Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Harnessing Vision Models for Time Series Analysis: A Survey

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This survey claims to be the first comprehensive review of vision models for time series analysis, organizing the field with a dual-view taxonomy of imaging and modeling methods.

desk verdict A genuinely useful first survey of imaging-based time series analysis, with a clear taxonomy and practical guidance; the loose definition of 'vision model' lets in K-NN and SVM rows that undercut the 'first survey of vision models' claim, but that is fixable with a sharper scope statement. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08869 v2 pith:HIGEVZKB submitted 2025-02-13 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

Jingchao Ni , Ziming Zhao , ChengAo Shen , Hanghang Tong , Dongjin Song , Wei Cheng , Dongsheng Luo , Haifeng Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
keywords timeseriesanalysisvisionmodelslargemultimodalimagingtaxonomysurveyforecasting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a survey that claims to be the first comprehensive review of using vision models for time series analysis. It argues that imaging time series and feeding the images to vision models is a promising alternative to sequence-based LLM approaches, because images naturally represent continuous values and can encode multivariate correlations. The paper organizes the field through two lenses: how time series are converted to images (line plots, heatmaps, spectrograms, Gramian Angular Fields, recurrence plots), and how the resulting images are modeled (conventional CNNs, large vision models, and multimodal models). It also collects practical guidance on normalization, image alignment, and recovering time series values from predicted images. A sympathetic reader would take away a structured map of the area and a set of open questions about when imaging helps.

What carries the argument

The organizing mechanism is the 'imaged time series' pipeline depicted in Figure 1: time series preprocessing, transformation to an image, image preprocessing, modeling by a vision model, and post-processing recovery. The survey's taxonomy is the dual view of this pipeline: Time Series to Image Transformation (§3) and Imaged Time Series Modeling (§4). The five primary imaging methods are Line Plot (x-y plot of values over time), Heatmap (color-coded variate-time matrix), Spectrogram (time-frequency representation via STFT, wavelet, or filterbank), Gramian Angular Field (polar-coordinate Gram matrix encoding pairwise temporal correlations), and Recurrence Plot (pairwise distances of delay-embedded phase-space vectors). On the modeling side the survey distinguishes conventional vision models (CNNs, ResNets, GANs, diffusion U-Nets), large vision models (ViT, Swin, BEiT, MAE, often ImageNet-pretrained), and large multimodal models that accept both image and text prompts.

