Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 33 references

Infrared properties of Planetary Nebulae with PG1159 central stars

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Infrared ages of planetary nebulae link PG1159 stars to Wolf-Rayet nuclei, not to wels stars.

desk verdict First systematic IR study of the 26 known PG1159 PNe; the descriptive results are solid, but the evolutionary split between [WRE] and wels rests on a small-sample gap the authors themselves concede could be selection. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.11721 v2 pith:UHFGCJWK submitted 2024-12-16 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

C. Muthumariappan , K. Khushbu , V. Kerni This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords planetarynebulaePG1159starshydrogen-poorcentralWolf-Rayetnucleiwelsinfraredphotometrydustpropertiesstellarevolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks how PG1159 stars, the hottest known hydrogen-poor planetary nebula nuclei, fit into the evolutionary family of hydrogen-poor central stars. Using archival infrared photometry and nebular H-beta surface brightness as an age indicator, it claims that PG1159 nebulae are old, expanded descendants of Wolf-Rayet nuclei, because their age distributions overlap with [WRE]-PNe. It also claims that wels-PNe, whose nuclei show weak emission lines, are not connected to PG1159-PNe in the same way, leaving a significant gap in surface brightness. If true, the main channel for making hydrogen-poor white-dwarf precursors runs from [WRL] through [WRE] to PG1159, with wels stars forming a separate group. The paper also derives the first uniform infrared properties of all 26 known PG1159-PNe, showing cooler AGB dust and lower dust masses than other hydrogen-poor PNe.

What carries the argument

The central object is the nebular H-beta surface brightness S_H-beta, a distance-independent age indicator: younger, denser nebulae shine brighter, while older, expanded nebulae are fainter. The paper pairs this with infrared color-color diagrams and dust properties derived from IRAS 25 and 60 micron fluxes fitted with a modified blackbody, yielding dust color temperature, dust mass, dust-to-gas mass ratio, infrared luminosity, and infrared excess. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test on the S_H-beta distributions decides whether young [WR]-, wels-, and normal-PNe come from similar parent samples, supporting the claim that these groups all evolved directly from the AGB.

What would settle it

A targeted deep survey for faint planetary nebulae around known PG1159 stars, or a systematic search for wels-PNe with log(S_H-beta) between roughly -4.5 and -5.5, would settle whether the gap is real; finding even a few objects in that range would weaken the claimed evolutionary discontinuity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the distribution of H-beta surface brightness places PG1159-PNe in an evolutionary sequence with Wolf-Rayet nuclei but separates them from wels-PNe. The authors compile all known PNe with PG1159-type central stars, measure their infrared colors, dust temperatures, dust masses, infrared luminosities, and infrared excesses, and plot these against surface brightness. They find that PG1159-PNe sit at the low-surface-brightness end, where [WR]-PNe are absent, yet their values overlap with [WRE]-PNe. In contrast, wels-PNe and PG1159-PNe are separated by a gap of 0.42 in log(S_H-beta), which is three times the mean spacing for wels-PNe and 2.5 times that for PG1159-PNe. This leads them to propose an evolutionary sequence [WRL] to [WRE] to PG1159, and to conclude that wels stars are not the direct progenitors of PG1159 stars.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that wels stars are not progenitors of PG1159 stars assumes that the observed gap in H-beta surface brightness is real and not an artifact of the small, faint, incompletely surveyed sample of known PG1159-PNe.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the sequence [WRL] to [WRE] to PG1159 is correct, late-type Wolf-Rayet nuclei are the youngest and PG1159 nuclei the oldest members of the same hydrogen-poor family.
  • The wels gap implies that weak-emission-line nuclei are not the immediate predecessors of PG1159 stars; their nebulae evolve separately, possibly fading without leaving a detectable PG1159-type remnant.
  • The similarity of young [WR]-, wels-, and normal-PNe age distributions indicates these three groups all form directly from AGB evolution, without requiring late or very late thermal pulses for the bulk of the population.
  • The infrared data show that PG1159-PNe retain a significant hot-dust component similar to [WR]-PNe despite being old, while their AGB dust is cooler, suggesting a distinct dust-processing history.
  • The lack of a trend in dust-to-gas mass ratio with S_H-beta supports the view that grain destruction timescales are longer than the lifetimes of planetary nebulae.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the wels gap is real, wels central stars should end their lives differently, perhaps as hydrogen-poor white dwarfs without luminous PNe; a deep search for faint, old nebulae around known wels nuclei would test this directly.
  • The same S_H-beta overlap method could be applied to other hydrogen-poor classes, such as born-again PNe, to see whether all hydrogen-poor channels converge on PG1159 or whether multiple distinct paths exist.
  • The hot-dust similarity between PG1159- and [WR]-PNe predicts that sensitive mid-infrared observations of the faintest known PG1159-PNe should detect statistically heated small grains; this is a testable extension of the paper's claim.
  • The evolutionary conclusion rests on only 26 known PG1159-PNe, most discovered through targeted surveys; future all-sky surveys are likely to fill the apparent surface-brightness gap and may overturn the proposed sequence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper presents a uniform infrared analysis of 26 planetary nebulae with PG1159-type central stars (including four hybrids) using archival 2MASS, WISE, and IRAS photometry together with nebular H-beta fluxes, angular sizes, E(B-V) and distances from the literature. Following the MP20 methodology, the authors construct near-, mid- and far-IR colour-colour diagrams and derive dust colour temperatures, dust masses, dust-to-gas mass ratios, IR luminosities and IR excesses for the subsample with available IRAS 25/60 micron data (11 objects). The PG1159-PNe are found to have cooler AGB dust, lower IR luminosity, lower mean dust mass, marginally higher mean dust-to-gas ratio and similar IR excess compared with [WR]-, wels- and normal-PNe. The number distributions of log(S_H-beta) are interpreted as showing that [WR]-, wels- and normal-PNe have similar young populations, that [WRL]-, [WRE]- and PG1159-PNe form an age sequence, and that a significant gap between wels- and PG1159-PNe indicates that wels stars are not evolutionary progenitors of PG1159 stars.

