Gauging or extending bulk and boundary conformal field theories: Application to bulk and domain wall problem in topological matter and their descriptions by (mock) modular covariant

Yoshiki Fukusumi

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Gauging or extending bulk and boundary conformal field theories: Application to bulk and domain wall problem in topological matter and their descriptions by (mock) modular covariant

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single modular partition function, Eq. (65), is claimed to classify the gapless edge modes of topological order; folded, it yields domain walls that can flip anyon chirality.

desk verdict A concrete but unproven framework: the new nonchiral simple current Jtot=JUV\bar{J}_IR and Eq. (65) are worth taking seriously, but the modular invariance and the RG domain wall existence are assumed, not shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19577 v3 pith:QNBDQXLN submitted 2024-12-27 hep-th cond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.CTmath.MP

Yoshiki Fukusumi This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thcond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.CTmath.MP MSC 81T4081T45 PACS 73.43.Lp71.10.Pm

keywords conformalfieldtheorytopologicalorderdomainwallanyonsrenormalizationgroupflowboundarymodularinvariantssimplecurrentextension

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that the standard data of rational conformal field theory—conformal dimensions and the charges assigned by the modular S matrix under a $\mathbb{Z}_N$ symmetry—already determine the bulk and edge physics of $2+1$ dimensional topological order. On the massive side it argues that gapped phases correspond to smeared boundary states of a boundary CFT, and it derives a condition under which a noninvertible symmetry obstructs mass condensation, extending the usual lattice no-go argument for symmetry-protected gaplessness. On the massless side it builds partition functions for two CFTs connected by a renormalization-group flow, Eq. (65), and claims these classify gapless edge modes. The construction separates into anomaly-cancelling flows, which give new modular invariants for layered systems, and anomaly-matching flows, which after folding produce domain walls that can change the chirality of anyons. If correct, the classification of conformal field theories becomes a practical input for predicting bulk degeneracies and anyon transport through domain walls.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the partition function $$Z_Q = \sum_{Q_{J_{\mathrm{tot}}}(i_{\mathrm{tot}})=Q}\left|\sum_p \Xi_{i_{\mathrm{tot}},p}\right|^2 + N \sum_{Q_{J_{\mathrm{tot}}}(a_{\mathrm{tot}})=Q} |\Xi_{a_{\mathrm{tot}}}|^2,$$ where $\Xi$ are characters of the product of the UV and IR theories and $J_{\mathrm{tot}}$ is a composite simple current—a field that generates a $\mathbb{Z}_N$ symmetry under fusion, here built as a chiral-chiral or chiral-antichiral pair. The charge is computed from conformal dimensions by $Q_J(\alpha)=h_J+h_\alpha-h_{J\times\alpha}$, and the anomaly-free condition is that the conformal spin $s_{J_{\mathrm{tot}}^k}$ is integral (half-integral for odd $k$ when $N$ is even). This equation does the work of the paper: it packages the topological degeneracies of the bulk (the prefactor $N$ and the zero-mode sectors), distinguishes anomaly cancellation from anomaly matching, and after the folding trick provides the matrix representative $D_{RG}$ that transports anyons across the domain wall.

What would settle it

Numerically compute the low-energy spectrum of the coupled three-state Potts chains built by the procedure in Appendix B; if the three predicted $\mathbb{Z}_3$ charge sectors do not appear with the stated relative degeneracies, the charge-and-parity projection of the RG domain wall is not faithful.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Eq. (65), together with its anomaly-free conditions on the conformal spin of the composite $\mathbb{Z}_N$ simple current $J_{\mathrm{tot}}$, provides a general classification of the gapless edge modes of topological order and is a detailed partition-function expression of the earlier proposal of [21]. The object $D_{RG}$ obtained by folding the coupled model is a domain wall map between the UV and IR anyon theories, and in the anomaly-matching case this map can swap the chiral and antichiral sectors, so anyons can change chirality when crossing the wall. The paper also claims that massive RG flows are encoded in smeared boundary states, that a new series of $\mathbb{Z}_N$-extended boundary CFTs describes the gapped phases, and that the obstruction to condensation of a smeared boundary state is a noninvertible-symmetry analog of the standard lattice no-go theorem.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the premise that a massless RG flow is faithfully represented by a conformal domain wall whose action on fields is fixed by their charge and parity under the $\mathbb{Z}_N$ symmetry; the paper states this explicitly, and if actual domain walls carry more data or do not exist for the proposed current, the anyon-transport conclusions do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Bulk topological degeneracies of a $2+1$ dimensional topological order can be read off from smeared boundary-state data of the corresponding $1+1$ dimensional CFT, bypassing the full categorical data.
Any rational CFT whose conformal-weight data satisfy the anomaly-free conditions fits into Eq. (65), so the known tables of modular invariants serve as a census of gapless edge modes, including cases with nonchiral anyons.
Anomaly-matching flows predict domain walls that exchange chirality, implying dualities between chiral and nonchiral topological orders of the type proposed for certain fractional quantum Hall states.
Anomaly-cancelling flows generate a new series of modular invariants for multilayer systems, covering coupled $\mathrm{SU}(N)_k$ models and parafermion chains.
The condensation obstruction for smeared boundary states constrains possible massive RG flows: a perturbation whose modular S matrix amplitude vanishes cannot drive the system into the corresponding gapped phase.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: If Eq. (65) is as general as claimed, existing tables of modular invariants become a screening tool; searching them for new anomaly-free charge assignments would predict new topological orders without wavefunction computations.
Editorial inference: The chirality-flipping domain wall should be visible as a conversion between electron-like and hole-like edge excitations, so interferometric or thermal-transport measurements across a designed interface could test this paper's proposal.
Editorial inference: The lattice construction of Appendix B gives a direct numerical test; exact diagonalization of the coupled parafermion chains should reveal the predicted charge sectors with their stated degeneracies.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague — this paper is a genuine attempt to unify simple-current extensions, boundary states, and RG domain walls into one formalism, with Eq. (65) as the anchor. The genuinely new idea is the nonchiral simple current Jtot = JUV \bar{J}_IR for anomaly matching, together with the "one edge CFT" reading of the resulting partition functions. The lattice construction in Appendix B gives the formalism concrete anchors. The paper is also honest: it repeatedly states what is assumed rather than proven. That is real credit.

The core equations (65), (75), (76) are concrete, and the program of reading bulk degeneracies and domain-wall anyon transport off tabulated CFT data is useful if it works. But the "if" matters. Modular invariance of Eq. (65) is asserted under anomaly-free conditions, not demonstrated; the S-transformation of the extended characters is not shown. That is load-bearing. The stress-test note lands: Section IV.B, right after Eq. (81), says explicitly that the RG domain wall is taken as already constructed and only charge/parity data are retained. That reduction is not justified. A conformal interface carries more data — reflection/transmission coefficients, fixed-point multiplicities, a full fusion matrix — and the matrix D in Eqs. (84)–(86) is left undetermined. So the chirality-changing anyon transport is an interpretation of the charge/parity structure, not a derivation from an actual interface. The paper says so itself, which is honest but does not fill the gap.

The massive-side analysis leans on Cardy's smeared-BCFT conjecture, which is a known uncertainty rather than a fatal flaw, but it should be labeled as a conjecture in the main text, not a standing result. The citation pattern is broad and mostly appropriate; the heavy reliance on the author's earlier works [12,32] is a soft spot because the SymTFT identifications are imported without independent derivation. Minor if those works are sound, but it makes the present algebra conditional on prior work.

Who is this for? People working on the CFT/TQFT correspondence, simple-current extensions, and FQHE edge theories. I would send it to referees rather than desk reject it. The referees should demand: (1) a proof of modular invariance of Eq. (65) under the stated conditions, (2) a construction or at least an existence argument for the RG domain wall, or a clear downgrade of the chirality claim to a conjecture, and (3) a novelty check against known simple-current classifications. With those, acceptance is plausible; without them, the physical conclusions rest on undemonstrated assumptions. I would not personally cite it until the modular invariance is settled, but I would want to see the referee reports.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a unified Z_N-gauging (group-extension) construction for bulk CFTs, boundary CFTs, and coupled CFT pairs, and applies it to the classification of 2+1d topological orders and their domain walls. In Section III it uses smeared Cardy states to connect massive RG flows to gapped phases, and derives an obstruction condition, Eq. (34), phrased as a noninvertible-symmetry analog of the Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorem. In Section IV it introduces product partition functions of the form Eq. (65) for massless RG flows, distinguishes anomaly-cancellation flows from anomaly-matching flows, defines a domain-wall map D_RG via the folding trick, and claims that anomaly-matching flows can change the chirality of anyons (OECFT). The paper also gives a lattice realization in Appendix B and discusses applications to quantum Hall systems, including nonchiral anyons and the thermal Hall controversy.

Significance. If the central claims were fully established, the paper would provide a useful and testable dictionary: bulk topological degeneracies and domain-wall anyon transport would be read off from conformal dimensions, modular S-matrix entries, and Z_N charges, without any fitted parameters. The paper is commendably concrete in places: it exhibits explicit partition functions for Z_3 and SU(3)_1 examples, gives a lattice construction for the anomaly-matching case in Appendix B, and explicitly states its main assumptions, including the limitation that the RG domain wall is assumed to be constructed by other techniques. However, the two load-bearing steps, modular invariance of Eq. (65) and the reduction of D_RG to charge/parity data, are asserted rather than proven, and key algebraic identifications are imported from the author's earlier works. The current manuscript is therefore best viewed as a promising program with explicit conjectures, not as a completed derivation of the claimed classification.

major comments (4)

[Section IV, Eq. (65)] The paper asserts that Eq. (65) is a modular-invariant (or modular T^2-invariant) partition function and that it 'provides a general classification of the gapless edge modes of topological order' and details the Kong-Zheng proposal. The anomaly-free conditions stated before Eq. (65) control conformal spins and hence T-transformation phases, but modular invariance also requires S-transformation covariance of the summed characters. For the anomaly-matching case J_tot = j \bar j, the characters Xi contain chiral-antichiral pairings, and the S-transformation of the sums is neither computed nor cited. Without a proof or explicit S-matrix, the classification claim is unestablished; this is load-bearing because the OECFT interpretation and the claimed new series of modular invariants rest on this modular invariance.
[Section IV.B, Eqs. (81)-(86)] The domain-wall map D_RG is derived only at the level of Z_N charge and parity. The text immediately after Eq. (81) explicitly states that the construction of the RG domain wall is assumed to be established by more respective techniques and that the analysis concentrates on charge and parity structures. Consequently the matrix D in Eqs. (84) and (86) is left undetermined, and the claim that anomaly-matching flows produce domain walls that change the chirality of anyons is not a derivation from the presented construction. A conformal interface carries reflection/transmission coefficients, fusion multiplicities, and additional defect data that cannot be recovered from the grading Q_J alone. The manuscript should either construct the interface explicitly or clearly label the chirality-change conclusion as conjectural and provide a falsifiable prediction that does not depend on the undetermined coefficients.
[Section III, Eqs. (28)-(34)] The obstruction statement 'noninvertible symmetry is an obstruction to RG flow' is based on Cardy's smeared-boundary-state conjecture and on dropping the smearing parameters tau_alpha with the comment that their contribution is 'not relevant.' No error estimate or quantitative argument is given. Since Eq. (34) is used to argue that certain massive RG flows are forbidden, the claim needs either a controlled approximation or a statement of the conditions under which the tau dependence cancels; otherwise the massive-side classification is conditional on an uncontrolled ansatz.
[Section II, Eqs. (45)-(50); Section IV.B, Eq. (82)] The identification of the SymTFT objects Psi with the Z_N-extended CCFT objects phi is stated as a 'CFT/TQFT correspondence' and imported from refs [12,32] without independent verification. The subsequent bulk semionization step D_RG: Psi_alphaUV -> Psi_alphaIR uses this identification. Because the paper does not reproduce the derivation, the anyon-transport conclusions inherit any unverified assumptions in those references. The manuscript should either prove the identification for the present models or explicitly mark it as an external input and state its precise validity conditions.

