Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 78 references

Examining Entropic Unbalanced Optimal Transport and Sinkhorn Divergences for Spatial Forecast Verification

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The unbalanced Sinkhorn divergence turns precipitation forecast verification into a transport problem, charging for moving rain rather than double-penalizing displacement.

desk verdict Useful application paper with a serious typo in its central definition; fix the formula and it's a solid contribution to the verification literature. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16063 v3 pith:ST4M54ZF submitted 2024-12-20 math.OC physics.ao-ph

Jacob J. M. Francis , Colin J. Cotter , Marion P. Mittermaier This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.OCphysics.ao-ph MSC 49Q2290C0886A10
keywords OptimaltransportSinkhorndivergenceforecastverificationprecipitationdoublepenaltyunbalancedspatialentropicregularization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the unbalanced Sinkhorn divergence $S_\varepsilon$, a debiased version of entropy-regularised unbalanced optimal transport, should be adopted as a spatial verification score for precipitation forecasts. Unlike pointwise scores, it treats rain fields as masses and charges for moving rain from one location to another, so a forecast that is correct in shape and intensity but displaced is penalised once, not twice. The paper shows on idealised geometric fields that $S_\varepsilon$ grows quadratically with translation, stays near zero for perfect or well-matched fields, tolerates small noise, and can be decomposed into transport cost versus mass-imbalance cost. On real Spring 2005 forecasts, its average ranking of three models matched the averaged expert subjective ranking, and the same tools worked on the MesoVICT core case. If these findings hold, forecasters gain a score plus visual diagnostics that handle displacement and intensity simultaneously, with a single tunable reach parameter controlling the distance beyond which features are treated as unrelated.

What carries the argument

The engine is the regularised unbalanced optimal transport problem $$\mathrm{UOT}_\varepsilon(\mu_O,\mu_F|\rho) = \min_\pi \sum_{i,j} \frac{\|X_{O,i}-X_{F,j}\|^2}{2\rho}\,\pi_{i,j} + \frac{\varepsilon}{\rho}\mathrm{KL}(\pi|\mu_O\otimes\mu_F) + D(\pi_0|\mu_O) + D(\pi_1|\mu_F),$$ with $D$ either KL or total variation, and the associated debiased score $$S_\varepsilon = \mathrm{UOT}_\varepsilon(\mu_O,\mu_F|\rho) - \tfrac12\mathrm{UOT}_\varepsilon(\mu_O,\mu_O|\rho) - \tfrac12\mathrm{UOT}_\varepsilon(\mu_F,\mu_F|\rho) + \tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}(m(\mu_O)+m(\mu_F))^2.$$ The extra self-comparison terms remove the entropic blur that would otherwise make the perfect forecast score non-zero and distort transport vectors toward centres of mass. Debiased barycentric projections of the plan give per-point transport vectors, from which average transport magnitude and direction (ATM and ATD) are formed. The reach $\sqrt{2\rho}$ is the central geometric parameter: features separated by more than about that distance are not matched, and the optimisation pays to create or destroy mass instead. The Sinkhorn iterations alternate updates of the two marginals and the plan, giving a scalable algorithm whose entropic parameter $\varepsilon$ is fixed by grid resolution rather than chosen by the user.

What would settle it

Compute $S_\varepsilon$ for identical rain fields shifted by increasing displacements up to twice the reach; if the score stops growing quadratically well before the reach, the double-penalty robustness claim fails. Separately, collect independent expert rankings on a larger set of forecast days and check whether $S_\varepsilon$'s average ranking matches them; a mismatch on many days would disprove the alignment claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that entropic unbalanced optimal transport, and especially its debiased Sinkhorn divergence, is an informative and geometrically intuitive spatial verification method for precipitation. The paper establishes that $S_\varepsilon$ is robust to the double-penalty problem: for balanced fields, the score reproduces the quadratic displacement behaviour of half the squared 2-Wasserstein distance, while the debiased transport vectors give the true mean direction and magnitude of translation. It further shows that in unbalanced settings the score ranks over- and under-forecasts as expected, that the marginal penalties and cost decomposition separate transport from mass imbalance, that the reach parameter $\sqrt{2\rho}$ sets the scale at which mass is destroyed instead of moved, and that the KL flavour is generally more tolerant of noise and mass imbalance while the TV flavour gives a sharper geometric link to the reach. On the Spring 2005 expert-scored cases, the score's average model ranking agrees with the averaged expert ranking, although per-day and per-model Spearman correlations are low or negative. The paper does not claim rotation detection, subset detection, or that the score is a true metric; it is a pseudo-metric without the triangle inequality.