Significance. If the evolutionary interpretation is accepted, the paper offers one of the few direct empirical links between [WR] and PG1159 central stars and separates the wels channel, which would be a useful step for post-AGB evolution. The descriptive IR dataset for the rare PG1159-PNe is a valuable compilation, and the parameter estimation follows a standard, published method with propagated errors. The paper is honest about its caveats (small sample, possible lack of observational points), and the plots comparing four groups on a common system make the comparisons transparent. However, the central evolutionary conclusions rest on a small number of S_H-beta values and on a visually assessed gap and overlap, so the significance depends on whether those statistics can be made robust.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.3, Fig. 6] The claim of a good overlap between [WRE]- and PG1159-PNe is not supported by a statistical test; the KS test is applied only to [WR]-, wels- and normal-PNe pairs, not to the crucial [WRE]-PG1159 pair. Since overlap in S_H-beta underlies the proposed [WRL]-to-[WRE]-to-PG1159 sequence, a two-sample KS test (or an equivalent small-sample test) on those two groups should be added, and the result should be reported regardless of outcome.
  2. [§3.3 and Table 1] The significant gap between wels- and PG1159-PNe is load-bearing for the conclusion that wels stars do not evolve into PG1159 stars, but the paper itself concedes that the gap could be due to the lack of observational points in that range. Because the 26 PG1159-PNe were largely found through targeted surveys of hot central stars while wels-PNe are typically found in broader PN surveys, the apparent deficit at intermediate S_H-beta could be a selection artifact rather than an evolutionary discontinuity. The authors should quantify this possibility, for example by simulating the expected gap under random sparse sampling from the combined S_H-beta distribution, by comparing the discovery channels of the two samples, or by explicitly downgrading the evolutionary conclusion to a conjecture; without such a test the conclusion is not yet established.
  3. [§3.3] The significance of the wels-PG1159 gap is established by a post-hoc criterion (three times the mean of successive differences) that is not derived from any distributional model or pre-registered rule. The choice of criterion strongly controls whether the gap is called significant, so the authors should report the actual successive-difference values and demonstrate robustness of the gap, for example by bootstrap or by comparing the largest observed successive difference in the combined sample.
  4. [§3.2 and Table 4] The adopted electron density of 500 cm^-3 for sources with no measured n_e and the fixed emissivity exponent alpha=1.0 enter directly into the dust-to-gas mass ratios, and the mean md/mg comparison in Table 4 is based on only 11 PG1159-PNe. A sensitivity analysis varying n_e over a plausible range (and, if possible, alpha for carbonaceous versus silicate grains) should be reported before the claim that PG1159-PNe have a marginally larger dust-to-gas ratio is used as a physical result; at present that particular comparison is not demonstrated to be robust.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§3.1.1] The text introduces 'A70 and A30' but then gives coordinates for 'A78 and A30'; the first occurrence appears to be a typo for A78 and should be corrected.
  2. [Fig. 6] The label 'wel -PNe' in the figure should read 'wels-PNe' for consistency with the text.
  3. [References] The reference list contains a duplicated entry for Löbling et al. (2019); one of the two entries should be removed.
  4. [Table 1] The final row 'V * LWLib' has only dashes and no PNG identifier or other data; either complete the row or remove it from the table.
  5. [§2 and §4.1] The emissivity exponent is described as 1.0 in Section 2 but as 'alpha = -1' in Section 4.1; the sign convention should be stated once and used consistently.
  6. [§1] 'Palmoar survey' is a typo for 'Palomar survey'.
  7. [Table 4] The column header 'log[md-sun]' should be written as log(md/M_sun) or similar for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the PG1159 parameters and S_Hβ comparisons are independent empirical derivations; the acknowledged wels-gap selection caveat is a data limitation, not a definitional or fitting circularity.

