A sharp spectral splitting theorem

Gioacchino Antonelli; Kai Xu; Marco Pozzetta

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

A sharp spectral splitting theorem

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read If a complete two-ended manifold satisfies λ1(−γΔ + Ric) ≥ 0 for γ < 4/(n−1), then it splits as R × N with N compact and Ric ≥ 0.

desk verdict Sharp spectral splitting theorem with a clean core computation; the n≥8 case relies on an unpublished appendix, which is fixable before acceptance. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12707 v1 pith:OK4PLHYS submitted 2024-12-17 math.DG math.AP

Gioacchino Antonelli , Marco Pozzetta , Kai Xu This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DGmath.AP MSC 53C2153C42

keywords spectralsplittingtheoremCheeger–GromollRiccicurvatureµ-bubblelowerboundstableminimalhypersurfacesbisharpconstant

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a sharp spectral version of the Cheeger–Gromoll splitting theorem: a complete noncompact Riemannian manifold of dimension at least 2 with at least two ends, whose Ricci curvature is nonnegative only in the spectral sense that the operator −γΔ + Ric has nonnegative first eigenvalue for some γ < 4/(n−1), must in fact have genuinely nonnegative Ricci curvature everywhere and split isometrically as a line times a compact nonnegatively curved manifold. Spectral curvature bounds are much weaker than pointwise ones, so the result shows that a large family of almost-rigid geometries is actually rigid. The threshold 4/(n−1) is optimal, and the multiple-end assumption is necessary for every γ > 0. The proof replaces the classical geodesic-line argument with a µ-bubble technique (minimizing a carefully weighted surface area), yielding an alternative route to splitting rigidity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the operator L = −γΔ + Ric, a weighted Laplacian with the pointwise minimum Ricci curvature as potential. The spectral hypothesis λ1(L) ≥ 0 is converted, via a theorem of Fischer-Colbrie and Schoen, into a positive solution u0 of L u0 = 0, which acts as a weight for the perimeter functional. The proof then runs a µ-bubble scheme: it minimizes Pε(Ω) = ∫_{∂*Ω} u^γ − ∫ (χΩ − χΩ0) hε u^γ, with hε a rapidly diverging function of a proper 1-Lipschitz coordinate φ whose level sets divide the ends. The second variation of Pε yields a stability inequality whose quadratic part has discriminant γ(γ − 4/(n−1)); this discriminant is negative exactly in the theorem's range, giving a nonzero penalty term. A surface-capturing perturbation of u0 (Lemma 2.2) forces the minimizers to pass through any prescribed point, and the density estimates on the bubbles let the inequality pass to the limit to show |∇u0| = 0 everywhere.

What would settle it

For the warped product in Remark 4.1 (M = R × $T^{{n−1}}$, g = dt² + $e^{{2t}}$g), compute the bottom of the spectrum of −γΔ + Ric at a value γ slightly below 4/(n−1). The theorem predicts λ1 < 0, so the manifold would not satisfy the hypothesis; a numerical or analytic demonstration that λ1 ≥ 0 for such γ would create a counterexample to the theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.1 states that for a complete noncompact manifold (M^n, g) with n ≥ 2, at least two ends, and λ1(−γΔ + Ric) ≥ 0 for some γ < 4/(n−1), the Ricci curvature satisfies Ric ≥ 0 pointwise and M is isometric to R × N, where N is compact and has Ric_N ≥ 0. The constant 4/(n−1) is sharp: for every γ ≥ 4/(n−1) the warped product (R × $T^{{n−1}}$, dt² + $e^{{2t}}$g) satisfies the spectral condition while having two ends but not splitting, and the paper details this in Remark 4.1. The multiple-end assumption is also necessary, as any sufficiently small compact perturbation of flat R^n satisfies the spectral condition for every γ > 0 while containing lines but not splitting (Remark 4.2). As a corollary, in a manifold with biRic ≥ 0 of dimension at most 5, any noncompact, two-sided stable minimal hypersurface either has one end or splits as R × Σ′ with Σ′ compact, is totally geodesic, and has vanishing normal Ricci curvature.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the bridge from the spectral inequality λ1(−γΔ+Ric) ≥ 0 to a global positive solution u0 of −γΔu0+Ric·u0 = 0, a conversion that must hold for the locally Lipschitz potential Ric on the whole noncompact manifold for the proof to start.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any complete two-ended manifold with λ1(−γΔ+Ric) ≥ 0 for γ < 4/(n−1) automatically has Ric ≥ 0, so the entire Cheeger–Gromoll rigidity apparatus applies: the universal cover splits, and the fundamental group is isomorphic to the fundamental group of the compact factor N (since R is simply connected).
Corollary 1.2 extends the one-end rigidity of stable minimal hypersurfaces from ambient nonnegative sectional curvature to ambient biRic ≥ 0 in dimension n ≤ 5, without requiring properness of the immersion.
The sharpness examples at γ = 4/(n−1) and for compact perturbations of R^n delineate exactly where the theorem stops: the two-end hypothesis and the range of γ cannot be relaxed.
The proof supplies a new proof of the classical Cheeger–Gromoll splitting theorem under the assumptions Ric ≥ 0, at least two ends, and inf_{x} |B(x,1)| > 0, using µ-bubbles instead of geodesic lines.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