Load-bearing premise

The advertised properties depend on the user-chosen reach parameter, and the claim that the score agrees with experts rests on a small averaged subjective ranking over nine days and three models.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Forecasters can use $S_\varepsilon$ as a single score that combines displacement and intensity errors, avoiding the double-penalty inflation that affects pointwise measures.
  • The reach parameter provides an explicit scale: setting it small keeps transport local and diagnoses only nearby displacement, while setting it large demands near-balanced total mass; this gives users a dial between transport and mass-balance priorities.
  • The debiased transport vectors and cost decomposition can be reported alongside the score, turning over- or under-forecasting into a sign: the marginal imbalance ratio is above one for under-forecasting and below one for over-forecasting.
  • Because $S_\varepsilon$ is a pseudo-metric with $S_\varepsilon(\mu,\mu)=0$, it can be used for model intercomparison and time-series monitoring, with anomalies traceable to specific events such as a missed feature or a mass imbalance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same transport machinery transfers naturally to other density-valued meteorological fields, such as potential temperature, momentum, or ensemble members, since the algorithm only needs nonnegative densities on grids and a chosen cost.
  • A reach sweep would yield a scale-dependent verification curve analogous to intensity-scale or neighbourhood methods; the paper notes this possibility but does not implement it.
  • The marginal mass imbalance ratio could be automated as a real-time bias diagnostic for NWP models, flagging over- and under-forecasting without requiring a separate bias score.
  • The inability to rotate objects suggests that for rotation-dominated errors the score behaves like aspect-ratio correction; adding an explicit rotation term to the objective is a natural next step the paper does not take.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces entropic unbalanced optimal transport (UOT_epsilon) and its debiased counterpart, the unbalanced Sinkhorn divergence S_epsilon, as spatial verification methods for precipitation fields. It presents the mathematical setup with KL and TV marginal penalties, a reach parameter rho, transport vectors via barycentric projection, and summary diagnostics such as average transport magnitude and direction. The method is tested on the ICP binary geometric cases, the perturbed and Spring 2005 real-intensity cases, and the MesoVICT core case. The authors claim that S_epsilon is robust to the double-penalty problem, diagnoses pure translation error, separates transport from mass imbalance, and on average aligns with expert assessment of model performance. The paper also documents limitations, including inability to handle rotation, subset relations, and null cases.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper offers a useful new member of the spatial verification toolbox: a debiased unbalanced optimal transport score with visual diagnostics that treat displacement and intensity simultaneously. The paper's strengths include the use of public ICP/MesoVICT datasets, an open Python implementation, and a sequence of deterministic geometric experiments that are internally consistent: perfect forecasts score zero after debiasing, translation costs scale quadratically for the default reach, and the cost decomposition separates transport from marginal imbalance. The central claims, however, are empirical and depend on a small expert benchmark and on the user's choice of the reach parameter. The paper is largely a demonstration of an existing mathematical object rather than a new derivation, and its value lies in the careful behavioral testing and in bringing the Sinkhorn divergence to the forecast verification community.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1, Eq. (5)] As printed, Eq. (5) is inconsistent with the claim immediately after it that S_epsilon(mu,mu)=0. Setting mu_O = mu_F = mu makes the three UOT terms cancel, leaving S_epsilon(mu,mu) = (epsilon/2)(2m(mu))^2 > 0 for any positive-mass field. This contradicts the perfect-forecast result S_epsilon(C1,C1)=0 in Section 4.1.1 and Figure 3. The known unbalanced Sinkhorn divergence of Sejourne et al. (2019) uses a mass-difference term, (epsilon/2)(m(mu_O)-m(mu_F))^2; if that is what is implemented, Eq. (5) is a misprint, and if Eq. (5) as printed is what is implemented, every unbalanced S_epsilon value carries a mass-dependent offset and the reported perfect-forecast score is not reproducible. Please correct Eq. (5), state the exact formula used in the implementation, and include a numerical check that S_epsilon(mu,mu)=0 for the code version.
  2. [Section 4.2.2, Figures S28 and S29] The claim that S_epsilon 'on average aligns with expert assessment' rests on a small benchmark: 9 valid times, 3 models, and a single averaged subjective ranking from Keil and Craig (2009). The paper itself notes that per-day rankings do not agree and that Spearman rank correlations are low and sometimes negative. Given that this is one of the headline findings in the abstract and Section 5, the support is weak. The authors should either temper the claim to 'alignment in a small case study' or provide an uncertainty quantification for the average agreement, such as a confidence interval or a permutation test, so the reader can judge how much weight to place on the expert-alignment result.
  3. [Section 4.1.3, Figure 5] The double-penalty robustness and the quadratic translation-scaling behavior hold only for sufficiently large values of the reach parameter rho. As Figure 5 shows, when rho is decreased it becomes cheaper to destroy mass than to transport it, so the score stops diagnosing translation and instead rewards marginal modification. The default rho = L^2 is used throughout the paper, but rho is a user-tunable parameter and the paper gives limited operational guidance for choosing it. The abstract and conclusions should state that these headline properties are conditional on the reach parameter and that the default choice is part of the method specification, not an automatic consequence of the score.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1.1, Eq. (6)] In the barycentric projection for observation points, the numerator should use XF,j, not XF,i; as written, the definition is dimensionally inconsistent with the corresponding forecast-to-observation formula in Eq. (7).
  2. [Figure 10 caption] The caption repeats 'Left:' for the second panel; the second panel should be labeled 'Right:'.
  3. [Section 2.2] The statement that 'the cost can be left in a dimensionless form' is clear, but it would help to state explicitly that all reported S_epsilon and UOT_epsilon numbers in Sections 4.1 and 4.2 are dimensionless and that the mass scaling M is only reintroduced when physical units are desired.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Sinkhorn verification claims are empirical evaluations against external benchmarks using a fixed imported metric.

