. Woo, J. Liu, X. Liu, C. Liu, S. Savarese, C. Xiong, and D. Sahoo. GIFT -eval: A benchmark for general time series forecasting model evaluation. arXiv e-prints, 2024. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=Z2cMOOANFX

    2024

  5. [5]

    A. F. Ansari, L. Stella, C. Turkmen, X. Zhang, P. Mercado, H. Shen, O. Shchur, S. S. Rangapuram, S. P. Arango, S. Kapoor, et al. Chronos: Learning the language of time series. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07815, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    D. H. Autor. Why are there still so many jobs? the history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29 0 (3): 0 3--30, 2015

    2015

  7. [7]

    S. S. Bakare, A. O. Adeniyi, C. U. Akpuokwe, and N. E. Eneh. Data privacy laws and compliance: A comparative review of the eu gdpr and usa regulations. Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 2024. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:268430251

    2024

  8. [8]

    Baltrusaitis, C

    T. Baltrusaitis, C. Ahuja, and L.-P. Morency. Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy . IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 41 0 (2): 0 423--443, Feb. 2019. ISSN 1939-3539. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2798607. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8269806. Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Mach...

    arXiv 2019

Show all 111 references
  1. [9]

    Beckhardt

    B. Beckhardt. Harnessing the power of prediction markets, no date. URL https://kalshi.com/blog/article/harnessing-the-power-of-prediction-markets

  2. [10]

    Bengio, B

    Y. Bengio, B. Fox, A. C. P. de Leon Ferreira de Carvalho, M. Nemer, et al. International scientific report on the safety of advanced ai: Interim. AI Seoul Summit, May 2024. URL https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-foundation-models-initial-report. This report is a syn...

    2024

  3. [11]

    C. Bennett. The politics of privacy and the privacy of politics: Parties, elections and voter surveillance in western democracies, 2013

    2013

  4. [12]

    K. O. Bokun, L. E. Jackson, K. L. Kliesen, and M. T. Owyang. FRED - SD : A real-time database for state-level data with forecasting applications. International Journal of Forecasting, 39 0 (1): 0 279--297, 2023. ISSN 0169-2070. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.11.008. URL https:/...

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    Borusyak and P

    K. Borusyak and P. Hull. Non-random exposure to exogenous shocks. Econometrica, 91 0 (6): 0 2155--2185, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Borusyak, P

    K. Borusyak, P. Hull, and X. Jaravel. Quasi-experimental shift-share research designs. The Review of Economic Studies, 89 0 (1): 0 181--213, 2022

    2022

  7. [15]

    L. Breiman. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45 0 (1): 0 5--32, 2001. ISSN 1573-0565. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324. URL https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

    2001 doi

  8. [16]

    quick and dirty

    J. Brooke. Sus: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. usability evaluation in industry. Association for Computing Machinery, pages 207--212, 1996. URL https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-35

    1996 doi

  9. [17]

    Brynjolfsson and A

    E. Brynjolfsson and A. McAfee. The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & Company, 2014

    2014

  10. [18]

    D. Cao, Y. Wang, J. Duan, C. Zhang, X. Zhu, C. Huang, Y. Tong, B. Xu, J. Bai, J. Tong, et al. Spectral temporal graph neural network for multivariate time-series forecasting. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33: 0 17766--17778, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    D. Cao, J. Li, H. Ma, and M. Tomizuka. Spectral temporal graph neural network for trajectory prediction. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 1839--1845. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  12. [20]

    D. Cao, J. Enouen, Y. Wang, X. Song, C. Meng, H. Niu, and Y. Liu. Estimating treatment effects from irregular time series observations with hidden confounders. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 37, pages 6897--6905, 2023 a

    2023

  13. [21]

    D. Cao, Y. Zheng, P. Hassanzadeh, S. Lamba, X. Liu, and Y. Liu. Large scale financial time series forecasting with multi-faceted model. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on AI in Finance, pages 472--480, 2023 b

    2023

  14. [22]

    D. Cao, F. Jia, S. O. Arik, T. Pfister, Y. Zheng, W. Ye, and Y. Liu. TEMPO : Prompt-based generative pre-trained transformer for time series forecasting. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024 a . URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=YH5w12OUuU