full rationale

The claimed analysis is an empirical comparison, not a derivation of a predicted quantity from fitted parameters. PG1159-PNe's IR colours, Td, Md, LIR, IRE and S_Hβ are computed from archival 2MASS/WISE/IRAS photometry, Hβ fluxes, sizes, and distances with stated assumptions (e.g., modified blackbody with emissivity exponent 1.0, mean electron density 500 cm^-3 where missing). No parameter is fitted to the comparison groups and then read back as a prediction; the evolutionary overlap/gap is read directly from the resulting distributions. The only author-overlap input is MP20, which supplies the methodology and the [WR]-, wels-, normal-PNe comparison values; those are published measurements from an external catalog, not hypotheses constructed to force the present result, and the PG1159 data are new and independent. Section 3.3 explicitly concedes that the wels-PG1159 gap could be due to sparse sampling: 'there is also a possibility that this gap in log(S_Hβ) could be due to the lack of observational points in this range.' This is a selection-effect limitation on the evolutionary conclusion, not a circular step, because the gap is not imposed by the definitions or the analysis procedure. Similarly, Section 4.2 hedges that wels-PNe 'may not form an evolutionary sequence' pending more observations. No equation is defined in terms of the conclusion, and no fitted value is renamed as a prediction. Hence no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central conclusions rest on a chain of astrophysical assumptions (optically thin dust, SHβ as age proxy, representative sample) and on two adopted numerical inputs (electron density 500 cm^-3 and emissivity exponent 1.0). No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Adopted electron density n_e = 500 cm^-3
    Used to convert Hβ flux to gas mass for objects without measured densities; directly affects dust-to-gas mass ratios in Table 3. Section 3.2: 'we have taken a mean value of 500 cm^-3, which is a good approximation for PG1159-PNe.'
  • Dust emissivity exponent alpha = 1.0
    Assumed for modified blackbody fits to IRAS 25 and 60 micron fluxes; affects derived dust temperature and mass. Section 2. The paper notes silicates would require -2 and that this overestimates Td and underestimates md/mg by up to 40%.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption PNe are optically thin at far-infrared wavelengths.
    Required for the simple modified blackbody dust temperature determination. Section 2.
  • domain assumption SHβ is a reliable monotonic indicator of nebular age across different groups.
    Used for all age comparisons and evolutionary conclusions; Section 2 and Section 3.3.
  • domain assumption IRAS 25 and 60 micron fluxes are dominated by thermal equilibrium dust continuum.
    Used for Td and dust mass, though line contamination is acknowledged in the discussion (Section 4.1).
  • ad hoc to paper The known sample of 26 PG1159-PNe is representative of the population.
    Needed for the gap analysis; the paper acknowledges this may be violated (Section 3.3).
  • ad hoc to paper The chosen threshold of 3 times the mean successive difference defines a significant gap.
    No statistical calibration is provided for this cutoff; Section 3.3.
  • domain assumption Distances from Frew et al. (2016) are accurate.
    Used for dust mass and LIR; Gaia DR3 distances are not used for all sources. Section 2.
  • domain assumption Grain properties (opacity) are as assumed in MP20.
    Dust mass derivation relies on the adopted mass absorption coefficient from MP20; Section 2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Infrared properties of Planetary Nebulae with PG1159 central stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UHFGCJWK