full rationale

The paper's central claims (double-penalty robustness, translation diagnosis, expert alignment) are empirical demonstrations, not derivations whose conclusions are equivalent to their inputs. The unbalanced Sinkhorn divergence is imported as a fixed object from Séjourné et al. (2019) and Feydy et al. (2019); the reach ρ is set to L² by default before the case studies, and ε is fixed from grid resolution following Mérigot and Thibert (2020). No parameter is fitted to a subset of the expert rankings and then renamed as a prediction: Section 4.2.2 explicitly reports weak or negative per-day Spearman correlations, so the average alignment is not manufactured. The only self-citations (the authors' code repository and Mittermaier et al. 2013) are contextual and not load-bearing. I find no circular step. One non-circular flag for correctness and reproducibility: Eq. (5) prints a mass term +ε/2(m(µO)+m(µF))², which prevents Sε(µ,µ)=0 for any positive-mass field, contradicting the sentence 'This corrects the transport vectors, and gives provably that Sε(µ,µ)=0' and the reported C1C1 zero score; this appears to be a typo rather than a circular argument, but it should be corrected before the published formula is relied upon.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All new content is empirical evaluation of a known mathematical object. The central claim rests on standard Sinkhorn theory, the domain assumption that rain fields are densities, a heuristic convergence guarantee, and an external benchmark of expert scores. Three user-chosen scales, rho, epsilon and M, shape the reported scores; none were fitted to force the expert ranking.

free parameters (3)
  • Reach parameter rho = rho = L^2 in main results; swept over 2^-6 L^2 to 2 L^2 in sensitivity studies
    Tunable parameter in the UOT objective controlling the balance between transport cost and marginal mass imbalance. It is user-chosen, not fitted to expert scores, but headline properties such as double-penalty robustness depend on it.
  • Entropic regularization epsilon = 0.005 L^2 for binary and MesoVICT cases; 0.001 L^2 for perturbed and Spring 2005 cases
    Chosen from grid resolution through epsilon ~ 1/sqrt(N) to maintain Sinkhorn convergence, following Merigot and Thibert (2020). It is not fitted to forecast skill but is a free numerical parameter.
  • Mass scaling M = In-sample average total mass, varying by dataset, e.g. 200464 for Spring 2005
    Used to nondimensionalize scores. The authors call the in-sample average suboptimal and prefer an out-of-sample value. It is constant within each dataset, so model rankings are largely unaffected, but absolute score interpretation depends on it.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math The unbalanced Sinkhorn divergence is a pseudo-metric and debiases entropic UOT to next order in epsilon (Sejourne et al., 2019).
    The paper relies on this to claim S_epsilon(mu,mu)=0 and to interpret scores as distances. It is cited, not re-derived.
  • domain assumption Precipitation fields can be represented as densities on a regular grid, with half squared Euclidean distance as the transport cost.
    This modeling choice underlies all scores and transport vectors, stated in Section 1.1 and Section 2. If this cost is not the right notion of forecast error, the metric still computes a distance but not the diagnostically meaningful one.
  • domain assumption The Sinkhorn iterations converge to the theoretical UOT optimum for the chosen epsilon and iteration counts.
    Justified by the Merigot-Thibert heuristic and a 1e-12 convergence tolerance, but not formally guaranteed for the unbalanced case. The supplementary material says the theoretical rates are not sharp and convergence is checked in practice.
  • domain assumption Expert subjective model rankings from Keil and Craig (2009) are a valid external benchmark for forecast verification quality.
    Question Q9 compares S_epsilon to expert scores. The benchmark is a small sample: 9 days, 3 models, and one averaged expert ordering, which the authors themselves note is not strongly discerning.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Examining Entropic Unbalanced Optimal Transport and Sinkhorn Divergences for Spatial Forecast Verification." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ST4M54ZF

@misc{pith2026241216063,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Examining Entropic Unbalanced Optimal Transport and Sinkhorn Divergences for Spatial Forecast Verification},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ST4M54ZF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16063}
}
read the original abstract