minor comments (4)

[Section IV.B, after Eq. (81)] There are several typographical errors: 'pratical' should be 'practical', and 'anonamly' before Eq. (83) should be 'anomaly'; these should be corrected.
[Eqs. (51) and (73)] The notation Z_Q in Eq. (51) is used before the charge sectors are fully explained, and the index p' in Eq. (73) is introduced without a clear definition of its range or relation to the total charge Q.
[Appendix B, Eqs. (B8)-(B10)] The partition functions Z_0, Z_{2/3}, and Z_{1/3} are presented without explaining the normalization or the meaning of the charge indices 0, 1/3, 2/3; a short definition would improve readability.
[References and figures] Reference [139] lacks a title and complete bibliographic data, and the captions of Figs. 7 and 9 contain spelling inconsistencies ('anithiral' in Eq. (87) and in the text around Fig. 9) that should be fixed.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The chirality-changing domain-wall prediction is the charge/parity ansatz restated, and the SymTFT lift is imported from the author's prior work, so the central anyon-transport claim is only partially derived.

self definitional [Section IV.A, Eqs. (74)-(75); Section IV.B, Eqs. (81)-(84)]
"For this purpose, we introduce the new nonchiral simple current as Jtot = jj = JUV J IR. ... Because of the anomaly matching between UV and IR theories, we name the corresponding RG flow anomaly matching flow. ... {ΦαUV ΦαIR ∈ FUV ⊗ FIR}Qtot=0 ⇒ {DRG : ΦαUV → ΦαIR }QUV=QIR ... However, this only implies the condition for the charge and parity, and more detailed data are necessary for pratical calculations. Hence, the following discussion, we assume that the construction of the RG domain wall has been established by more respective techniques ..."

The map DRG is not constructed; it is defined by the same charge condition that defines the partition function. Equation (75) sums pairs with QUV×IR=Q, and Eq. (84) restricts DRG to fields with QJUV(αUV)=QJIR(αIR) (or the opposite-sign condition in Eq. (86)). The chirality-changing pairing is introduced at the outset by choosing Jtot=j\bar j (Eq. (74)), so holomorphic UV characters are paired with the complex-conjugated IR sector. Thus the advertised result—that anomaly-matching massless flows produce domain walls that transport matched-charge anyons and change chirality—is a restatement of the defining ansatz, not a consequence derived from an independently constructed conformal interface.
self citation load bearing [Section II.A, Eqs. (45)-(48); Section IV.B, Eq. (82)]
"The algebraic data of SymTFTS = {Ψ} can be identified as[32] ... By the above observations and taking bulk semion algebra [32] (or by topological holography[24]), one can construct action of DRG to SymTFT because the SymTFT can be interpreted as a subalgebra of the SFC."

The action of DRG on the SymTFT, which underlies the anyon-transport claims, is imported from the author's previous work [32] without proof here. That identification is load-bearing: Eq. (82) uses it to lift the charge/parity map to the symmetry TFT. Since [32] is not independently verified in the present paper and is not machine-checked, this part of the argument rests on a self-citation rather than on an established external result. The partition-function construction itself does not depend on this citation, so the circularity is partial.

full rationale

No data are fitted and no constants are tuned, and Eq. (65) is a genuine modular construction rather than a trivial identity. However, the paper's central advertised prediction—that anomaly-matching massless RG flows produce domain walls that change anyon chirality—is effectively imposed by the defining charge/parity ansatz: the partition function is built by pairing sectors according to QJtot, and D_RG is then defined by the same charge equality. The paper's own limitation statement in Section IV.B concedes that only charge and parity structures are used, so the chirality-changing transport is an interpretation of the ansatz rather than an independent derivation. In addition, the SymTFT-level lift of D_RG relies on the author's earlier work [32] for the bulk semion algebra and the identification of the SymTFT as a subalgebra of the SFC; this is load-bearing self-citation. The formal modular-invariant content, the new BCFT series in Section III, and the lattice realizations in Appendices B-D retain independent content, so the overall circularity is partial rather than total.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The central claims rest on Cardy's smeared boundary state conjecture, the existence of conformal RG domain walls with prescribed charge and parity action, and a chain of simple current and SymTFT identifications imported from the author's previous work. No data are fitted. The paper introduces OECFT, nonchiral anyons, and a domain wall quark as new theoretical objects without external falsifiable evidence.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Cardy's conjecture that massive RG ground states are approximated by smeared Cardy states
Invoked throughout Section III, especially in Eqs. (27)-(34), to convert ordering in a gapped phase into boundary condensation. If not true, the obstruction statement Eq. (34) has no basis.
domain assumption Conformal RG domain walls realizing massless flows exist and act on fields through Z_N charge and parity
Stated in Section IV.B after Eq. (81): 'we assume that the construction of the RG domain wall has been established by more respective techniques...'. The domain wall map D_RG and all anyon transport conclusions depend on this.
domain assumption SymTFT and simple current extension identifications from the author's previous work
Eqs. (45)-(48) define Psi as SymTFT data via formulas from refs [12,32] without proof in this paper; the fusion rules for the extended theory inherit these identifications.
domain assumption Anomaly-free simple current conditions suffice for modular invariance of Eq. (65)
The paper states conditions on conformal spins and then writes modular partition functions, but does not provide a proof of S and T covariance for the generalized Jtot = JUV conjugate(JIR) case.

invented entities (3)

One-edge CFT (OECFT)
purpose: Describe edge theories of FQHE states with nonchiral anyons by pairing holomorphic and antiholomorphic fields of two CFTs.
Proposed as a new class of edge CFT in Section IV.A. No quantitative prediction such as a specific thermal Hall value or topological spin is given.
Domain wall quark
purpose: Restore Z_N charge conservation at charged domain walls through anomaly inflow.
Introduced in Section IV.B near Eq. (88) as an analog of quark confinement; no independent observable signature is specified.
Nonchiral anyons phi_alphaUV conjugate(phi_alphaIR)
purpose: Describe anyons in OECFT that mix left and right movers, relevant to anti-Pfaffian and high Landau level states.
Presented as the mechanism for chirality-changing domain walls, but no braiding or fusion data beyond charge and parity are computed.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gauging or extending bulk and boundary conformal field theories: Application to bulk and domain wall problem in topological matter and their descriptions by (mock) modular covariant." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QNBDQXLN

@misc{pith2026241219577,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gauging or extending bulk and boundary conformal field theories: Application to bulk and domain wall problem in topological matter and their descriptions by (mock) modular covariant},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QNBDQXLN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19577}
}

abstract

We study gauging operations (or group extensions) in (smeared) boundary conformal field theories (BCFTs) and bulk conformal field theories, and their applications to various phenomena in topologically ordered systems. We apply the resultant theories to the correspondence between the renormalization group (RG) flow of CFTs and the classification of topological quantum field theories in the testable information of general classes of partition functions. One can obtain the bulk topological properties of $2+1$ dimensional topological ordered phase corresponding to the massive RG flow of $1+1$ dimensional systems, or smeared BCFT. We present an obstruction of mass condensation for smeared BCFT analogous to the Lieb-Shultz-Mattis theorem for noninvertible symmetry. Related to the bulk topological degeneracies in $2+1$ dimensions and quantum phases in $1+1$ dimensions, we construct a new series of BCFT. We also investigate the implications of the massless RG flow of $1+1$ dimensional CFT to $2+1$ dimensional topological order, which corresponds to the earlier proposal by L. Kong and H. Zheng in [Nucl. Phys. B 966 (2021), 115384], arXiv:1912.01760, closely related to the integer-spin simple current by Schellekens and Gato-Rivera. We study the properties of the product of two CFTs connected by the two kinds of massless flows. The (mock) modular covariants appearing in the analysis seem to contain new ones. By applying the folding trick to the coupled model, we provide a general method to solve the gapped and charged domain wall. One can obtain the general phenomenology of the transportation of anyons through the domain wall. Our work gives a unified direction for the future theoretical and numerical studies of the topological phase based on the established data of classifications of conformal field theories or modular invariants.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.19577 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Folding trick applied to coupled models. By apply [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Mass-condensation or ordering in BCFT and RG. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (8 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The connection between symmetry and defect under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Existence of a disordered state and its implication [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Existence of disordered phase and its implication in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. OECFT constructed from the product of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Multiple domain walls and the consequence of shrink [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Picture of the respective interface. After the fold [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. Respective benefit of the bosonic representations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11. The construction of nonchiral gauging is imple [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Characterizing gapped phases by smeared boundary conformal field theories: Duality in unusual ordering with spontaneously broken generalized symmetries
hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

Gapped phases dual to massless RG flows in 2D CFTs exhibit unusual ordering via spontaneous breaking of non-group-like symmetries and are characterized using smeared boundary CFTs applied to smeared Ishibashi states.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Gauging anomalous symmetry at one edge conformal field theories In this subsection, we note the result for the gauging of anomalous symmetry in the bulk OECFT. The method is the same as in the existing works[12, 73, 340–342], so we only note the results, ZQ = X QJtot (itot,p)=Q Ξitot,p  X ptot Ξitot,ptot   , (A12) where we have used the same notation ...
[2]

F. A. Bais and J. K. Slingerland,Condensate induced transitions between topologically ordered phases,Phys. Rev. B79 (2009) 045316, arXiv:0808.0627 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

arXiv 2009
[3]

Kong,Anyon condensation and tensor categories, Nucl

L. Kong,Anyon condensation and tensor categories, Nucl. Phys. B886 (2014) 436–482, arXiv:1307.8244 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2014
[4]

Burnell,Anyon condensation and its applications, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics9 (Mar., 23

F. Burnell,Anyon condensation and its applications, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics9 (Mar., 23
[5]

S. H. Simon,Topological Quantum. Oxford University Press, 9, 2023

2023
[6]

Kong and Z.-H

L. Kong and Z.-H. Zhang,An invitation to topological orders and category theory, arXiv:2205.05565 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[7]

