Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Survey on Inference Optimization Techniques for Mixture of Experts Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.14219 v2 pith:GKT3LLXD submitted 2024-12-18 cs.LG cs.AIcs.DC

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.DC
keywords optimizationinferencemodelsefficiencysurveytechniquesapproacheschallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The emergence of large-scale Mixture of Experts (MoE) models represents a significant advancement in artificial intelligence, offering enhanced model capacity and computational efficiency through conditional computation. However, deploying and running inference on these models presents significant challenges in computational resources, latency, and energy efficiency. This comprehensive survey analyzes optimization techniques for MoE models across the entire system stack. We first establish a taxonomical framework that categorizes optimization approaches into model-level, system-level, and hardware-level optimizations. At the model level, we examine architectural innovations including efficient expert design, attention mechanisms, various compression techniques such as pruning, quantization, and knowledge distillation, as well as algorithm improvement including dynamic routing strategies and expert merging methods. At the system level, we investigate distributed computing approaches, load balancing mechanisms, and efficient scheduling algorithms that enable scalable deployment. Furthermore, we delve into hardware-specific optimizations and co-design strategies that maximize throughput and energy efficiency. This survey provides both a structured overview of existing solutions and identifies key challenges and promising research directions in MoE inference optimization. To facilitate ongoing updates and the sharing of cutting-edge advances in MoE inference optimization research, we have established a repository accessible at https://github.com/MoE-Inf/awesome-moe-inference/.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MoE-Compression: How the Compression Error of Experts Affects the Inference Accuracy of MoE Model?

    cs.LG 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a 26-layer MoE model, injecting Gaussian weight errors into middle-layer experts hurts math accuracy most, while deep-layer errors can sometimes improve instruction compliance.

  2. Toward Edge General Intelligence with Agentic AI and Agentification: Concepts, Technologies, and Future Directions

    cs.NI 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes agentic AI for 6G edge networks into four pillars, compactness, efficiency, knowledge and reasoning, and migration, and illustrates them with prior case studies.

  3. Graph-of-Causal Evolution: Challenging Chain-of-Model for Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    GoCE swaps CoM's chain structure for a differentiable causal graph and reports accuracy gains on CLUTRR, CLadder, EX-FEVER, and CausalQA, but the evidence is sandbox-generated and unauditable.

  4. EvoMoE: Expert Evolution in Mixture of Experts for Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    EvoMoE creates MoE experts as decaying averages of a single trained FFN and routes tokens with hypernetwork-generated weights, yielding small benchmark gains over MoE-LLaVA.

Pith tools