    2024

  15. [23]

    D. Cao, W. Ye, and Y. Liu. Timedit: General-purpose diffusion transformers for time series foundation model. In ICML 2024 Workshop on Foundation Models in the Wild, 2024 b

    2024

  16. [24]

    N. V. Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer. Smote: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16: 0 321--357, 2002

    2002

  17. [25]

    L. J. Christiano, M. S. Eichenbaum, and M. Trabandt. On dsge models. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32 0 (3): 0 113--140, 2018. doi:10.1257/jep.32.3.113

    2018 doi

  18. [27]

    A. Das, W. Kong, R. Sen, and Y. Zhou. A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecasting, 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10688. version: 2

    2024 arXiv

  19. [28]

    P. Dhar. The carbon impact of artificial intelligence. Nat. Mach. Intell., 2 0 (8): 0 423--425, 2020

    2020

  20. [29]

    Diyora and N

    V. Diyora and N. Savani. Blockchain or ai: Web applications security mitigations, 2024

    2024

  21. [30]

    Dzeparoska, J

    K. Dzeparoska, J. Lin, A. Tizghadam, and A. Leon-Garcia. Llm-based policy generation for intent-based management of applications. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Analytics for Service and Application Management (AnServApp 2023), 2023

    2023

  22. [31]

    T. D. P. Edwards, J. Alvey, J. Alsing, N. H. Nguyen, and B. D. Wandelt. Scaling-laws for large time-series models, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13867

    2024 arXiv

  23. [32]

    C. B. Frey and M. A. Osborne. The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological forecasting and social change, 114: 0 254--280, 2017

    2017

  24. [33]

    L. Gao, J. Tow, B. Abbasi, S. Biderman, S. Black, A. DiPofi, C. Foster, L. Golding, J. Hsu, A. Le Noac'h, H. Li, K. McDonell, N. Muennighoff, C. Ociepa, J. Phang, L. Reynolds, H. Schoelkopf, A. Skowron, L. Sutawika, E. Tang, A. Thite, B. Wang, K. Wang, and A. Zou. A framework ...

    2024

  25. [34]

    Garza, M

    F. Garza, M. M. Canseco, C. Challú, and K. G. Olivares. StatsForecast : Lightning fast forecasting with statistical and econometric models. PyCon Salt Lake City, Utah, US 2022, 2022. URL https://github.com/Nixtla/statsforecast

    2022

  26. [35]

    Godahewa, C

    R. Godahewa, C. Bergmeir, G. I. Webb, R. J. Hyndman, and P. Montero-Manso. Monash time series forecasting archive. In Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks, 2021

    2021

  27. [36]

    Goldsmith-Pinkham, I

    P. Goldsmith-Pinkham, I. Sorkin, and H. Swift. Bartik instruments: What, when, why, and how. American Economic Review, 110 0 (8): 0 2586--2624, 2020

    2020

  28. [37]

    Govtrack.us: Tracking the activities of congress, 2024

    GovTrack.us . Govtrack.us: Tracking the activities of congress, 2024. URL https://www.govtrack.us/

    2024

  29. [38]

    Graham, J

    J. Graham, J. Haidt, S. Koleva, M. Motyl, R. Iyer, S. P. Wojcik, and P. H. Ditto. Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In Advances in experimental social psychology, volume 47, pages 55--130. Elsevier, 2013

    2013

  30. [39]

    Griesemer, D

    S. Griesemer, D. Cao, Z. Cui, C. Osorio, and Y. Liu. Active sequential posterior estimation for sample-efficient simulation-based inference. In The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=fkuseU0nJs

    2024

  31. [40]

    H. P. R. Group. Nasa task load index (tlx). NASA Arms Research Center, n.d. URL https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20000021488/downloads/20000021488.pdf

  32. [41]

    Haner and D

    J. Haner and D. Garcia. The artificial intelligence arms race: Trends and world leaders in autonomous weapons development. Global Policy, 10 0 (3): 0 331--337, 2019

    2019

  33. [42]

    Harraf and H

    A. Harraf and H. Ghura. Potentials of artificial intelligence for business performance. The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Implementation of Artificial Intelligence for Growing Business Success, pages 99--109, 2021

    2021

  34. [43]