@misc{pith2026241211721,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Infrared properties of Planetary Nebulae with PG1159 central stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UHFGCJWK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.11721}
}
abstract

We study the properties of 26 PNe with PG1159-type central stars known till date and compare them with the properties of PNe having [WR], $wels$ and hydrogen-rich central stars published earlier. We use archival photometric measurements of $2MASS$ for near-IR analysis and $WISE$ and $IRAS$ data for mid- and far-IR analysis and derive the IR properties of PG1159-PNe. We analyze the IR colour-colour diagrams of PG1159-PNe and compare them with the other three groups of PNe. Similar to the [WR]-PNe, many PG1159-PNe also show large amount of near-IR emission from the hot-dust component but their AGB dust is relatively cooler. We also report here the dust colour temperatures, dust masses, dust-to-gas mass ratios, IR luminosities and IR excess of PG1159-PNe and plot them against their surface H$\beta$ brightness (age) and compare them with the distribution of other groups of PNe. The IR luminosity and dust temperature show strong correlation with surface H$\beta$ brightness, however, the dust-to-gas mass ratio and IR excess do not show any trend. While the mean dust mass has a lower value for PG1159-PNe, in compared to other groups, the average dust-to-gas mass ratio is found to be marginally larger for PG1159-PNe. An analysis of the number distribution of different groups of PNe against surface H$\beta$ brightness shows that a) younger [WR]-, $wels$- and normal-PNe have a similar distribution indicating that they all have evolved from the AGB in a similar way, b) while there is an overlap of surface H$\beta$ brightness between [WR]- and PG1159-PNe, showing an evolutionary connection between them, there exists a significant gap between the values derived for $wels$- and PG1159-PNe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.11721 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Extinction corrected near-IR CCDMs of PG1159- and hy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mid-IR CCDMs of PG1159- and hybrid PG1159-PNe derive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Variation of dust colour temperature with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Different nebular and dust parameters of PG1159- and hybrid PG1159-PNe derived from this study are plotted against S Hβ. Also shown in the plot are [WRL]-,[WRE]-,wels- and normal-PNe. Data description as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Number distribution of PNe against log(S Hβ) (bin size 0.5). Top left: [WRL]- (dashed line), [WRE]- (solid line); top right: wels-; bottom left: PG1159- (solid line) and hybrid PG1159- (dashed line) and bottom right: normal-PNe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A plot of log(∆S Hβ) versus log S Hβ for different group of PNe with H-poor CSPNe. See the text for details. Parameter [WR]-PNe wels-PNe PG-1159 Normal PNe (mean value) (No. of PNe) (No. of PNe) (No. of PNe) (No. of PNe) Td(K) 96 ± 25(78) 95 ± 14(52) 75 ± 17(11) 93 ± 3…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [3]

    10.1093/mnras/stad524. 20 C. Muthumariappan etal / Advances in Space Research xx (2024) xxx-xxx Kazimierz J. Borkowski, J. Patrick Harrington, William P . B lair, and Jesse D. Bregman. The Dust in the Hydrogen-poor Eje cta of Abell

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad524 2024

  2. [7]

    10.48550/arXiv.0711.2461. David J. Frew, Q. A. Parker, and I. S. Bojiˇ ci´ c. The H αsurface brightness-radius relation: a robust statistical distance indicator for planetary nebulae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , 455(2):1459–1488, January

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0711.2461

  3. [14]

    10.1093/mnras/stz1994

    ISSN 0035-8711. 10.1093/mnras/stz1994. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1994. R. H. Mendez. Photospheric Abundances in Central Stars of Pl anetary Nebulae, and Evolutionary Implications. In George s Michaud and A. V . Tutukov, editors, Evolution of Stars: the Photospheric Abundance Connection , volume 145, page 375, January

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1994

  4. [22]

    10.1086/498708. G. Stasi´ nska and R. Szczerba. VizieR Online Data Catalog: T he dust content of planetary nebulae (Stasi´ nska +, 1999). VizieR Online Data Catalog , art. J/A+A/352/297, November 1999a. Gra˙ zyna Stasi´ nska and Ryszard Szczerba. The dust content of planetary nebulae: a reappraisal. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 352:297–307, December 1999b. 1...

