Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

AlzheimerRAG: Multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generation for Clinical Use Cases using PubMed articles

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.16701 v3 pith:IE4H35FK submitted 2024-12-21 cs.IR cs.CL

classification cs.IRcs.CL
keywords clinicalmultimodalalzheimerragcasesretrievalalzheimerapplicationarticles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in generative AI have fostered the development of highly adept Large Language Models (LLMs) that integrate diverse data types to empower decision-making. Among these, multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications are promising because they combine the strengths of information retrieval and generative models, enhancing their utility across various domains, including clinical use cases. This paper introduces AlzheimerRAG, a Multimodal RAG application for clinical use cases, primarily focusing on Alzheimer's Disease case studies from PubMed articles. This application incorporates cross-modal attention fusion techniques to integrate textual and visual data processing by efficiently indexing and accessing vast amounts of biomedical literature. Our experimental results, compared to benchmarks such as BioASQ and PubMedQA, have yielded improved performance in the retrieval and synthesis of domain-specific information. We also present a case study using our multimodal RAG in various Alzheimer's clinical scenarios. We infer that AlzheimerRAG can generate responses with accuracy non-inferior to humans and with low rates of hallucination.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Benchmarking Poisoning Attacks against Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A unified benchmark evaluation finds that existing RAG poisoning attacks remain effective on standard QA datasets, drop on expanded knowledge bases, and are only partially mitigated by current defenses.

  2. Addressing accuracy and hallucination of LLMs in Alzheimer's disease research through knowledge graphs

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    GraphRAG chatbots answer Alzheimer's research questions more comprehensively than plain GPT-4o in LLM-judged comparisons, but reference-level traceability remains unsolved.

  3. MetaGen Blended RAG: Unlocking Zero-Shot Precision for Specialized Domain Question-Answering

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A metadata-enriched hybrid retrieval pipeline reports 82.1% retrieval and 77.9% RAG accuracy on PubMedQA without fine-tuning.

Pith tools