    Harrison, D

    S. Harrison, D. Tatar, and P. Sengers. The three paradigms of hci and (by courtesy) art and art history and (by courtesy) psychology. Virgina Tech, 2007. URL https://people.cs.vt.edu/srh/Downloads/TheThreeParadigmsofHCI.pdf

    2007

  35. [44]

    Hendren and B

    N. Hendren and B. Sprung-Keyser. A unified welfare analysis of government policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135 0 (3): 0 1209--1318, 2020

    2020

  36. [45]

    Hendrycks, M

    D. Hendrycks, M. Mazeika, and T. Woodside. An overview of catastrophic ai risks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.12001, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  37. [46]

    K. Hmue, M. P. Phyu, and A. M. M. Paing. Microservices vs monolith: A comparative analysis and problem-solving approach in web development area, 2024

    2024

  38. [47]

    Huang, C

    Q. Huang, C. Meng, D. Cao, B. Huang, Y. Chang, and Y. Liu. An empirical examination of balancing strategy for counterfactual estimation on time series. In R. Salakhutdinov, Z. Kolter, K. Heller, A. Weller, N. Oliver, J. Scarlett, and F. Berkenkamp, editors, Proceedings of the ...

    2024

  39. [48]

    R. J. Hyndman and G. Athanasopoulos. Chapter 8 exponential smoothing, 2021. URL https://otexts.com/fpp3/expsmooth.html

    2021

  40. [49]

    isidewith.com: America's most popular voting guide for elections, political issues, and polls, 2024

    isidewith.com . isidewith.com: America's most popular voting guide for elections, political issues, and polls, 2024. URL https://www.isidewith.com/

    2024

  41. [50]

    Jens and J

    F. Jens and J. Nyarko. Natural language processing in legal tech. Cambridge University Press EBooks, pages 70--90, 2023. URL https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009255301.005

    2023 doi

  42. [51]

    F. Jia, K. Wang, Y. Zheng, D. Cao, and Y. Liu. Gpt4mts: Prompt-based large language model for multimodal time-series forecasting. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, 2024

    2024

  43. [52]

    M. Jin, S. Wang, L. Ma, Z. Chu, J. Y. Zhang, X. Shi, P.-Y. Chen, Y. Liang, Y.-F. Li, S. Pan, and Q. Wen. Time-llm: Time series forecasting by reprogramming large language models, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.01728

    2024 arXiv

  44. [53]

    Juric, A

    M. Juric, A. Sandic, and M. Brcic. Ai safety: state of the field through quantitative lens. In 2020 43rd International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO), pages 1254--1259, 2020. doi:10.23919/MIPRO48935.2020.9245153

    2020

  45. [54]

    Kaplan, S

    J. Kaplan, S. McCandlish, T. Henighan, T. B. Brown, B. Chess, R. Child, S. Gray, A. Radford, J. Wu, and D. Amodei. Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361, 2020

    2001 arXiv

  46. [55]

    G. Ke, Q. Meng, T. Finley, T. Wang, W. Chen, W. Ma, Q. Ye, and T.-Y. Liu. LightGBM : A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_fil...

    2017

  47. [56]

    S. M. Khan. Maintaining the ai chip competitive advantage of the united states and its allies. Center for Security and Emerging Technology, Georgetown University: Washington, DC, USA, 2019

    2019

  48. [57]

    Kunigonyte and G

    G. Kunigonyte and G. Kolev. Web design for different generations- initial impact of web aesthetics. Jonkoping University School of Engineering, 2021. URL https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1580287/FULLTEXT01.pdf

    2021

  49. [58]

    Lambert, V

    N. Lambert, V. Pyatkin, J. Morrison, L. Miranda, B. Y. Lin, K. Chandu, N. Dziri, S. Kumar, T. Zick, Y. Choi, N. A. Smith, and H. Hajishirzi. Rewardbench: Evaluating reward models for language modeling, 2024

    2024

  50. [59]

    Lechmann and D

    F. Lechmann and D. Buschek. Functional flexibility in generative ai interfaces: Text editing with llms through conversations, toolbars, and prompts. acm symposium on neural gaze detection., 2018. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/1122445.1122456

    2018

  51. [60]