What would settle it

A systematic literature search with a defined protocol that finds a substantial number of vision-based time series methods not representable in the five imaging categories or the three modeling categories of Table 1 would weaken the survey's claim to comprehensiveness. Concretely, discovering a widely used imaging technique for multivariate series that is neither a Line Plot, Heatmap, Spectrogram, GAF, nor RP — or a modeling paradigm outside conventional CNNs, LVMs, and LMMs — would falsify the taxonomy's coverage.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the whole pipeline — from raw time series to image, through a vision model, and back to time series — is a coherent framework that deserves its own survey and taxonomy. The paper's distinctive contribution is the dual-view classification: one axis enumerates five primary imaging transforms (Line Plot, Heatmap, Spectrogram, Gramian Angular Field, Recurrence Plot) and their extensions to multivariate series; the other axis groups modeling strategies into conventional vision models, large vision models such as ViT and MAE, and large multimodal models such as LLaVA-based architectures. Within that scaffold, the survey collects findings such as VisionTS's one-epoch fine-tuned MAE becoming state-of-the-art forecaster and ViTime's image-pretrained ViT beating TimesFM in zero-shot forecasting. The paper also maps pre- and post-processing desiderata, including instance normalization, channel alignment for RGB inputs, and the varying ease of recovering a series from different image types.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's claim to be comprehensive and its taxonomy's utility rest on the assumption that the papers collected in Table 1 form a representative and sufficiently complete sample of vision-based time series methods; the paper does not describe a systematic search protocol for the literature.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the survey's framework is correct, researchers can slot any new vision-plus-time-series method into one of the two taxonomy axes and quickly identify what is genuinely new.
  • The reported results, such as MAE fine-tuned for one epoch becoming a state-of-the-art forecaster and ViTime beating TimesFM in zero-shot forecasting, suggest that image-based encoders are a credible rival to LLM-based time series models and deserve inclusion in future benchmarks.
  • The pre- and post-processing guidance implies that practitioners must check image size, channel count, and normalization before reusing pretrained vision models, and that some imaging formats (GAF) support exact recovery while others (RP) do not.
  • The survey's future-directions list points to vision-based time series foundation models and multimodal agents as the next targets for the field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The survey's framework suggests a natural benchmark study that fixes the imaging method and varies the vision model, or vice versa, across a common set of tasks; the survey itself notes that such systematic comparisons are largely absent.
  • The paper's emphasis on visual prompt-friendliness yields a testable extension: for long multivariate series, a plotted image plus a short text prompt should outperform a fully verbalized numeric sequence in zero-shot multimodal settings, at lower API cost.
  • One could push the 'images encode correlations' argument further by combining a heatmap of the variate-time matrix with a graph neural network over variate positions, which might address the row-order sensitivity the paper flags.
  • Because the survey claims to be the first of its kind, future surveys will need to update this taxonomy as multimodal and foundation models evolve; the two-axis structure may need a third axis for task types.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper surveys methods that convert time series into image representations and then apply vision models for tasks such as classification, forecasting, and anomaly detection. It organizes the field with a dual-view taxonomy: imaging transformations (line plots, heatmaps, spectrograms, GAF, RP, and others) and modeling approaches (conventional vision models, LVMs, LMMs/VLMs, and task-specific heads). It also discusses pre-/post-processing considerations and future directions, and claims to be the first comprehensive survey on this topic.

Significance. If the scope is clarified, this will be a useful reference: the mathematical descriptions of the main imaging transforms are accurate, the comparative tables are informative, and the maintained GitHub repository is a practical asset. The survey does not present new experiments, so its value lies in organization and synthesis rather than empirical claims. The main risks are definitional: without a precise inclusion criterion for 'vision model' and a transparent literature collection protocol, the 'first comprehensive survey' claim is hard to assess.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2, Table 1] The central claim that this is 'the first survey on leveraging vision models for time series analysis' requires a precise definition of 'vision model,' but none is given in the scope discussion. Section 2 defines only the imaging side and excludes video/image time series, without restricting the modeling side. As a result, Table 1 includes K-NN on recurrence plots [Silva et al., 2013], an SVM/AdaBoost ensemble on line plots [Cohen et al., 2020], and ConvLSTM on correlation-matrix images [Zhang et al., 2019], none of which is a vision model in the usual sense of a model developed for or pre-trained on images. If the intended scope is 'any classifier applied to imaged time series,' the first-survey claim becomes very broad and needs a supporting literature search; if it is 'models developed for natural images,' those rows and their comparative discussion in §4.1 must be removed or reframed. The inclusion criterion should be stated explicitly and the taxonomy and Table 1 adjusted accordingly.
  2. [§1, §7] The paper claims to be 'comprehensive' and 'the first survey' on this topic, but no systematic search protocol is described. Table 1 appears to be a curated list, and there is no statement of databases, search terms, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or time window used to assemble it. Without such a protocol, a reader cannot verify the completeness that the 'first comprehensive survey' claim depends on, and the risk of missing important methods (e.g., early bitmap-based approaches, which are mentioned only in passing in §3.6) remains. Please add a methodology paragraph describing how the literature was collected and how representative Table 1 is intended to be.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.7] The text refers to 'Fig. 1(b)' when discussing Heatmap for MTS, but the referenced heatmap is in Fig. 2(b); please correct the cross-reference.
  2. [§2.1] There is a typo in the phrase 'the deigns of task-specific heads'; 'deigns' should be 'designs.'
  3. [§5] In the Time Series Normalization paragraph, 'withtin [0, 1]' should be 'within [0, 1]'; the same typo appears in the GAF sentence.
  4. [§2] The term 'spaciotemporal' in the scope paragraph should be 'spatiotemporal.'
  5. [§3.1] The sentence 'ForCNN [Semenoglou et al., 2023] even uses a single 8-bit integer to represent each pixel for black-white images' reads awkwardly because 'ForCNN' is not formatted as a method name; please clarify whether it is a named method or a typo for 'For CNN.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey organizes external published methods; its claims are not derived from its own inputs, and the presence of self-citations is not load-bearing.