For dimensions n ≥ 5, the theorem does not cover γ = 1 (the standard operator −Δ + Ric); since the sharpness examples are perturbations of the threshold, one might suspect the splitting conclusion could fail for γ = 1 in high dimensions, and checking this case directly would be a natural test of the result's boundary.
The proof actually shows the stronger local fact that |∇u0| = 0 at each point x (by constructing a bubble through x), so a variation with a local spectral bound, e.g., λ1 ≥ 0 on a single end, might yield a partial splitting or an end-stability statement.
The discriminant γ(γ − 4/(n−1)) suggests that the constant 4/(n−1) is the sharp threshold for positivity of the stability form; the same algebraic structure may govern other weighted-area problems, for instance with the Bakry–Émery operator, and could be probed with the same warped-product examples.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

It's a good paper. The main theorem is real: if a complete noncompact n-manifold with at least two ends satisfies λ1(−γΔ+Ric) ≥ 0 for γ < 4/(n−1), then Ric ≥ 0 and the manifold splits as R × N with compact N. The constant is sharp, and the two counterexamples—the hyperbolic quotient at γ = 4/(n−1), and the compact perturbation of R^n showing two ends can't be weakened to just having a line—are genuinely new. The proof strategy is also new, at least to me: use the [FS80] positive solution u0 to convert the spectral bound into a pointwise equation, run µ-bubbles with a surface-capturing perturbation, and get |∇u0| = 0 at an arbitrary point. The algebra in Section 3 is clean; the discriminant computation (3.16) and the resulting bound (3.17) are the heart, and the contradiction works.

The real soft spot is the n ≥ 8 range. The decisive stability estimate (3.19) requires a second variation computation on the singular set of the µ-bubble minimizer. The authors defer it to [AX24, Appendix A], an unpublished self-cited preprint. That is a genuine self-containedness gap for the stated range of Theorem 1.1. It is probably repairable—the singular set has codimension at least 8, and a cutoff vanishing on it should pass to the limit—but as written the theorem is not proved for n ≥ 8.

Two smaller notes. The equivalence (i)⇔(ii) is cited tersely to [FS80]; since Ric is only locally Lipschitz, I'd like the precise statement and hypotheses spelled out. And after u is constant, the compactness of N in the splitting is invoked without comment; it's standard for a two-ended Ric ≥ 0 manifold, but worth a line.

The citation pattern is fine. [AX24] and [Xu24] provide auxiliary lemmas, not the target result. The addendum about the independent overlap with Catino–Mari–Mastrolia–Roncoroni is honest.

Bottom line: send it to peer review. The core mathematics is solid. Ask the authors to either include the n ≥ 8 computation or restrict the theorem to n ≤ 7. Once that is fixed, this is a strong paper.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves a sharp spectral generalization of the Cheeger–Gromoll splitting theorem. The main result, Theorem 1.1, states that a complete noncompact Riemannian n-manifold (n≥2) with at least two ends satisfying λ1(-γΔ+Ric)≥0 for some γ<4/(n-1) must have Ric≥0 and split isometrically as R×N with N compact and Ric_N≥0. The proof uses an existence result of an eigenfunction u0 for the Schrödinger operator, constructs weighted µ-bubbles, and obtains a stability inequality that forces |∇u0|=0 at every point, making u0 constant. The paper also includes remarks showing that the constant 4/(n-1) is sharp and that the multiple-end assumption is necessary for γ>0, and derives a corollary on stable minimal hypersurfaces in manifolds with biRic≥0.

