REVIEW 2 cited by
AIGCodeSet: A New Annotated Dataset for AI Generated Code Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While large language models provide significant convenience for software development, they can lead to ethical issues in job interviews and student assignments. Therefore, determining whether a piece of code is written by a human or generated by an artificial intelligence (AI) model is a critical issue. In this study, we present AIGCodeSet, which consists of 2.828 AI-generated and 4.755 human-written Python codes, created using CodeLlama 34B, Codestral 22B, and Gemini 1.5 Flash. In addition, we share the results of our experiments conducted with baseline detection methods. Our experiments show that a Bayesian classifier outperforms the other models.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Code via Approximated Task Conditioning
ATC detects AI-generated code by asking a language model to reconstruct the programming task, then scoring token entropy under that reconstructed task, outperforming prior zero-shot detectors on Python, C++, and Java ...
-
CodeMirage: A Multi-Lingual Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated and Paraphrased Source Code from Production-Level LLMs
CodeMirage is a ten-language, ten-LLM benchmark with original and paraphrased AI code, and it shows current AI-generated-code detectors drop sharply under cross-model and low-false-alarm settings.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.