full rationale

This is a survey paper, not a derivation or fitting pipeline, so the circularity patterns that apply to method papers (fitted inputs renamed as predictions, parameters defined in terms of targets, self-citation chains forcing a conclusion) do not arise. The paper's central claim is that it is the first survey of vision-model-based time series analysis, supported by a literature table and a dual-view taxonomy. That claim rests on literature coverage and on the authors' reading of prior work, not on any reduction of an output to an input. The imaging transforms in Section 3 (STFT, CWT, GAF, RP) are standard, externally defined constructions, and the modeling taxonomy in Section 4 is a categorization of existing published methods. Table 1 includes MSCRED [Zhang et al., 2019], which has overlapping authors with this survey, but that row is one representative example among many and no conclusion or exclusion depends on MSCRED's internal validity; removing it would not change the taxonomy or the survey's structural claims. The paper also cites several of the authors' other works in passing, but none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem, an ansatz justification, or a required premise for the survey's organization. The more substantive weakness is scope precision: Table 1 includes K-NN, SVM/AdaBoost, and ConvLSTM under 'Conventional Vision Models' without a formal definition of 'vision model,' and the completeness of the 'first survey' claim is not backed by a described search protocol. These are falsifiability and coverage concerns, not circularity: the survey does not derive its conclusions from its own definitions or from self-citations. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a survey paper; it introduces no free parameters or invented entities. The central claim relies on the completeness of the literature selection and on the correctness of the standard transforms it summarizes.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The papers in Table 1 are a representative sample of the field.
    The survey's comprehensiveness claim relies on this premise; no systematic search protocol is provided to justify completeness.
  • standard math Standard mathematical definitions of STFT, CWT, GAF, and RP are correct as cited.
    Used to describe imaging methods in Sections 3.3 to 3.5; these are well-established transforms from signal processing and dynamical systems.
  • domain assumption Pre-trained vision models transfer knowledge to imaged time series.
    Stated as a motivating advantage in Section 1, supported only by citations to prior work such as VisionTS, not by analysis within this survey.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Harnessing Vision Models for Time Series Analysis: A Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HIGEVZKB

@misc{pith2026250208869,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Harnessing Vision Models for Time Series Analysis: A Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HIGEVZKB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08869}
}
read the original abstract

Time series analysis has witnessed the inspiring development from traditional autoregressive models, deep learning models, to recent Transformers and Large Language Models (LLMs). Efforts in leveraging vision models for time series analysis have also been made along the way but are less visible to the community due to the predominant research on sequence modeling in this domain. However, the discrepancy between continuous time series and the discrete token space of LLMs, and the challenges in explicitly modeling the correlations of variates in multivariate time series have shifted some research attentions to the equally successful Large Vision Models (LVMs) and Vision Language Models (VLMs). To fill the blank in the existing literature, this survey discusses the advantages of vision models over LLMs in time series analysis. It provides a comprehensive and in-depth overview of the existing methods, with dual views of detailed taxonomy that answer the key research questions including how to encode time series as images and how to model the imaged time series for various tasks. Additionally, we address the challenges in the pre- and post-processing steps involved in this framework and outline future directions to further advance time series analysis with vision models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08869 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The general process of leveraging vision models for time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An illustration of different methods for imaging time series with a sample (length=336) from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An illustration of different modeling strategies on imaged time series in (a)(b)(c) and task-specific heads in (d). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VEIL: How Visual Encoding Hijacking Induces Bias In Vision Models

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Vision models trained on chart images of time series often latch onto rendering style rather than temporal class structure, an effect the authors call visual encoding hijacking.

