Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 33 references

Super volumes and KdV tau functions

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The generalized Brezin-Gross-Witten KdV tau function is the generating function for spin-class intersection numbers with Neveu-Schwarz and Ramond marked points, and the resulting super Weil-Petersson volumes satisfy the Stanford-Witten…

desk verdict Solid paper proving the generalized BGW tau function generates spin class intersections with Ramond punctures and proving the Stanford-Witten recursion for s-deformed super volumes; main caveat is a load-bearing boundary restriction property that is cited rather than proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17272 v1 pith:6YQTC2MW submitted 2024-12-23 math.AG hep-thmath-phmath.MPnlin.SI

Alexander Alexandrov , Paul Norbury This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGhep-thmath-phmath.MPnlin.SI MSC 14H1014D2332G15
keywords spincurvessuperWeil-PeterssonvolumesgeneralizedBrezin-Gross-WittentaufunctionKdVhierarchyNeveu-SchwarzandRamondpunctureskappaclassesVirasoroconstraintsStanford-Wittenrecursion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that the generalised Brézin-Gross-Witten (BGW) tau function—a one-parameter deformation of a classic KdV solution—counts intersection numbers of spin classes on moduli spaces of curves, with the deformation parameter $s$ tracking how many marked points are of Ramond type. The central identity is $Z^{\mathrm{BGW}}(\hbar,s,t_0,t_1,\ldots)=Z^{\Omega}(\hbar,s,t_0,t_1,\ldots)$, where $Z^{\Omega}$ is assembled from integrals of spin classes $\Omega^{(1^n,0^m)}_{g,n+m}$ against $\psi$ classes. As a corollary, the super Weil-Petersson volumes with Neveu-Schwarz and Ramond punctures satisfy the Stanford-Witten recursion, the super analogue of the classical recursion for Weil-Petersson volumes, with the only $s$-dependent term being the initial condition. A sympathetic reader should care because this gives a concrete geometric meaning to an abstract KdV tau function and extends the integrable structure of super curve volumes beyond the all-Neveu-Schwarz case.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the spin class $\Omega^{\sigma}_{g,n}$, defined as the pushforward (with a sign factor) of the top Chern class of the bundle $E_{g,n}=-R\pi_*\theta^{\vee}$ over the moduli space of stable twisted spin curves; $\sigma\in\{0,1\}^n$ labels each marked point as Ramond ($0$) or Neveu-Schwarz ($1$). The identity that carries the argument is Theorem 5, equation (13): $\sum_{m\ge0}\frac{1}{m!}\pi^{(m)}_*\big(\Omega^{(1^n,0^m)}_{g,n+m}\prod_{j=1}^n\psi_j^{k_j}\big)=(K-\delta_{n,0}K_{3g-3})\prod_{j=1}^n\psi_j^{(k_j)}$, which converts spin-class intersections into intersections of the kappa-class polynomials $K=\exp(\sum\sigma_i\kappa_i)$. This makes $Z^{\Omega}$ equal to the $K$-tau function $Z^{(K)}$, and the Virasoro group element $D=e^{N(\hbar s^{-2})}e^{\hbar^{-1}S_\alpha}e^{\frac12 s^2 L_{-1}}$ conjugates the string equation so that $Z^{\mathrm{BGW}}=D\cdot Z^K$, yielding Theorem 1; Proposition 3.8 then converts the Virasoro constraints satisfied by $Z^{\Omega}$ into the Stanford-Witten recursion.