Significance. If the proof is completed as claimed, the result is a significant and attractive contribution: it extends the classical Cheeger–Gromoll splitting theorem to a spectral Ricci lower bound, gives a sharp threshold 4/(n-1), and introduces a µ-bubble/surface-capturing approach that differs from the original Busemann-function proof. The discriminant computation leading to (3.16) is clean, and the sharpness examples in Section 4 are explicit and checkable. However, the proof as submitted has a substantial gap for dimensions n≥8, where the key stability inequality is deferred to an unpublished self-cited appendix; this prevents the main theorem from being fully established in the stated range.

major comments (3)

[§3, footnote to (3.11) and equation (3.19)] For n≥8 the decisive stability inequality (3.19) is not proved in the paper. The footnote states that one multiplies test functions by a cutoff vanishing on the singular set ∂Ωε\∂*Ωε and carries out computations 'as in [AX24, Appendix A]', which are omitted and appear only in a self-cited arXiv preprint. Equation (3.19) is the estimate used to force the contradiction at the end of the proof; without a complete argument that the cutoff approximation passes to the limit for the weighted perimeter functional with the bulk term hεu^γ, the claim |∇u0|(x)=0 is not established in dimensions n≥8. The gap is likely repairable (the singular set has codimension at least 7, hence capacity zero), but as submitted the proof of Theorem 1.1 is not self-contained for the full stated range n≥2.
[§1, definition of λ1 and equation (3.1)] The proof starts from the existence of a positive C^{2,α} function u0 satisfying -γΔu0+Ric·u0=0, which is deduced from the quadratic-form condition via [FS80, Theorem 1]. Since Ric is only locally Lipschitz and the manifold is noncompact, the hypotheses under which [FS80, Theorem 1] applies should be stated precisely, or a short justification should be given. This is load-bearing because every subsequent µ-bubble construction depends on u0; if the equivalence of (i) and (ii) fails for this class of potentials, the argument cannot start.
[Abstract and Remark 4.2] The abstract states that the multiple-end assumption is necessary for any γ>0, but the counterexample in Remark 4.2 is explicitly constructed only for n≥3. For n=2 the necessity of the multiple-end assumption is not demonstrated. Please qualify the abstract statement to match the proven range, or supply a two-dimensional example.

minor comments (4)

[§4, proof of Corollary 1.2] In the Gauss equation display, the sign of the second fundamental form term in '0 = Ric_Σ(∂t, ∂t) = -II^2(∂t, ∂t) + Ric_M(∂t, ∂t) - Sect(∂t∧ν_Σ)' appears to be opposite to the standard minimal-hypersurface Gauss equation; please check the sign convention and notation (what II^2(∂t,∂t) denotes).
[§2, Lemma 2.2] The statement of Lemma 2.2(1) gives -2u0≤w<0, but the proof only establishes -u0≤w<0 outside U and says the lemma follows 'by extending w inside U keeping -2u0≤w<0'. It would help to indicate explicitly how the extension across ∂U is made while preserving C^{2,α} regularity.
[§3, proof of Theorem 1.1] In the paragraph after (3.19), the argument that ∂*Ωε∩φ^{-1}([-1,1])≠∅ implicitly uses that Ωε is admissible (so ∂*Ωε is nonempty); it may be worth stating this explicitly.
[General] There are minor typos in the abstract/OCR rendering, e.g., 'Cheeger–Gro moll' and 'greaterorequalslant'; these should be corrected in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central spectral splitting proof is self-contained, with only auxiliary self-citations and an omitted n>=8 stability computation.