  2. Time Series Representations for Classification Lie Hidden in Pretrained Vision Transformers

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Frozen vision transformers, applied to image representations of time series, produce classification features that outperform or match time series foundation models on UCR and UEA benchmarks.

  3. Signal, Image, or Symbolic: Exploring the Best Input Representation for Electrocardiogram-Language Models Through a Unified Framework

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A unified benchmark across six ECG datasets and five text-generation metrics finds tokenized symbolic ECG inputs outperform raw signal and image inputs for ECG-language models.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Gpt-4 technical report

    [Achiam et al., 2023] Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agar- wal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, et al. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv:2303.08774,

    arXiv 2023

  2. [4]

    Mae-ast: Masked autoencoding audio spectrogram trans- former

    [Baade et al., 2022] Alan Baade, Puyuan Peng, and David Har- wath. Mae-ast: Masked autoencoding audio spectrogram trans- former. arXiv:2203.16691,

    arXiv 2022

  3. [7]

    Deep learning and time series-to-image encoding for financial forecasting

    [Barra et al., 2020] Silvio Barra, Salvatore Mario Carta, Andrea Corriga, Alessandro Sebastian Podda, et al. Deep learning and time series-to-image encoding for financial forecasting. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin., 7(3):683–692,

    work page 2020

  4. [9]

    Trading via image classification

    [Cohen et al., 2020] Naftali Cohen, Tucker Balch, and Manuela Veloso. Trading via image classification. In ICAIF,

    work page 2020

  5. [10]

    Fusion of image representations for time series classification with deep learning

    [Costa et al., 2024] Henrique V Costa, Andr ´e GR Ribeiro, and Vinicius MA Souza. Fusion of image representations for time series classification with deep learning. In ICANN,

    work page 2024

  6. [11]

    A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecasting

    [Das et al., 2024] Abhimanyu Das, Weihao Kong, Rajat Sen, and Yichen Zhou. A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecasting. In ICML,

    work page 2024

  7. [12]

    Plots unlock time-series understanding in multimodal models

    [Daswani et al., 2024] Mayank Daswani, Mathias MJ Bellaiche, Marc Wilson, Desislav Ivanov, et al. Plots unlock time-series understanding in multimodal models. arXiv:2410.02637,

    arXiv 2024

  8. [13]

    The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis

    [Daubechies, 1990] Ingrid Daubechies. The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 36(5):961–1005,

    work page 1990

Show all 72 references
  1. [15]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale

    [Dosovitskiy et al., 2021] Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In ICLR,

    2021

  2. [17]

    Recurrence plots of dynamical systems

    [Eckmann et al., 1987] J-P Eckmann, S Oliffson Kamphorst, et al. Recurrence plots of dynamical systems. EPL, 4(9):973,

    1987

  3. [19]

    Ssast: Self-supervised audio spectrogram trans- former

    [Gong et al., 2022] Yuan Gong, Cheng-I Lai, Yu-An Chung, and James Glass. Ssast: Self-supervised audio spectrogram trans- former. In AAAI,

    2022

  4. [20]

    Moment: A family of open time-series foundation models

    [Goswami et al., 2024] Mononito Goswami, Konrad Szafer, Arjun Choudhry, Yifu Cai, Shuo Li, and Artur Dubrawski. Moment: A family of open time-series foundation models. In ICML,

    2024

  5. [21]

    Signal estima- tion from modified short-time fourier transform

    [Griffin and Lim, 1984] Daniel Griffin and Jae Lim. Signal estima- tion from modified short-time fourier transform. IEEE Trans. Acoust., 32(2):236–243,

    1984

  6. [23]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition

    [He et al., 2016] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In CVPR,

    2016

  7. [25]

    Empowering time series analy- sis with large language models: A survey

    [Jiang et al., 2024] Yushan Jiang, Zijie Pan, Xikun Zhang, Sahil Garg, Anderson Schneider, et al. Empowering time series analy- sis with large language models: A survey. In IJCAI,

    2024

  8. [26]

