Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

LLMs are Also Effective Embedding Models: An In-depth Overview

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.12591 v2 pith:RVEGLZAN submitted 2024-12-17 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords embeddingmodelsllmsembeddingsdataefficiencysurveychallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing by achieving state-of-the-art performance across various tasks. Recently, their effectiveness as embedding models has gained attention, marking a paradigm shift from traditional encoder-only models like ELMo and BERT to decoder-only, large-scale LLMs such as GPT, LLaMA, and Mistral. This survey provides an in-depth overview of this transition, beginning with foundational techniques before the LLM era, followed by LLM-based embedding models through two main strategies to derive embeddings from LLMs. 1) Direct prompting: We mainly discuss the prompt designs and the underlying rationale for deriving competitive embeddings. 2) Data-centric tuning: We cover extensive aspects that affect tuning an embedding model, including model architecture, training objectives, data constructions, etc. Upon the above, we also cover advanced methods for producing embeddings from longer texts, multilingual, code, cross-modal data, as well as reasoning-aware and other domain-specific scenarios. Furthermore, we discuss factors affecting choices of embedding models, such as performance/efficiency comparisons, dense vs sparse embeddings, pooling strategies, and scaling law. Lastly, the survey highlights the limitations and challenges in adapting LLMs for embeddings, including cross-task embedding quality, trade-offs between efficiency and accuracy, low-resource, long-context, data bias, robustness, etc. This survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners by synthesizing current advancements, highlighting key challenges, and offering a comprehensive framework for future work aimed at enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of LLMs as embedding models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BitNet Text Embeddings

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    BITEMBED trains 1.58-bit ternary-weight LLM embedders with contrastive pre-training, supervised distillation, and multi-precision output training, matching FP16 teachers within ~0.6 MMTEB points at ~2x CPU speed.

  2. CogDual: Enhancing Dual Cognition of LLMs via Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Rule-Based Rewards

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A role-playing LLM that reasons about the scene and its own state before responding, trained with two semantic rewards, beats stronger baselines on role-play benchmarks.

  3. LLM-BT-Terms: Back-Translation as a Framework for Terminology Standardization and Dynamic Semantic Embedding

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM-based back-translation can validate and recommend standardized multilingual terminology with over 90 percent reported consistency in small case studies.

  4. CoRet: Improved Retriever for Code Editing

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CoRet fine-tunes a code encoder with a repository-level likelihood loss and call-graph context, improving retrieval recall on SWE-bench and Long Code Arena.

  5. Training-Free versus Training-Based Intent Classification in LLMs: Accuracy, Robustness, and Failure Modes

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Statistical classifiers built on LLM activation norms and coordinates match or beat trained MLP heads on coarse intent routing and resist camouflage better, while MLPs win on fine-grained subfield distinctions.

  6. CDAE: Enhancing Perturbation Robustness in Pretrained Language Models with Contrastive Denoising

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A lightweight contrastive denoising autoencoder on frozen BERT keeps clean and perturbed sentence embeddings more similar than raw BERT or SimCSE under synonym, mask, and dropout noise.

Pith tools