REVIEW 2 cited by
On the Feasibility of Vision-Language Models for Time-Series Classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We build upon time-series classification by leveraging the capabilities of Vision Language Models (VLMs). We find that VLMs produce competitive results after two or less epochs of fine-tuning. We develop a novel approach that incorporates graphical data representations as images in conjunction with numerical data. This approach is rooted in the hypothesis that graphical representations can provide additional contextual information that numerical data alone may not capture. Additionally, providing a graphical representation can circumvent issues such as limited context length faced by LLMs. To further advance this work, we implemented a scalable end-to-end pipeline for training on different scenarios, allowing us to isolate the most effective strategies for transferring learning capabilities from LLMs to Time Series Classification (TSC) tasks. Our approach works with univariate and multivariate time-series data. In addition, we conduct extensive and practical experiments to show how this approach works for time-series classification and generative labels.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
From Images to Signals: Are Large Vision Models Useful for Time Series Analysis?
Large vision models slightly beat strong baselines on imaged time series classification, but their forecasting advantage is narrow, tied to periodic patterns, and shrinks with long histories.
-
Harnessing Vision Models for Time Series Analysis: A Survey
A survey organizing existing methods that encode time series as images and apply vision models, with a dual-view taxonomy of imaging and modeling approaches.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.