    Time-llm: Time series forecasting by re- programming large language models

    [Jin et al., 2024] Ming Jin, Shiyu Wang, Lintao Ma, Zhixuan Chu, James Y Zhang, et al. Time-llm: Time series forecasting by re- programming large language models. In ICLR,

    2024

  9. [27]

    Multi-sensor data fusion and time series to image encoding for hardness recognition

    [Kaewrakmuk et al., 2024] Thossapon Kaewrakmuk, Jakkree Sri- nonchat, et al. Multi-sensor data fusion and time series to image encoding for hardness recognition. IEEE Sens. J.,

    2024

  10. [28]

    Timehr: Image-based time series generation for electronic health records

    [Karami et al., 2024] Hojjat Karami, Mary-Anne Hartley, David Atienza, et al. Timehr: Image-based time series generation for electronic health records. arXiv:2402.06318,

    2024 arXiv

  11. [29]

    Reversible instance normalization for accurate time-series forecasting against distribution shift

    [Kim et al., 2022] Taesung Kim, Jinhee Kim, Yunwon Tae, Cheon- bok Park, et al. Reversible instance normalization for accurate time-series forecasting against distribution shift. In ICLR,

    2022

  12. [30]

    Cafo: Feature-centric explanation on time series classification

    [Kim et al., 2024] Jaeho Kim, Seok-Ju Hahn, Yoontae Hwang, Junghye Lee, and Seulki Lee. Cafo: Feature-centric explanation on time series classification. In KDD,

    2024

  13. [31]

    Convolutional neural networks for energy time se- ries forecasting

    [Koprinska et al., 2018] Irena Koprinska, Dengsong Wu, and Zheng Wang. Convolutional neural networks for energy time se- ries forecasting. In IJCNN,

    2018

  14. [32]

    Time-series bitmaps: a practical visualization tool for working with large time series databases

    [Kumar et al., 2005] Nitin Kumar, Venkata Nishanth Lolla, Ea- monn Keogh, et al. Time-series bitmaps: a practical visualization tool for working with large time series databases. In SDM,

    2005

  15. [34]

    Tts-gan: A transformer-based time- series generative adversarial network

    [Li et al., 2022] Xiaomin Li, Vangelis Metsis, Huangyingrui Wang, and Anne Hee Hiong Ngu. Tts-gan: A transformer-based time- series generative adversarial network. In AIME,

    2022

  16. [35]

    Foundation models for time series analysis: A tutorial and survey

    [Liang et al., 2024] Yuxuan Liang, Haomin Wen, Yuqi Nie, Yushan Jiang, Ming Jin, Dongjin Song, et al. Foundation models for time series analysis: A tutorial and survey. In KDD,

    2024

  17. [36]

    Hierarchical context representation and self-adaptive thresholding for multivariate anomaly detection

    [Lin et al., 2024] Chunming Lin, Bowen Du, Leilei Sun, and Lin- chao Li. Hierarchical context representation and self-adaptive thresholding for multivariate anomaly detection. TKDE,

    2024

  18. [37]

    Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows

    [Liu et al., 2021] Ze Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu, Yixuan Wei, Zheng Zhang, et al. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In ICCV,

    2021

  19. [38]

    Visual instruction tuning

    [Liu et al., 2023] Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. Visual instruction tuning. NeurIPS,

    2023

  20. [39]

    Learning traffic as images: A deep convolutional neural network for large-scale transporta- tion network speed prediction

    [Ma et al., 2017] Xiaolei Ma, Zhuang Dai, Zhengbing He, Jihui Ma, Yong Wang, and Yunpeng Wang. Learning traffic as images: A deep convolutional neural network for large-scale transporta- tion network speed prediction. Sensors, 17(4):818,

    2017

  21. [41]

    Training-free time-series anomaly detection: Leveraging image foundation models

    [Namura et al., 2024] Nobuo Namura, Yuma Ichikawa, et al. Training-free time-series anomaly detection: Leveraging image foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.14756,

    2024 arXiv

  22. [42]