    T. Li, Y. Tian, H. Li, M. Deng, and K. He. Autoregressive image generation without vector quantization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11838, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Congress.gov API

    Library of Congress . Congress.gov API . https://api.congress.gov, 2023. Accessed: October 7, 2024

    2023

  53. [62]

    Congress.gov: The official website for u.s

    Library of Congress . Congress.gov: The official website for u.s. federal legislative information, 2024. URL https://www.congress.gov/

    2024

  54. [63]

    H. Liu, S. Xu, Z. Zhao, L. Kong, H. Kamarthi, A. B. Sasanur, M. Sharma, J. Cui, Q. Wen, C. Zhang, and B. A. Prakash. Time-mmd: A new multi-domain multimodal dataset for time series analysis, 2024 a

    2024

  55. [64]

    H. Liu, S. Xu, Z. Zhao, L. Kong, H. Kamarthi, A. B. Sasanur, M. Sharma, J. Cui, Q. Wen, C. Zhang, et al. Time-mmd: A new multi-domain multimodal dataset for time series analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08627, 2024 b

    2024 arXiv

  56. [65]

    J. Liu, C. Liu, G. Woo, Y. Wang, B. Hooi, C. Xiong, and D. Sahoo. Unitst: Effectively modeling inter-series and intra-series dependencies for multivariate time series forecasting, 2024 c . URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04975

    2024 arXiv

  57. [66]

    M. W. McCracken and S. Ng. FRED - MD : A monthly database for macroeconomic research, 2016. ISSN 0735-0015. URL https://www.jstor.org/stable/44166591. Publisher: [American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis, Ltd.]

    2016

  58. [67]

    M. W. McCracken and S. Ng. FRED - QD : A quarterly database for macroeconomic research, 2021. URL https://ideas.repec.org//a/fip/fedlrv/90588.html. Publisher: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

    2021

  59. [68]

    C. Meng, S. Seo, D. Cao, S. Griesemer, and Y. Liu. When physics meets machine learning: A survey of physics-informed machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.16797, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  60. [69]

    E. Mishan. Introduction to normative economics, 1981

    1981

  61. [70]

    Morris, H

    S. Morris, H. Murphy, and C. Hodgson. Big tech groups say their \ 100bn ai spending spree is just beginning. Financial Times, August 2024. URL https://www.ft.com/content/b7037ce1-4319-4a4a-8767-0b1373cec9ce. Accessed: 2024-10-07

    2024

  62. [71]

    B. A. Myers and M. B. Rosson. Survey on user interface programming. proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery, page 195–202, 1992. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142789

    1992

  63. [72]

    Federal reserve bank of st

    National Renewable Energy Laboratory . Federal reserve bank of st. louis time series (fred). Open Energy Data Initiative (OEDI), 2011. URL https://data.openei.org/submissions/488. Accessed: October 7, 2024

    2011

  64. [73]

    Ngiam, A

    J. Ngiam, A. Khosla, M. Kim, J. Nam, H. Lee, and A. Y. Ng. Multimodal deep learning. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML'11, page 689–696, Madison, WI, USA, 2011. Omnipress. ISBN 9781450306195

    2011

  65. [74]

    H. Niu, C. Meng, D. Cao, G. Habault, R. Legaspi, S. Wada, C. Ono, and Y. Liu. Mu2rest: Multi-resolution recursive spatio-temporal transformer for long-term prediction. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 68--80. Springer, 2022

    2022

  66. [75]

    H. Niu, G. Habault, R. Legaspi, C. Meng, D. Cao, S. Wada, C. Ono, and Y. Liu. Time-delayed multivariate time series predictions. In Proceedings of the 2023 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM), pages 325--333. SIAM, 2023

    2023

  67. [76]

    Ml forecast, 2021

    Nixtla. Ml forecast, 2021. URL https://nixtlaverse.nixtla.io/mlforecast/index.html

    2021

  68. [77]

    Y. N. Nugroho, D. S. Kusumo, and M. J. Alibasa. Clean architecture implementation impacts on maintainability aspect for backend system code base, 2022

    2022

  69. [78]

    R. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report. arxiv 2303.08774. View in Article, 2 0 (5), 2023

    2023 arXiv

  70. [79]