An optimal transport (OT) problem seeks to find the cheapest mapping between two distributions with equal total density, given the cost of transporting density from one place to another. Unbalanced OT allows for different total density in each distribution. This is the typical setting for precipitation forecast and observation data, when considering the densities as accumulated rainfall, or intensity. In this work, entropic unbalanced OT and its associated Sinkhorn divergence are examined as a spatial forecast verification method for precipitation data. It offers many attractive features, such as morphing one field into another, defining a distance between fields and providing feature based optimal assignment. It is found that the Sinkhorn divergence is robust against the common double penalty problem (a form of phase error), on average aligns with expert assessments of model performance, and allows for a variety of novel pictorial illustrations of error. It provides informative summary scores, and has few limitations to its application. Combined, these findings place unbalanced entropy regularised optimal transport and the Sinkhorn divergence as an informative method which follows geometric intuition.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

    work page

  2. [2]

    , author Gilleland, E

    author Ahijevych, D. , author Gilleland, E. , author Brown, B.G. , author Ebert, E.E. , year 2009 . title Application of Spatial Verification Methods to Idealized and NWP-Gridded Precipitation Forecasts . journal Weather and Forecasting volume 24 , pages 1485--1497 . : 10.1175/2009WAF2222298.1

    work page doi:10.1175/2009waf2222298.1 2009

  3. [3]

    , author von Lindheim, J

    author Beier, F. , author von Lindheim, J. , author Neumayer, S. , author Steidl, G. , year 2022 . title Unbalanced Multi-marginal Optimal Transport . journal Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision , pages 1--20 : 10.1007/S10851-022-01126-7/FIGURES/5

    work page doi:10.1007/s10851-022-01126-7/figures/5 2022

  4. [4]

    unbalanced

    author Benamou, J.D. , year 2003 . title Numerical resolution of an “unbalanced” mass transport problem . journal ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis volume 37 , pages 851–868 . : 10.1051/m2an:2003058

    work page doi:10.1051/m2an:2003058 2003

  5. [5]

    , year 2021

    author Benamou, J.D. , year 2021 . title Optimal transportation, modelling and numerical simulation . : 10.1017/S0962492921000040

    work page doi:10.1017/s0962492921000040 2021

  6. [6]

    , author Brenier, Y

    author Benamou, J.D. , author Brenier, Y. , year 1998 . title Weak Existence for the Semigeostrophic Equations Formulated as a Coupled Monge–Amp \` e re/Transport Problem . journal SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics volume 58 , pages 1450--1461 . : 10.1137/S0036139995294111

    doi:10.1137/s0036139995294111 1998

  7. [7]

    , author Brenier, Y

    author Benamou, J.D. , author Brenier, Y. , year 2000 . title A computational fluid mechanics solution to the Monge-Kantorovich mass transfer problem . journal Numerische Mathematik 2000 84:3 volume 84 , pages 375--393 . : 10.1007/S002110050002

    doi:10.1007/s002110050002 2000

  8. [8]

    , author Martinet, M

    author Benamou, J.D. , author Martinet, M. , year 2020 . title Capacity Constrained Entropic Optimal Transport, Sinkhorn Saturated Domain Out-Summation and Vanishing Temperature

    work page 2020

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    , year 2020

    author Berman, R.J. , year 2020 . title The Sinkhorn algorithm, parabolic optimal transport and geometric Monge–Amp \` e re equations . journal Numerische Mathematik volume 145 , pages 771--836 . : 10.1007/s00211-020-01127-x

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    , author Vanderbecken, P.J

    author Bocquet, M. , author Vanderbecken, P.J. , author Farchi, A. , author Dumont Le Brazidec, J. , author Roustan, Y. , year 2024 . title Bridging classical data assimilation and optimal transport: the 3D-Var case . journal Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics volume 31 , pages...

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    , author Gilleland, E

    author Brown, B.G. , author Gilleland, E. , author Ebert, E.E. , year 2011 . title Forecasts of Spatial Fields . journal Forecast Verification , pages 95--117 : 10.1002/9781119960003.CH6

    2011 doi

  4. [12]

    , author Ross, G

    author Casati, B. , author Ross, G. , author Stephenson, D.B. , year 2004 . title A new intensity-scale approach for the verification of spatial precipitation forecasts . journal Meteorol. Appl volume 11 , pages 141--154 . : 10.1017/S1350482704001239

    2004 doi

  5. [13]

    , author Feydy, J

    author Charlier, B. , author Feydy, J. , author Glaun \` e s, J.A. , . title Kernel Operations on the GPU, with autodiff, without memory overflows — KeOps . https://www.kernel-operations.io/keops/index.html

  6. [14]

    , author Feydy, J

    author Charlier, B. , author Feydy, J. , author Glaun \` e s, J.A. , author Collin, F.D. , author Durif, G. , year 2021 . title Kernel Operations on the GPU, with Autodiff, without Memory Overflows . journal Journal of Machine Learning Research volume 22 , pages 1--6 . http://...