What would settle it

Independently compute the coefficient of $s^2t_1$ in $\log Z^{\Omega}$, namely $\frac{1}{2!}\int_{M_{1,3}}\Omega^{(1,0,0)}_{1,3}\,\psi_1$, using only the definition of the spin class and a direct degeneration analysis that does not invoke (7), and compare it with the value predicted by (13) and by the generalised BGW tau function; a mismatch would refute Theorem 1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is Theorem 1: the generalised BGW tau function equals the generating function for spin class intersection numbers with both Neveu-Schwarz and Ramond insertions. Concretely, $Z^{\mathrm{BGW}}(\hbar,s,t_0,t_1,\ldots)=\exp\sum_{g,n,\vec k}\frac{\hbar^{g-1}}{n!}s^{2-2g+2|\vec k|}\langle\prod \tau_{k_i}\rangle_g\prod t_{k_i}$, where the correlators are defined by integrating $\Omega^{(1^n,0^m)}_{g,n+m}$ against $\psi$ classes and the power of $s$ fixes the number of Ramond points. Theorem 2 then derives the Stanford-Witten recursion (5) for the volumes $\widehat{V}^{\mathrm{WP}}_{g,n}(s,L_1,\ldots,L_n)$ defined in (4), including the $s$-dependent initial condition $\delta_{1,n}(\frac{s^2}{2}\delta_{0,g}+\frac{1}{8}\delta_{1,g})L_1$. The proof reduces spin intersections to intersections of kappa-class polynomials via Theorem 5, identifies the resulting tau function with $Z^K$, and uses a Virasoro-group conjugation to identify $Z^K$ with the generalised BGW tau function.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes a specific rule for how the spin class behaves when a curve acquires a node: the two new branches at the node must behave like Neveu-Schwarz marked points, equation (7); this rule is imported from earlier work, not proved here, and the induction behind the main equality collapses without it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The generalized BGW tau function now has a geometric interpretation: its Taylor coefficients are intersection numbers of spin classes, with the parameter $s$ counting Ramond marked points.
  • The super Weil-Petersson volumes with Neveu-Schwarz and Ramond punctures satisfy the Stanford-Witten recursion and are therefore determined recursively from a genus-zero and genus-one seed, with all $s$-dependence contained in the initial condition.
  • The Virasoro constraints (18) hold for $Z^{\Omega}$, so the $s$-deformed super volumes inherit the same integrable structure as the ordinary BGW tau function.
  • The closed formula for genus-zero spin correlators (Proposition 3.11) proves the genus-zero part of the conjectural generalised BGW tau function, giving an independent check at genus zero.
  • Spin intersection numbers are stored in the correlators of the spectral curve $C_K$ expanded at $z=\infty$ (equation 37), so topological recursion packages the relation between spin classes and KdV tau functions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Since the recursion kernels $D(x,y,z)$ and $R(x,y,z)$ in (5) are independent of $s$, the whole $s$-dependence of the volumes appears to live in the initial data; this suggests the $s$-deformed volumes form an interpolation that might be reproduced by a one-parameter family of spectral curves deforming $C_{NS}$, which the paper leaves open.
  • The identification of the generalized BGW tau function with spin intersections gives a geometric handle on the unitary matrix-model origin of BGW, potentially connecting the $s$ deformation to an external-field parameter in a matrix integral.
  • A direct test of the boundary restriction rule (7) at low genus, independent of the Chiodo-class formalism, would confirm the induction on which the main equality rests.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the generating function of intersection numbers of spin classes on the moduli space of curves, where marked points are of Neveu-Schwarz or Ramond type. The main result (Theorem 1) identifies this generating function, denoted Z^Ω(s, ℏ, t_0, t_1, ...), with the generalized Brezin-Gross-Witten KdV tau function Z^BGW(s, ℏ, t_0, t_1, ...). The proof passes through an auxiliary class K built from kappa classes: Theorem 5 establishes a relation between the spin classes and K, and a Virasoro/operator argument relates K to Z^BGW. A second main result (Theorem 2) states that the super Weil-Petersson volumes with Neveu-Schwarz and Ramond punctures, defined by integrals of spin classes times exp(2π²κ_1), satisfy the Stanford-Witten recursion, including the s-dependent initial condition. The paper also computes all genus 0 spin correlators and discusses the spectral-curve interpretation.