    Osterloh and S

    M. Osterloh and S. Rota. Trust and community in open source software production. Analyse & kritik, 26 0 (1): 0 279--301, 2004

    2004

  71. [80]

    J. S. Park, C. Q. Zou, A. Shaw, B. M. Hill, C. Cai, M. R. Morris, R. Willer, P. Liang, and M. S. Bernstein. Generative agent simulations of 1,000 people. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10109, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  72. [81]

    Poria, N

    S. Poria, N. Majumder, D. Hazarika, E. Cambria, A. Gelbukh, and A. Hussain. Multimodal Sentiment Analysis : Addressing Key Issues and Setting Up the Baselines . IEEE Intelligent Systems, 33 0 (6): 0 17--25, Nov. 2018. ISSN 1941-1294. doi:10.1109/MIS.2018.2882362. URL https://i...

    2018

  73. [82]

    Pushpakumar, K

    R. Pushpakumar, K. Sanjaya, S. Rathika, A. Hussein Alawadi, K. Makhzuna, S. Venkatesh, and B. Rajalakshmi. Human-computer interaction: Enhancing user experience in interactive systems. E3S Web of Conferences, page 399, 2023. URL https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339904037

    2023

  74. [83]

    X. Qiu, J. Hu, L. Zhou, X. Wu, J. Du, B. Zhang, C. Guo, A. Zhou, C. S. Jensen, Z. Sheng, and B. Yang. Tfb: Towards comprehensive and fair benchmarking of time series forecasting methods. Proc. VLDB Endow. , 17: 0 2363 -- 2377, 2024

    2024

  75. [84]

    Rasul, A

    K. Rasul, A. Ashok, A. R. Williams, H. Ghonia, R. Bhagwatkar, A. Khorasani, M. J. D. Bayazi, G. Adamopoulos, R. Riachi, N. Hassen, et al. Lag-llama: Towards foundation models for probabilistic time series forecasting. Preprint, 2024 a

    2024

  76. [85]

    Rasul, A

    K. Rasul, A. Bennett, P. Vicente, U. Gupta, H. Ghonia, A. Schneider, and Y. Nevmyvaka. Vq-tr: Vector quantized attention for time series forecasting. In ICLR 2024, 2024 b . URL https://openreview.net/pdf?id=IxpTsFS7mh

    2024

  77. [86]

    Requeima, J

    J. Requeima, J. Bronskill, D. Choi, R. E. Turner, and D. Duvenaud. Llm processes: Numerical predictive distributions conditioned on natural language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12856, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  78. [87]

    Rezan and M

    M. Rezan and M. Karim. Legal language in the digital environment: A review of language simplification projects. E3S Web of Conferences, pages 57--68, 2022. URL https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362360963_LEGAL_LANGUAGE_IN_THE_DIGITAL_ENVIRONMENT_A_REVIEW_OF_LANGUAGE_SIM...

    2022

  79. [88]

    Soni and V

    M. Soni and V. Jyotinagar. Sql vs nosql databases for the microservices: A comparative survey. In 2023 2nd International Conference on Edge Computing and Applications (ICECAA), pages 17--22, 2023. doi:10.1109/ICECAA58104.2023.10212190

    2023

  80. [89]

    Stierholz

    K. Stierholz. ALFRED : Capturing data as it happens, no date

  81. [90]

    Szczepanski

    M. Szczepanski. Economic impacts of artificial intelligence (ai), 2019

    2019

  82. [91]

    Talukder, Y

    S. Talukder, Y. Yue, and G. Gkioxari. Totem: Tokenized time series embeddings for general time series analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.16412, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  83. [92]

    Tesfatsion

    L. Tesfatsion. Agent-based computational economics: A constructive approach to economic theory. In Handbook of Computational Economics, volume 2, pages 831--880. Elsevier, 2006

    2006

  84. [93]

    Touvron, T

    H. Touvron, T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet, M.-A. Lachaux, T. Lacroix, B. Rozi \`e re, N. Goyal, E. Hambro, F. Azhar, et al. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Turchin and D

    A. Turchin and D. Denkenberger. Classification of global catastrophic risks connected with artificial intelligence. Ai & Society, 35 0 (1): 0 147--163, 2020

    2020

  86. [95]