Kawahigashi,Two-dimensional topological order and operator algebras,Int

Y. Kawahigashi,Two-dimensional topological order and operator algebras,Int. J. Mod. Phys. B35 (2021) 2130003, arXiv:2102.10953 [math-ph]

arXiv 2021
[8]

D. E. Evans and Y. Kawahigashi,Subfactors and mathematical physics,Bull. Am. Math. Soc.60 (2023) 459–482, arXiv:2303.04459 [math-ph]

arXiv 2023

Show all 300 references

[9]

Cappelli, C

A. Cappelli, C. Itzykson, and J. B. Zuber,The ADE Classification of Minimal andA1 (1) Conformal Invariant Theories,Commun. Math. Phys.113 (1987) 1

1987
[10]

Cappelli and J.-B

A. Cappelli and J.-B. Zuber,A-D-E Classification of Conformal Field Theories,Scholarpedia5 (2010) 10314, arXiv:0911.3242 [hep-th]

2010 arXiv
[11]

Fuchs,Affine Lie algebras and quantum groups: An Introduction, with applications in conformal field theory

J. Fuchs,Affine Lie algebras and quantum groups: An Introduction, with applications in conformal field theory. Cambridge University Press, 3, 1995

1995
[12]

Kaidi, Z

J. Kaidi, Z. Komargodski, K. Ohmori, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao,Higher central charges and topological boundaries in 2+1-dimensional TQFTs, arXiv:2107.13091 [hep-th]

arXiv
[13]

Fukusumi,Composing parafermions: a construction of ZN fractional quantum Hall systems and a modern understanding of confinement and duality, arXiv:2212.12999 [cond-mat.str-el]

Y. Fukusumi,Composing parafermions: a construction of ZN fractional quantum Hall systems and a modern understanding of confinement and duality, arXiv:2212.12999 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[14]

Kikuchi, K.-S

K. Kikuchi, K.-S. Kam, and F.-H. Huang,Anyon condensation in mixed-state topological order, arXiv:2406.14320 [hep-th]
[15]

Y. Fukusumi,Edge modes of topologically ordered systems as emergent integrable flows: Robustness of algebraic structures in nonlinear quantum fluid dynamics, arXiv:2408.04451 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[16]

Kikuchi,Rational RG flow, extension, and Witt class, arXiv:2412.08935 [hep-th]

K. Kikuchi,Rational RG flow, extension, and Witt class, arXiv:2412.08935 [hep-th]
[17]

Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial, Commun

E. Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial, Commun. Math. Phys.121 (1989) 351–399

1989
[18]

Moore and N

G. Moore and N. Read,Nonabelions in the fractional quantum hall effect,Nuclear Physics B360 (Aug.,
[19]

Fuchs, I

J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert,TFT construction of RCFT correlators 1. Partition functions, Nucl. Phys. B646 (2002) 353–497, arXiv:hep-th/0204148

2002 arXiv
[20]

Kong and H

L. Kong and H. Zheng,Gapless edges of 2d topological orders and enriched monoidal categories,Nucl. Phys. B 927 (2018) 140–165, arXiv:1705.01087 [cond-mat.str-el]

2018 arXiv
[21]

Kong and H

L. Kong and H. Zheng,A mathematical theory of gapless edges of 2d topological orders. Part I,JHEP 02 (2020) 150, arXiv:1905.04924 [cond-mat.str-el]

2020 arXiv
[22]

Kong and H

L. Kong and H. Zheng,A mathematical theory of gapless edges of 2d topological orders. Part II,Nucl. Phys. B966 (2021) 115384, arXiv:1912.01760 [cond-mat.str-el]

2021 arXiv
[23]

Ji and X.-G

W. Ji and X.-G. Wen,Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions,Phys. Rev. Res.2 (2020) 033417, arXiv:1912.13492 [cond-mat.str-el]

2020 arXiv
[24]

We thank Liang Kong for notifying us a lot references and their status in the fields
[25]

Moradi, S

H. Moradi, S. F. Moosavian, and A. Tiwari, Topological holography: Towards a unification of Landau and beyond-Landau physics,SciPost Phys. Core6 (2023) 066, arXiv:2207.10712 [cond-mat.str-el]

2023 arXiv
[26]

Husain and S

V. Husain and S. Jaimungal,Topological holography, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 061501, arXiv:hep-th/9812162

1999 arXiv
[27]

Kong, X.-G

L. Kong, X.-G. Wen, and H. Zheng,Boundary-bulk relation for topological orders as the functor mapping higher categories to their centers,2015. https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01690

2015 arXiv
[28]

Kong, X.-G

L. Kong, X.-G. Wen, and H. Zheng,Boundary-bulk relation in topological orders,Nucl. Phys. B922 (2017) 62–76, arXiv:1702.00673 [cond-mat.str-el]

2017 arXiv
[29]

Bhardwaj, L

L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki,The Club Sandwich: Gapless Phases and Phase Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries, arXiv:2312.17322 [hep-th]

arXiv
[30]

Huang and M

S.-J. Huang and M. Cheng,Topological holography, quantum criticality, and boundary states, arXiv:2310.16878 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[31]

R. Wen, W. Ye, and A. C. Potter,Topological holography for fermions, arXiv:2404.19004 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[32]

Bhardwaj, L

L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari,Illustrating the Categorical Landau Paradigm in Lattice Models, arXiv:2405.05302 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[33]

Y. Fukusumi,Fusion rule in conformal field theories and topological orders: A unified view of correspondence and (fractional) supersymmetry and their relation to topological holography, arXiv:2405.05178 [hep-th]
[34]

Bhardwaj, K

L. Bhardwaj, K. Inamura, and A. Tiwari,Fermionic Non-Invertible Symmetries in (1+1)d: Gapped and Gapless Phases, Transitions, and Symmetry TFTs, arXiv:2405.09754 [hep-th]

arXiv
[35]

Huang,Fermionic quantum criticality through the lens of topological holography, arXiv:2405.09611 [cond-mat.str-el]

S.-J. Huang,Fermionic quantum criticality through the lens of topological holography, arXiv:2405.09611 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[36]

Vanhove, V

R. Vanhove, V. Ravindran, D. T. Stephen, X.-G. Wen, and X. Chen,Duality via Sequential Quantum Circuit in the Topological Holography Formalism, arXiv:2409.06647 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[37]

Lan,Tube Category, Tensor Renormalization and Topological Holography, arXiv:2412.07198 [math-ph]

T. Lan,Tube Category, Tensor Renormalization and Topological Holography, arXiv:2412.07198 [math-ph]

arXiv
[38]

D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, Two-dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit,Phys. Rev. Lett.48 (May, 1982) 1559–1562

1982
[39]

A. N. Schellekens,Fusion rule automorphisms from integer spin simple currents,Phys. Lett. B244 (1990) 255–260

1990
[40]

Gato-Rivera and A

B. Gato-Rivera and A. N. Schellekens,Complete classification of simple current modular invariants for (Z(p))**k, Commun. Math. Phys.145 (1992) 85–122

1992
[41]

Gato-Rivera and A

B. Gato-Rivera and A. N. Schellekens,Classification of simple current invariants,in Joint International Lepton Photon Symposium at High Energies (15th) and European Physical Society Conference on High-energy Physics. 9, 1991. arXiv:hep-th/9109035. 24

1991 arXiv
[42]

Kreuzer and A

M. Kreuzer and A. N. Schellekens,Simple currents versus orbifolds with discrete torsion: A Complete classification, Nucl. Phys. B411 (1994) 97–121, arXiv:hep-th/9306145

1994 arXiv
[43]

Fuchs, B

J. Fuchs, B. Schellekens, and C. Schweigert,Fixed Point Resolution in Conformal Field Theory,in 21st International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics. 12, 1996. arXiv:hep-th/9612093

1996 arXiv
[44]

Fuchs, A

J. Fuchs, A. N. Schellekens, and C. Schweigert,A Matrix S for All Simple Current Extensions,Nucl. Phys. B473 (1996) 323–366, arXiv:hep-th/9601078

1996 arXiv
[45]

Milovanovic and N

M. Milovanovic and N. Read,Edge excitations of paired fractional quantum Hall states,Phys. Rev. B53 (1996) 13559, arXiv:cond-mat/9602113

1996 arXiv
[46]

Cappelli and G

A. Cappelli and G. R. Zemba,Modular invariant partition functions in the quantum Hall effect,Nucl. Phys. B490 (1997) 595–632, arXiv:hep-th/9605127

1997 arXiv
[47]

Ino,Modular invariants in the fractional quantum Hall effect,Nucl

K. Ino,Modular invariants in the fractional quantum Hall effect,Nucl. Phys. B532 (1998) 783–806, arXiv:cond-mat/9804198

1998 arXiv
[48]

Ino,Supersymmetry and D wave superconductivity, arXiv:cond-mat/0011101

K. Ino,Supersymmetry and D wave superconductivity, arXiv:cond-mat/0011101

arXiv
[49]

Ino,Field theory of spin singlet quantum Hall states, Phys

K. Ino,Field theory of spin singlet quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. Lett.86 (2001) 882–885, arXiv:cond-mat/0008228

2001 arXiv
[50]

Cappelli, L

A. Cappelli, L. S. Georgiev, and I. T. Todorov,A Unified conformal field theory description of paired quantum Hall states,Commun. Math. Phys.205 (1999) 657–689, arXiv:hep-th/9810105

1999 arXiv
[51]

Frohlich, B

J. Frohlich, B. Pedrini, C. Schweigert, and J. Walcher, Universality in quantum Hall systems: Coset construction of incompressible states,J. Stat. Phys. 103 (2001) 527–567, arXiv:cond-mat/0002330

2001 arXiv
[52]

Lu, X.-G

Y.-M. Lu, X.-G. Wen, Z. Wang, and Z. Wang, Non-abelian quantum hall states and their quasiparticles: From the pattern of zeros to vertex algebra, Physical Review B81 (Mar., 2010)

2010
[53]

Cappelli and G

A. Cappelli and G. Viola,Partition Functions of Non-Abelian Quantum Hall States,J. Phys. A44 (2011) 075401, arXiv:1007.1732 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

2011 arXiv
[54]

Cappelli and E

A. Cappelli and E. Randellini,Partition Functions and Stability Criteria of Topological Insulators,JHEP 12 (2013) 101, arXiv:1309.2155 [cond-mat.str-el]

2013 arXiv
[55]

Schoutens and X.-G

K. Schoutens and X.-G. Wen,Simple-current algebra constructions of 2+1-dimensional topological orders, Phys. Rev. B93 (2016) 045109, arXiv:1508.01111 [cond-mat.str-el]

2016 arXiv
[56]

Yang, Z.-X

B. Yang, Z.-X. Hu, Z. Papić, and F. D. M. Haldane, Model wave functions for the collective modes and the magnetoroton theory of the fractional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.108 (Jun, 2012) 256807

2012
[57]

Yang,Analytic wave functions for neutral bulk excitations in fractional quantum hall fluids,Physical Review B87 (June, 2013)

B. Yang,Analytic wave functions for neutral bulk excitations in fractional quantum hall fluids,Physical Review B87 (June, 2013)

2013
[58]