Significance. If the cited inputs hold, Theorem 1 is a substantial extension of the known geometric interpretation of the Brezin-Gross-Witten tau function: it provides a generating function for spin class intersection numbers with Ramond insertions, thereby geometrizing the one-parameter deformation of BGW. Theorem 2 proves a conjecture from the authors' earlier work and gives the first proof of the Stanford-Witten recursion for volumes with Ramond punctures. The paper combines algebraic geometry (spin curves, cohomological field theories), integrable systems (KdV hierarchy, Virasoro constraints), and explicit genus-zero computations, and it offers a concrete spectral-curve picture. The central proofs are largely self-contained once several key technical inputs are granted, and the genus-zero checks are explicit and verifiable. The main weaknesses are the reliance on unproved or preprint-level restriction properties for the spin classes and the abbreviated treatment of the s-generalization of the recursion-to-Virasoro equivalence.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1, Eq. (7)] The boundary restriction formulas (7) are load-bearing for the proof of Theorem 5 and therefore for Theorem 1. The induction in Theorem 5 uses these formulas to decompose D_{1,I} · Ω^{(1^n,0^m)}_{g,n+m} into a tensor product of spin classes, and the same circle of properties underlies the forgetful relation Ω^{(σ,1)}_{g,n+1} = ψ_{n+1}π_*Ω^σ_{g,n} used in Proposition 3.8. The paper cites [27] and [19] but does not prove (7). In particular, the assertion that Ramond insertions at nodes produce only lower-degree terms annihilated by taking the top Chern class is not verified for the situations with Ramond marked points that arise in the induction (e.g., σ = (1^n, 0^m) with m > 0). This is a genuine verification gap rather than a demonstrated error; the authors should either provide a proof or state (7) with a complete reference that covers the Ramond case explicitly.
  2. [Section 3.3, proof of Theorem 5] The equality ⟨τ_{k1−1}τ_0⟩_0 = (2k1−1)!!/(2k1)! = 1/(2k1 k1!) is algebraically incorrect. The correct value is (2k1−1)!!/(2k1)! = 1/(2^{k1} k1!). Consequently, the recursion written as x^{(m+1)} = x·x^{(m)} + 1/(2^m m!) should be x^{(m+1)} = x·x^{(m)} + 1/(2^{m+1}(m+1)!). As written, the induction step in Theorem 5 does not close arithmetically. This appears to be a typo, but because it occurs in the proof of the main theorem, it must be fixed and the surrounding algebra checked.
  3. [Section 3.3, Eq. (28)] The displayed identity e^{1/2 L_{−1}} · Z_K(ℏ, {t_k}) = Z_K(ℏ, {t_k + 1/2 t_{k+1} + ...}) = Z^{(K)}(ℏ, {t_k}) is incorrect as stated, because L_{−1} contains the multiplicative term (1/2)t_0^2/ℏ in addition to the shift operator. The shift that produces Z^{(K)} from Z_K is the operator e^{1/2 Σ t_{k+1}∂/∂t_k}; the proof of Theorem 1 uses the correct factorization (25), so this is a presentational error. Nevertheless, the displayed equation is misleading and should be corrected to avoid confusing the reader.
  4. [Section 3.4, Proposition 3.8] The proof that the Virasoro constraints (31) are equivalent to the Stanford-Witten recursion (5) for general s is only sketched. The argument defers to [25] and asserts that the proof 'generalises immediately', with a brief description of the shift (32). Since Theorem 2 is a central claim, the authors should provide more details on how the s-dependence enters, particularly the derivation of the s²δ_{0,g}/2 term in the initial condition of the recursion. The current presentation leaves an nontrivial step to an earlier preprint of one of the authors.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] In the abstract, 't au functions' should be 'tau functions'.
  2. [Section 3.2, proof of Proposition 3.5] In the proof of Proposition 3.5, 'we arrive an the equation' should be 'we arrive at the equation'.
  3. [Section 3.5, Lemma 3.9] The shorthand notation Ω^{2,|I|−1}_{0,|I|+1} and Ω^{1,|I^c|}_{0,|I^c|+1} is used without explicit definition; the authors should clarify that the superscripts denote the pattern of Neveu-Schwarz (1) and Ramond (0) entries.
  4. [Section 3.3, Eq. (27)] The sentence introducing the ring-homomorphism property of exp(D) is longer than necessary and could be streamlined; the mathematical content is correct.
  5. [Section 4] There is a typo 'definitioniton' in the second paragraph of Section 4; it should be 'definition'.