full rationale

The main derivation is not circular. Theorem 1.1 converts the spectral assumption (1.1) into a positive solution u0 of -gamma Delta u0 + Ric u0 = 0 via [FS80], an external theorem, and then runs a mu-bubble minimization with perturbed weight u = u0 + a w_r. The threshold gamma < 4/(n-1) emerges internally from the discriminant computation (3.16), not from the desired conclusion, and the conclusion Ric >= 0 follows from constancy of u0 plus the classical Cheeger-Gromoll splitting theorem. The sharpness examples in Remark 4.1 and Remark 4.2 are genuine counterexamples with explicit functions u, not reformulations of the theorem. The only self-citations are auxiliary: the footnote after (3.11) invokes [AX24, Appendix A] for the omitted first and second variation computations when n >= 8, and Corollary 1.2 uses [Xu24, Lemma 1.9] to transfer the stability inequality to the spectral condition on the hypersurface. These are load-bearing for parts of the paper, but they are technical transfers rather than restatements of the target result. However, as the footnote itself states, the n >= 8 stability inequality leading to (3.19) is not proved in the paper and is deferred to an unpublished self-cited preprint, so the full stated range n >= 2 is not fully self-contained as submitted. This is a completeness and correctness concern, not circularity, because no equation is defined in terms of the conclusion and no fit is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central proof is a derivation that uses standard tools from spectral theory, geometric measure theory, and the classical splitting theorem. No free numerical constants are fitted; the threshold 4/(n-1) emerges from the discriminant computation. The only self-cited technical ingredient is [AX24, Appendix A], used to handle singular sets in dimension at least 8; this is the main item a referee would want to inspect.

assumptions (5)

standard math Fischer-Colbrie-Schoen theorem (FS80): for a Schrodinger operator -gamma Delta + Ric with locally Lipschitz potential, spectral nonnegativity over C_c^1 implies existence of a positive C^{2,alpha} solution u0 with -gamma Delta u0 + Ric u0 = 0.
Invoked in Section 1 (definition of the spectral condition) and Section 3, equation (3.1), to obtain the positive solution that anchors the mu-bubble construction.
standard math Cheeger-Gromoll splitting theorem (CG71): a complete manifold with Ric >= 0 and a line splits isometrically as R x N with Ric_N >= 0.
Used at the end of Theorem 1.1 to conclude the splitting once Ric >= 0 is proved. The paper also implicitly uses the fact that two ends force N to be compact.
standard math Existence of mu-bubble minimizers for the weighted functional P_epsilon and their C^{2,alpha} regularity away from a codimension-8 singular set.
Used in Section 3 to obtain Omega_epsilon and the first and second variation formulas (3.11) and (3.12); based on references [CL24, Proposition 12], [Mag12], and [Kin+13, Lemma 5.1].
standard math Density estimates for quasi-minimal sets and local isoperimetric inequalities on small balls in a precompact region.
Used in Lemma 2.3 to get uniform density estimates for the mu-bubble boundaries, which are then used in Section 3 to derive the lower bound (3.20).
ad hoc to paper Handling of the singular set partial Omega_epsilon minus partial* Omega_epsilon for n >= 8 via [AX24, Appendix A].
Footnote 1 in Section 3 says the first and second variation are computed away from the singular set and the extension is omitted, deferring to the authors' own prior work. This is a self-cited technical tool that is not fully reproduced.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A sharp spectral splitting theorem." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OK4PLHYS

@misc{pith2026241212707,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A sharp spectral splitting theorem},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OK4PLHYS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12707}
}

abstract

We prove a sharp spectral generalization of the Cheeger--Gromoll splitting theorem. We show that if a complete non-compact Riemannian manifold $M$ of dimension $n\geq 2$ has at least two ends and \[ \lambda_1(-\gamma\Delta+\mathrm{Ric})\geq 0, \] for some $\gamma<\frac{4}{n-1}$, then $M$ splits isometrically as $\mathbb R\times N$ for some compact manifold $N$ with nonnegative Ricci curvature. We show that the constant $\frac{4}{n-1}$ is sharp, and the multiple-end assumption is necessary for any $\gamma>0$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Bottom spectrum and parabolicity of 3-manifolds with scalar curvature lower bound
math.DG 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

Complete 3-manifolds with scalar curvature lower bound, finitely many ends, and finite first Betti number satisfy a sharp bottom spectrum upper bound and are parabolic under positive scalar curvature.
Connected sum of manifolds with spectral Ricci lower bounds
math.DG 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Connected sums preserve the spectral Ricci bound lambda1(-gamma Delta + Ric) > lambda for n >= 3 and gamma > (n-1)/(n-2), and this range is sharp.
Some rigidity theorems for spectral curvature bounds
math.DG 2026-04 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