    2021

  7. [15]

    , year 2024

    author Chizat, L. , year 2024 . title Annealed Sinkhorn for Optimal Transport: convergence, regularization path and debiasing http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11620

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    , author Peyr \' e , G

    author Chizat, L. , author Peyr \' e , G. , author Schmitzer, B. , author Vialard, F.X. , year 2016 . title Scaling Algorithms for Unbalanced Transport Problems : 10.48550/arxiv.1607.05816

    2016 doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    , year 2013

    author Cuturi, M. , year 2013 . title Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transport , in: editor Burges, C.J. , editor Bottou, L. , editor Welling, M. , editor Ghahramani, Z. , editor Weinberger, K.Q. (Eds.), booktitle Advances in Neural Information Processin...

    2013

  10. [18]

    , author Brown, B

    author Davis, C.A. , author Brown, B. , author Bullock, R. , year 2006 . title Object-Based Verification of Precipitation Forecasts. Part I: Methodology and Application to Mesoscale Rain Areas . journal Monthly Weather Review volume 134 , pages 1772--1784 . : 10.1175/MWR3145.1

    2006 doi

  11. [19]

    , author Brown, B.G

    author Davis, C.A. , author Brown, B.G. , author Bullock, R. , author Halley-Gotway, J. , year 2009 . title The Method for Object-Based Diagnostic Evaluation (MODE) Applied to Numerical Forecasts from the 2005 NSSL/SPC Spring Program . journal Weather and Forecasting volume 24...

    2009 doi

  12. [20]

    , author Gilleland, E

    author Dorninger, M. , author Gilleland, E. , author Casati, B. , author Mittermaier, M.P. , author Ebert, E.E. , author Brown, B.G. , author Wilson, L.J. , year 2018 . title The Setup of the MesoVICT Project . journal Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society volume 99 ...

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    , author Mittermaier, M.P

    author Dorninger, M. , author Mittermaier, M.P. , author Gilleland, E. , author Ebert, E.E. , author Brown, B.G. , author Wilson, L.J. , year 2013 . title MesoVICT: Mesoscale Verification Inter-Comparison over Complex Terrain . type Technical Report number NCAR/TN-505+STR . NC...

    2013 doi

  14. [22]

    , author McBride, J

    author Ebert, E. , author McBride, J. , year 2000 . title Verification of precipitation in weather systems: determination of systematic errors . journal Journal of Hydrology volume 239 , pages 179--202 . : https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00343-7

    2000 doi

  15. [23]

    , year 2008

    author Ebert, E.E. , year 2008 . title Fuzzy verification of high-resolution gridded forecasts: a review and proposed framework . journal Meteorological Applications volume 15 , pages 51--64 . : 10.1002/met.25

    2008 doi

  16. [24]

    , author Gallus, W.A

    author Ebert, E.E. , author Gallus, W.A. , year 2009 . title Toward better understanding of the contiguous rain area (cra) method for spatial forecast verification . journal Weather and Forecasting volume 24 , pages 1401 -- 1415 . : 10.1175/2009WAF2222252.1

    2009 doi

  17. [25]

    title Spatial Forecast Verification Reference List

    author Eric Gilleland , year n.d. title Spatial Forecast Verification Reference List . https://projects.ral.ucar.edu/icp/references.html

  18. [26]

    , author Bocquet, M

    author Farchi, A. , author Bocquet, M. , author Roustan, Y. , author Mathieu, A. , author Qu \' e rel, A. , year 2016 . title Using the Wasserstein distance to compare fields of pollutants: application to the radionuclide atmospheric dispersion of the Fukushima-Daiichi acciden...

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    , author Roussillon, P

    author Feydy, J. , author Roussillon, P. , year n.d. title Geometric Loss functions between sampled measures, images and volumes — GeomLoss . https://www.kernel-operations.io/geomloss/index.html

  20. [28]

    , author S \' e journ \' e , T

    author Feydy, J. , author S \' e journ \' e , T. , author Vialard, F.X. , author Amari, S.i. , author Trouve, A. , author Peyr \' e , G. , year 2019 . title Interpolating between Optimal Transport and MMD using Sinkhorn Divergences , in: editor Chaudhuri, K. , editor Sugiyama,...

    2019

  21. [29]

    , author Vidard, A

    author Feyeux, N. , author Vidard, A. , author Nodet, M. , year 2018 . title Optimal transport for variational data assimilation . journal Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics volume 25 , pages 55--66 . : 10.5194/npg-25-55-2018

    2018 doi

  22. [30]

    , author Courty, N

    author Flamary, R. , author Courty, N. , author Gramfort, A. , author Alaya, M.Z. , author Boisbunon, A. , author Chambon, S. , author Chapel, L. , author Corenflos, A. , author Fatras, K. , author Fournier, N. , author Gautheron, L. , author Gayraud, N.T.H. , author Janati, H...