  6. [Section 1, Theorem 2] It would be helpful to note explicitly that the s²δ_{0,g}/2 term in the initial condition of the recursion reproduces the genus-zero, one-point volume computation s²/2 given in Section 3.5, since this is the only place the parameter s enters the initial condition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the central equality Z^BGW = Z^Omega is established through independent kappa-class and Virasoro arguments; the main caveat is reliance on boundary restriction properties (7) cited to an author's preprint, which is a verification gap rather than a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is not circular by construction. Z^BGW is defined independently as the unique normalized KdV tau function with a prescribed homogeneity and string condition, while Z^Omega is defined geometrically from spin class intersection numbers. The proof connects the two through the kappa-class tau function Z^K, the Manin-Zograf change of variables, Virasoro conjugation, and the identification Z^Omega = exp(U) Z^(K) obtained from Theorem 5. Each of these is an independent mathematical statement: the kappa/spin relation is cited to [9], the Chiodo-class framework is cited to [19], and the Virasoro characterization of the BGW tau function is classical. The self-citations to [17], [25], and [27] concern prior results with their own proofs rather than restatements of the theorem being proved here. The one genuine weakness is that the restriction formulas (7) for the spin classes are quoted from [27] and [19] and are not re-proven in this paper; in particular, the assertion that Ramond insertions at nodes produce only lower-degree terms annihilated by taking the top Chern class is not verified in the Ramond cases that arise in the induction for Theorem 5. This is a verification gap and a potential correctness risk, but it is not a circularity: the paper does not define the spin classes in terms of Z^BGW, does not fit any parameter to the BGW expansion, and does not use Theorem 1 as an input to prove Theorem 1. The genus-zero checks in Lemmas 3.9 and 3.10 are computed directly and match the known BGW expansion, providing independent content. Accordingly, the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper postulates no new entities or fitted constants. It relies on standard integrable-systems theorems (KdV uniqueness, Virasoro constraints, Givental-Teleman), on Chiodo class/restriction properties cited from the literature, and on the prior interpretation of the relevant integrals as super Weil-Petersson volumes. The parameter s is a formal deformation variable tracking Ramond points; no numerical parameter is fitted to data.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Boundary restriction properties (7) of spin classes Ω^σ under the boundary divisors.
    The pullback formulas (7) are stated and cited to [27] (an author's preprint) and [19] (Chiodo class theory). They are used in the proof of Theorem 5 and in the genus zero computations, and are load-bearing for Theorem 1.
  • standard math Givental-Teleman classification of semisimple cohomological field theories.
    Theorem 4, cited from [9], uses the Givental-Teleman classification to prove the spin-kappa relation (12). Theorem 5 and the proof of Theorem 1 rely on (12).
  • domain assumption The integrals defining bVWP represent super Weil-Petersson volumes.
    The paper defines bVWP by integrals over M_{g,n+m} and states it represents super WP volumes, citing [25], [27], and [28]. The paper itself uses only intersection theory and does not prove the supergeometry identification, which is needed for the physical/supergeometric meaning of Theorem 2.
  • standard math Uniqueness of a normalized KdV tau function satisfying the string equation and initial value.
    In Proposition 3.4, the identification of D·Z_K with Z^BGW invokes the standard fact that a KdV tau function is uniquely determined by its string equation and normalization at t=0.
  • standard math Orbifold Riemann-Roch and vanishing of H^0(E^∨) for the universal spin bundle.
    The construction of the spin classes Ω^σ in Section 2.1 relies on the rank calculation of the bundle E_{g,n} and the negativity of degrees of θ^∨ on irreducible components.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Super volumes and KdV tau functions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6YQTC2MW