    H. R. Varian. Equity, envy, and efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory, 9 0 (1): 0 63--91, 1974

    1974

  87. [96]

    Vaswani, N

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin. Attention is all you need, 2023

    2023

  88. [97]

    L. Wang, C. Ma, X. Feng, Z. Zhang, H. Yang, J. Zhang, Z. Chen, J. Tang, X. Chen, Y. Lin, W. X. Zhao, Z. Wei, and J.-R. Wen. A survey on large language model-based autonomous agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11432, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11432

    2023 arXiv

  89. [98]

    Q. Wang, Y. Li, and R. Li. Ecological footprints, carbon emissions, and energy transitions: the impact of artificial intelligence (ai). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11 0 (1): 0 1--18, 2024

    2024

  90. [99]

    A. R. Williams, A. Ashok, \'E . Marcotte, V. Zantedeschi, J. Subramanian, R. Riachi, J. Requeima, A. Lacoste, I. Rish, N. Chapados, et al. Context is key: A benchmark for forecasting with essential textual information. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.18959, 2024

    arXiv

  91. [100]

    G. Woo, C. Liu, A. Kumar, C. Xiong, S. Savarese, and D. Sahoo. Unified training of universal time series forecasting transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02592, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  92. [101]

    C. Wu, T. Wang, Y. Ge, Z. Lu, R. Zhou, Y. Shan, and P. Luo. Pi-tuning: Transferring multimodal foundation models with optimal multi-task interpolation. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2023), pages 37713--37727, 2023. URL https://ar...

    2023 arXiv

  93. [102]

    X. Xiao, D. Cao, R. Yang, G. Gupta, G. Liu, C. Yin, R. Balan, and P. Bogdan. Coupled multiwavelet operator learning for coupled differential equations. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=kIo_C6QmMOM

    2023

  94. [103]

    W. Xue, T. Zhou, Q. Wen, J. Gao, B. Ding, and R. Jin. Card: Channel aligned robust blend transformer for time series forecasting, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.12095

    2024 arXiv

  95. [104]

    G. Yang, E. J. Hu, I. Babuschkin, S. Sidor, X. Liu, D. Farhi, N. Ryder, J. Pachocki, W. Chen, and J. Gao. Tuning large neural networks via zero-shot hyperparameter transfer. In NeurIPS, 2021. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=Bx6qKuBM2AD

    2021

  96. [105]

    S. Yu. Big privacy: Challenges and opportunities of privacy study in the age of big data. IEEE Access, 4: 0 2751--2763, 2016. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2577036

    2016

  97. [106]

    Z. Yue, Y. Wang, J. Duan, T. Yang, C. Huang, Y. Tong, and B. Xu. Ts2vec: Towards universal representation of time series. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 36, pages 8980--8987, 2022

    2022

  98. [107]

    M. Zajko. Artificial intelligence, algorithms, and social inequality: Sociological contributions to contemporary debates. Sociology Compass, 16 0 (3): 0 e12962, 2022

    2022

  99. [108]

    A. Zeng, M. Chen, L. Zhang, and Q. Xu. Are transformers effective for time series forecasting?, 2023. ISSN 2374-3468. URL https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/26317. Number: 9

    2023

  100. [109]

    Zhang, S

    E. Zhang, S. Zhao, T. Wang, S. Hossain, H. Gasztowtt, S. Zheng, D. C. Parkes, M. Tambe, and Y. Chen. Position: Social environment design should be further developed for AI -based policy-making. In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024. URL https://open...

    2024

  101. [110]

    Zhang and J

    Y. Zhang and J. Yan. Crossformer: Transformer utilizing cross-dimension dependency for multivariate time series forecasting. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=vSVLM2j9eie

    2023

  102. [111]

    Zhang, D

    Y. Zhang, D. Cao, and Y. Liu. Counterfactual neural temporal point process for estimating causal influence of misinformation on social media. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35: 0 10643--10655, 2022

    2022

  103. [112]

    H. Zhao, Y. Wang, J. Duan, C. Huang, D. Cao, Y. Tong, B. Xu, J. Bai, J. Tong, and Q. Zhang. Multivariate time-series anomaly detection via graph attention network. In 2020 IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM), pages 841--850. IEEE, 2020

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.