Sagi and R

E. Sagi and R. A. Santos,Supersymmetry in the Fractional Quantum Hall Regime,Phys. Rev. B95 (2017) 205144, arXiv:1610.07627 [cond-mat.str-el]

2017 arXiv
[59]

Gromov, E

A. Gromov, E. J. Martinec, and S. Ryu,Collective excitations at filling factor 5/2: The view from superspace, Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020) 077601, arXiv:1909.06384 [cond-mat.str-el]

2020 arXiv
[60]

Bae and S

J.-B. Bae and S. Lee,Emergent supersymmetry on the edges, SciPost Phys.11 (2021) 091, arXiv:2105.02148 [hep-th]

2021 arXiv
[61]

K. K. W. Ma, R. Wang, and K. Yang,Realization of supersymmetry and its spontaneous breaking in quantum Hall edges,Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 206801, arXiv:2101.05448 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

2021 arXiv
[62]

Fukusumi and B

Y. Fukusumi and B. Yang,Fermionic fractional quantum Hall states: A modern approach to systems with bulk-edge correspondence,Phys. Rev. B108 (2023) 085123, arXiv:2212.12993 [cond-mat.str-el]

2023 arXiv
[63]

S. Pu, A. C. Balram, M. Fremling, A. Gromov, and Z. Papić,Signatures of supersymmetry in theν = 5/2 fractional quantum hall effect,Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (Apr, 2023) 176501

2023
[64]

D. X. Nguyen, K. Prabhu, A. C. Balram, and A. Gromov,Supergravity model of the Haldane-Rezayi fractional quantum Hall state, arXiv:2212.00686 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[65]

T. Lan, L. Kong, and X.-G. Wen,Theory of (2 + 1)-dimensional fermionic topological orders and fermionic/bosonic topological orders with symmetries, Physical Review B94 (Oct, 2016)

2016
[66]

T. Lan, L. Kong, and X.-G. Wen,Modular extensions of unitary braided fusion categories and 2+1d topological/spt orders with symmetries, Communications in Mathematical Physics351 (2016) 709 – 739

2016
[67]

Ji, S.-H

W. Ji, S.-H. Shao, and X.-G. Wen,Topological Transition on the Conformal Manifold,Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 033317, arXiv:1909.01425 [cond-mat.str-el]

2020 arXiv
[68]

P. H. Ginsparg,APPLIED CONFORMAL FIELD THEORY, in Les Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics: Fields, Strings, Critical Phenomena. 9, 1988. arXiv:hep-th/9108028

1988 arXiv
[69]

Kitaev,Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Annals Phys.321 (2006) 2–111, arXiv:cond-mat/0506438

A. Kitaev,Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Annals Phys.321 (2006) 2–111, arXiv:cond-mat/0506438

2006 arXiv
[70]

Nayak and F

C. Nayak and F. Wilczek,2n-quasihole states realize 2n − 1-dimensional spinor braiding statistics in paired quantum hall states,Nuclear Physics B479 (Nov.,
[71]

Ardonne and G

E. Ardonne and G. Sierra,Chiral correlators of the Ising conformal field theory,J. Phys. A43 (2010) 505402, arXiv:1008.2863 [cond-mat.str-el]

2010 arXiv
[72]

Aasen, E

D. Aasen, E. Lake, and K. Walker,Fermion condensation and super pivotal categories,J. Math. Phys. 60 (2019) 121901, arXiv:1709.01941 [cond-mat.str-el]

2019 arXiv
[73]

Chen, C.-M

W.-Q. Chen, C.-M. Jian, L. Kong, Y.-Z. You, and H. Zheng,Topological phase transition on the edge of two-dimensional topological order,Physical Review B 102 (July, 2020)

2020
[74]

Fukusumi,Gaplessness protected by bulk-edge correspondence, arXiv:2212.12996 [cond-mat.str-el]

Y. Fukusumi,Gaplessness protected by bulk-edge correspondence, arXiv:2212.12996 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[75]

Fukusumi, G

Y. Fukusumi, G. Ji, and B. Yang,Operator-state correspondence in simple current extended conformal field theories: Toward a general understanding of chiral conformal field theories and topological orders, arXiv:2311.15621 [hep-th]

arXiv
[76]

Gaiotto and A

D. Gaiotto and A. Kapustin,Spin TQFTs and fermionic phases of matter,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A31 (2016) 1645044, arXiv:1505.05856 [cond-mat.str-el]

2016 arXiv
[77]

Bhardwaj, D

L. Bhardwaj, D. Gaiotto, and A. Kapustin,State sum constructions of spin-TFTs and string net constructions of fermionic phases of matter,JHEP 04 (2017) 096, arXiv:1605.01640 [cond-mat.str-el]. 25

2017 arXiv
[78]

Tachikawa,On gauging finite subgroups,SciPost Phys

Y. Tachikawa,On gauging finite subgroups,SciPost Phys. 8 (2020) 015, arXiv:1712.09542 [hep-th]

2020 arXiv
[79]

Bhardwaj and Y

L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa,On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions,JHEP 03 (2018) 189, arXiv:1704.02330 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[80]

Kobayashi,Pin TQFT and Grassmann integral, JHEP 12 (2019) 014, arXiv:1905.05902 [cond-mat.str-el]

R. Kobayashi,Pin TQFT and Grassmann integral, JHEP 12 (2019) 014, arXiv:1905.05902 [cond-mat.str-el]

2019 arXiv
[81]

Inamura,Fermionization of fusion category symmetries in 1+1 dimensions, arXiv:2206.13159 [cond-mat.str-el]

K. Inamura,Fermionization of fusion category symmetries in 1+1 dimensions, arXiv:2206.13159 [cond-mat.str-el]
[82]

Debray, W

A. Debray, W. Ye, and M. Yu,Bosonization and Anomaly Indicators of (2+1)-D Fermionic Topological Orders, arXiv:2312.13341 [math-ph]

arXiv
[83]

Zhou and Z.-C

J.-R. Zhou and Z.-C. Gu,Exactly solvable models for fermionic symmetry-enriched topological phases and fermionic ’t Hooft anomaly, arXiv:2410.19126 [cond-mat.str-el]
[84]

Seiberg and S.-H

N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao,Majorana chain and Ising model – (non-invertible) translations, anomalies, and emanant symmetries, arXiv:2307.02534 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[85]

Cardy,Bulk Renormalization Group Flows and Boundary States in Conformal Field Theories,SciPost Phys

J. Cardy,Bulk Renormalization Group Flows and Boundary States in Conformal Field Theories,SciPost Phys. 3 (2017) 011, arXiv:1706.01568 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[86]

Li and F

H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane,Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-abelian fractional quantum hall effect states,Physical Review Letters101 (Jul, 2008)

2008
[87]

X.-L. Qi, H. Katsura, and A. W. W. Ludwig,General relationship between the entanglement spectrum and the edge state spectrum of topological quantum states, Physical Review Letters108 (May, 2012)

2012
[88]

Lencses, J

M. Lencses, J. Viti, and G. Takacs,Chiral entanglement in massive quantum field theories in 1+1 dimensions, JHEP 01 (2019) 177, arXiv:1811.06500 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[89]

Das and S

D. Das and S. Datta,Universal features of left-right entanglement entropy,Phys. Rev. Lett.115 (2015) 131602, arXiv:1504.02475 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[90]

J. Lou, C. Shen, and L.-Y. Hung,Ishibashi states, topological orders with boundaries and topological entanglement entropy. Part I,JHEP 04 (2019) 017, arXiv:1901.08238 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[91]

Bischoff and C

M. Bischoff and C. Jones,Computing fusion rules for spherical G-extensions of fusion categories,Selecta Math. 28 (2022) 26, arXiv:1909.02816 [math.QA]

2022 arXiv
[92]

Davydov and D

A. Davydov and D. Nikshych,Braided picard groups and graded extensions of braided tensor categories,
[93]

Kawahigashi,A remark on gapped domain walls between topological phases,Lett

Y. Kawahigashi,A remark on gapped domain walls between topological phases,Lett. Math. Phys.105 (2015) 893–899, arXiv:1504.01088 [cond-mat.str-el]

2015 arXiv
[94]

Nishioka, Y

T. Nishioka, Y. Okuyama, and S. Shimamori,Method of images in defect conformal field theories,Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) L081701, arXiv:2205.05370 [hep-th]

2022 arXiv
[95]

Moller and B

S. Moller and B. C. Rayhaun,Equivalence Relations on Vertex Operator Algebras, II: Witt Equivalence and Orbifolds, arXiv:2410.18166 [hep-th]

arXiv
[96]

Moller and B

S. Moller and B. C. Rayhaun,Equivalence Relations on Vertex Operator Algebras, I: Genus, arXiv:2408.07117 [hep-th]

arXiv
[97]

Saleur and M

H. Saleur and M. Bauer,On Some Relations Between Local Height Probabilities and Conformal Invariance, Nucl. Phys. B320 (1989) 591–624

1989
[98]

E. Date, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, and M. Okado, Automorphic properties of local height probabilities for integrable solid-on-solid models,Phys. Rev. B35 (1987) 2105–2107

1987
[99]

A. B. Zamolodchikov,Renormalization Group and Perturbation Theory Near Fixed Points in Two-Dimensional Field Theory,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.46 (1987) 1090

1987
[100]

Foda,Off-critical local height probabilities on a plane and critical partition functions on a cylinder, arXiv:1711.03337 [hep-th]

O. Foda,Off-critical local height probabilities on a plane and critical partition functions on a cylinder, arXiv:1711.03337 [hep-th]

arXiv
[101]

A. B. Zamolodchikov,Integrable field theory from conformal field theory,Adv. Stud. Pure Math.19 (1989) 641–674

1989
[102]

A. B. Zamolodchikov,Higher Order Integrals of Motion in Two-Dimensional Models of the Field Theory with a Broken Conformal Symmetry,JETP Lett.46 (1987) 160–164

1987
[103]

Brunner and D

I. Brunner and D. Roggenkamp,Defects and bulk perturbations of boundary Landau-Ginzburg orbifolds, JHEP 04 (2008) 001, arXiv:0712.0188 [hep-th]

2008 arXiv
[104]

Crnkovic, R

C. Crnkovic, R. Paunov, G. M. Sotkov, and M. Stanishkov,Fusions of Conformal Models,Nucl. Phys. B336 (1990) 637–690

1990
[105]

Ravanini,Thermodynamic Bethe ansatz for G(k) x G(l) / G(k+l) coset models perturbed by their phi(1,1,Adj) operator,Phys

F. Ravanini,Thermodynamic Bethe ansatz for G(k) x G(l) / G(k+l) coset models perturbed by their phi(1,1,Adj) operator,Phys. Lett. B282 (1992) 73–79, arXiv:hep-th/9202020

1992 arXiv
[106]

Gaiotto,Domain Walls for Two-Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows,JHEP 12 (2012) 103, arXiv:1201.0767 [hep-th]

D. Gaiotto,Domain Walls for Two-Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows,JHEP 12 (2012) 103, arXiv:1201.0767 [hep-th]