@misc{pith2026241217272,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Super volumes and KdV tau functions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6YQTC2MW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17272}
}
read the original abstract

Weil-Petersson volumes of the moduli space of curves are deeply related to the Kontsevich-Witten KdV tau function. They possess a Virasoro symmetry which comes out of recursion relations between the volumes due to Mirzakhani. Similarly, the super Weil-Petersson volumes of the moduli space of super curves with Neveu-Schwarz punctures are related to the Br\'ezin-Gross-Witten (BGW) tau function of the KdV hierarchy and satisfy a recursion due to Stanford and Witten, analogous to Mirzakhani's recursion. In this paper we prove that by also allowing Ramond punctures, the super Weil-Petersson volumes are related to the generalised BGW KdV tau function, which is a one parameter deformation of the BGW tau function. This allows us to prove that these new super volumes also satisfy the Stanford-Witten recursion.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    Super Weil-Petersson measures on the moduli space of curves

    Norbury, P. Super Weil-Petersson measures on the moduli space of curves. arXiv:2312.14558arXiv:2312.14558

    arXiv

  2. [19]

    and Zvonkine, D

    Lewanski, D.; Popolitov, A.; Shadrin, S. and Zvonkine, D. Chiodo formulas for the r-th roots and topological recursion. Lett. Math. Phys. 107 (2017), 901-919

    work page 2017

  3. [25]

    Enumerative geometry via the moduli space of super Riemann surfaces

    Norbury, P. Enumerative geometry via the moduli space of super Riemann surfaces. arXiv:2005.04378arXiv:2005.04378

    arXiv 2005

  4. [1]

    and Jarvis, T

    Abramovich, D. and Jarvis, T. Moduli of twisted spin curves. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 131 (2003), 685-699

    work page 2003

  5. [2]

    Cut-and-join description of generalized Brezin-Gross-Witten model

    Alexandrov, A. Cut-and-join description of generalized Brezin-Gross-Witten model. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 22 (2018), 1347-1399

    work page 2018

  6. [3]

    Degenerate and irregular topological recursion

    Alexandrov, A., Bychkov, B., Dunin-Barkowski, P., Kazarian, M., Shadrin, S. Degenerate and irregular topological recursion. arXiv:2408.02608arXiv:2408.02608

    work page Pith review arXiv

  7. [4]

    and Chekhov, L

    Ambjørn, J. and Chekhov, L. The NBI matrix model of IIB superstrings. JHEP 12 (1998), 007

    work page 1998

  8. [5]

    and Cornalba, M

    Arbarello, E. and Cornalba, M. Combinatorial and algebro-geometric cohomology classes on the moduli spaces of curves. J. Algebraic Geom. 5 (1996), 705-749

    work page 1996

Show all 33 references
  1. [6]

    and Gross, D.J

    Br´ ezin, E. and Gross, D.J. The external field problem in the large N limit of QCD. Phys. Lett. B97 (1980) 120

    1980

  2. [7]

    and Eynard, B

    Chekhov, L. and Eynard, B. Hermitian matrix model free energy: Feynman graph technique for all genera. J. High Energy Phys., 03014, (2006)

    2006

  3. [8]

    and Norbury, P

    Chekhov, L. and Norbury, P. Topological recursion with hard edges. Inter. Journal Math. 30 (2019) 1950014 (29 pages). SUPER VOLUMES AND KDV TAU FUNCTIONS 25

    2019

  4. [9]

    and Giacchetto, A

    Chidambaram, N.; Garcia-Failde, E. and Giacchetto, A. Relations on Mg,n and the negative r-spin Witten conjecture. arXiv:2205.15621arXiv:2205.15621

    arXiv

  5. [10]

    and Norbury, P

    Do, N. and Norbury, P. Topological recursion on the Bessel curve. Commun. Number Theory Phys. 12 (2018), 53-73

    2018

  6. [11]

    and Spitz, L

    Dunin-Barkowski, P.; Orantin, N.; Shadrin, S. and Spitz, L. Identification of the Givental formula with the spectral curve topological recursion procedure. Comm. Math. Phys. 328, (2014), 669–700

    2014

  7. [12]

    and Orantin, N

    Eynard, B. and Orantin, N. Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion. Com- mun. Number Theory Phys. 1 (2), (2007), 347-452

    2007

  8. [13]

    and Orantin, N

    Eynard, B. and Orantin, N. Topological recursion in enumerative geometry and random matrices. J. Phys. A 42, no. 29, 293001, 117 pp., (2009)

