Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Challenges in Human-Agent Communication

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.10380 v1 pith:32XPBLVS submitted 2024-11-28 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords challengescommunicationhuman-agentagentsresearchagentcommunicateinformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Remarkable advancements in modern generative foundation models have enabled the development of sophisticated and highly capable autonomous agents that can observe their environment, invoke tools, and communicate with other agents to solve problems. Although such agents can communicate with users through natural language, their complexity and wide-ranging failure modes present novel challenges for human-AI interaction. Building on prior research and informed by a communication grounding perspective, we contribute to the study of \emph{human-agent communication} by identifying and analyzing twelve key communication challenges that these systems pose. These include challenges in conveying information from the agent to the user, challenges in enabling the user to convey information to the agent, and overarching challenges that need to be considered across all human-agent communication. We illustrate each challenge through concrete examples and identify open directions of research. Our findings provide insights into critical gaps in human-agent communication research and serve as an urgent call for new design patterns, principles, and guidelines to support transparency and control in these systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 7 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Modeling Distinct Human Interaction in Web Agents

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new corpus and fine-tuned language models predict when web-agent users will intervene, with a small user study reporting 26.5% higher perceived usefulness.

  2. Because we have LLMs, we Can and Should Pursue Agentic Interpretability

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Agentic interpretability, using LLMs as proactive conversational teachers that model the user, is offered as a needed complement to black-box interpretability.

  3. TableTalk: Scaffolding Spreadsheet Development with a Language Agent

    cs.SE 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A scaffolding spreadsheet agent produced partial spreadsheets that evaluators preferred 2.3 times more often than a standard AI assistant's in a 20-user controlled study.

  4. HiLSVA: Design and Evaluation of a Human-in-the-Loop Agentic System for Scientific Visualization

    cs.HC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    HiLSVA shows that a human-in-the-loop LLM agent system can help novices and experts complete scientific visualization tasks, while human oversight adds measurable execution time.

  5. Interaction as Intelligence: Deep Research With Human-AI Partnership

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A human-in-the-loop deep research system with transparent, interruptible interaction is claimed to outperform commercial baselines, but the evidence is weakened by small samples and biased instructions.

  6. From Conversation to Orchestration: HCI Challenges and Opportunities in Interactive Multi-Agentic Systems

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A position paper identifies six HCI design challenges for end-user interaction with hierarchical multi-agentic systems and proposes a research agenda.

Pith tools