Spectral lower bounds on scalar/Ricci curvature imply the same rigidity, band-width, and splitting conclusions as classical pointwise bounds, via warped µ-bubbles.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

[1]

Sharp isoperimetric comparison on non-collapsed spaces with lower Ricci bounds

[AFP00] L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco, and D. Pallara. Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxf ord University Press, New York, 2000, pp. xviii+434. [Ant+23] G. Antonelli, E. Pasqualetto, M. Pozzetta, and D. S emola. “Sharp isoperimetric comparison on non-collapsed spaces with lower R...

work page 2000
[4]

[Cat+24] G

arXiv: 2305.07428 [math.DG] . [Cat+24] G. Catino, L. Mari, P. Mastrolia, and A. Roncoroni. Criticality, splitting theorems under spec- tral Ricci bounds and the topology of stable minimal hypersu rfaces. Preprint to appear

arXiv
[5]

The splitting theorem for manifolds of nonnegative Ricci curva- ture

[CG71] J. Cheeger and D. Gromoll. “The splitting theorem for manifolds of nonnegative Ricci curva- ture”. In: J. Diﬀerential Geometry 6 (1971), pp. 119–128. [CEM19] O. Chodosh, M. Eichmair, and V. Moraru. “A splitting theorem for scalar curvature”. In: Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 72.6 (2019), pp. 1231–1242. [CL23] O. Chodosh and C. Li. “Stable anisotropic mini...

work page 1971
[7]

[CLZ24a] J

arXiv: 2401.01492 [math.DG] . [CLZ24a] J. Chu, M.-C. Lee, and J. Zhu. Homological n-systole in (n + 1)-manifolds and bi-Ricci curva- ture

arXiv
[8]

Homological $n$-systole in $(n+1)$-manifolds and bi-Ricci curvature

arXiv: 2410.20785 [math.DG] . [CLZ24b] J. Chu, M.-C. Lee, and J. Zhu. On Kähler manifolds with non-negative mixed curvature

work page Pith review arXiv
[9]

An elementary proof of the Cheeger-Gromoll splitting theorem

arXiv: 2408.14043 [math.DG] . [EH84] J. Eschenburg and E. Heintze. “An elementary proof of the Cheeger-Gromoll splitting theorem”. In: Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 2.2 (1984), pp. 141–151. [FS80] D. Fischer-Colbrie and R. Schoen. “The structure of c omplete stable minimal surfaces in 3- manifolds of nonnegative scalar curvature”. In: Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 33....

arXiv 1984
[12]

Ricci curvature, geodesics and some geom etric properties of Riemannian manifolds with boundary

Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics. New York University Courant I nstitute of Mathematical Sci- ences, 1999, pp. x+309. [Kas83] A. Kasue. “Ricci curvature, geodesics and some geom etric properties of Riemannian manifolds with boundary”. In: J. Math. Soc. Japan 35.1 (1983), pp. 117–131. [Kin+13] J. Kinnunen, R. Korte, A. Lorent, and N. Shanmugali ngam. “...

work page 1983
[14]

[Xu24] K

arXiv: 2405.14676 [math.DG] . [Xu24] K. Xu. Dimension constraints in some problems involving intermed iate curvature

arXiv

Show all 15 references

[15]

Rigidity results for complete manifolds wi th nonnegative scalar curvature

arXiv: 2301.02730 [math.DG] . [Zhu23] J. Zhu. “Rigidity results for complete manifolds wi th nonnegative scalar curvature”. In: J. Diﬀerential Geom. 125.3 (2023), pp. 623–644. 10 REFERENCES Gioacchino Antonelli Courant Institute Of Ma thema tical Sciences (NYU), 251 Merc er St...

