Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Pitfalls of Memorization: When Memorization Hurts Generalization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.07684 v1 pith:NJQYVUXQ submitted 2024-12-10 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords memorizationgeneralizationexplanationswhencorrelationslearnpatternspoor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neural networks often learn simple explanations that fit the majority of the data while memorizing exceptions that deviate from these explanations.This behavior leads to poor generalization when the learned explanations rely on spurious correlations. In this work, we formalize the interplay between memorization and generalization, showing that spurious correlations would particularly lead to poor generalization when are combined with memorization. Memorization can reduce training loss to zero, leaving no incentive to learn robust, generalizable patterns. To address this, we propose memorization-aware training (MAT), which uses held-out predictions as a signal of memorization to shift a model's logits. MAT encourages learning robust patterns invariant across distributions, improving generalization under distribution shifts.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Memorization in Graph Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GNNs memorize node labels more on low-homophily graphs, a behavior NCMemo can quantify and graph rewiring can partially mitigate.

Pith tools