    2021

  23. [31]

    , year n.d

    author Francis, J. , year n.d. title UOTforSpatialVerification: Unbalanced Optimal transport implementation with total variation or Kullback Leiber marginal penalisation for Precipitation forecast verification. https://github.com/Jacob-Francis/UOTforSpatialVerification

  24. [32]

    , year 2013

    author Gilleland, E. , year 2013 . title Testing competing precipitation forecasts accurately and efficiently: The spatial prediction comparison test . journal Monthly Weather Review volume 141 , pages 340 -- 355 . : 10.1175/MWR-D-12-00155.1

    2013 doi

  25. [33]

    , year 2021

    author Gilleland, E. , year 2021 . title Novel measures for summarizing high-resolution forecast performance . journal Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography volume 7 , pages 13--34 . : 10.5194/ascmo-7-13-2021

    2021 doi

  26. [34]

    , year 2022

    author Gilleland, E. , year 2022 . title Comparing spatial fields with SpatialVx : Spatial forecast verification in R . journal Unpublished volume 0 , pages 1--69 . : 10.5065/4px3-5a05

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    , author Ahijevych, D

    author Gilleland, E. , author Ahijevych, D. , author Brown, B.G. , author Casati, B. , author Ebert, E.E. , year 2009 . title Intercomparison of Spatial Forecast Verification Methods . journal Weather and Forecasting volume 24 , pages 1416--1430 . : 10.1175/2009WAF2222269.1

    2009 doi

  28. [36]

    , author Ahijevych, D.A

    author Gilleland, E. , author Ahijevych, D.A. , author Brown, B.G. , author Ebert, E.E. , year 2010 a. title Verifying forecasts spatially . journal Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society volume 91 , pages 1365--1373 . : 10.1175/2010BAMS2819.1

    2010 doi

  29. [37]

    , author Lindström, J

    author Gilleland, E. , author Lindström, J. , author Lindgren, F. , year 2010 b. title Analyzing the image warp forecast verification method on precipitation fields from the icp . journal Weather and Forecasting volume 25 , pages 1249 -- 1262 . : 10.1175/2010WAF2222365.1

    2010 doi

  30. [38]

    , author Skok, G

    author Gilleland, E. , author Skok, G. , author Brown, B.G. , author Casati, B. , author Dorninger, M. , author Mittermaier, M.P. , author Roberts, N. , author Wilson, L.J. , year 2020 . title A Novel Set of Geometric Verification Test Fields with Application to Distance Measu...

    2020 doi

  31. [39]

    , author Cuturi M , year 2015

    author Gramfort A , author Peyr \' e , G. , author Cuturi M , year 2015 . title Fast Optimal Transport Averaging of Neuroimaging Data , in: editor Ourselin, S. , editor Alexander, D. , editor Westin, C. , editor Cardoso, M. (Eds.), booktitle Information Processing in Medical I...

    2015

  32. [40]

    , author Darrell, T

    author Grauman, K. , author Darrell, T. , year 2005 . title The pyramid match kernel: discriminative classification with sets of image features , in: booktitle Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1 , pp. pages 1458--1465 . : 10.1109/ICCV.2005.239

    2005 doi

  33. [41]

    , author Kakar, R.K

    author Hou, A.Y. , author Kakar, R.K. , author Neeck, S. , author Azarbarzin, A.A. , author Kummerow, C.D. , author Kojima, M. , author Oki, R. , author Nakamura, K. , author Iguchi, T. , year 2014 . title The Global Precipitation Measurement Mission . journal Bulletin of the ...

    2014 doi

  34. [42]

    , author Mishra, A

    author Hyun, S. , author Mishra, A. , author Follett, C.L. , author Jonsson, B. , author Kulk, G. , author Forget, G. , author Racault, M.F. , author Jackson, T. , author Dutkiewicz, S. , author M \" u ller, C.L. , author Bien, J. , year 2022 . title Ocean movers distance: usi...

    2022

  35. [43]

    , author Weiss, S.J

    author Kain, J.S. , author Weiss, S.J. , author Bright, D.R. , author Baldwin, M.E. , author Levit, J.J. , author Carbin, G.W. , author Schwartz, C.S. , author Weisman, M.L. , author Droegemeier, K.K. , author Weber, D.B. , author Thomas, K.W. , year 2008 . title Some Practica...