2023 arXiv
[22]

Generalized soap bubbles and th e topology of manifolds with positive scalar curvature

[CL24] O. Chodosh and C. Li. “Generalized soap bubbles and th e topology of manifolds with positive scalar curvature”. In: Ann. of Math. (2) 199.2 (2024), pp. 707–740. [Cho+24] O. Chodosh, C. Li, P. Minter, and D. Stryker. Stable minimal hypersurfaces in R5

2024
[132]

Progr. Math. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1996, pp. 1–213. [Gro21] M. Gromov. Four Lectures on Scalar Curvature

1996
[135]

An introduction to geomet ric measure theory

Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. An introduction to geomet ric measure theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012, pp. xx+454. [Maz24] L. Mazet. Stable minimal hypersurfaces in R6

2012
[2021]

[Heb99] E

arXiv: 1908.10612 [math.DG] . [Heb99] E. Hebey. Nonlinear analysis on manifolds: Sobolev spaces and inequa lities. Vol

1908 arXiv
[2023]

[AX24] G

arXiv: 2201.04916. [AX24] G. Antonelli and K. Xu. New spectral Bishop-Gromov and Bonnet-Myers theorems and a ppli- cations to isoperimetry

arXiv
[2024]

The structure of stab le minimal hypersurfaces in Rn+1

arXiv: 2405.08918 [math.DG] . REFERENCES 9 [CSZ97] H.-D. Cao, Y. Shen, and S. Zhu. “The structure of stab le minimal hypersurfaces in Rn+1”. In: Math. Res. Lett. 4.5 (1997), pp. 637–644. [CCE16] A. Carlotto, O. Chodosh, and M. Eichmair. “Eﬀective versions of the positive mass ...

1997 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Sharp isoperimetric comparison on non-collapsed spaces with lower Ricci bounds

[AFP00] L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco, and D. Pallara. Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxf ord University Press, New York, 2000, pp. xviii+434. [Ant+23] G. Antonelli, E. Pasqualetto, M. Pozzetta, and D. S emola. “Sharp isoperimetric comparison on non-collapsed spaces with lower R...

work page 2000

[2] [4]

[Cat+24] G

arXiv: 2305.07428 [math.DG] . [Cat+24] G. Catino, L. Mari, P. Mastrolia, and A. Roncoroni. Criticality, splitting theorems under spec- tral Ricci bounds and the topology of stable minimal hypersu rfaces. Preprint to appear

arXiv

[3] [5]

The splitting theorem for manifolds of nonnegative Ricci curva- ture

[CG71] J. Cheeger and D. Gromoll. “The splitting theorem for manifolds of nonnegative Ricci curva- ture”. In: J. Diﬀerential Geometry 6 (1971), pp. 119–128. [CEM19] O. Chodosh, M. Eichmair, and V. Moraru. “A splitting theorem for scalar curvature”. In: Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 72.6 (2019), pp. 1231–1242. [CL23] O. Chodosh and C. Li. “Stable anisotropic mini...

work page 1971

[4] [7]

[CLZ24a] J

arXiv: 2401.01492 [math.DG] . [CLZ24a] J. Chu, M.-C. Lee, and J. Zhu. Homological n-systole in (n + 1)-manifolds and bi-Ricci curva- ture

arXiv

[5] [8]

Homological $n$-systole in $(n+1)$-manifolds and bi-Ricci curvature

arXiv: 2410.20785 [math.DG] . [CLZ24b] J. Chu, M.-C. Lee, and J. Zhu. On Kähler manifolds with non-negative mixed curvature

work page Pith review arXiv

[6] [9]

An elementary proof of the Cheeger-Gromoll splitting theorem

arXiv: 2408.14043 [math.DG] . [EH84] J. Eschenburg and E. Heintze. “An elementary proof of the Cheeger-Gromoll splitting theorem”. In: Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 2.2 (1984), pp. 141–151. [FS80] D. Fischer-Colbrie and R. Schoen. “The structure of c omplete stable minimal surfaces in 3- manifolds of nonnegative scalar curvature”. In: Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 33....

arXiv 1984

[7] [12]

Ricci curvature, geodesics and some geom etric properties of Riemannian manifolds with boundary

Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics. New York University Courant I nstitute of Mathematical Sci- ences, 1999, pp. x+309. [Kas83] A. Kasue. “Ricci curvature, geodesics and some geom etric properties of Riemannian manifolds with boundary”. In: J. Math. Soc. Japan 35.1 (1983), pp. 117–131. [Kin+13] J. Kinnunen, R. Korte, A. Lorent, and N. Shanmugali ngam. “...

work page 1983

[8] [14]

[Xu24] K

arXiv: 2405.14676 [math.DG] . [Xu24] K. Xu. Dimension constraints in some problems involving intermed iate curvature

arXiv