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9911006 1999

  5. [23]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-810985-4.00001-3

    ISBN 978-0-12-810985-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-810985-4.00001-3 . URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128109854000013. H. Todt, M. A. Guerrero, X. Fang, J. A. Toala, J. S. Arthur, W. P . Blair, Y . H. Chu, R. A. Gruendl, W. R. Hamann, R. A. Marquez-L ugo, L. Oskinova, N. Ruiz, M. Steffen, and D. Schoenberner. The Born-agai...

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-810985-4.00001-3

  6. [24]

    10.1017/S1743921306002869. W. A. Weidmann and R. Gamen. Central stars of planetary nebul ae: New spectral classifications and catalogue. aap, 526:A6, February

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921306002869

  7. [26]

    Walter Alfredo Weidmann, MB Mari, Eduardo Osvaldo Schmidt, Gaia Gaspar, MM Miller Bertolami, Gabriel Andr´ es Oio, LA Gu ti´ errez-Soto, Maria Gabriela C

    10.1051/0004-6361/202346401. Walter Alfredo Weidmann, MB Mari, Eduardo Osvaldo Schmidt, Gaia Gaspar, MM Miller Bertolami, Gabriel Andr´ es Oio, LA Gu ti´ errez-Soto, Maria Gabriela C. Muthumariappan etal / Advances in Space Research xx (2024) xxx-xxx 21 V olpe, R Gamen, and Damian Mast. Catalogue of the central sta rs of planetary nebulae-expanded edition...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346401 2024

  8. [27]

    10.1007/978-94-011-2020-3_10

    ISBN 978-94-011-2020-3. 10.1007/978-94-011-2020-3_10 . URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2020-3_10 . K. Werner, T. Rauch, R. Napiwotzki, N. Christlieb, D. Reimer s, and C. A. Karl. Identification of a DO white dwarf and a PG 115 9 star in the ESO SN Ia progenitor survey (SPY). aap, 424:657–663, September

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2020-3_10 2020

Show all 33 references
  1. [29]

    URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/500443

    10.1086/500443. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/500443. P . A. Whitelock. JHK photometry of planetary nebulae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 213:59–69, March

    doi

  2. [31]

    Patrick A

    10.1086/163193. Patrick A. Woudt, Brian Warner, and Ewald Zietsman. SDSS J03 49-0059 is a GW Virginis star. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , 426(3): 2137–2141, November

    doi

  3. [1981]

    10.1086/159142. G. Neugebauer, H. J. Habing, R. van Duinen, H. H. Aumann, B. Ba ud, C. A. Beichman, D. A. Beintema, N. Boggess, P . E. Clegg, T. de Jong, J. P . Emerson, T. N. Gautier, F. C. Gillett, S. Harris, M. G. Hauser, J. R. Hou ck, R. E. Jennings, F. J. Low, P . L. Mars...

    doi

  4. [1983]

    10.1093/mnras/202.3.615

    ISSN 0035-8711. 10.1093/mnras/202.3.615. S. R. Pottasch, C. Bignell, R. Olling, and A. A. Zijlstra. Pla netary nebulae near the galactic center. I. Method of discov ery and preliminary results. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 205:248–256, October

    doi

  5. [1984]

    10.1086/184209. J. A. Peacock. Two-dimensional goodness-of-fit testing in a stronomy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , 202(3):615–627, 03

    doi

  6. [1985]

    10.1093/mnras/213.1.59. D. E. Winget, S. O. Kepler, E. L. Robinson, R. E. Nather, and D. Odonoghue. A measurement of secular evolution in the pre-wh ite dwarf star PG 1159-035. The Astrophysical Journal, 292:606–613, May

    doi

  7. [1986]

    Icko Iben

    10.1086/191115. Icko Iben. The evolution of planetary nebulae, their precur sors and their progeny — a commentary. In Ronald Weinberger a nd Agnes Acker, editors, Planetary Nebulae, pages 587–596, Dordrecht,

    doi

  8. [1989]

    L L ¨ obling, T Rauch, M M Miller Bertolami, H Todt, F Friederich, M Ziegler, K Werner, and J W Kruk

    10.1086/167906. L L ¨ obling, T Rauch, M M Miller Bertolami, H Todt, F Friederich, M Ziegler, K Werner, and J W Kruk. Spectral analysis of the h ybrid PG 1159-type central stars of the planetary nebulae abell 43 and NGC

    doi

  9. [1993]