    A time series is worth 64 words: Long- term forecasting with transformers

    [Nie et al., 2023] Yuqi Nie, Nam H Nguyen, Phanwadee Sinthong, and Jayant Kalagnanam. A time series is worth 64 words: Long- term forecasting with transformers. In ICLR,

    2023

  23. [43]

    S 2ip-llm: Semantic space informed prompt learning with llm for time series forecasting

    [Pan et al., 2024] Zijie Pan, Yushan Jiang, Sahil Garg, Anderson Schneider, et al. S 2ip-llm: Semantic space informed prompt learning with llm for time series forecasting. In ICML,

    2024

  24. [44]

    On the feasibility of vision-language models for time-series classification

    [Prithyani et al., 2024] Vinay Prithyani, Mohsin Mohammed, Richa Gadgil, et al. On the feasibility of vision-language models for time-series classification. arXiv:2412.17304,

    2024 arXiv

  25. [45]

    Image- based time series forecasting: A deep convolutional neural network approach

    [Semenoglou et al., 2023] Artemios-Anargyros Semenoglou, Evangelos Spiliotis, and Vassilios Assimakopoulos. Image- based time series forecasting: A deep convolutional neural network approach. Neural Netw., 157:39–53,

    2023

  26. [46]

    Time-moe: Billion-scale time series foundation models with mixture of experts

    [Shi et al., 2024] Xiaoming Shi, Shiyu Wang, Yuqi Nie, Dianqi Li, et al. Time-moe: Billion-scale time series foundation models with mixture of experts. arXiv:2409.16040,

    2024 arXiv

  27. [47]

    Time series classification using compression distance of recurrence plots

    [Silva et al., 2013] Diego F Silva, Vin´ıcius MA De Souza, and Gus- tavo EAPA Batista. Time series classification using compression distance of recurrence plots. In ICDM,

    2013

  28. [50]

    Going deeper with convolutions

    [Szegedy et al., 2015] Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Pierre Sermanet, Scott Reed, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Er- han, et al. Going deeper with convolutions. In CVPR,

    2015

  29. [51]

    Are language models ac- tually useful for time series forecasting? In NeurIPS,

    [Tan et al., 2024] Mingtian Tan, Mike A Merrill, Vinayak Gupta, Tim Althoff, and Thomas Hartvigsen. Are language models ac- tually useful for time series forecasting? In NeurIPS,

    2024

  30. [52]

    Vits for sits: Vision transformers for satellite image time series

    [Tarasiou et al., 2023] Michail Tarasiou, Erik Chavez, and Stefanos Zafeiriou. Vits for sits: Vision transformers for satellite image time series. In CVPR,

    2023

  31. [53]

    Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models

    [Team, 2023] Gemini Team. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv:2312.11805,

    2023 arXiv

  32. [54]

    Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention

    [Touvron et al., 2021] Hugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Matthijs Douze, Francisco Massa, et al. Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention. In ICML,

    2021

  33. [55]

    Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio

    [Van Den Oord et al., 2016] Aaron Van Den Oord, Sander Diele- man, Heiga Zen, Karen Simonyan, Oriol Vinyals, et al. Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio. arXiv:1609.03499, 12,

    2016 arXiv

  34. [56]

    Wavelets and filter banks: Theory and design.IEEE Trans

    [Vetterli and Herley, 1992] Martin Vetterli and Cormac Herley. Wavelets and filter banks: Theory and design.IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 40(9):2207–2232,

    1992

  35. [57]

    Timemixer++: A general time series pattern machine for universal predictive analysis

    [Wang et al., 2025] Shiyu Wang, Jiawei Li, Xiaoming Shi, Zhou Ye, Baichuan Mo, Wenze Lin, Shengtong Ju, Zhixuan Chu, and Ming Jin. Timemixer++: A general time series pattern machine for universal predictive analysis. In ICLR,

    2025

  36. [59]

    Leveraging vision-language models for granular mar- ket change prediction

    [Wimmer and Rekabsaz, 2023] Christopher Wimmer and Navid Rekabsaz. Leveraging vision-language models for granular mar- ket change prediction. arXiv:2301.10166,