    2008 doi

  36. [44]

    , year 1958

    author Kantorovitch, L. , year 1958 . title On the Translocation of Masses . journal Management Science volume 5 , pages 1--4 . http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626967

    1958

  37. [45]

    , author Craig, G.C

    author Keil, C. , author Craig, G.C. , year 2007 . title A Displacement-Based Error Measure Applied in a Regional Ensemble Forecasting System . journal Monthly Weather Review volume 135 , pages 3248--3259 . : 10.1175/MWR3457.1

    2007 doi

  38. [46]

    , author Craig, G.C

    author Keil, C. , author Craig, G.C. , year 2009 . title A Displacement and Amplitude Score Employing an Optical Flow Technique . journal Weather and Forecasting volume 24 , pages 1297 -- 1308 . : 10.1175/2009WAF2222247.1

    2009 doi

  39. [47]

    , author Park, S.R

    author Kolouri, S. , author Park, S.R. , author Thorpe, M. , author Slepcev, D. , author Rohde, G.K. , year 2017 . title Optimal Mass Transport: Signal processing and machine-learning applications . journal IEEE Signal Processing Magazine volume 34 , pages 43--59 . : 10.1109/M...

    2017

  40. [48]

    , author Mielke, A

    author Liero, M. , author Mielke, A. , author Savar \' e , G. , year 2016 . title Optimal transport in competition with reaction: The Hellinger-Kantorovich distance and geodesic curves . journal SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis volume 48 , pages 2869--2911 . : 10.1137/15M1041420

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    , author Mitchell, K.E

    author Lin, Y. , author Mitchell, K.E. , year 2005 . title The NCEP Stage II/IV Hourly Precipitation Analyses: Development and Applications , in: booktitle Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Hydrology , publisher American Meteorological Society , address San Diego, CA, USA

    2005

  42. [50]

    , author Frank, J

    author Liu, X. , author Frank, J. , year 2022 . title Ensemble data assimilation using optimal control in the Wasserstein metric . journal Journal of Computational Science volume 65 , pages 101895 . : 10.1016/J.JOCS.2022.101895

    2022

  43. [51]

    , author Kanade, T

    author Lucas, B.D. , author Kanade, T. , year 1981 . title An Iterative Image Registration Technique with an Application to Stereo Vision , in: booktitle IJCAI'81: 7th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence , address Vancouver, Canada . pp. pages 674--679 . ...

    1981

  44. [52]

    , author Sambridge, M

    author Magyar, J.C. , author Sambridge, M. , year 2023 . title Hydrological objective functions and ensemble averaging with the Wasserstein distance . journal Hydrology and Earth System Sciences volume 27 , pages 991--1010 . : 10.5194/hess-27-991-2023

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    , author Sandgathe, S

    author Marzban, C. , author Sandgathe, S. , year 2010 . title Optical Flow for Verification . journal Weather and Forecasting volume 25 , pages 1479--1494 . : 10.1175/2010WAF2222351.1

    2010 doi

  46. [54]

    , author Sandgathe, S

    author Marzban, C. , author Sandgathe, S. , author Lyons, H. , author Lederer, N. , year 2009 . title Three spatial verification techniques: Cluster analysis, variogram, and optical flow . journal Weather and Forecasting volume 24 , pages 1457--1471 . : 10.1175/2009WAF2222261.1

    2009 doi

  47. [55]

    , author Ovens, D

    author Mass, C.F. , author Ovens, D. , author Westrick, K. , author Colle, B.A. , year 2002 . title DOES INCREASING HORIZONTAL RESOLUTION PRODUCE MORE SKILLFUL FORECASTS?: The Results of Two Years of Real-Time Numerical Weather Prediction over the Pacific Northwest . journal B...

    2002 doi

  48. [56]

    , author Thibert, B

    author M \' e rigot, Q. , author Thibert, B. , year 2020 . title Optimal transport: discretization and algorithms . journal Handbook of Numerical Analysis volume 22 , pages 133--212 . : 10.1016/bs.hna.2020.10.001

    2020 doi

  49. [57]

    , author Roberts, N

    author Mittermaier, M. , author Roberts, N. , author Thompson, S.A. , year 2013 . title A long-term assessment of precipitation forecast skill using the Fractions Skill Score . journal Meteorological Applications volume 20 , pages 176--186 . : 10.1002/MET.296

    2013 doi

  50. [58]

    , year 1781

    author Monge, G. , year 1781 . title M\' e moire sur la th\' e orie des d\' e blais et des remblais . https://search.worldcat.org/title/Memoire-sur-la-theorie-des-deblais-et-des-remblais/oclc/51928110

  51. [59]

    , year 1993

    author Murphy, A.H. , year 1993 . title What Is a Good Forecast? An Essay on the Nature of Goodness in Weather Forecasting . journal Weather and Forecasting volume 8 , pages 281--293 . : https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1993)008<0281:WIAGFA>2.0.CO;2