2012 arXiv
[107]

Dorey and F

P. Dorey and F. Ravanini,Generalizing the staircase models, Nucl. Phys. B406 (1993) 708–726, arXiv:hep-th/9211115

1993 arXiv
[108]

Ravanini, R

F. Ravanini, R. Tateo, and A. Valleriani,A New family of diagonal A-D-E related scattering theories,Phys. Lett. B293 (1992) 361–366, arXiv:hep-th/9207069

1992 arXiv
[109]

Tateo,The Sine-Gordon model as SO(n)-1 x SO(n)-1 / SO(n)-2 perturbed coset theory and generalizations, Int

R. Tateo,The Sine-Gordon model as SO(n)-1 x SO(n)-1 / SO(n)-2 perturbed coset theory and generalizations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A10 (1995) 1357–1376, arXiv:hep-th/9405197

1995 arXiv
[110]

P. E. Dorey and F. Ravanini,Staircase models from affine Toda field theory,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A8 (1993) 873–894, arXiv:hep-th/9206052

1993 arXiv
[111]

Dorey, C

P. Dorey, C. Dunning, and R. Tateo,New families of flows between two-dimensional conformal field theories, Nucl. Phys. B578 (2000) 699–727, arXiv:hep-th/0001185

2000 arXiv
[112]

Dorey, R

P. Dorey, R. Tateo, and K. E. Thompson,Massive and massless phases in selfdual Z(N) spin models: Some exact results from the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz, Nucl. Phys. B470 (1996) 317–368, arXiv:hep-th/9601123

1996 arXiv
[113]

Georgiou and K

G. Georgiou and K. Sfetsos,Integrable flows between exact CFTs,JHEP 11 (2017) 078, arXiv:1707.05149 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[114]

Sfetsos and K

K. Sfetsos and K. Siampos,Integrable deformations of the Gk1 × Gk2 /Gk1+k2 coset CFTs,Nucl. Phys. B927 (2018) 124–139, arXiv:1710.02515 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[115]

T. Lan, J. C. Wang, and X.-G. Wen,Gapped Domain Walls, Gapped Boundaries and Topological Degeneracy, Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (2015) 076402, arXiv:1408.6514 [cond-mat.str-el]

2015 arXiv
[116]

Lan and X.-G

T. Lan and X.-G. Wen,Topological quasiparticles and the holographic bulk-edge relation in (2+1) 26 -dimensional string-net models,Phys. Rev. B90 (2014) 115119, arXiv:1311.1784 [cond-mat.str-el]

2014 arXiv
[117]

Y. Zhao, H. Wang, Y. Hu, and Y. Wan,Symmetry fractionalized (irrationalized) fusion rules and two domain-wall Verlinde formulae,JHEP 04 (2024) 115, arXiv:2304.08475 [cond-mat.str-el]

2024 arXiv
[118]

Huston, F

P. Huston, F. Burnell, C. Jones, and D. Penneys, Composing topological domain walls and anyon mobility, SciPost Phys.15 (2023) 076, arXiv:2208.14018 [cond-mat.str-el]

2023 arXiv
[119]

C. V. Cogburn, A. L. Fitzpatrick, and H. Geng,CFT and lattice correlators near an RG domain wall between minimal models,SciPost Phys. Core7 (2024) 021, arXiv:2308.00737 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[120]

Wong and I

E. Wong and I. Affleck,Tunneling in quantum wires: A Boundary conformal field theory approach,Nucl. Phys. B 417 (1994) 403–438, arXiv:cond-mat/9311040

1994 arXiv
[121]

Brunner and C

I. Brunner and C. Schmidt-Colinet,Reflection and transmission of conformal perturbation defects,J. Phys. A49 (2016) 195401, arXiv:1508.04350 [hep-th]

2016 arXiv
[122]

Quella, I

T. Quella, I. Runkel, and G. M. T. Watts,Reflection and transmission for conformal defects,JHEP 04 (2007) 095, arXiv:hep-th/0611296

2007 arXiv
[123]

Stanishkov,RG domain wall for the generalcsu(2) coset models,JHEP 08 (2016) 096, arXiv:1606.03605 [hep-th]

M. Stanishkov,RG domain wall for the generalcsu(2) coset models,JHEP 08 (2016) 096, arXiv:1606.03605 [hep-th]

2016 arXiv
[124]

Kimura and M

T. Kimura and M. Murata,Transport Process in Multi-Junctions of Quantum Systems,JHEP 07 (2015) 072, arXiv:1505.05275 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[125]

Klos and D

F. Klos and D. Roggenkamp,Realizing IR theories by projections in the UV,JHEP 01 (2020) 097, arXiv:1907.12339 [hep-th]

2020 arXiv
[126]

Stanishkov,Second order RG flow in generalbsu(2) coset models,JHEP 09 (2016) 040, arXiv:1606.04328 [hep-th]

M. Stanishkov,Second order RG flow in generalbsu(2) coset models,JHEP 09 (2016) 040, arXiv:1606.04328 [hep-th]

2016 arXiv
[127]

Poghosyan and R

H. Poghosyan and R. Poghossian,RG flow between W3 minimal models by perturbation and domain wall approaches, JHEP 08 (2022) 307, arXiv:2205.05091 [hep-th]

2022 arXiv
[128]

Klos,Embedding topological quantum field theories functorially in the UV.PhD thesis, Heidelberg U., 2021

F. Klos,Embedding topological quantum field theories functorially in the UV.PhD thesis, Heidelberg U., 2021

2021
[129]

R. B. Zeev, B. Ergun, E. Milan, and S. S. Razamat, Categorical structure of the set of all CFTs,Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 025019, arXiv:2212.11022 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[130]

Poghosyan and R

H. Poghosyan and R. Poghossian,RG flows between W3 minimal models,PoS Regio2021 (2022) 039

2022
[131]

Konechny,RG boundaries and Cardy’s variational ansatz for multiple perturbations,JHEP 11 (2023) 004, arXiv:2306.13719 [hep-th]

A. Konechny,RG boundaries and Cardy’s variational ansatz for multiple perturbations,JHEP 11 (2023) 004, arXiv:2306.13719 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[132]

Fukusumi,Protected edge modes based on the bulk and boundary renormalization group: A relationship between duality and generalized symmetry, arXiv:2312.12887 [hep-th]

Y. Fukusumi,Protected edge modes based on the bulk and boundary renormalization group: A relationship between duality and generalized symmetry, arXiv:2312.12887 [hep-th]

arXiv
[133]

Kikuchi,RG flows from WZW models, arXiv:2212.13851 [hep-th]

K. Kikuchi,RG flows from WZW models, arXiv:2212.13851 [hep-th]

arXiv
[134]

Poghosyan and H

A. Poghosyan and H. Poghosyan,A note on RG domain wall between successiveA(p) 2 minimal models, JHEP 08 (2023) 072, arXiv:2305.05997 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[135]

D. F. Mross, Y. Oreg, A. Stern, G. Margalit, and M. Heiblum,Theory of disorder-induced half-integer thermal hall conductance,Physical Review Letters121 (Jul, 2018)

2018
[136]

Benedetti, H

V. Benedetti, H. Casini, and J. M. Magan,Selection rules for RG flows of minimal models, arXiv:2412.16587 [hep-th]

arXiv
[137]

Fuchs,Lectures on conformal field theory and Kac-Moody algebras,Lect

J. Fuchs,Lectures on conformal field theory and Kac-Moody algebras,Lect. Notes Phys.498 (1997) 1, arXiv:hep-th/9702194

1997 arXiv
[138]

C. Wang, A. Vishwanath, and B. I. Halperin, Topological order from disorder and the quantized hall thermal metal: Possible applications to theν=5/2 state, Physical Review B(2017)

2017
[139]

Fuji and P

Y. Fuji and P. LecheminantPhysical Review B95 (Mar, 2017)

2017
[140]

Schweigert, J

C. Schweigert, J. Fuchs, and J. Walcher,Conformal field theory, boundary conditions and applications to string theory,in Eotvos Summer School in Physics: Nonperturbative QFT Methods and Their Applications, pp. 37–93. 11, 2000. arXiv:hep-th/0011109

2000 arXiv
[141]

Sohal, B

R. Sohal, B. Han, L. H. Santos, and J. C. Y. Teo, Entanglement entropy of generalized moore-read fractional quantum hall state interfaces,Physical Review B102 (July, 2020)

2020
[142]

O. M. Sule, X. Chen, and S. Ryu,Symmetry-protected topological phases and orbifolds: Generalized Laughlin’s argument,Phys. Rev. B88 (2013) 075125, arXiv:1305.0700 [cond-mat.str-el]

2013 arXiv
[143]

B. I. Halperin,Theory of the quantized Hall conductance, Helv. Phys. Acta56 (1983) 75–102

1983
[144]

We thank Tokiro Numasawa for sharing his notes with us

We also note the simplest cases for theSU (2) models have been studied by Tokiro Numasawa, in his unpublished notes. We thank Tokiro Numasawa for sharing his notes with us
[145]

Goddard and D

P. Goddard and D. I. Olive,Kac-Moody Algebras, Conformal Symmetry and Critical Exponents,Nucl. Phys. B257 (1985) 226–252

1985
[146]

Hansson, M

T. Hansson, M. Hermanns, S. Simon, and S. Viefers, Quantum hall physics: Hierarchies and conformal field theory techniques,Reviews of Modern Physics89 (May, 2017)

2017
[147]

Goddard, A

P. Goddard, A. Kent, and D. I. Olive,Unitary Representations of the Virasoro and Supervirasoro Algebras, Commun. Math. Phys.103 (1986) 105–119

1986
[148]

Goddard, A

P. Goddard, A. Kent, and D. I. Olive,Virasoro Algebras and Coset Space Models,Phys. Lett. B152 (1985) 88–92

1985
[149]

Estienne, Z

B. Estienne, Z. Papić, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Matrix product states for trial quantum hall states, Physical Review B87 (Apr., 2013)

2013
[150]

M. P. Zaletel and R. S. K. Mong,Exact matrix product states for quantum hall wave functions, Physical Review B86 (Dec., 2012)

2012
[151]

Y.-L. Wu, B. Estienne, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Matrix product state representation of non-abelian quasiholes,Physical Review B92 (July,
[152]

Estienne, N

B. Estienne, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Fractional quantum hall matrix product states for interacting conformal field theories,2013. https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.2936

2013 arXiv
[153]

Chen, H.-C

L. Chen, H.-C. Zhang, K.-X. Ji, C. Shen, R.-s. Wang, X.-d. Zeng, and L.-Y. Hung,Exact Holographic Tensor Networks – Constructing CFTD from TQFTD+1, arXiv:2210.12127 [hep-th]

arXiv
[154]

Vanhove, M

R. Vanhove, M. Bal, D. J. Williamson, N. Bultinck, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete,Mapping topological 27 to conformal field theories through strange correlators, Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018) 177203, arXiv:1801.05959 [quant-ph]

2018 arXiv
[155]

J. L. Cardy,Boundary conformal field theory, arXiv:hep-th/0411189

arXiv
[156]