    2023 arXiv

  37. [60]

    Timesnet: Temporal 2d-variation model- ing for general time series analysis

    [Wu et al., 2023] Haixu Wu, Tengge Hu, Yong Liu, Hang Zhou, Jianmin Wang, et al. Timesnet: Temporal 2d-variation model- ing for general time series analysis. In ICLR,

    2023

  38. [61]

    Large multimodal agents: A survey

    [Xie et al., 2024] Junlin Xie, Zhihong Chen, Ruifei Zhang, Xiang Wan, and Guanbin Li. Large multimodal agents: A survey. arXiv:2402.15116,

    2024 arXiv

  39. [62]

    Your time series is worth a binary image: machine vision assisted deep framework for time series forecasting

    [Yang et al., 2023] Luoxiao Yang, Xinqi Fan, et al. Your time series is worth a binary image: machine vision assisted deep framework for time series forecasting. arXiv:2302.14390,

    2023 arXiv

  40. [63]

    Vitime: A visual intelligence-based foundation model for time series forecasting

    [Yang et al., 2024] Luoxiao Yang, Yun Wang, Xinqi Fan, Israel Co- hen, et al. Vitime: A visual intelligence-based foundation model for time series forecasting. arXiv:2407.07311,

    2024

  41. [64]

    Multivariate time series classification using dilated convolutional neural network

    [Yazdanbakhsh and Dick, 2019] Omolbanin Yazdanbakhsh and Scott Dick. Multivariate time series classification using dilated convolutional neural network. arXiv:1905.01697,

    2019 arXiv

  42. [66]

    From pixels to predictions: Spectrogram and vision transformer for better time series forecasting

    [Zeng et al., 2023] Zhen Zeng, Rachneet Kaur, Suchetha Siddagan- gappa, et al. From pixels to predictions: Spectrogram and vision transformer for better time series forecasting. In ICAIF,

    2023

  43. [67]

    Deep spatio-temporal residual networks for citywide crowd flows pre- diction

    [Zhang et al., 2017] Junbo Zhang, Yu Zheng, and Dekang Qi. Deep spatio-temporal residual networks for citywide crowd flows pre- diction. In AAAI,

    2017

  44. [68]

    A deep neural network for unsupervised anomaly detection and diagnosis in multivariate time series data

    [Zhang et al., 2019] Chuxu Zhang, Dongjin Song, Yuncong Chen, Xinyang Feng, Cristian Lumezanu, Wei Cheng, Jingchao Ni, et al. A deep neural network for unsupervised anomaly detection and diagnosis in multivariate time series data. In AAAI,

    2019

  45. [69]

    Tapnet: Multivariate time series classification with attentional prototypical network

    [Zhang et al., 2020] Xuchao Zhang, Yifeng Gao, Jessica Lin, and Chang-Tien Lu. Tapnet: Multivariate time series classification with attentional prototypical network. In AAAI,

    2020

  46. [70]

    Insight miner: A time series analysis dataset for cross-domain alignment with natural language

    [Zhang et al., 2023] Yunkai Zhang, Yawen Zhang, et al. Insight miner: A time series analysis dataset for cross-domain alignment with natural language. In NeurIPS AI4Science,

    2023

  47. [71]

    Large language models for time series: A survey

    [Zhang et al., 2024] Xiyuan Zhang, Ranak Roy Chowdhury, Ra- jesh K Gupta, and Jingbo Shang. Large language models for time series: A survey. In IJCAI,

    2024

  48. [72]

    See it, think it, sorted: Large multimodal models are few- shot time series anomaly analyzers

    [Zhuang et al., 2024] Jiaxin Zhuang, Leon Yan, Zhenwei Zhang, et al. See it, think it, sorted: Large multimodal models are few- shot time series anomaly analyzers. arXiv:2411.02465, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  49. [1984]