    1993 doi

  52. [60]

    title RAL | JNT | Forecast Evaluation and Applied Statistics | Spatial Forecast Methods Inter-Comparison Project (ICP/MesoVICT)

    author NCAR , year n.d. title RAL | JNT | Forecast Evaluation and Applied Statistics | Spatial Forecast Methods Inter-Comparison Project (ICP/MesoVICT) . https://projects.ral.ucar.edu/icp/

  53. [61]

    , year 2024

    author Nishizawa, S. , year 2024 . title Extracting Latent Variables From Forecast Ensembles and Advancements in Similarity Metric Utilizing Optimal Transport . journal Journal of Geophysical Research: Machine Learning and Computation volume 1 . : 10.1029/2023JH000112

    2024 doi

  54. [62]

    , author Galanis, G.N

    author Papayiannis, G.I. , author Galanis, G.N. , author Yannacopoulos, A.N. , year 2018 . title Model aggregation using optimal transport and applications in wind speed forecasting . journal Environmetrics volume 29 . : https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2531

    2018 doi

  55. [63]

    , author Cuturi, M

    author Peyr \' e , G. , author Cuturi, M. , year 2019 . title Computational Optimal Transport: With Applications to Data Science . journal Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning volume 11 , pages 355--607 . : 10.1561/2200000073

    2019 doi

  56. [64]

    , author Tomasi, C

    author Rubner, Y. , author Tomasi, C. , author Guibas, L.J. , year 2000 . title The earth mover's distance as a metric for image retrieval . journal International journal of computer vision volume 40 , pages 99--121 . : 10.1023/A:1026543900054

    2000 doi

  57. [65]

    , year 2015

    author Santambrogio, F. , year 2015 . title Optimal Transport for Applied Mathematicians volume 87 . : 10.1007/978-3-319-20828-2

    2015 doi

  58. [66]

    , year 2019

    author Schmitzer, B. , year 2019 . title Stabilized sparse scaling algorithms for entropy regularized transport problems . journal SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing volume 41 , pages A1443--A1481 . : 10.1137/16M1106018

    2019 doi

  59. [67]

    , author Feydy, J

    author S \' e journ \' e , T. , author Feydy, J. , author Vialard, F.X. , author Trouv \' e , A. , author Peyr \' e , G. , year 2019 . title Sinkhorn Divergences for Unbalanced Optimal Transport http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.12958

    2019 arXiv

  60. [68]

    , author Vialard, F.X

    author S \' e journ \' e , T. , author Vialard, F.X. , author Peyr \' e , G. , year 2022 . title Faster Unbalanced Optimal Transport: Translation invariant Sinkhorn and 1-D Frank-Wolfe . journal Proceedings of Machine Learning Research volume 151 , pages 4995--5021 . https://a...

    2022 arXiv

  61. [69]

    , year 2022

    author Skok, G. , year 2022 . title A New Spatial Distance Metric for Verification of Precipitation . journal Applied Sciences volume 12 . : 10.3390/app12084048

    2022 doi

  62. [70]

    , year 2023

    author Skok, G. , year 2023 . title Precipitation attribution distance . journal Atmospheric Research volume 295 , pages 106998 . : 10.1016/J.ATMOSRES.2023.106998

    2023

  63. [71]

    , author Lled \' o , L

    author Skok, G. , author Lled \' o , L. , year 2024 . title Spatial verification of global precipitation forecasts https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20624v1

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    a berli, C. , author P \

    author Steinacker, R. , author H \"a berli, C. , author P \"o ttschacher, W. , year 2000 . title A transparent method for the analysis and quality evaluation of irregularly distributed and noisy observational data . journal Monthly Weather Review volume 128 , pages 2303--2316 ...

    2000 doi

  65. [73]

    , author Dumont Le Brazidec, J

    author Vanderbecken, P.J. , author Dumont Le Brazidec, J. , author Farchi, A. , author Bocquet, M. , author Roustan, Y. , author Potier, E. , author Broquet, G. , year 2023 . title Accounting for meteorological biases in simulated plumes using smarter metrics . journal Atmosph...

    2023 doi

  66. [74]

    , year 2009

    author Villani, C. , year 2009 . title Optimal Transport: Old and New volume 338 . : 10.1007/978-3-540-71050-9

    2009 doi

  67. [75]

    , author Paulat, M

    author Wernli, H. , author Paulat, M. , author Hagen, M. , author Frei, C. , year 2008 . title SAL—A Novel Quality Measure for the Verification of Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts . journal Monthly Weather Review volume 136 , pages 4470 -- 4487 . : 10.1175/2008MWR2415.1

    2008 doi

  68. [76]

    , author Kokoska, S

    author Zwillinger, D. , author Kokoska, S. , year 1999 . title CRC standard probability and statistics tables and formulae . publisher Crc Press

    1999

  69. [77]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.senten...

  70. [78]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.