A. Ueda, K. Inamura, and K. Ohmori,Chiral Edge States Emerging on Anyon-Net, arXiv:2408.02724 [cond-mat.str-el]
[157]

Recknagel and V

A. Recknagel and V. Schomerus,Boundary Conformal Field Theory and the Worldsheet Approach to D-Branes. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 11, 2013

2013
[158]

V. B. Petkova and J.-B. Zuber,Conformal boundary conditions and what they teach us,in Eotvos Summer School in Physics: Nonperturbative QFT Methods and Their Applications, pp. 1–35. 8, 2000. arXiv:hep-th/0103007

2000 arXiv
[159]

Northe,Young Researchers School 2024 Maynooth: Lectures on CFT, BCFT and DCFT, arXiv:2411.03381 [hep-th]

C. Northe,Young Researchers School 2024 Maynooth: Lectures on CFT, BCFT and DCFT, arXiv:2411.03381 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[160]

V. B. Petkova and J. B. Zuber,Generalized Twisted Partition Functions,Phys. Lett. B504 (2001) 157–164, arXiv:hep-th/0011021

2001 arXiv
[161]

Andreiet al., Boundary and Defect CFT: Open Problems and Applications,J

N. Andreiet al., Boundary and Defect CFT: Open Problems and Applications,J. Phys. A53 (2020) 453002, arXiv:1810.05697 [hep-th]

2020 arXiv
[162]

Di Francesco, P

P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal, Conformal Field Theory. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997

1997
[163]

Gannon,Comments on nonunitary conformal field theories, Nucl

T. Gannon,Comments on nonunitary conformal field theories, Nucl. Phys. B670 (2003) 335–358, arXiv:hep-th/0305070

2003 arXiv
[164]

J. L. Cardy,Boundary Conditions, Fusion Rules and the Verlinde Formula,Nucl. Phys. B324 (1989) 581–596

1989
[165]

Ishibashi,The Boundary and Crosscap States in Conformal Field Theories,Mod

N. Ishibashi,The Boundary and Crosscap States in Conformal Field Theories,Mod. Phys. Lett. A4 (1989) 251

1989
[166]

J. A. Harvey, Y. Hu, and Y. Wu,Galois Symmetry Induced by Hecke Relations in Rational Conformal Field Theory and Associated Modular Tensor Categories, J. Phys. A53 (2020) 334003, arXiv:1912.11955 [hep-th]

2020 arXiv
[167]

Cobanera, G

E. Cobanera, G. Ortiz, and Z. Nussinov,Unified approach to Quantum and Classical Dualities,Phys. Rev. Lett.104 (2010) 020402, arXiv:0907.0733 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2010 arXiv
[168]

E. P. Verlinde,Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D Conformal Field Theory,Nucl. Phys. B300 (1988) 360–376

1988
[169]

Inamura and X.-G

K. Inamura and X.-G. Wen,2+1D symmetry-topological-order from local symmetric operators in 1+1D, arXiv:2310.05790 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[170]

Gaiotto, A

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized Global Symmetries,JHEP 02 (2015) 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[171]

G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg,Naturality in Conformal Field Theory,Nucl. Phys. B313 (1989) 16–40

1989
[172]

G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg,Classical and Quantum Conformal Field Theory,Commun. Math. Phys.123 (1989) 177

1989
[173]

Rida and T

A. Rida and T. Sami,Nonchiral fusion rules, structure constants of D(m) minimal models, arXiv:hep-th/9910070

arXiv
[174]

Rida and T

A. Rida and T. Sami,The nonchiral fusion rules in rational conformal field theories,Lett. Math. Phys.58 (2001) 239–248, arXiv:hep-th/9907137

2001 arXiv
[175]

Balaska and K

S. Balaska and K. Demmouche,Correlation functions of the tricritical 3 states Potts model,Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19 (2004) 2135–2146, arXiv:hep-th/0312275

2004 arXiv
[176]

Balaska and K

S. Balaska and K. Demmouche,The Correlation functions of the D(6) conformal model,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A19 (2004) 4271–4286, arXiv:hep-th/0210071

2004 arXiv
[177]

Kong and I

L. Kong and I. Runkel,Cardy algebras and sewing constraints. I.,Commun. Math. Phys.292 (2009) 871–912, arXiv:0807.3356 [math.QA]

2009 arXiv
[178]

Deligne,Catégories tannakiennes, The Grothendieck Festschrift volume 2,Progr

P. Deligne,Catégories tannakiennes, The Grothendieck Festschrift volume 2,Progr. Math.87 (1990) 111–195

1990
[179]

Bhardwaj, D

L. Bhardwaj, D. Pajer, S. Schafer-Nameki, A. Tiwari, A. Warman, and J. Wu,Gapped Phases in (2+1)d with Non-Invertible Symmetries: Part I, arXiv:2408.05266 [hep-th]

arXiv
[180]

Hsieh, Y

C.-T. Hsieh, Y. Nakayama, and Y. Tachikawa, Fermionic minimal models,Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 195701, arXiv:2002.12283 [cond-mat.str-el]

2021 arXiv
[181]

Bhardwaj, S

L. Bhardwaj, S. Schafer-Nameki, A. Tiwari, and A. Warman,Gapped Phases in (2+1)d with Non-Invertible Symmetries: Part II, arXiv:2502.20440 [hep-th]

arXiv
[182]

Bullimore and J

M. Bullimore and J. J. Pearson,Towards All Categorical Symmetries in 2+1 Dimensions, arXiv:2408.13931 [hep-th]

arXiv
[183]

Stern, F

A. Stern, F. von Oppen, and E. Mariani,Geometric phases and quantum entanglement as building blocks for non-abelian quasiparticle statistics,Physical Review B70 (2003) 205338

2003
[184]

Bhardwaj, Y

L. Bhardwaj, Y. Gai, S.-J. Huang, K. Inamura, S. Schafer-Nameki, A. Tiwari, and A. Warman, Gapless Phases in (2+1)d with Non-Invertible Symmetries, arXiv:2503.12699 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[185]

S. C. Furuya and M. Oshikawa,Symmetry Protection of Critical Phases and a Global Anomaly in1 + 1 Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 021601, arXiv:1503.07292 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2017 arXiv
[186]

Pauli,The Connection Between Spin and Statistics, Phys

W. Pauli,The Connection Between Spin and Statistics, Phys. Rev.58 (1940) 716–722

1940
[187]

Pollmann, A

F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa,Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension,Phys. Rev. B81 (2010) 064439, arXiv:0910.1811 [cond-mat.str-el]

2010 arXiv
[188]

Oshikawa,Hidden z2 × z2 symmetry in quantum spin chains with arbitrary integer spin,Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter4 (Sep, 1992) 7469

M. Oshikawa,Hidden z2 × z2 symmetry in quantum spin chains with arbitrary integer spin,Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter4 (Sep, 1992) 7469

1992
[189]

Bardeen, L

J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer,Theory of superconductivity,Phys. Rev.108 (1957) 1175–1204

1957
[190]

Pollmann, E

F. Pollmann, E. Berg, A. M. Turner, and M. Oshikawa, Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems,Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012) 075125, arXiv:0909.4059 [cond-mat.str-el]

2012 arXiv
[191]

V. P. Yurov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Truncated fermionic space approach to the critical 2-D Ising model with magnetic field,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6 (1991) 4557–4578

1991
[192]

V. P. Yurov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,TRUNCATED CONFORMAL SPACE APPROACH TO SCALING 28 LEE-YANG MODEL,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A5 (1990) 3221–3246

1990
[193]

Kohmoto,Topological invariant and the quantization of the Hall conductance,Annals of Physics 160 (Apr., 1985) 343–354

M. Kohmoto,Topological invariant and the quantization of the Hall conductance,Annals of Physics 160 (Apr., 1985) 343–354

1985
[194]

Cordova and D

C. Cordova and D. García-Sepúlveda,Symmetry Enriched c-Theorems & SPT Transitions, arXiv:2210.01135 [hep-th]

arXiv
[195]

T. D. Schultz, D. C. Mattis, and E. H. Lieb, Two-Dimensional Ising Model as a Soluble Problem of Many Fermions,Rev. Mod. Phys.36 (1964) 856–871

1964
[196]

E. H. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis,Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain,Annals Phys.16 (1961) 407–466

1961
[197]

Yao, C.-T

Y. Yao, C.-T. Hsieh, and M. Oshikawa,Anomaly matching and symmetry-protected critical phases in SU (N ) spin systems in 1+1 dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 180201, arXiv:1805.06885 [cond-mat.str-el]

2019 arXiv
[198]

G. Y. Cho, S. Ryu, and C.-T. Hsieh,Anomaly Manifestation of Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Theorem and Topological Phases,Phys. Rev. B96 (2017) 195105, arXiv:1705.03892 [cond-mat.str-el]

2017 arXiv
[199]

Lecheminant and K

P. Lecheminant and K. Totsuka,Lieb-Schultz-Mattis constraints for the insulating phases of the one-dimensional SU(N) Kondo lattice model, arXiv:2404.11030 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[200]

Wamer, M

K. Wamer, M. Lajkó, F. Mila, and I. Affleck, Generalization of the Haldane conjecture to SU(n) chains, Nucl. Phys. B952 (2020) 114932, arXiv:1910.08196 [cond-mat.str-el]

2020 arXiv
[201]

A. A. Aligia and G. Ortiz,Quantum mechanical position operator and localization in extended systems, Physical Review Letters82 (Mar., 1999) 2560–2563

1999
[202]

Resta,Macroscopic polarization in crystalline dielectrics: the geometric phase approach,Rev

R. Resta,Macroscopic polarization in crystalline dielectrics: the geometric phase approach,Rev. Mod. Phys. 66 (1994) 899–915

1994
[203]

Kobayashi, Y

R. Kobayashi, Y. O. Nakagawa, Y. Fukusumi, and M. Oshikawa,Scaling of the polarization amplitude in quantum many-body systems in one dimension,Phys. Rev. B97 (2018) 165133, arXiv:1802.01606 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2018 arXiv
[204]

A. A. Aligia and C. D. Batista,Dimerized phase of ionic hubbard models,Physical Review B71 (Mar.,
[205]

B. F. Marquez, N. Aucar Boidi, K. Hallberg, and A. A. Aligia,Phase diagram and topology of the xxz chain with alternating bonds and staggered magnetic field, Physical Review B109 (June, 2024)

2024
[206]

S. C. Furuya and M. Nakamura,Polarization amplitude near quantum critical points,Physical Review B99 (Apr., 2019)

2019
[207]

Seiberg, S

N. Seiberg, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao, Non-invertible symmetries and LSM-type constraints on a tensor product Hilbert space, arXiv:2401.12281 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[208]

Fukusumi and Y

Y. Fukusumi and Y. Furuta,Homomorphism, substructure and ideal: Elementary but rigorous aspects of renormalization group or hierarchical structure of topological orders, arXiv:2506.23155 [hep-th]

arXiv
[209]

Chang, Y.-H

C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang, and X. Yin,Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,JHEP 01 (2019) 026, arXiv:1802.04445 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[210]