    IS BN 978-94-011-2088-3

    Springer Netherlands. IS BN 978-94-011-2088-3. A. Leene and S. R. Pottasch. IRAS pointed observations of pla netary nebulae. aap, 202:203–214, August

  10. [1994]

    10.1086/174849. M. Catelan, J. A. de Freitas Pacheco, and J. E. Horvath. The He lium-Core Mass at the Helium Flash in Low-Mass Red Giant Star s: Observations and Theory. The Astrophysical Journal, 461:231, April

    doi

  11. [1996]

    10.1086/177051. P . A. Crowther. Physical and Wind Properties of [WC] Stars. I n A. Werner and T. Rauch, editors, Hydrogen-Deficient Stars , volume 391 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series , page 83, July

    doi

  12. [2001]

    10.1051/0004-6361:20011050. R. F. Green, M. Schmidt, and J. Liebert. The Palomar-Green Ca talog of Ultraviolet-Excess Stellar Objects. ApJS, 61:305, June

    doi

  13. [2002]

    10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0105448

    doi arXiv

  14. [2003]

    10.1051/0004-6361:20030391. Z. Awad and A. Ali. Physical and Kinematical Characteristic s of Wolf-Rayet Central Stars and their Host Planetary Nebul ae. Research in Astronomy and Astro- physics, 23(9):095021, September

    doi

  15. [2004]

    Klaus Werner and Falk Herwig

    10.1051/0004-6361:20041157. Klaus Werner and Falk Herwig. The elemental abundances in ba re planetary nebula central stars and the shell burning in ag b stars. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , 118(840):183, feb

    doi

  16. [2006]

    URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/500041

    10.1086/500041. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/500041. C. Muthumariappan, M. Parthasarathy, and Y . Ita. Radiative transfer modelling of dust in IRAS 18333 −2357: the only planetary nebula in the metal-poor globular cluster M22. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societ...

    doi

  17. [2008]

    10.48550/arXiv.0710.5774. R. M. et al. Cutri. VizieR Online Data Catalog: WISE All-Sky D ata Release (Cutri+ 2012). VizieR Online Data Catalog, art. II /311, April

    2012 doi arXiv

  18. [2010]

    Albert A

    10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868. Albert A. Zijlstra. Hydrogen-poor planetary nebulae. Astrophysics and Space Science, 279:171–182, January

    doi

  19. [2011]

    10.1051/0004-6361/200913984. W. A. Weidmann, K. Werner, J. A. Ahumada, R. A. Pignata, and V . Firpo. Revealing the ionising star of evolved planetary neb ulae. aap, 676:A1, August

    doi

  20. [2012]

    Edward L

    10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21899.x. Edward L. Wright, Peter R. M. Eisenhardt, Amy K. Mainzer, Mic hael E. Ressler, Roc M. Cutri, Thomas Jarrett, J. Davy Kirkpa trick, Deborah Padgett, Robert S. McMillan, Michael Skrutskie, S. A. Stanford, Martin Cohen, Russell G. Walker, John C....

    2012

  21. [2013]

    10.1093/mnras/stt1319

    ISSN 0035-8711. 10.1093/mnras/stt1319. A. Natta and N. Panagia. Dust in planetary nebulae. The Astrophysical Journal, 248:189–194, August

    doi

  22. [2016]

    Pascal Girard, J

    10.1093/mnras/stv1516. Pascal Girard, J. Koppen, and A. Acker. Chemical compositions and plasma parameters of planetary nebulae with Wolf-Rayet and wels type central stars. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 463:265–274,

    doi

  23. [2017]

    10.1093/mnras/stx1071

    ISSN 0035-8711. 10.1093/mnras/stx1071. C. Muthumariappan and M. Parthasarathy. Infrared properti es of planetary nebulae with [WR] and wels central stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 493(1):730–746, March

    doi

  24. [2020]

    10.1093/mnras/staa217. C. Muthumariappan, Sun Kwok, and Kevin V olk. Subarcsecond mid-infrared imaging of dust in the bipolar nebula hen 3-401* . The Astrophysical Journal, 640(1): 353, mar

    doi

  25. [2023]

    Howard E

    10.1088/1674-4527/acd993. Howard E. Bond, Klaus Werner, George H. Jacoby, and Gregory R . Zeimann. Spectroscopic survey of faint planetary-nebula nuclei - I. Six new ’O VI’ central stars. mnras, 521(1):668–676, May

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.