    Classification of time-series images using deep convo- lutional neural networks

    [Hatami et al., 2018] Nima Hatami, Yann Gavet, and Johan De- bayle. Classification of time-series images using deep convo- lutional neural networks. In ICMV,

    2018

  50. [1987]

    Ast: Audio spectrogram transformer

    [Gong et al., 2021] Yuan Gong, Yu-An Chung, and James Glass. Ast: Audio spectrogram transformer. Interspeech,

    2021

  51. [1990]

    Vision language models are few-shot audio spectrogram classi- fiers

    [Dixit et al., 2024] Satvik Dixit, Laurie Heller, and Chris Donahue. Vision language models are few-shot audio spectrogram classi- fiers. In NeurIPS Workshop,

    2024

  52. [2005]

    Forecasting with time series imaging

    [Li et al., 2020] Xixi Li, Yanfei Kang, and Feng Li. Forecasting with time series imaging. Expert Syst. Appl., 160:113680,

    2020

  53. [2013]

    Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale im- age recognition

    [Simonyan and Zisserman, 2015] Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale im- age recognition. In ICLR,

    2015

  54. [2015]

    Visual time series forecasting: an image-driven approach

    [Sood et al., 2021] Srijan Sood, Zhen Zeng, Naftali Cohen, Tucker Balch, and Manuela Veloso. Visual time series forecasting: an image-driven approach. In ICAIF,

    2021

  55. [2016]

    Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners

    [He et al., 2022] Kaiming He, Xinlei Chen, Saining Xie, Yanghao Li, Piotr Doll ´ar, and Ross Girshick. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In CVPR,

    2022

  56. [2017]

    Utilizing image transforms and diffusion models for generative modeling of short and long time series

    [Naiman et al., 2024] Ilan Naiman, Nimrod Berman, Itai Pemper, Idan Arbiv, Gal Fadlon, and Omri Azencot. Utilizing image transforms and diffusion models for generative modeling of short and long time series. NeurIPS,

    2024

  57. [2018]

    Beit: Bert pre-training of image transformers

    [Bao et al., 2022] Hangbo Bao, Li Dong, Songhao Piao, et al. Beit: Bert pre-training of image transformers. In ICLR,

    2022

  58. [2019]

    Deep video pre- diction for time series forecasting

    [Zeng et al., 2021] Zhen Zeng, Tucker Balch, et al. Deep video pre- diction for time series forecasting. In ICAIF,

    2021

  59. [2020]

    Vi- sionts: Visual masked autoencoders are free-lunch zero-shot time series forecasters

    [Chen et al., 2024] Mouxiang Chen, Lefei Shen, Zhuo Li, et al. Vi- sionts: Visual masked autoencoders are free-lunch zero-shot time series forecasters. arXiv:2408.17253,

    2024 arXiv

  60. [2021]

    Image processing tools for financial time series classi- fication

    [Du et al., 2020] Bairui Du, Delmiro Fernandez-Reyes, and Paolo Barucca. Image processing tools for financial time series classi- fication. arXiv:2008.06042,

    2020 arXiv

  61. [2022]

    An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling

    [Bai et al., 2018] Shaojie Bai, J Zico Kolter, and Vladlen Koltun. An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling. arXiv:1803.01271,

    2018 arXiv

  62. [2023]

    Chronos: Learn- ing the language of time series

    [Ansari et al., 2024] Abdul Fatir Ansari, Lorenzo Stella, Caner Turkmen, Xiyuan Zhang, Pedro Mercado, et al. Chronos: Learn- ing the language of time series. arXiv:2403.07815,

    2024 arXiv

  63. [2024]

    The claude 3 model family: Opus, sonnet, haiku

    [Anthropic, 2024] AI Anthropic. The claude 3 model family: Opus, sonnet, haiku. Claude-3 Model Card,

    2024

  64. [2025]

    Transformers in time series: a survey

    [Wen et al., 2023] Qingsong Wen, Tian Zhou, Chaoli Zhang, Weiqi Chen, Ziqing Ma, Junchi Yan, and Liang Sun. Transformers in time series: a survey. In IJCAI,

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.