Verresen, R

R. Verresen, R. Thorngren, N. G. Jones, and F. Pollmann,Gapless topological phases and symmetry-enriched quantum criticality, arXiv:1905.06969 [cond-mat.str-el]

1905 arXiv
[211]

Kormos, I

M. Kormos, I. Runkel, and G. M. T. Watts,Defect flows in minimal models,JHEP 11 (2009) 057, arXiv:0907.1497 [hep-th]

2009 arXiv
[212]

Graham and G

K. Graham and G. M. T. Watts,Defect lines and boundary flows,JHEP 04 (2004) 019, arXiv:hep-th/0306167

2004 arXiv
[213]

Bernard,Hidden Yangians in 2-D massive current algebras, Commun

D. Bernard,Hidden Yangians in 2-D massive current algebras, Commun. Math. Phys.137 (1991) 191–208

1991
[214]

Fukusumi and S

Y. Fukusumi and S. Iino,Open spin chain realization of a topological defect in a one-dimensional Ising model: Boundary and bulk symmetry,Phys. Rev. B 104 (2021) 125418, arXiv:2004.04415 [hep-th]

2021 arXiv
[215]

Alvarez-Gaume, C

L. Alvarez-Gaume, C. Gomez, and G. Sierra,Hidden Quantum Symmetries in Rational Conformal Field Theories, Nucl. Phys. B319 (1989) 155–186

1989
[216]

Bernard,An Introduction to Yangian Symmetries, Int

D. Bernard,An Introduction to Yangian Symmetries, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B7 (1993) 3517–3530, arXiv:hep-th/9211133

1993 arXiv
[217]

Gomez and G

C. Gomez and G. Sierra,The Quantum Symmetry of Rational Conformal Field Theories,Nucl. Phys. B352 (1991) 791–828

1991
[218]

G. W. Moore and N. Reshetikhin,A Comment on Quantum Group Symmetry in Conformal Field Theory, Nucl. Phys. B328 (1989) 557–574

1989
[219]

Mack and V

G. Mack and V. Schomerus,QuasiHopf quantum symmetry in quantum theory,Nucl. Phys. B370 (1992) 185–230

1992
[220]

Felder and A

G. Felder and A. Leclair,Restricted quantum affine symmetry of perturbed minimal conformal models, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A7S1A (1992) 239–278, arXiv:hep-th/9109019

1992 arXiv
[221]

Inamura,Topological field theories and symmetry protected topological phases with fusion category symmetries, Journal of High Energy Physics2021 (May, 2021)

K. Inamura,Topological field theories and symmetry protected topological phases with fusion category symmetries, Journal of High Energy Physics2021 (May, 2021)

2021
[222]

Gomez and G

C. Gomez and G. Sierra,A Brief history of hidden quantum symmetries in conformal field theories, NATO Sci. Ser. C409 (1993) 25–43, arXiv:hep-th/9211068

1993 arXiv
[223]

Jia,Weak Hopf non-invertible symmetry-protected topological spin liquid and lattice realization of (1+1)D symmetry topological field theory, arXiv:2412.15336 [hep-th]

Z. Jia,Weak Hopf non-invertible symmetry-protected topological spin liquid and lattice realization of (1+1)D symmetry topological field theory, arXiv:2412.15336 [hep-th]
[224]

Inamura,On lattice models of gapped phases with fusion category symmetries,JHEP 03 (2022) 036, arXiv:2110.12882 [cond-mat.str-el]

K. Inamura,On lattice models of gapped phases with fusion category symmetries,JHEP 03 (2022) 036, arXiv:2110.12882 [cond-mat.str-el]

2022 arXiv
[225]

Viola,Partition Functions of Non-Abelian Quantum Hall States

G. Viola,Partition Functions of Non-Abelian Quantum Hall States. PhD thesis, U. Florence (main), 2011

2011
[226]

C. Meng, X. Yang, T. Lan, and Z. Gu,Non-invertible SPTs: an on-site realization of (1+1)d anomaly-free fusion category symmetry, arXiv:2412.20546 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[227]

F. D. M. Haldane,Luttinger liquid theory of one-dimensional quantum fluids. I. Properties of the Luttinger model and their extension to the general 1D interacting spinless Fermi gas,J. Phys. C14 (1981) 2585–2609

1981
[228]

Hung and Y

L.-Y. Hung and Y. Wan,Generalized ADE classification of topological boundaries and anyon condensation, JHEP 07 (2015) 120, 29 arXiv:1502.02026 [cond-mat.str-el]

2015 arXiv
[229]

H. J. Schulz,Phase diagrams and correlation exponents for quantum spin chains of arbitrary spin quantum number,Phys. Rev. B34 (Nov, 1986) 6372–6385

1986
[230]

Affleck and E

I. Affleck and E. H. Lieb,A Proof of Part of Haldane’s Conjecture on Spin Chains,Lett. Math. Phys.12 (1986) 57

1986
[231]

Lecheminant,Massless renormalization group flow in SU(N)k perturbed conformal field theory,Nucl

P. Lecheminant,Massless renormalization group flow in SU(N)k perturbed conformal field theory,Nucl. Phys. B901 (2015) 510–525, arXiv:1509.01680 [cond-mat.str-el]

2015 arXiv
[232]

D. C. Cabra, P. Pujol, and C. von Reichenbach, NonAbelian bosonization and Haldane’s conjecture, Phys. Rev. B58 (1998) 65–68, arXiv:hep-th/9802014

1998 arXiv
[233]

Fukusumi, Y

Y. Fukusumi, Y. Tachikawa, and Y. Zheng, Fermionization and boundary states in 1+1 dimensions, SciPost Phys.11 (2021) 082, arXiv:2103.00746 [hep-th]

2021 arXiv
[234]

Dijkgraaf, C

R. Dijkgraaf, C. Vafa, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, The Operator Algebra of Orbifold Models, Commun. Math. Phys.123 (1989) 485

1989
[235]

Runkel and G

I. Runkel and G. M. T. Watts,Fermionic CFTs and classifying algebras,JHEP 06 (2020) 025, arXiv:2001.05055 [hep-th]

2020 arXiv
[236]

Ebisu and M

H. Ebisu and M. Watanabe,Fermionization of conformal boundary states,Phys. Rev. B104 (2021) 195124, arXiv:2103.01101 [hep-th]

2021 arXiv
[237]

A. Y. Kitaev,Unpaired Majorana Fermions in Quantum Wires,Phys. Usp.44 (2001) 131–136, arXiv:cond-mat/0010440

2001 arXiv
[238]

Boyle Smith,Boundary States and Anomalous Symmetries of Fermionic Minimal Models, arXiv:2102.02203 [hep-th]

P. Boyle Smith,Boundary States and Anomalous Symmetries of Fermionic Minimal Models, arXiv:2102.02203 [hep-th]

arXiv
[239]

Frohlich, J

J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, Kramers-Wannier duality from conformal defects, Phys. Rev. Lett.93 (2004) 070601, arXiv:cond-mat/0404051

2004 arXiv
[240]

Greiter, V

M. Greiter, V. Schnells, and R. Thomale,The 1D Ising model and the topological phase of the Kitaev chain, Annals of Physics351 (Dec., 2014) 1026–1033, arXiv:1402.5262 [cond-mat.str-el]

2014 arXiv
[241]

F. Ares, M. A. Rajabpour, and J. Viti,Scaling of the Formation Probabilities and Universal Boundary Entropies in the Quantum XY Spin Chain,J. Stat. Mech.2008 (2020) 083111, arXiv:2004.10606 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2020 arXiv
[242]

Frohlich, J

J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, Duality and defects in rational conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B763 (2007) 354–430, arXiv:hep-th/0607247

2007 arXiv
[243]

Witten,Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions,Commun

E. Witten,Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.92 (1984) 455–472

1984
[244]

Wess and B

J. Wess and B. Zumino,Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,Phys. Lett. B37 (1971) 95–97

1971
[245]

Zhou, Q.-R

J.-R. Zhou, Q.-R. Wang, and Z.-C. Gu,Towards a complete classification of nonchiral topological phases in two-dimensional fermion systems,Phys. Rev. B106 (2022) 245120, arXiv:2112.06124 [cond-mat.str-el]

2022 arXiv
[246]

M. R. Zirnbauer,Particle–hole symmetries in condensed matter,J. Math. Phys.62 (2021) 021101, arXiv:2004.07107 [math-ph]

2021 arXiv
[247]

Fendley,Parafermionic edge zero modes in Zn-invariant spin chains,J

P. Fendley,Parafermionic edge zero modes in Zn-invariant spin chains,J. Stat. Mech.1211 (2012) P11020, arXiv:1209.0472 [cond-mat.str-el]

2012 arXiv
[248]

Herviou, S

L. Herviou, S. Capponi, and P. Lecheminant, Even-odd effects in theJ1 − J2 SU(N) Heisenberg spin chain, Phys. Rev. B107 (2023) 205135, arXiv:2302.14090 [cond-mat.str-el]

2023 arXiv
[249]

B. Han, A. Tiwari, C.-T. Hsieh, and S. Ryu,Boundary conformal field theory and symmetry protected topological phases in2 + 1dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) 125105, arXiv:1704.01193 [cond-mat.str-el]

2017 arXiv
[250]

A. S. Jermyn, R. S. K. Mong, J. Alicea, and P. Fendley,Stability of zero modes in parafermion chains, Physical Review B90 (Oct., 2014)

2014
[251]

Kikuchi and Y

K. Kikuchi and Y. Zhou,Two-dimensional Anomaly, Orbifolding, and Boundary States, arXiv:1908.02918 [hep-th]

1908 arXiv
[252]

Numasawa and S

T. Numasawa and S. Yamaguch,Mixed Global Anomalies and Boundary Conformal Field Theories, JHEP 11 (2018) 202, arXiv:1712.09361 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[253]

Affleck, M

I. Affleck, M. Oshikawa, and H. Saleur,Boundary critical phenomena in the three state Potts model,J. Phys. A31 (1998) 5827, arXiv:cond-mat/9804117

1998 arXiv
[254]

Li, C.-T

L. Li, C.-T. Hsieh, Y. Yao, and M. Oshikawa, Boundary conditions and anomalies of conformal field theories in 1+1 dimensions,arXiv:2205.11190 [hep-th]

arXiv
[255]

Birke, J

L. Birke, J. Fuchs, and C. Schweigert,Symmetry breaking boundary conditions and WZW orbifolds, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3 (1999) 671–726, arXiv:hep-th/9905038

1999 arXiv
[256]

Fuchs and C

J. Fuchs and C. Schweigert,Symmetry breaking boundaries. 1. General theory,Nucl. Phys. B558 (1999) 419–483, arXiv:hep-th/9902132

1999 arXiv
[257]

Quella and V

T. Quella and V. Schomerus,Symmetry breaking boundary states and defect lines,JHEP 06 (2002) 028, arXiv:hep-th/0203161

2002 arXiv
[258]

Fuchs and C

J. Fuchs and C. Schweigert,Symmetry breaking boundaries. 2. More structures: Examples,Nucl. Phys. B 568 (2000) 543–593, arXiv:hep-th/9908025