    2009

  9. [14]

    Gross, D. J. and Newman, M. J. Unitary and Hermitian matrices in an external field. 2: The Kontsevich model and continuum Virasoro constraints. Nucl. Phys. B 380 (1992) 168

    1992

  10. [15]

    and Witten, E

    Gross, D. and Witten, E. Possible third-order phase transition in the large- N lattice gauge theory. Phys. Rev. D21 (1980) 446

    1980

  11. [16]

    and Vaintrob, A

    Jarvis, T.; Kimura, T. and Vaintrob, A. Moduli Spaces of Higher Spin Curves and Integrable Hierarchies. Compositio Mathematica 126 (2001), 157-212

    2001

  12. [17]

    and Norbury, P

    Kazarian, M. and Norbury, P. Polynomial relations among kappa classes on the moduli space of curves. IMRN 3 (2024), 1825-1867

    2024

  13. [18]

    Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix Airy func- tion

    Kontsevich, M. Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix Airy func- tion. Comm. Math. Phys. 147 (1992), 1-23

    1992

  14. [20]

    and Zograf, P

    Manin, Y.I. and Zograf, P. Invertible cohomological field theories and Weil-Petersson vol- umes. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 50 (2000), 519-535

    2000

  15. [21]

    and Semenoff, G.W

    Mironov, A.; Morozov, A. and Semenoff, G.W. Unitary matrix integrals in the framework of generalized Kontsevich model. 1. Brezin-Gross-Witten model. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 11 (1996), 5031-5080

    1996

  16. [22]

    Simple geodesics and Weil-Petersson volumes of moduli spaces of bordered Riemann surfaces

    Mirzakhani, M. Simple geodesics and Weil-Petersson volumes of moduli spaces of bordered Riemann surfaces. Invent. Math. 167 (2007), 179-222

    2007

  17. [23]

    Towards an enumerative geometry of the moduli space of curves

    Mumford, D. Towards an enumerative geometry of the moduli space of curves. Arithmetic and geometry, Vol. II, Progr. Math. 36, Birkh¨ auser Boston, (1983), 271-328

    1983

  18. [24]

    Moduli of Riemann Surfaces, Real Algebraic Curves, and Their Superanalogs

    Natanzon, S. Moduli of Riemann Surfaces, Real Algebraic Curves, and Their Superanalogs. Transl. Math. Monographs 225, AMS, 2004

    2004

  19. [26]

    A new cohomology class on the moduli space of curves

    Norbury, P. A new cohomology class on the moduli space of curves. Geom. Topol. 27 (2023), 2695-2761

    2023

  20. [28]

    and Witten, E

    Stanford, D. and Witten, E. JT Gravity and the Ensembles of Random Matrix Theory Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 24, (2020), 1475-1680

    2020

  21. [29]

    and Yang, D

    Xu, J. and Yang, D. Galilean symmetry of the KdV hierarchy. arXiv:2403.04631arXiv:2403.04631

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    and Zhang, Q

    Yang, D. and Zhang, Q. On the Hodge-BGW correspondence Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 18 (2024) no.3, 611-651

    2024

  23. [31]

    On the Kontsevich model and other models of two-dimensional gravity

    Witten, E. On the Kontsevich model and other models of two-dimensional gravity. Proceed- ings of the XXth International Conference on Differential Geometric Methods in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 1, 2 (New York, 1991), 176-216. World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 1992

    1991

  24. [32]

    Two-dimensional gravity and intersection theory on moduli space

    Witten, E. Two-dimensional gravity and intersection theory on moduli space. Surveys in differential geometry (Cambridge, MA, 1990), 243–310, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA, 1991

    1990

  25. [33]

    The Weil-Petersson volume of the moduli spaces of punctured spheres

    Zograf, P. The Weil-Petersson volume of the moduli spaces of punctured spheres. Cont. Math., 150 (1993), 267-372. 26 ALEXANDER ALEXANDROV AND PAUL NORBURY Center for Geometry and Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Pohang 37673, Korea Email address : alex at ibs.re.kra...

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.