2000 arXiv
[259]

Ishikawa and T

H. Ishikawa and T. Tani,Twisted Boundary States and Representation of Generalized Fusion Algebra,Nucl. Phys. B739 (2006) 328–388, arXiv:hep-th/0510242

2006 arXiv
[260]

Ishikawa and T

H. Ishikawa and T. Tani,Novel construction of boundary states in coset conformal field theories,Nucl. Phys. B649 (2003) 205–242, arXiv:hep-th/0207177

2003 arXiv
[261]

Iino,Boundary CFT and tensor network approach to surface critical phenomena of the tricritical 3-state Potts model,J

S. Iino,Boundary CFT and tensor network approach to surface critical phenomena of the tricritical 3-state Potts model,J. Statist. Phys.182 (2021) 56, arXiv:2007.03182 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2021 arXiv
[262]

R. E. Behrend and P. A. Pearce,Integrable and conformal boundary conditions for sl(2) A-D-E lattice models and unitary minimal conformal field theories,J. Statist. Phys.102 (2001) 577, arXiv:hep-th/0006094

2001 arXiv
[263]

F. D. M. Haldane and E. H. Rezayi,Spin-singlet wave function for the half-integral quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.60 (Mar, 1988) 956–959. 30

1988
[264]

Antinucci, C

A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, Defect Conformal Manifolds from Phantom (Non-Invertible) Symmetries, arXiv:2505.09668 [hep-th]

arXiv
[265]

B. A. Bernevig and F. D. M. Haldane,Properties of non-abelian fractional quantum hall states at filling ν = k/r., Physical review letters101 24(2008) 246806

2008
[266]

S. H. Simon, E. H. Rezayi, N. R. Cooper, and I. Berdnikov,Construction of a paired wave function for spinless electrons at filling fractionν = 2/5, Phys. Rev. B75 (Feb, 2007) 075317

2007
[267]

S. C. Davenport, E. Ardonne, N. Regnault, and S. H. Simon, Spin-singlet Gaffnian wave function for fractional quantum Hall systems,Phys. Rev. B87 (2013) 045310, arXiv:1210.8143 [cond-mat.str-el]

2013 arXiv
[268]

B. A. Bernevig and F. D. M. Haldane,Model fractional quantum hall states and jack polynomials, Physical Review Letters100 (Jun, 2008)

2008
[269]

We thank Justin Kaidi for related discussions
[270]

Yang,Gaffnian and haffnian: Physical relevance of nonunitary conformal field theory for the incompressible fractional quantum hall effect,Physical Review B103 (Mar., 2021)

B. Yang,Gaffnian and haffnian: Physical relevance of nonunitary conformal field theory for the incompressible fractional quantum hall effect,Physical Review B103 (Mar., 2021)

2021
[271]

Lecheminant, A

P. Lecheminant, A. O. Gogolin, and A. A. Nersesyan, Criticality in selfdual sine-Gordon models,Nucl. Phys. B 639 (2002) 502–523, arXiv:cond-mat/0203294

2002 arXiv
[272]

LeClair,Chiral stabilization of the renormalization group for flavor and color anisotropic current interactions, Phys

A. LeClair,Chiral stabilization of the renormalization group for flavor and color anisotropic current interactions, Phys. Lett. B519 (2001) 183–187, arXiv:hep-th/0105092

2001 arXiv
[273]

Borsato,Lecture notes on current–current deformations, Eur

R. Borsato,Lecture notes on current–current deformations, Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) 648, arXiv:2312.13847 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[274]

Georgiou and K

G. Georgiou and K. Sfetsos,The most general λ-deformation of CFTs and integrability,JHEP 03 (2019) 094, arXiv:1812.04033 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[275]

Saleur and B

H. Saleur and B. Wehefritz Kaufmann,Integrable quantum field theories with supergroup symmetries: The OSP (1/2) case,Nucl. Phys. B663 (2003) 443, arXiv:hep-th/0302144

2003 arXiv
[276]

A. N. Schellekens and S. Yankielowicz,Field Identification Fixed Points in the Coset Construction, Nucl. Phys. B334 (1990) 67–102

1990
[277]

Mathieu, J

P. Mathieu, J. Rasmussen, and M. A. Walton,Fusion in coset CFT from admissible singular vector decoupling, Nucl. Phys. B595 (2001) 587–604, arXiv:hep-th/0007088

2001 arXiv
[278]

Saleur and B

H. Saleur and B. Wehefritz-Kaufmann,Integrable quantum field theories with OSP(m / 2n) symmetries, Nucl. Phys. B628 (2002) 407–441, arXiv:hep-th/0112095

2002 arXiv
[279]

Katsevich, I

A. Katsevich, I. R. Klebanov, and Z. Sun, Ginzburg-Landau description of a class of non-unitary minimal models, arXiv:2410.11714 [hep-th]
[280]

Nakayama and T

Y. Nakayama and T. Tanaka,Infinitely many new renormalization group flows between Virasoro minimal models from non-invertible symmetries,JHEP 11 (2024) 137, arXiv:2407.21353 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[281]

Delouche, J

O. Delouche, J. E. Miro, and J. Ingoldby,Testing the RG-flow M (3, 10) + ϕ1,7 → M (3, 8) with Hamiltonian Truncation, arXiv:2412.09295 [hep-th]

arXiv
[282]

Katsevich,The spectrum of perturbed (3, 10) minimal model, arXiv:2410.18069 [hep-th]

A. Katsevich,The spectrum of perturbed (3, 10) minimal model, arXiv:2410.18069 [hep-th]

arXiv
[283]

Hsieh and P.-Y

C.-T. Hsieh and P.-Y. Chang,Relating non-Hermitian and Hermitian quantum systems at criticality,SciPost Phys. Core6 (2023) 062, arXiv:2211.12525 [cond-mat.str-el]

2023 arXiv
[284]

Guruswamy and A

S. Guruswamy and A. W. W. Ludwig,Relating c < 0 and c > 0 conformal field theories,Nucl. Phys. B519 (1998) 661–681, arXiv:hep-th/9612172

1998 arXiv
[285]

Chen, B.-X

C.-Y. Chen, B.-X. Lao, X.-Y. Yu, and L.-Y. Hung, Galois conjugates of string-net model,Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 065009, arXiv:2108.05730 [cond-mat.str-el]

2022 arXiv
[286]

Lootens, R

L. Lootens, R. Vanhove, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete,Galois Conjugated Tensor Fusion Categories and Nonunitary Conformal Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.124 (2020) 120601, arXiv:1902.11241 [quant-ph]

2020 arXiv
[287]

Campanelli, P

L. Campanelli, P. Cea, G. L. Fogli, and L. Tedesco, Charged domain walls,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D13 (2004) 65–74, arXiv:astro-ph/0307211

2004 arXiv
[288]

Xu and N

W.-T. Xu and N. Schuch,Characterization of topological phase transitions from a non-Abelian topological state and its Galois conjugate through condensation and confinement order parameters,Phys. Rev. B104 (2021) 155119, arXiv:2107.04549 [cond-mat.str-el]

2021 arXiv
[289]

Campanelli,Scattering of Dirac and Majorana fermions off domain walls,Phys

L. Campanelli,Scattering of Dirac and Majorana fermions off domain walls,Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 116008, arXiv:hep-ph/0408078

2004 arXiv
[290]

T. W. B. Kibble,Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings, J. Phys. A9 (1976) 1387–1398

1976
[291]

J. E. Wang, E. Greenwood, and D. Stojkovic, Schrodinger formalism, black hole horizons and singularity behavior,Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 124027, arXiv:0906.3250 [hep-th]

2009 arXiv
[292]

Campanelli, P

L. Campanelli, P. Cea, G. L. Fogli, and L. Tedesco, Baryogenesis and CP-violating domain walls in the background of a magnetic field,JCAP 03 (2006) 005, arXiv:astro-ph/0505531

2006 arXiv
[293]

C. Bao, S. Yang, C. Wang, and Z.-C. Gu,Lattice model constructions for gapless domain walls between topological phases,Physical Review Research4 (Apr.,
[294]

Belendryasova and V

E. Belendryasova and V. A. Gani,Scattering of theϕ8 kinks with power-law asymptotics,Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.67 (2019) 414–426, arXiv:1708.00403 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[295]

J. C. Bridgeman, D. Barter, and C. Jones,Fusing Binary Interface Defects in Topological Phases: The Vec(Z/pZ) case, J. Math. Phys.60 (2019) 121701, arXiv:1810.09469 [math.QA]

2019 arXiv
[296]

Barter, J

D. Barter, J. C. Bridgeman, and C. Jones,Domain Walls in Topological Phases and the Brauer–Picard Ring for Vec(Z/pZ), Commun. Math. Phys.369 (2019) 1167–1185, arXiv:1806.01279 [math.QA]

2019 arXiv
[297]

Affleck and A

I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig,The Kondo effect, conformal field theory and fusion rules,Nucl. Phys. B 352 (1991) 849–862

1991
[298]

Y. Li, Z. Song, A. Kubica, and I. H. Kim,Domain walls from SPT-sewing, arXiv:2411.11967 [quant-ph]

arXiv
[300]

C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher,Transport in a one-channel Luttinger liquid,Phys. Rev. Lett.68 (1992) 1220

1992
[2021]

https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.08022

2006 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Gauging anomalous symmetry at one edge conformal field theories In this subsection, we note the result for the gauging of anomalous symmetry in the bulk OECFT. The method is the same as in the existing works[12, 73, 340–342], so we only note the results, ZQ = X QJtot (itot,p)=Q Ξitot,p  X ptot Ξitot,ptot   , (A12) where we have used the same notation ...

[2] [2]

F. A. Bais and J. K. Slingerland,Condensate induced transitions between topologically ordered phases,Phys. Rev. B79 (2009) 045316, arXiv:0808.0627 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

arXiv 2009

[3] [3]

Kong,Anyon condensation and tensor categories, Nucl

L. Kong,Anyon condensation and tensor categories, Nucl. Phys. B886 (2014) 436–482, arXiv:1307.8244 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2014

[4] [4]

Burnell,Anyon condensation and its applications, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics9 (Mar., 23

F. Burnell,Anyon condensation and its applications, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics9 (Mar., 23

[5] [5]

S. H. Simon,Topological Quantum. Oxford University Press, 9, 2023

2023

[6] [6]

Kong and Z.-H

L. Kong and Z.-H. Zhang,An invitation to topological orders and category theory, arXiv:2205.05565 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv

[7] [7]

Kawahigashi,Two-dimensional topological order and operator algebras,Int

Y. Kawahigashi,Two-dimensional topological order and operator algebras,Int. J. Mod. Phys. B35 (2021) 2130003, arXiv:2102.10953 [math-ph]

arXiv 2021

[8] [8]

D. E. Evans and Y. Kawahigashi,Subfactors and mathematical physics,Bull. Am. Math. Soc.60 (2023) 459–482, arXiv:2303.04459 [math-ph]

arXiv 2023